Friday, January 30, 2015

Retainer amount reached…Battle for Gary’s Freedom will soon start

http://silentbrotherhood.org/retainer-amount-reached-battle-for-garys-freedom-will-soon-start/



Yes, you read the title right. The retainer for the law firm to represent Gary Yarbrough to fight the great injustice by the BOP, has been reached. We have reached $5,000 thanks to all those who put in a lot of hard work, including: Pastor Gulett/Aryan Nations, Warrior’s Pride, and WarHag Clothing…and all the individuals and groups who also contributed. We still have to raise $2,500 to reach the final total of $7,500, but if we raised $5,000….$2,500 is just a drop in the bucket!
This goes to show what we can accomplish when we work together without all the bickering and fighting. We accomplished something major because this will not only help get Gary home, but also some of the other Bruders, who are still behind those walls. The BOP will be less likely to mess them over on their mandatory parole release date. We accomplished something great…the possible freedom of some of our folk heroes, who have already been held in prison to long!
Get ready Bureau of Prisons…you can’t cover up all the injustice you have done to these men! The light always shows what has been hidden in the dark. Justice will prevail!
This is truly a HAPPY DAY in our history!
Susan Yarbrough
Don’t forget we now have the black T-shirts for sale! Go to Warrior’s Pride!

Saturday, January 24, 2015

DOJ: No evidence of a civil rights violation in Ferguson. The White Information Network stands with Darren Wilson.



The Rent a Riot Crowd

Black Who Tortured and Murdered White Teens Yells “Black Lives Matter” at Victims’ Families During Sentencing

Daily Stormer
January 24, 2015
    Jacob Kudla and Jourdan Bobbish were both murdered in cold blood by wild Blacks.
Jacob Kudla and Jourdan Bobbish were both murdered in cold blood by wild Blacks.
As we keep telling you, Black people are wolves who have been taught by Jews to play the innocent sheep.  They have made this their collective identity.
A Black man recently proved this point when he was found guilty of torturing and murdering two White teenagers who went to buy drugs from him shouted “Black lives matter!” at the families of the victims.
Fredrick Young and Felando Hunter were sentenced Wednesday to life in prison without parole for robbing, torturing and murdering Jourdan Bobbish and Jacob Kudla, who had met up with them in July 2012 to buy drugs, a local Fox affiliate reported.
Young shocked the courtroom when he was given the chance to address the victims’ families, but instead apologized to the families of Michael Brown and Eric Garner.
“I’d like to say sorry to the families of Aiyanna Jones, Michael Brown, Eric Garner,” he said. “And I want to apologize to them for not being able to get justice for their loved ones who was murdered in cold blood.
“And in respect for the peaceful protest, I want to say ‘hands up don’t shoot,’” he said, raising his hands in the air. “Black lives matter — that’s it your honor.”
Despite Young’s message, Jourdon Bobbish’s mother, Carrie Bobbish, spoke of forgiveness during her impact statement, the Fox affiliate reported.
See.  They have a collective identity as victims and even when they are convicted of torture-murder of White kids – which this guy apparently just did for the fun of it – they view themselves as the one being injured.
How are you supposed to negotiate with that?  How are you supposed to address grievances from people who not only refuse collective responsibility on the level of society, but will literally blame personal acts of murder on oppression by the people who pay for their entire lives and take care of them like they are children?

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

White Activist Robert Ransdell Arrested for Protesting MLK Day


UNITED STATES CODE
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 13 - CIVIL RIGHTS
§ 241. Conspiracy against rights If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any inhabitant of any State, Territory, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured - They shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results, they shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.
§ 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of any State, Territory, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such inhabitant being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.        Guilty of violating Ransdell's Civil rights.
Police Chief John McDermond
Florence Police Department
Florence Government Center
8100 Ewing Boulevard
Florence, KY 41042
Phone: (859) 647-5420
Fax: (859) 647-5436
 

                                         

White Activist Robert Ransdell Arrested for Protesting MLK Day

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 21, 2015


Robert Ransdell, pictured during his 2014 campaign for US Senate
The heroic White activist Robert Ransdell was arrested on Monday by the agents of the Jew-Negro Occupation government for peacefully protesting the national day of revelry devoted to the terroristic Negro communist plagiarist Martin Luther King, Jr. Through email, he explained to me what went down on this dark day.
Ransdell showed up at the government building in Florence, Kentucky where the annual MLK Day celebrations are held on Monday afternoon, prepared to exercise his Constitutional right to protest. He had with him two placards, one reading “Happy Marchin’ Lootin’ Killin’ Day,” and the other a collage of White victims of Black murderers.
He arrived at 1:45pm, in advance of the Negro fiesta, which was to begin at 3:00. There he saw a row of displays honoring the communist Black revolutionary, which he said “looked like it was put together by a fifth grade class or something.”

