Monday, March 28, 2016

TruConservatives: Where Are They Now (2010 Edition)

The Tea Party Revolution six years later
1.) Gov. Nathan Deal of Georgia – Vetoed the religious liberty bill. Removed the Tom Watson statue from the Georgia State Capitol. Replaced it with a statue of MLK.
2.) Gov. Robert Bentley of Alabama – Got caught red handed screwing his mistress who was his top aide. Boasted about how he was the first governor to remove the Confederate flag.
SC State of the State
3.) Gov. Nikki Haley of South Carolina – Rode the Tea Party wave into power only to transition into establishment darling. Removed the Confederate flag from the South Carolina Statehouse.
4.) Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida – Rode the Tea Party wave into power. Gave us the Gang of 8 amnesty. Ran for president as the establishment backup candidate only to win Minnesota, Puerto Rico and Washington, DC and be rebranded as #LittleMarco.


GOP betrayal in Georgia

Georgia Governor Nathan Deal vetoed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, thus giving in to pressure by the sodomite community and the anti-Christian big businesses (including the NFL) who support such perversion. The act would have protected clergymen who refuse to perform LGBT marriages. Faith-based organizations, like Christian schools, would also have been extended protection from renting facilities to any organization that held contrary beliefs.
Governor Deal, a Republican, said “I do not respond well to insults or threats” when reminded that he had been the Judas Iscariot to Georgia’s Christian community. But Deal, merely another craven politician, indeed bowed to the threats of big business to take their Almighty Dollars out of the State of Georgia and to the forces of political correctness.
The League of the South has said for the past two decades that the GOP did not represent the interest of Southerners or Christians. In fact, we pointed out that the Republicans were actual enemies of our Southern traditions and Christian faith. Nathan Deal is merely the latest GOP politician to prove how right we have been.
It’s time for Southerners to identify their enemies and kick them out of office and out of the South altogether. They mean to destroy us and all we hold dear, including our Christian faith. It is past time that we understand we are at war with an enemy that will not be placated. He only understands power. Let’s give him a dose of it.
Michael Hill

Thursday, March 24, 2016

6 Pieces Of Advice To Donald Trump’s Campaign For Handling Upcoming Violence

After witnessing the actions of loony liberals last week in Chicago and Ohio, it’s clear that we’re seeing only the beginning of genuine violence that the left will levy upon Donald Trump and his supporters leading up to the Republican National Convention in July. Members of the elite establishment that support these violent protesters refuse to lose fair and square, so we must assume that the situation will get increasingly dangerous.
On March 11, Trump attempted to hold a rally in Chicago. It was infiltrated by Bernie Sanders and protesters who accosted Trump supporters with the intent to shut it down. Because of the security risk, Trump cancelled the rally. The protesters who attended proceeded to threaten and intimate anyone who showed support for Trump.

The next day, a BlackLivesMatter supporter jumped the railing at a Trump rally to assault Trump before being stopped by the Secret Service. Afterwards, the media gave him a softball interview that excused his violent behavior, essentially handing him a social justice medal of honor.
Here is the media playbook until the election:
  • Ignore or rationalize any violence by the left. Assassination attempts against Trump will be reported on the level of a practical joke.
  • Amplify or exaggerate any attempt at self-defense by Trump supporters. If someone in a Trump hat defends himself against violence, he will be labeled a right-wing extremist and Nazi sympathizer.
  • Blame Donald Trump for anything bad that happens. If Trump raises his voice at a rally louder than that of a sports fan attending a football match, the media will claim that any future protest incident is the result of him inciting “literal” genocide.
Since it is an absolute certainty that leftists will disrupt future Trump gatherings and force Trump supporters to defend themselves, the Trump camp must be ready for these occurrences and the subsequent distortions by the lying media. Here are six things that the Trump camp must do:

1. Prime the public to associate leftists with violence

Trump supporters and moderates must be bombarded with the truthful notion that leftists are quick to use violence when they sense they are losing. Trump must associate his enemies as violent just like he has associated the media with lying. Based on Trump’s rhetoric on ISIS, people will connect the dots of leftists acting as terrorists to shut down those they disagree with. The benefit of this tactic is that when a violent episode does erupt, people will immediately assume that it was instigated by the left before all the details come in.
Sample Talking Points
  • “The left can’t win with their arguments, because they have none, so they are now resorting to intimidation and violence.”
  • “The left are sore losers. They are so desperate that they have to act like violent thugs to disrupt our rallies. But they can’t stop us from making America great again.”
  • “The left wants to turn America into a nation of thugs. They don’t believe in the First or Second Amendment, but these are the most important rights that make America a great nation.”
  • “We have high energy while the left has criminal energy. They are trying to use violence to stop us from making America great again. Their leading candidate has the most criminal energy of all!”

