Thursday, February 28, 2019's Colorado Springs Civil Rights Lawsuit On The Chuck And Julie Show's lawsuit about our cancelled Colorado Springs Conference is discussed on Colorado's Chuck And Julie Show
January 17, 2019
Chuck and Julie hold the first Great Cory Gardner debate as well as discuss open spaces, VDARE, the border and much more on the show today. Jimmy Sengenberger and Randy Corporon join us in-studio. Denver Post reporter, Bruce Finley, joins the conversation via telephone.[More]
Download the MP3 here.
The lawsuit was is in response to a conference we scheduled in at Cheyenne Mountain Resort in in Colorado being cancelled after Mayor Suthers of Colorado Springs issued a statement saying “The City of Colorado Springs will not provide any support or resources to this event…” which would deny us police protection against Antifa.
It's a straightforward civil rights case. (If you want to contribute to our Legal Defence Fund, go here.)
Mayor John Suthers
573 Vista Grande Dr.
Colorado Springs,CO. 80906
Possible PHONE NUMBERS below (719) 375-5247 Fixed Voip (719) 632-2514 Fixed Voip

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Der Untermensch


Hey you on public assistance
Why don't you get a job?
Sell some dope and buy some pride
The only thing you couldn't rob


How does it feel to live for free?
Get off society's back
Skells like you allowed to live
You wonder why we're taxed?


II. Waste of Life

Waste of life!
You're a waste of life!

Getting fucked up on Classon Avenue
Smoking crack and drinking booze
Spike in your armno money for food
But there's plenty of gas in your BMW

There's a dopewhore waiting at home
Dealing your shit on the telephone
Poor Tawana's got a birth defect
But it only increases your welfare check

Been doing some thinking, I have an answer
To arrest the spreading cancer
Send you back to where you're from
Get the fuck rid of you subhuman scum

If you don't pay taxes, you shouldn't vote
So get in line and get on the boat
I'd love to tear down all the projects
Kiss my ass, Home Relief reject

Waste of life!
You're a waste of life!
You're a waste of life!