 
Martin Luther King, Jr. literally attended a Jew-run communist school.
He stood near the ridiculous display with his signs, speaking with a local comrade who had come to show his support for the resistance. Within ten minutes, he was approached by three Florence police officers, one of which he recognized as the Chief of Police. They began as soon as they approached with “you need to leave.”
Ransdell responded that he was on public property, and had every right to protest the public event. The police officer began playing a mind game with him, saying “the city owns the property,” as though that meant he was trespassing, when in fact it merely confirms that it is public property where he is Constitutionally entitled to peacefully protest.
The officer, Robert told me, then put his hands behind him and began guiding him toward the exit. He protested, only to once again hear “you have to leave.”
“I think it was just the record of token harassment I have got from this city in particular for my political activity in the past that moved me to just refuse to be bullied around anymore. As we were walking I stopped and said I am not leaving,” Ransdell says that is when the cop who had been attempting to guide him called to the other to arrest him. He complied peacefully, simply telling the ZOG agents: “you have taken this to a whole new level.”
It was not until he arrived at the local jail that Ransdell found he’d been charged with 3rd degree criminal trespass. He was booked in and released on his own recognizance.
“Some of the intake officers, while they did not come out and say it, seemed a bit confused on why I was even arrested,” Ransdell said of the scene at the jail.
He then had to walk more than ten miles back to his car. A true soldier, he continued his protest, turning the long walk to the car into a freedom march, “freedom,” he said, “from this rotten, phony, hypocritical, Jew-corrupted, non-White infested shithole of a country.” He held high his “Marchin’ Lootin’ Killin’ Day” sign up for everyone who drove past him to see.
Due to the ordeal, he was forced to cancel a second protest he had planned that day.



The MLK Day march in nearby Cincinnati – looks to me like these people should be arrested before they start rioting and looting!
Ransdell’s attorney says that he may have a civil lawsuit against the city, but he first has to beat the criminal charge. The cops are definitely going to have a hard time explaining how they saw fit to arrest a patriotic American exercising his right to protest on public property.
“They will have a hell of a time explaining their actions and I look forward to that,” he said.
He potentially faces a $250 fine. His first court appearance is on February 3rd, and we will be following up on these happenings here on the Daily Stormer.

Ransdell expressed deep disappointment in the fact that he was illegally targeted for persecution in this once-great country, saying “I feel depressed at the fact that I was arrested, I have been able to walk that line over the years and it is something I have taken pride in, getting out there balls to the wall and at the same time not being shackled for doing so. I wasn’t shackled literally today but I was handcuffed and arrested for doing nothing more than speaking out against this contrived and artificial hero the anti-White establishment has pressed on the Whites of this country as someone to put on a pedestal.”
 
Robert Ransdell’s campaign for Senate featured the slogan “With Jews, We Lose,” and garnered international media attention
Robert Ransdell, a former US Senate candidate, has been active in the Nationalist scene for ten years, and this is the first time he has ever been arrested. But he remains unshaken.
“My resolve cannot be strengthened, it is however still at full capacity despite this incident.” He said. “There is always another day and another fight in this war, the events of this day have only made certain that that day and that fight is one I will be eagerly seeking out. We have hoax remembrance day coming very soon so there will not be long to wait.”