2. Produce video reels of leftist violence against Trump supporters

Images must be used alongside verbal rhetoric to ingrain the desired belief. If I was in the Trump camp, I’d have a “viral media team” combing through clips of leftist anger and violence against Trump to produce slick 2-4 minute clips that spread naturally on social networking. These videos can be linked through Trump’s accounts and homepage. If Trump doesn’t want to be associated with these videos, he can share them with Trump sympathizers who will then help spread them.

3. Instruct supporters on how to react to violence

Trump must give his supporters peaceful guidance on what to do if they are dangerously confronted by a leftist while not endorsing violence or frightening his supporters into thinking that they will certainly be attacked. This is important because when there is a violent episode—and there will be—Trump can take the high road by citing his earlier instructions as proof that he is not inciting violence. If I was him, I’d stop short on telling his followers to “use self-defense,” because even that will be twisted by the media.
Sample Talking Points
  • “Bernie and Hillary supporters are going loony. Please take care of yourself by staying alert at this rally and after you leave. They’ve failed to stump me so far and I don’t want them to stump you either.”
  • “If you are confronted by an unstable liberal, extract yourself to safety. De-escalate the situation. Chicago has shown they do not want to have a logical debate on how to make America great again.”
  • “The left is beginning to use violence because they have lost the battle of ideas. We don’t need to use violence, because we have a plan for America to win again.”

4. Quickly publicize all future attempts by leftists to use violence against Trump supporters

The Trump camp could do a better job on exposing the violent tendencies of leftists. They may be giving protesters a bit of a pass by sweeping things under the rug, because I suspect they desire to reduce levels of anxiety for Trump supporters while not appearing to have security issues during events. However, the public must be aware of leftist violence because it motivates them to vote for Trump at the polls while continuing to prime them as described in point number one. As long as Trump never appears to be the victim, there is more upside than downside in sharing wrongful acts by the left, especially since all rational people abhor tactics of violence to silence legal speech.

5. Have an emergency action plan for when a Trump supporter murders a leftist

It’s probably going to happen that a Trump supporter is threatened with his life by a mob of leftists and acts in legal self-defense. Even though he will be legally excused for the killing, the media will go crazy and start up with the “Trump has started a holocaust” rhetoric. Trump must immediately denounce the violence and re-frame the issue as a man using force to defend his life or family, adding that this is why the Second Amendment is so important for all Americans.
If the use of violence by a Trump supporter is in no way justifiable from a legal self-defense standpoint  and is possibly even a false flag attack, Trump should condemn the act and make a visible monetary donation to the health care costs of the victim, stating how as President he will heal the nation and prevent such attacks from even occurring.
Sample Talking Points:
  • “I absolutely denounce all violence by either my supporters or the left. The killing today was absolutely tragic. Obama has spent eight years tearing America apart, creating these angry divisions, but I know that more violence is not the answer.”
  • “If you encounter an angry mob, please escape to safety. Don’t confront these animals. Remove yourself to safety and protect your family legally and lawfully.”

6. Appear as a divine unifier and de-escalater

Whatever violence does happen, Trump must  imply that liberals are the flock that has been led astray by years of bad political policy and media manipulation, and that he will help them become a part of a better America. His rhetoric must be centered around unifying the country against the very sort of violence that is happening against him and his supporters. He can also show that the violence is endorsed and even sponsored by foreign agitators on the left (e.g. George Soros) because it’s in their monetary interests to have a weak America that can’t defend itself against harmful globalist policies and trade deals.
Trump must turn the volume down in the aftermath of violent events while still hammering home that the left is acting violently and using thug tactics to prevent America from coming together. Trump should appear stern, direct, and concerned, but never angry or worried, even in the fact of dire threats to his safety, just like he did in Ohio after the crazed leftist rushed the stage.
Sample Talking Points:
  • “Why are Hillary supporters so ready to use violence? Where did they get that criminal energy from? We can only wonder!”
  • “The type of violence you are seeing by Hillary supporters will disappear once I become President. They are being led by bad ideas and bad policies, and we’re going to roll all that back.”
  • “The anger you see now is by people who lack employment and good communities. This is a direct result of Obama’s policies that Hillary wants to continue. Once I become president, the door will be open for these misguided individuals to become productive citizens in a stronger America.”
Because violence will happen at increasing regularity from this point on, the Trump camp must incorporate that fact into their campaign, not only to take advantage of it among their base, but to properly defend against false accusations of incitement that will surely come from the media. If the Trump camp implements my suggestions above, I believe they will be firmly positioned to ride the worst sort of violence between leftists and Trump supporters. Otherwise, they may be caught with their pants down, because I guarantee you that the media already has a fully laid-out plan for accusing Trump of more incitement. If anything, I expect the media to actually create the violence themselves.