Monday, February 25, 2019

War, Sex Skew, Beta Male Thirst, And Female Beauty

The title of this post suggests a wordy exegesis, but readers may relax because the connections between the thematic elements aren’t difficult to explain.
The cause-and-effect arrows go like this:
War reduces the number of young men in a population
Fewer men skews the sex ratio to favor men’s preferences
A sex skew favoring men means more women available for each man
More sexual market options means increased male choosiness for better-looking women
Better-looking women produce better-looking daughters, ensuring more beauty in future generations.
Conversely, a sex skew that favors women (more men than women) intensifies beta male thirst, because there are fewer women for men to fight over. Men operating in such a parched sexual market will blast online fatties with horrible anti-Game and wife up sluts and single moms. Fertility will collapse from all the men “dropping out” to be one with their fapatoriums, and many ugly, fat, feminist women will find lsmv mates and bear ugly children, ruining the aesthetics of future generations.
Greg Cochran inspired this post with his comments about the insane post-WW2 female-tilted sex skew in Russia, which likely contributed to the Communist wasteland’s eventual collapse a generation later.
Cochran provided a handy dandy graphic to drive home the point about sex skews as an under-appreciated factor in large-scale geopolitical events.
In 1950 in Russia, there were 62 men for every 100 women in the 25-49 age bracket (prime reproduction years). This was the closest earth has come to a Poosy Paradise. An ugly, broke, charmless man in 1950 Russia could pick up 9s and 10s with no Game at all, and have them coming back begging for more of his situational alpha male love because he would have natural Dread Game from his near-limitless options.
In 2017 in Russia, that number had climbed up to 98 men for every 100 women in the 25-49 age bracket. Poosy Party’s over, but a Russia Enlightenment begins.
In 1950, there was a male-favoring sex skew in almost all of Eastern Europe, particular along the Eurasian steppe extending from the Baltics down to Crimea. Post-war Germany, unsurprisingly, also had a sex skew favoring men, although not as pronounced as that experienced by the Soviet Union and its satellites.
By 2017, the sex skew in almost all of Allied Europe has favored women (more men than women), and Russia has bounced back to near numerical reproductive-age parity between the sexes.
Cochran writes,
[The map] shows the sex ratio ( males per 100 females)  of the population aged 25-49 [sic] in a number of European countries in 1950 –  the adult men that do most of the world’s work. Those that produce more than they consume. In Russia, that number was 62, likely lower than anywhere else in the world.
I think one could truthfully say that one reason for the failure of Communism in the Soviet Union was that the heart of the country had been torn out.  Something similar happened in France, in the 1920s and 1930s. People would talk about some problem that need to be solved, or some desirable innovation, and explain that it never happened, because the guy that should have done it died at Verdun.  But it was worse in Russia. And it’s not just the dead: a lot of guys were crippled –  so many that they made Moscow look bad, and therefore were exiled to Central Asia for appearances’ sake.
In part, the Soviet Union failed because  ” an assegai had been thrust into the belly of the nation”. This makes a half-decent excuse: but it would be a better excuse if the Soviets hadn’t done so much of it to themselves.
Still: look at what Khrushchev had to work with.  He had released most of the zeks, wasn’t running show trials, undoubtedly wanted to make Russia great again: but the young, strong, independent-minded men he needed were scarce. Some had died of typhus or famine in the Revolution, some had been shot and buried in Kuropaty Forest. More had died at Vyazma,Stalingrad, Kursk, and Berlin.
Back in the 1950s, Russia was a lot weaker than it looked.
Yes, but Russia was stronger in one respect: A new generation of Russian beauties was being born.
Cochran may object on genetic computational grounds, but I don’t think it’s a coincidence that today Russia, the Baltics, and the EE steppe countries have famously beautiful native women. Those regions went through a male meat grinder (that’s male privilege for ya), and out of that came rapid and intense sexual selection for an exquisite female beauty that has astounded the world.
As often happens, when men lose, women win. And then the surviving men get to enjoy women’s winnings.
Now that Russia has its core of young men restored, go long on the country’s prospects. Thankfully, once a high average female beauty is genetically established in the population, it tends to stick around for many more generations. Russia, not China, may be the story of the 21st Century.
The male-heavy sex skew in most of Europe and America now is an ominous portent. Excess men, each with no (feminine) woman to call his own, suggests a present and future West dominated by beta male thirst, intra-tribal skirmishing, foreign entanglements, rampant polygyny and a consequent growing incel subpopulation, and ugly unfeminine women acting like hard 10s. Mass migration of third world males into the West only exacerbates the problem.
We have entered the Age of Schisms and Solo Jizms.
It’s Meme Monday!
PS Must-read: Confessions of a Public Defender (Dindu Nuffins all the way down).

League of the South Holds Flash Rallies In Central Arkansas

The League of the South held two flash rallies this weekend in Arkansas.
The first was at Central High School in Little Rock which was famously desegregated by President Eisenhower in 1957. The second was thirty minutes south of Little Rock, AR. Both rallies were similar to recent League events in Selma, AL and Livingston and Newport, TN.