#BlackLivesMatter protests at the home of new Jewish Mayor of Oakland

#BlackLivesMatter protests at the home of new Jewish Mayor of Oakland


Oakland has always been a center for extreme black power movements. It was even the scene of mass murder in the 70s, when a Nation of Islam splinter group killed dozens of white people.
In the pre-dawn hours of Martin Luther King day, dozens of black power activists gathered in front of the home of Oakland Mayor-elect Libby Schaaf. They screamed hysterically, chanted, danced, wrote messages with chalk, and pounded on the front door. They called their protest #WakeUpTheMayor.
They spent about two hours screaming and chanting outside of Schaaf’s home.
The protesters accused Schaaf, who is Jewish, of being a pro-Israel capitalist.
Schaaf’s husband eventually answered the door. They gave him a flyer decorated with black fists. It told Schaaf to “end your relationship with Israel” and crack down on the police. It demanded that the entire Oakland University police department be dissolved.
The flyer also denounced capitalism in general and called for 80% of the city operating budget to be re-allocated to public schools. Oakland public schools already receive over $12,000 per student student per year to operate. It is among the most lavishly funded school districts in the entire state.
Libby Schaaf was elected on November 4, 2014. She is a liberal Democrat. The previous Mayor is an Asian female. In late January, black power activists put posters of Schaaf up with a Nazi Party Swastika insignia on her forehead. The posters referenced eminent domain.
Inspired by the so-called #BlackBrunch offensive, Oakland black power activists also “invaded” a grocery store and screamed hysterically. On twitter, one of the participants vowed “no comfortable grocery shopping until we get Justice.”
The is all part of an ongoing escalation of militant, confrontational tactics. They are partially inspired by a segment on MSNBC which urged black people to go to “white safe havens” and “make white people feel uncomfortable.”

Aspiring gangster rap starts new “viral” vandalism/assault trend

Aspiring gangster rap starts new “viral” vandalism/assault trend


filthy-dirty-thugAn aspiring gangster rapper by the name “VonMar” posted videos of himself committing vandalism on the internet. Now it has sparked a trend of copycats posting videos of themselves. Many use the hastag #PutEmInTheCoffin, which was started by VonMar.
VonMar began videotaping himself vandalizing cars and other property to promote his song Put Em In The Coffin. The song calls for the murder of “snitches.”

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

We need your support!

Please use the donate button located at the upper right hand corner if you'd like to help.Thank you.

Federal Court Says It’s 100% Legal To Give Cops The Finger

http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/01/federal-court-says-its-100-legal-to-give-cops-the-finger/


It’s now perfectly legal to flip off a cop.A police officer can’t simply pull you over because you gave them the “finger,” according to a federal appeals court ruling from 2013.
The 14-page opinion issued by the the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled that the “ancient gesture of insult is not the basis for a reasonable suspicion of a traffic violation or impending criminal activity.”
The ruling comes in response to a case where John Swartz and his wife Judy Mayton-Swartz were forced to bring suit against two police officers who arrested Swartz back in May of 2006. The arrest was made simply as a result of John Swartz flipping off the officer who was using a radar device at an intersection in St. Johnsville, New York.
Swartz was charged with “disorderly conduct,” the common way that officers charge people when they have not committed any crime.
Even though a federal judge in the Northern District of New York had granted summary judgement in favor of the officers back in July of 2011, the Court of Appeals erased that decision.
The cops tried to defend themselves, saying that the did have probable cause because they thought being flipped off meant the couple was “trying to get my attention for some reason.”
But the court didn’t buy this ridiculous excuse, saying that the “nearly universal recognition that this gesture is an insult deprives such an interpretation of reasonableness.”
In the end, they ruled that that “gesture” of insult is protected.