Black and Hispanic Democrats versus White, Liberal Democrats

Sam Dickson

Lots of White faces at a Bernie rally
Lots of White faces at a Bernie rally
With all the attention on Donald Trump, there has been little discussion of the astonishing rift between Black and Hispanic Democrats on one hand and White liberal Democrats on the other.
Hillary Clinton has shut Bernie Sanders out of the Black and Brown voters. She is their candidate. She is catering to them to an astonishing degree. She has endorsed all the fantasies and lies about White cops killing Black males. She has hauled the mother of Travon Martin around, putting her on the stage to endorse her candidacy, and talking about how Lil’ Travon was murdered by George Zimmerman but there was no justice. She has extolled the Gentle Giant. She made statements about a breaking story about three Black coeds who claimed they were attacked by Whites on a bus who called them “nigger.” When a surveillance video from the bus revealed that the whole story was concocted, Hillary refused to retract her statements or to apologize for joining in false accusations against innocent people.
There is no limit in race-betrayal that Clinton will not go to.
Clinton is now virtually the captive of the Blacks and Browns. They cast about half the votes in the Democratic Party. They are the ones who have given her the nomination.
The White Democrats — even the wimmin — have deserted her and flocked to Sanders in droves.
Sanders has gotten nowhere in his efforts to chip non-White voters away from Clinton.
He is the candidate of the White wing of the Democratic Party.
What does this mean for White Nationalists like us who are thinking in long range terms (like Jews) instead of next weeks primary vote?
A lot.
For many years I have predicted that there would come a point at which White liberals would realize that their Black and Brown friends don’t have the slightest interest in issues that excite White liberals: gay rights, environmentalism, funding for the arts, conservation, public parks.
No. The Blacks and the Browns are only interested in “The Gimme.”
And increasingly Blacks and Browns will control and dominate the Democratic Party. Already, they are sending the White liberal Democrats to the back of the bus.
The alliance between White liberals and the racist minorities is breaking up. They are splitting.
Add in the fact that there are a lot of White liberals at the local level who have caught on that the Jews are running their own racist ethnostate and that their posturings about fighting racism and their deep, deep concern about the plight of Blacks and the need for open borders are utterly insincere.
At some point our White liberal racial brothers and sisters are going to be up for grabs.
The shizoid nature of Democratic voter behavior along racial lines shows that this is coming.
How can we reach out to them and help raise the consciousness?