Saturday, February 23, 2019

Dating Market Value Test For Men

Here is a system for determining your dating market value if you are a man.  Dating market value is a measurement of how you stack up against other men in the competition for attracting female interest.  Be honest with yourself taking this survey.  It will give you a fairly accurate assessment of the quality and number of women you are capable of attracting for a sexual relationship.  Girls, you may take this quiz for your boyfriends to see if you are slumming it or about to be cheated on.
1.  How old are you?
under 25 years old:  0 points
26-34 years old:  +1 point
35-45 years old:  0 points
45+ years old:  -1 point
2.  How tall are you?
under 5’9″:  -1 point
5’9″ to 5’11”:  0 points
6′ to 6’4″:  +1 point
over 6’4″:  0 points
3.  What is your BMI?
(Go here to calculate your BMI.  I know BMI doesn’t account for very muscular physiques, but since most men are not Lee Haney, it is adequate for this survey’s purposes.)
under 20.0:  -1 point
20.0 to 24.0:  +1 point
24.1 to 27.0:  0 points
over 27.0:  -1 point
4.  How much do you bench press?
60% or less of your body weight:  -1 point
61% to 80% of your body weight:  0 points
81% to 170% of your body weight:  +1 point
over 170% of your body weight:  0 points
5.  What does your hairline look like?
Full head of hair if you are over 35:  +1 point
Full head of hair if you are under 35:  0 points
Receding hairline if you are over 35:  0 points
Receding hairline if you are under 35:  -1 point
Bald (age irrelevant):  -1 point
Bald but you are dark-skinned:  0 points
6.  How much money do you make?
under $40K and you are out of college:  -1 point
$40K to $70K out of college and under 40 years old:  0 points
over $70K out of college and under 40 years old:  +1 point
under $40K and you are college age or younger:  0 points
$40K to $55K and over 40 years old:  -1 point
$55K to $90K and over 40 years old:  0 points
over $90K and 40 to 55 years old:  +1 point
over $200K (age irrelevant):  +1 point
7.  Do you have a car?
No (under 21yo):  0 points
No (over 21yo):  -1 point
Yes (under 21yo):  +1 point
Yes (over 21yo):  0 points
No, but you have a motorcycle (age irrelevant):  +1 point
8.  Are you good-looking?
(Self-assessment is somewhat unreliable, so if you are uncertain of your looks post your pic on hotornot and wait a week for your score.  Or get opinions from unbiased and blunt friends.  Hashing out the biometric details of what makes a male face attractive would require another lengthy post, so for now these two methods are acceptable substitutes.)
On a 1 – 10 scale:
0 – 4:  -1 point
5 – 7:  0 points
8 – 10:  +1 point
9.  Have you ever played a leading role in a team sport?
No:  0 points
Yes:  +1 point
10.  What is your occupation?
(Since I won’t list every single high status job in the Department of Labor’s Occupational Handbook, you’ll have to make a judgment call on your own job.  It’s a safe assumption that most people know a high status job when they see it.)
High status (doctor, lawyer, stockbroker, executive, professor, business owner, successful artist or musician or writer, professional athlete, etc.):  +1 point
Neutral status (engineer, programmer, accountant, salesman, mid level manager, scientist, military officer, well-paid tradesman, etc.):  0 points
Low status (low paid blue collar, admin, construction, janitor, struggling web designer, help desk, etc.):  -1 point
11.  How many friends do you have?
0 to 3:  -1 point
4 to 20:  0 points
over 20:  +1 point
12.  How many friends have you met through the internet that you have never seen in person?
0 to 2:  0 points
over 2:  -1 point
13.  When was the last time you went to a house party?
Within the past month:  +1 point
Between one month and one year ago:  0 points
Over one year ago:  -1 point
14.  Have people besides your family called you funny?
None:  -1 point
A few have:  0 points
Nearly everyone who knows me:  +1 point
15.  What is your IQ?
Under 85:  -1 point
85 to 110:  0 points
110 to 130:  +1 point
130 to 145:  0 points
over 145:  -1 point
16.  At a party, which happens first – you approach someone or someone approaches you?
I approach someone first almost every time:  +1 point
I occasionally approach first:  0 points
Someone normally approaches me first:  -1 point
17.  Have you ever been in a serious fight where real punches were thrown and you felt like you wanted to kill your opponent(s)?
No:  0 points
Yes:  +1 point
Yes, with a girl:  -1 point
18.  Have you ever been arrested?
No:  0 points
Yes:  +1 point
Yes, for child pornography or public exposure:  -1 point