Pseudo Labels-Administrative Camouflage by Gary Yarbrough

The second superseding indictment against the men of “The Order” in 1985 reads: This organization constituted an enterprise, that is, a group of individuals associated in fact for the purposes of advancing their views of “white” or “Aryan” supremacy and the political, social, and economic ascendancy of persons of a White or Aryan background, and of making and retaining profits for the enterprise through acts and threats involving robbery, murder, arson, counterfeiting, and interstate transportation of stolen property (as defined by Title 18, United States Code 1961.4).
I have read Title 18, no where in the code does it refer to “White or Aryan Supremacy.” Yet, the Department of Just-Us is threatening to keep me incarcerated another ten years, ten years beyond the court established guideline for a “mandatory two-thirds release” date for “views of white or Aryan Supremacy.” Oddly enough, views that no members of the Order held. None of us were “white supremacists,” we were white separatists. We did not believe in the concept of reigning supreme over non-white people, we wanted our own white nation, void of non-whites entirely. We were not tried, convicted, and sentenced to lengthy prison terms for our political views, which are not illegal, we were prosecuted for the violations noted in Title 18: “robbery, murder, arson, counterfeiting, and interstate transportation of stolen property.” The accusation of “white supremacy” in the indictment was merely spurious postulation. We didn’t even believe in being supreme over other whites, let alone, non-whites. The allegation of white supremacy was just window dressing to ensure that the public would interpret the event of our trial from a particular point of view, i.e. “spin”.
The term “white supremacy” is a buzzword or catchword utilized to illicit a pre-conditioned reflexive response, that is, to sway public opinion. Americans have been bombarded with propaganda daily about the evils of white supremacists of the 1900’s. Images of slavery, whippings, and lynchings of black people automatically come to mind when we hear or read the term “white supremacy.” The accusers wanted to detract from what the Order truly wanted-government reform, hence the contrivance to distort the facts. The authorities were worried that the public would side with the ideals of The Order.
The tactic of distorting the events to mold and sway public opinion has been around a long time. Whether the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” are genuine or a forgery the contrivance is true: Protocol No. 19.3, “In order to destroy the prestige of heroism for political crimes we shall send it for trial in the category of thieving, murder, and every kind of abominable and filthy crime. Public opinion will then confuse its conception of this category of crime with the disgrace attaching to every other and will brand it with the same contempt.” This is exactly what happened to the men of The Order at trial in 1985. And now, 30 years later, after serving the sentence for my “crimes,” The Department of Justice is attempting to utilize the spurious postulation of my “continued advocacy of white supremacy” to extend my sentence by 10 years.
Many labels have been used by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to misrepresent me: “white supremacist” being foremost, along with “extremist, radicals,” and “anti-government.” Slanderous labels utilized to create stigma, to stain and brand me, to characterize me as something I am not in order to justify their nefarious acts and condemnation of me.
There is an old proverb that goes: Whoever digs a pit shall fall therein: and he that rolls a stone, it will return upon him!” that is to say, the wicked will be snared by their own devices. It is ironic that all the labels with which they erroneously branded my character really are only applicable to the authorities of the United States!
According to my Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, “White Supremacy” is defined as: “A doctrine based on belief in the inherent superiority of the White race over the black race and the correlative necessity for the subordination of blacks to whites in all relationships.” I have at least a dozen “advancement denial notices,” “referral notices,” and “Notices of Action” wherein the DOJ claims that I am an advocate of white supremacy. I defied them to provide any evidence whatsoever to indicate that I ever said, wrote, or did anything to advocate white supremacy. They produced nothing, because there is nothing to produce. I am not a white supremacist, and there is not a single pro-white group in America that advocates this odious concept. The only entity that did, and covertly still does, is the national, state, and local authorities within the United States. It is the authorities, and the aristocrats from which they came and were elected that white supremacy, defined by Webster’s, is derived. It was them who allowed the institution of slavery in America, them who profited from it. It was them who considered themselves superior to blacks and other races. It was them who believed that the non-white races were inferior; and therefore, an exploitable resource. However, it was not about race as far as they themselves were concerned, they were not about racial cultivation, they were merely supremacists for their own sake and profit. They enslaved, manipulated, and exploited the “lower class”–whites as well! Blacks had nothing that the average white man wanted, the average white man was, more or less indifferent about blacks.