US “Aid” to Israel is Illegal

The New Observer
March 24, 2016
The untold billions of dollars of “aid” provided to Israel by America since 1976 has been illegal in terms of the US’s own law, which forbids aid to any nuclear-armed nation which is not a signatory to the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty (NPF).
Sections 101 and 102 of the US’s Arms Export Control Act of 1976 (AECA) contains the specific provisions, and Israel has refused to sign the NPF despite being in possession of around eighty nuclear weapons.
The law banning aid to any nuclear-armed country which is not a signatory to the NPF came about in 1976, when the so-called “Symington Amendment” was passed by Congress.
Originally introduced by Stuart Symington, a Democratic senator from Missouri, to strengthen the US position on nuclear non-proliferation, the amendment was made to the then Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, under section 669.
It banned US economic and military assistance, and export credits to countries that deliver or receive, acquire or transfer nuclear enrichment technology when they do not comply with IAEA regulations and inspections. This provision, as amended, isnow contained in Section 101 of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), and reads as follows:
(a) PROHIBITIONS; SAFEGUARDS AND MANAGEMENT. —Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, no funds made available to carry out the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 or this Act may be used for the purpose of providing economic assistance (including assistance under chapter 4 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961), providing military assistance or grant military education and training, providing assistance under chapter 6 of part II of that Act, or extending military credits or making guarantees, to any country which the President determines delivers nuclear enrichment equipment, materials, or technology to any other country on or after August 4, 1977, or receives such equipment, materials, or technology from any other country on or after August 4, 1977, unless before such delivery—
(1) the supplying country and receiving country have reached agreement to place all such equipment, materials, or technology, upon delivery, under multilateral auspices and management when available; and
(2) the recipient country has entered into an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency to place all such equipment, materials, technology, and all nuclear fuel and facilities in such country under the safeguards system of such Agency.
Part (b) of that amendment does provide for the provision of aid to nations which have not signed the NPF, if, and only if, two conditions have been fulfilled, namely that the President informs Congress in writing that US interests will be adversely affected, or a report in writing that the nation in question will stop its nuclear weapons program:
(1) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, the President may furnish assistance which would otherwise be prohibited under such subsection if he determines and certifies in writing to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate that—
(A) the termination of such assistance would have a serious adverse effect on vital United States interests; and
(B) he has received reliable assurances that the country in question will not acquire or develop nuclear weapons or assist other nations in doing so. Such certification shall set forth the reasons supporting such determination in each particular case.
As no such written certification has ever been issued by any US president allowing Israel to receive aid—and all senior US government officials, from the President down have always known Israel has nuclear weapons—it is therefore clear that all aid to Israel since 1976 has been illegal.
This is not the only section of the Arms Export Control Act which makes aid to Israel illegal. In 1977, the so-called “Glenn Amendment” was adopted to the then Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and was taken up into that law under its section 670.
This amendment also forbade aid to countries that acquire or transfer nuclear reprocessing technology or explode or transfer a nuclear device.This provision, as amended, is now contained in Section 102 of the Arms Export Control Act.
Israel is now known to have begun full-scale production of nuclear weapons following the 1967 Six-Day War, although it built its first operational nuclear weapon by December 1966.
It is no secret that Israel has nuclear weapons. This was directly admitted by then US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton in her email of 2012, when she discussed why it was necessary to destroy Syria for Israel:
Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but they are. What Israeli military leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing their nuclear monopoly.
An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well. The result would be a precarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today.
This email proves that senior US government officials know that Israel has nuclear weapons—and that its continuing “aid” to Israel is direct contravention of the Arms Export Control Act.
In 1974, the US Government’s CIA Special National Intelligence Estimate specifically said that “Israel has already produced and stockpiled a small number of fission weapons, and has invested heavily in a costly missile system that is ineffective for precision delivery of conventional weapons” (“Prospects for Further Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.” Special National Intelligence Estimate. CIA. August 23, 1974. SNIE 4-1-74).
In a TV documentary titled “The Bomb in the Basement: Israel’s Nuclear Option,” Peres directly confirmed Israel’s nuclear capability, and he and French government officials gave details about the cooperation between Israel and France in launching Israel’s nuclear program.
The existence of Israel’s nuclear weapons program was also confirmed by a Jewish deserter, Mordechai Vanunu, a former nuclear technician who worked at the Negev Nuclear Research Center, south of Dimona.
Vanunu photographed many of the nuclear weapon components at the Dimona facility, defected, and then revealed all in a famous front page interview with the London Sunday Times in 1986.

Vanunu was subsequently lured to Italy by a Mossad agent, where he was drugged, abducted, and transported to Israel. There he was put on trial for treason and convicted in a closed court hearing, spending more than eighteen years in prison.
He is currently under effective house arrest in Israel, but maintains a website which contains all of his pictures of the Jewish nuclear weapons program.
Production model of Israeli nuclear weapon core. From the photographs taken by whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu.
As all the evidence therefore shows, it is no secret that Israel has nuclear weapons, but that state has still not signed the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty—even though Barack Obama asked Israel to do so, in public, in 2010.
The conclusion is therefore inescapable: American “aid” to Israel is illegal, and every US administration since 1976 has openly broken the law because of the Jewish lobby’s control over the politicians.
It is also equally clear that any group which got together the money and the legal ability could successfully prosecute a case against the US government for breaking the Arms Export Control Act.