It’s best to answer the following four questions based on your past experience with similar scenarios.  Who we really are is not what we wish we were but what we have always been.
19.  You are on a second date with a girl.  You go to kiss her.  She turns her cheek to you and says “Slow down, I’m not that kind of girl.”  You reply:
(A) “Sorry.”
(B) “Yeah, well, no prob.”
(C) “This could be trouble ’cause I’m that kind of guy.” *smirk*
If you answered (A), subtract a point.
If (B), no points.
If (C), add a point.
20.  You’re chatting up a pretty girl you just met in a bar.  After a few minutes she asks you to buy her a drink.  You reply:
(A) “Sure.”
(B) “I’m not an ATM.”
(C) “No, but you can buy me one.”
If you answered (A), subtract a point.
If (B), no points.
If (C), add a point.
21.  You’ve just met a cute girl in a club and have been talking with her for five minutes when she abruptly changes the topic to a raunchy conversation about her multiorgasmic ability.  You respond with:
(A) a huge grin and an eager “Damn! That is HOT!”
(B) a look of mild disdain.
(C) a raised eyebrow while saying “Hey, thanks for the medical report.”
If you answered (A), subtract a point.
If (B), no points.
If (C), add a point.
22.  The pickup has been going well.  Later in the night she leans in and begins making out with you passionately.  You feel like a king and your jeans suddenly feel much tighter.  Do you:
(A) immediately grope her boob in return.
(B) continue making out with her for as long as she wishes.
(C) kiss for a little bit then push her gently away and look distracted for a second.
If you answered (A), subtract a point.
If (B), no points.
If (C), add a point.
And finally, the critical thinking portion of the quiz.  The following questions are based on the progression of a single pickup attempt.
23.  You go to a bar.  Twenty feet away are a pretty girl, a fat girl, and an average guy talking amongst themselves.  The pretty girl briefly eye flirts with you.  In reponse, you:
(A) eye flirt back and forth a few times before approaching 20 minutes later.
(B) immediately approach in a direct fashion maintaining strong eye contact with your target.
(C) immediately approach but from an indirect angle, looking around the room distractedly on the way over to your target as if you might see an even prettier girl somewhere else, and finally delivering your opener from over your shoulder.
(A):  -1 point
(B):  0 points
(C):  +1 point
24.  Who do you address first?
(A) the pretty girl.
(B) the fat girl.
(C) everyone.
(A):  -1 point
(B):  0 points
(C):  +1 point
25.  After getting the whole group engaged in conversation and having a good time, your target blurts out “Hey nice pink shirt! Are you gay?”  You:
(A) say “No, I’m not gay!”
(B) ignore her.
(C) say “OK, who brought their little sister to the bar!”
(A):  -1 point
(B):  0 points
(C):  +1 point
26.  In the middle of the conversation you have to pee.  You say:
(A) “I have to go to the bathroom. I’ll be right back.”
(B) “Excuse me.”
(C) nothing.  Just go.
(A):  -1 point
(B):  0 points
(C):  +1 point
27.  You’ve managed to get her outside your front door.  There is obvious sexual tension.  You want to close this deal.  You say:
(A) “So, um, ah, see you around.”
(B) “Why don’t you come inside?”
(C) “I’m thirsty.  Are you thirsty?  Let’s go inside and taste DC’s finest tap water.  But you can only stay for a minute, I have to get up early.”
(A):  -1 point
(B):  0 points
(C):  +1 point
There are 26 points to earn or lose based on the questions asked.  The scoring breaks down as follows:
-26:  Why are you still alive?
-25 to -20:  You’re an omega.  Celibacy has its charms.
-19 to -15:  You actively repulse girls.  Your kind will usher forth the sexbot revolution.
-14 to -10:  You’re always getted foisted onto the warpigs.
-9 to 0:  Lesser beta.  You don’t immediately disgust girls; they just don’t notice you.  With much painful effort you can redeem yourself.
1 to 9:  Classic beta.  You catch some girls’ eyes, usually the ones you don’t want.  Try not to make fatty fucking a lifestyle.
10 to 14:  A few attractive girls in the bar will be intrigued by your presence.  But you need game to close the deal.
15 to 19:  Congrats, you have crossed the alpha Rubicon.  A lot of cute girls will be pleased when you hit on them.  But you can still fuck up by being yourself.
20 to 25:  You’re a natural.  Many hot girls check you out and forgive your occasional pickup blunders.  You always have a look of sexual satisfaction on your face.
26:  Super Alpha.  Booty sticks to you like bird shit on car roofs.

Are the Feds Rounding Up Political Dissidents?

Lt. Christopher Paul Hasson of the United States Coast Guard, is currently being held without bail in Maryland. The drug and weapons charges on which he is being held, by the Judge’s own admission, do not warrant him being so detained. Unfortunately for Lieutenant Hasson, and the eighth amendment, prosecutors stitched together a parallel narrative which had almost nothing to do with the charges pressed.
Radical Agenda S05E016 - Every Last Person
Radical Agenda S05E016 – Every Last Person
According to them, Mr. Hasson is a neo-Nazi who has spent years plotting to commit acts of terrorism. In a draft letter which Hasson never sent, prosecutors claimed he wrote that he was “dreaming of a way to kill almost every last person on the earth.” They also say he searched Google for terms like “best place in dc to see congress people” and “are supreme court justices protected.” Additionally, they claim Hasson developed a spreadsheet of targets that included top Democratic congressional leaders and media personalities. The list includes “JOEY,” what prosecutors say is a reference to former congressman Joe Scarborough (R-Fla.), now of MSNBC; “cortez,” an alleged reference to freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.); and “Sen blumen jew,” presumably about Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). Federal prosecutor Jennifer Sykes said Hasson would log onto his government computer during work and spend hours searching for information on such people as the Unabomber, the Virginia Tech gunman and anti-abortion bomber Eric Rudolph.
Hasson’s public defender Julie Stelzig, rightly pointed out that aside from the drug and weapons charges, none of these supposed Google searches, draft letters, or spreadsheets actually amounted to anything criminal. They do not even show criminal intent. She also questioned whether the government is trying to make an example out of Hasson, given criticism that authorities have overlooked domestic terrorists. “Perhaps now they can say, ‘Look, we’re not targeting only Muslims,'” she said. Stelzig also said the prosecution’s detention memo offered up a “histrionic characterization of Mr. Hasson” and was intended to garner media attention.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Charles Day agreed that, by themselves, the two charges filed against Hasson do not warrant detention, but agreed to keep Hasson behind bars for 14 days while prosecutors contemplate other charges. After that, with no further criminal charges, the judge suggested Hasson could be released.
Hasson was arrested on February 15th. One wonders, if these charges are “the tip of the iceburg” as prosecutors allege, why did they choose that day to arrest him on these minor ones? Why did they not wait until they had enough evidence to bring more serious charges? Why did they not prepare the more serious charges before his arrest on that date? There is no allegation that a specific attack was planned, or that there was imminent risk to the public. Only that Hasson has unfashionable political views, and contraband.
Perhaps Ms. Stelzig had a point about the intent to garner media attention. Note that the top story when news of Hasson’s arrest broke, was Jussie Smollett’s hate crime hoax. Looking at a timeline of how that narrative collapse unfolded, the arrest could not have come at a better time for those interested in pushing Jewish race hoaxes.
Smollett’s hoax was nonsense from the outset, obviously. No serious person goes to Chicago and says “THIS IS MAGA COUNTRY NIGGER FAGGOT!” But most people in the media were either desperate to believe the lie, or too scared of the Jews to call it what it obviously was.
Sometime between the initial report and February 12th, police requested Smollett turn over his phone to investigators, and he refused. Eventually he turned over heavily redacted phone records, which police announced on February 12th “do not meet the burden for a criminal investigation.”
On February 14th, Smollett appeared on ABC’s “Good Morning America” for his first television interview since the incident. Anyone trained to spot deception knew that he was lying, and his story now differed from his original account to investigators. That same day, ABC7 reported that detectives were talking to two persons of interest in connection with the alleged attack, and investigating whether Smollett and the two men staged the attack because Smollett was being written off of “Empire.”
On February 15th, those two men were released without charges, and that same day, Chris Hasson was arrested.
On February 20th, Smollett was criminally charged. Later that very afternoon, Seamus Hughes broke the storyof Hasson’s arrest. Hughes is a former Senate counterterrorism advisor who now works with the George Washington University Program on Extremism, which provides “analysis and policy solutions on radicalization, terrorism and extremism.” He has revealed details on several cases supposedly involving American extremism and terrorism, often finding the information in federal court documents before the media.
Interestingly, the George Washington University Program on Extremism’s website contains not a single reference to Antifa, the Left wing terrorist group which has been terrorizing the country for years. Their Twitter account has only mentioned the terrorist group twice. Once to share a Politico article about the FBI predicting more Antifa terrorism in September of 2017, just after Unite the Right. The other to share a blog post from the Daily Beast about the Proud Boys fight with Antifa in NYC last October. To say it strains the credibility of an organization that supposedly studies extremism, not to mention the number one source of political violence in the United States, is the understatement of the century. This is obviously another SPLC-esque Left wing think tank designed to malign Right wingers as terrorists.
On February 21st, Hasson and Smollett were both arraigned. Smollett was back on the set of Empire later that afternoon, while Hasson sits in federal custody.
Perhaps it’s just a coincidence, but it’s a really convenient one if it is.
Democrat Presidential hopeful Kamala Harris released a statement saying “Like most of you, I’ve seen the reports about Jussie Smollett, and I’m sad, frustrated, and disappointed”. She continued “At the same time, we must speak the truth: hate crimes are on the rise in America… Just last year, the FBI released statistics that revealed a 17 percent increase in the number of hate crimes in America. Part of the tragedy of this situation is that it distracts from that truth, and has been seized by some who would like to dismiss and downplay the very real problems we must address.”
The sentiment is familiar, of course. All across the media, lying sacks of shit are telling us that the big problem with Smollett’s hoax is that it distracts from a very serious problem of White supremacist violence and terrorism. Few dare utter the truth, that hate crime hoaxes are far more common than actual hate crimes. Even fewer dare mention the bottom line, which is that hoaxes are the whole entire point of the “hate crime” designation.
But, luckily for the con artists who pedal this Jewish garbage, they’ve got a new scam to direct the public’s attention toward. Chris Hasson, a loving husband, and father, a committed public servant with 28 years of service to the U.S. Coast Guard, five years to the U.S. Marine Corps, and two years to the Army National Guard, now sits in the custody of the very government he dedicated his life to serving.
So if you own firearms and you’ve ever done a Google search, watch out folks. The next time some Jewish faggot gets caught in a lie, you might be the one held without bail in a desperate effort to rescue the media.