Monday, March 21, 2016

Jews Scheme to Stop Trump

Leading American conservatives have drawn up a list of Republicans to run as an independent candidate should Donald Trump become the party’s official presidential candidate.
Bill Kristol,who worked for the Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr administrations and is a prominent voice in the conservative movement, said that people should seek to support Ted Cruz, the Texas senator running second to Mr Trump, before the nominating convention.
However, if, as seems likely, Mr Trump secures the Republican nomination, key players in the party should seek an independent to run against him. More than 20 conservative leaders met at a private club in Washington late last week to consider several potential candidates.
They included Rick Perry, the former Texas governor who has made two failed presidential runs, according to The New York Times. He was suggested as a consensus candidate, respected in the party and capable, at the least, of beating Mr Trump in Texas in a presidential election.
Mr Kristol had circulated a memo to a smaller number of allies that also suggested Tom Coburn, a former senator from Oklahoma who stepped down last year to undergo cancer treatment. Mr Coburn has said that Mr Trump needs to be stopped and while he appeared reluctant to put himself forward, he has not completely ruled it out.
Writing in the Weekly Standard, a publication that is regarded as the “neo-conservatives’ bible”, Mr Kristol conceded that there were arguments against such an idea. However, he advanced “persuasive answers” to such sceptics.
The Weekly Standard could more accurately be described as the “Neo-Conservatives’ Torah” than the “Neo-Conservatives’ Bible”. Here is a link to his article there (link).
Bill Kristol is the son of Irving Kristol, the founder of neo-conservatism, who said, as a child, that he had been taught to spit whenever he walked past a Christian church (link).
I’m struck by the parallels between Trump in America and Jeremy Corbyn in Britain. Although their politics are diametrically opposite to one another, they have both, for various reasons, earned the disapprobation of the Jewish element in their respective parties. Once the decision has been made that they’re not “good for the Jews”, all the vast legions of Jewish journalists and influence mongers mobilise against them, sniping at them continuously and undermining them in public debate. And if anyone dares to take note of the phenomenon, they are of course branded “evil antisemites”. The Jews have a right to mobilise as an ethnic group to advance their own perceived interests, but no one else does. Nor do the goy even have a right to take note of the fact that this hostile ethnic activism is occurring.

Why the Jewish Elite Hates Donald Trump

New David Duke video on the issue of our time: The Jews v Donald Trump.
We now literally have an open war between White Western society and the Jews – Trump represents our team.
People are all choosing sides.
I know what side I’m on.
Please spread this video around. It really encompasses the entire situation. The general public needs to see it. This is an issue that people care about – Donald Trump – which connects directly back to the most important issue of all – stopping these Jews.
Spam it profusely!

Black Police Officer Shares his Experience at Trump Rally

Wednesday, March 16, 2016

Wow, Just Wow: Obama Nominates Jew for SCOTUS – Would Make Court 45% Jew

Wow, Just Wow: Obama Nominates Jew for SCOTUS – Would Make Court 45% Jew

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 16, 2016
Merrick Garland: You can trust him, goyim – he’s God’s chosen people.
Obama announced his Supreme Court nominee.
Merrick Garland.
He is – wait for it – a Jew.
Right now, there are three Jews on the court. Adding a fourth would make the court 45% Jewish.
Current Jews.
Jews are 2% of the US population.
Yellow Asians are 5.6% of the population. Is there anyone who wouldn’t find it weird to have the Supreme Court 4/9ths Asian?
Federal appeals court judge Merrick Garland is President Obama’s pick to fill the Supreme Court seat left vacant by the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.
The president officially named Garland as a Supreme Court nominee Wednesday as they stood before the media and a large gathering of attendees in the Rose Garden at the White House.
Addressing the refusal by Republican leaders in the Senate to consider a Supreme Court nominee, Obama said that in Garland, he had chosen “a serious man and an exemplary judge.”
He added that in discussions about Supreme Court vacancies — the current one, as well as earlier openings — “the one name that has come up repeatedly — from Republicans and Democrats alike — is Merrick Garland.”
The nerve of such a move is incredible.
Here’s the announcement:

And here’s a White House video – “Meet Merrick Garland”:

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Foxman Says Trump is the New Hitler Because He Put His Hand in the Air