ADL and Huffington Post libelled innocent father of WN activist Michael Weaver as a MURDERER

Spread the love
I have often written about the travails of WN activist Michael Weaver of Georgia, shown here with his baby daughter, including being outrageously railroaded into state prison in 2011 for TWENTY MONTHS for pepper-spraying two blacks felons.
The jewstice system called that “aggravated assault”! !
And the two negroes, because of their felonies, were not even supposed to associate with each other, yet they stalked him, they attacked him in his car — and their word that HE attacked THEM was Gospel Truth against that of a white man with no record, at least for a white-hating male judge, Demoncrat Bobby Peters, who was influenced by Rabbi Jeffrey Salkin, author of a website named “Martini Judaism” (
Anti-Semitism returned to [Rabbi Salkin’s] daily life in his most recent pulpit, Temple Israel in Columbus, Georgia, when he crossed paths with a white supremacist.
“In a local Starbucks I saw a young man reading a pile of books that included Das Kapital and Mein Kampf. It’s unusual to see someone reading such a pile of books. I struck up a conversation with him,” Salkin said. “He then started badgering me with anti-Semitic email. “
Lo and behold I discovered my tires were slashed. [Ahah….]
“When he was arrested for spraying mace in the face of a black man, I became pivotal in the investigation.
“He had an interesting prison sentence. He was sentenced to one year of prison and nine years of parole, which includes exile from that particular part of the state of Georgia. In my sermon on that, I said that now he knows how the Jew feels. His punishment is to live his life in exile. Our experience will now become his experience.”

Weaver’s outrageous “conviction” was upheld in 2013 — after he had fully served his incredible sentence — and he is still banned from six counties in Georgia, including his home country where his father, David Carothers, his grandmother (until her death) and his car were located!
Now the Jews and their lackeys are going after his father, David Carothers (, libeling him for a horrific murder — a black man set on fire with lighter fluid — which was committed byanother man named Carothers (there are Carothers, a Scottish name, all over the South!) in another state, Tennessee.
David Carothers is NOT John Daniel Carothers!

  1. Michael Weaver just posted: (

My e-mail to the ADL

To whom it may concern,
I expect a full retraction and apology in regards to your libelous article about David Carothers. I have in my possession screenshots of your libelous article falsely accusing David Carothers of a murder in Tennessee. I’ve attached these screenshots in this email.
I’m positive that many attorneys who specialize in libel/defamation law would be interested to take this case. Here are the screenshots that would fall under Georgia’s libel law. Furthermore,Georgia courts have routinely interpreted defamation per se to include statements “that one is guilty of a crime, dishonesty, or immorality.” Eidson v. Berry, 415 S.E.2d 16, 17 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992).  As you are aware, it is not necessary for a person that has been a victim of defamation per se to prove actual out of pocket loss.
P.S. Calling yourself Anti-Defamation League while engaging in defamation of others. Oh! The irony. It would behoove you to contact me in regards to this serious allegation or legal action may be forthcoming.
Contemptuously yours,
Michael Weaver

The Van Dyke Law Firm
Criminal Defense · Commercial Debt Collection · Civil Litigation
Constance M. Pendleton
Davis, Wright, Tremaine LLP
1919 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Ste. 800
Washington D.C. 20006
Re:  Notice of Representation
Dear Ms. Pendleton:
This firm has been retained by David Carothers with respect to an article published by your client,The Huffington Post, on or around August 28, 2018.  A copy of this article, as it was originally published, is attached to this letter together with a tweet concerning the story (sent by the author of the article).  
The facts of my client’s case are not the subject of any legitimate dispute.  The Huffington Post is a “news” organization with a well-known reputation for publishingfalse “news” stories libeling conservatives.  Many people, including myself, have been the victims of shoddy reporting by the Huffington Post over the course of the past several years. The various hit pieces published by the Huffington Post all have two things in common: poor fact checking and zero journalistic integrity. 
In this particular instance, Mr. [DAVID!!!] Carothers was accused of being the same person as John Daniel Carothers – a person accused of a vicious hate crime in Tennessee.  This accusation meets the statutory definition of libel in Georgia:
a false and malicious defamation of another, expressed in print, writing, pictures, or signs, tending to injure the reputation of the person and exposing him to public hatred, contempt, or ridicule.”
In this particular instance, Mr. Mathias attributed a hate crime to Mr. Carothers that, in fact, Mr. Carothers had nothing to do with.  Mr. Mathias also took the occasions of this false allegation to take note of the criminal history of Mr. Carothers’ son – Michael Weaver.
Mr. Carothers is mindful of the fact that The Huffington Post was able to correct the story within the time provided under O.C.G.A. 51-5-11. This does not, however, change Mr. Carothers’ entitlement to actual damages for libel resulting from the initial publication of this story because the published content is defamation per se.Georgia courts have routinely interpreted defamation per se to include statements “that one is guilty of a crime, dishonesty, or immorality.” Eidson v. Berry, 415 S.E.2d 16, 17 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992).  
As you are aware, it is not necessary for a person that has been a victim of defamation per se to prove actual out of pocket loss. In short, both The Huffington Post and Mr. Mathias are liable to Mr. Carothers for damages.  
The key, libellous excerpt:
My client has authorized me to settle this matter with The Huffington Post for a one-time payment in the amount of $30,000.00 in full accord and satisfaction of all damages that he has suffered, or which he may suffer, as a result of the story published by The Huffington Post. 
Please have your general counsel contact me at his earliest convenience to discuss settlement, or in the alternative, to arrange service of legal process.  
Very truly yours,
Jason L. Van Dyke
Attorney & Counselor at Law
108 Durango Drive
Crossroads, TX 76227
P – (469) 964-5346
F – (972) 421-1830
Licensed in:  Texas, Colorado, Georgia & Washington D.C.
3.  The ADL chimed in, repeating the same libel! (They corrected it without any apology or offer of compensation.)