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 8, 2016

My ancestors are all lampshades because of Hitler, you goyim.
How dare you raise your hands?
Put down those filthy goyim hands, dirty goyim – you gassed us all, you goyim.
Abe Foxman, the former director of the Anti-Defamation League, has said that Donald Trump is encouraging his supporters to show their loyalty with Nazi-style salutes.
At a Republican rally in Orlando, Florida, this weekend, Mr Trump said to his audience: “Let’s do a pledge. Who likes me in this room?
“Raise your right hand: ‘I do solemnly swear that I — no matter how I feel, no matter what the conditions, if there’s hurricanes or whatever — will vote, on or before the 12th for Donald J Trump for president.’”
Abe Foxman, a Holocaust survivor, said: “It is a fascist gesture.”
As a Jew who survived the Holocaust, to see an audience of thousands of people raising their hands in what looks like the ‘Heil Hitler’ salute is about as offensive, obnoxious and disgusting as anything I thought I would ever witness in the United States of America,” he told the Times of Israel.
What was worse than the gesture, said Mr Foxman, was the fact that he believed the controversial politician was aware of the resonance.
“He is smart enough — he always tells us how smart he is — to know the images that this evokes. Instead of asking his audience to pledge allegiance to the United States of America, which in itself would be a little bizarre, he’s asking them to swear allegiance to him.”
Mr Foxman said that Mr Trump’s rhetoric and the support it has elicited from neo-Nazis, white supremacists and racists, should alarm Americans. “This made me quiver,” he said.
Funny that it’s retired Foxman saying it, instead of the present ADL chief.

Before TRUMP!-David Duke for President 1992!

24 years ago, long before Donald Trump and the crop of current Republican candidates who swear they will stop the illegal immigration – was David Duke… blazing the way,
The only thing a younger generation of and many older people know of David Duke is the relentless attacks on him by the controlled media. All that changes with amazing speech, Articulate, passionate, intelligent and courageous speech about issues that Dr. Duke pioneered.
Now you can see and hear him for yourself in a speech in Massachusetts before Super Tuesday 1992.
Dr. David Duke was the first Republican elected official to make massive immigration a campaign issue. He warned about how our companies and jobs were being shipped out in mass to China and Mexico. He was the first to expose the massive racial discrimination against European Americans. He was the first major Republican to included a flat tax in his program for U.S. Senate.
Now you have the chance to hear an incredible speech by David Duke in Massachusetts before Super Tuesday 1992.
You may view this as one of the greatest speeches you have ever heard!

Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Captain Clay Higgins Resigns Because: “I Will Not Kneel to a Discredited, Wanna-Be, Black Activist”

Real men of character are hard to come by in Black-Run America (BRA).
To get ahead in BRA, self-preservation usually revolves around promoting the interests of blacks 24/7/365 and convincing yourself the morality of this endeavor supersedes all other pursuits in life. 
Enter Clay Higgins, a man who represents a movement back to law and order whose time has not only come, but is upon us. [UPDATE: Sheriff issues expanded statement; Clay Higgins leaves the St. Landry Parish Sheriff’s Office,, 2-29-16]:
Clay Higgins, the charismatic Sheriff’s captain who put St. Landry Parish Crime Stoppers on the international map with his viral videos, has resigned from the Sheriff’s Office.
Higgins made the announcement Monday morning on the steps of the St. Landry Parish Courthouse.  He says he was not forced to resign, but he felt he need to turn in his badge, which the Sheriff accepted.
“I will not kneel to violent street gangs. I will not kneel to murderers or the parents that raised them. I will not kneel to a discredited, wanna-be, black activist that doesn’t really have the best interest of his people in mind, who just wants to make a profit,” says Higgins. “I will not kneel to bureaucrats in Baton Rouge, Washington or anywhere else who have forgotten why they wear a badge and who have forgotten who they serve.”
Higgins said he loves Sheriff Bobby Guidroz.  He admires him and respects him, but he can’t abide by his current orders.
“I would die rather than sacrifice my principles,” Higgins says. “I would leave my wife without a husband, my children without a daddy, rather than kneel to the very forces of evil that I have so long stood against.”
His announcement comes on the heels of some controversy surrounding the most recent video Higgins made about fugitives – which was not on behalf of Crime Stoppers. Higgins says per a request by State Police, he put together a video about seven suspects who have been on the run since last fall, accused members of the Gremlins Gang and under indictment on conspiracy charges.
Along with Higgins, appearing in the video were members of various law enforcement agencies in the area and leaders in the black community of St. Landry Parish.
However, the ACLU took issue with an advance copy of Higgins’ script for the segment, and several people identifying themselves as family members of the accused gang members said they felt their relatives were in danger because of the segment.
The ACLU and family members of black criminals would rather defend black criminality than defend law and order.
The movement back to harmony is unstoppable: all because white people are remembering they don’t have to live on their knees.
It’s a Trump world now.

Trove of Leaked FBI, Fusion Center and DHS Documents Provide Insight Into Antifa, Charlottesville, Political Bias, and the Erosion of Civil Liberties

On June 22nd, a group of anarchist hackers called DDoSecrets  dumped 270 gigabytes  worth of internal documents belonging to regional...