ADL Condemns Vicious Tennessee Hate Crime

Atlanta, GA, August 28, 2018 … ADL today condemned a savage, brutal murder likely motivated by racism and white supremacist ideology.  The suspect, John Carothers, has apparent ties to the white supremacist movement.
Last March, he allegedly burned to death an African-American man, Robert Miller, at a VA assisted living facility.   Law enforcement recently uncovered a jailhouse letter penned by Carothers to a white supremacist group, in which he admits to the murder and indicates that his racist, white supremacist beliefs motivated the crime.
“ADL condemns in the strongest terms this vicious murder and the white supremacist ideology that likely motivated the suspect. No words can truly capture the savagery of this act.  We commend law enforcement for its diligent investigation which uncovered the apparent racist motive for this crime,” said Allison Padilla-Goodman, ADL Southeast Regional Director.
Carothers’ beliefs seem to fall in line with the Christian Identity movement – an anti-Semitic, racist religious ideology which claims that white Europeans are the true Israelites, and non-whites are the “mud people.”
The letter that was intercepted by authorities was sent by Carothers to a long-standing, small Christian Identity group based in Arkansas, according to the Center on Extremism.
Padilla-Goodman stressed that “discovery of the letter intensifies the magnitude of an already brutal homicide.  The crime has undoubtedly inflicted deep wounds on the victim’s family, the African American community and beyond.  Justice demands that hate crime charges be brought.  Although Tennessee technically does not have a stand-alone hate crime law, it has a discretionary sentencing enhancement and civil rights intimidation law, which effectively serve the same purpose.”
She urged that “as part of the healing process, the District Attorney should apply these laws because it would convey the critical message that targeting anyone in Tennessee for who they are is unacceptable.”  And she “called on the state legislature to enact a comprehensive hate crime law in the victim’s honor mandating increased penalties for crimes committed because of hate, bias or bigotry.”
Law enforcement recently uncovered a letter Carothers wrote from jail stating, “I believe the Bible is about white people and for white people. I am in the Rutherford County Jail for burning a black man I set on fire with lighter fluid poured on his head.”
It is reported that Rutherford County District Attorney Jennings Jones is considering the hate crime sentencing enhancement should Carothers be found guilty on the underlying murder and other charges.  The U.S. Department of Justice also could bring federal charges under the 2009 Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act (HCPA).
*NOTE: We previously reported that John Carothers was the father of a convicted white supremacist, Michael Carothers, also known as Michael Weaver. We have corrected it to reflect that there is no relation between John Carothers and Michael Carothers. 

P.S. My father has never been charged with murder and this article by the ADL is libelous.
Also,I’ve never been charged with a hate crime as there is no hate crime statute in the State of Georgia.

Here’s the definition of libelous: li·bel·ous
  1. containing or constituting a libel.
Here’s the definition for defamation:def·a·ma·tion
  1. the action of damaging the good reputation of someone; slander or libel.
    “she sued him for defamation”
    synonyms:libelslandercalumnycharacter assassinationvilificationMore

FAKE NEWS: Huffington Post “Journalist” Accuses Wrong Man Of Burning Black Man Alive In Tennessee

UPDATE: Mark Pitcavage and Christopher Mathias have deleted several of their tweets. The Huff Post and ADL articles have also been changed, but not before we archived it.
Editor’s Note: These are the “experts” who the federal government has been relying on for “intelligence” about hate and extremism … people who can’t even do a Google image search or make a simple phone call to do the most basic fact checking.
I was scanning through my Twitter feed when I saw this:
Mark Pitcavage is very proud of putting together this fake news story:
So a white supremacist burned a black man alive earlier this year in Tennessee. 


John Carothers allegedly wrote a letter admitting to the murder and sent it to a racist “Christian Identity” group.
According to @ADL_National researcher Carla Hill, the letter was addressed to a Christian Identity church in Arizona.
Adherents of Christian Identity teachings believes Jews are Satanic, non-whites are sub-human, & that whites are the “true Israelites.” 
We’re horrified by the vicious murder of Robert Miller. Our experts from our Center on Extremism confirmed today with @letsgomathias at @HuffPost that the suspect is an active white supremacist. We call on this to be investigated as a hate crime. 


John Carothers allegedly wrote a letter admitting to the murder and sent it to a racist “Christian Identity” group.
If the experts at the ADL’s Center on Extremism who are responsible for policing Facebook, Twitter and Google/YouTube are saying it, it must be true, right?

Biden Day 3: Baptist Church Firebombed by Homosexuals

Just three days in, and Joe Biden is marching us straight towards progress. LA Times : The FBI and local authorities are investigating the e...