The terms, “extremist” and “radical” have similar definitions. “Radical”: of or relating to the origin: fundamental-marked by a considerable departure from the usual or traditional: tending or disposed to make extreme changes in existing views, habits, conditions, or institutions; of relating to or constituting a political group associated with views, practices, and policies of extreme change: advocating extreme measures to retain or restore a political state of affairs.
“Origin, fundamental,” I interpret this to represent the foundation and basis for the beginning of our existence and the conditions thereof, that is NATURAL LAW. The definition: “Marked by a considerable departure from the usual or traditional” Any authority that legislates laws that are contrary to the laws established by nature, constitutes a departure from the usual or traditional, the fundamentals of mans existence.
The so-called Founding Fathers of the United States practiced a faith known as “deism” advocating “natural reusion” over time, the U.S. Government and legislators are marked by a considerable departure from the tradition! It use to be that only free white males could vote or own property; segregation was enforced by law; inter-racial marriages, homosexuality, abortion, and pornography were illegal. According to Websters definition of “radical” define the US authorities as the true “radicals.” Definition: “Advocating extreme measures to retain or restore a political state of affairs.” I guess, with a bit of spin, the last definition could apply to me, except the retention of the previous state of affairs is beyond reconstruction or restoration. And the only advocacy on my part was to create a separate territory for a white racial imperative, a return to the natural state of affairs, the fundamentals. This could hardly be defined as “extreme measures.”
As previously noted, “radical” and “extremist” are practically synonymous terms. “Extremist”-advocacy of extreme political measures: radicalism.” So, Webster’s definitions for both terms indicate that it is the U.S. authorities who are the real radical extremists! Just because the legislators define “legality,” and are so big it lends them an air of “authority,” it does not mean they are just or legitimate. There is a greater authority, the Laws of Nature and its Creator. Laws that no authority have right to encroach upon. I advocate a reform, a return to Natural Law. I have the Faith of my Fathers before me. The laws, morals, and ethnics established by nature and learned by observance. That is the TRUE DEFINITION of “Patriotism.” From the Latin: “Pater:Father.” “Patriot (late Latin) Patriota, lineage: one who has the faith of his fathers before him and propagates his fore fathers ethics.
So, the real white supremacist, radical extremist is not me, but those who accuse me. Those that want to incarcerate me for then more years for crimes THEY COMMITTED, not me! And, regardless of what my political beliefs are, and what I advocate, according to the “Bill of Rights,” I am, as a citizen, entitled to those beliefs without fear of imprisonment for merely exercising my constitutional freedoms! Title 18 listed the “crimes” as: “threats involving robbery, murder, arson, counterfeiting, and interstate transportation of stolen property.” Freedom of expression, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom from being oppressed due to political views, are not listed as crimes in Title 18 United States Code 1961.4.
“Anti-government:” apparently the Department of Just-Us equates expressing verbal dissent to abuse of authority as being “anti-government.” I am not anti-government, but I am averse to injustice and inequity. Social structures are organized on the fundamental precepts of Natural Law. Any “authority” that legislates laws contrary to nature is a crime against nature and all mankind. The innate instinct to survive, to procreate and propagate is a powerful natural instinct among all organisms. Self-preservation is a fundamental law of nature, and, by extension, the protection, cultivation, and propagation of the family, tribe, race, and nation is of the utmost importance! The term “nation” is from the Latin “natio” meaning: birth, race, nation, to be born, to begat, more at KIN. “Social” is defined as: “trending to form cooperative and interdependent relationships with others of one’s kind.” A “society” is: “A voluntary association of individuals for common ends; a natural group of plants, usually of a single species; the progeny of a pair of insects when constituting a social unit (as a hive of bees).” In light of Webster’s dictionary, who is the real anti-government, anti-social entity? I defer to the superseding indictment: “The political, social, and economic ascendancy of persons of a white or Aryan ethnic background…” Except the authorities seem to convey the idea that we were only out for cultivation of our own kind. We must first be in a position to help ourselves before we can help others. However, I believe all mean are sovereign and should never be coerced, forced, or tricked in to doing anything against ones freewill. It is the authorities who have usurped the sovereignty of mankind……
By the usurpation of the sovereignty of the populace, America is reduced to an anomic commercialistic  pseudo society. We are all thrall born slaves today, laboring for the psychopathic personalities of a runaway bureaucratic aristocracy. REDEEM THY SELF!
Gary Lee Yarbrough
November 2014

America’s Foremost Political Prisoner: Free Matt Hale Now!!!


















Write to Matt Hale at :


Matthew F. Hale
#15177-424
U.S. Penitentiary Max
P.O. Box 8500
Florence, CO 81226-8500



16 Reasons for Mistrial in Matt’s Case


1. Matt was tried and convicted in federal court in Hammond, Indiana in 2004 for having solicited the murder of Chicago Federal Judge Joan Lefkow. James T. Moody was the judge in the trial. No evidence was ever presented during trial that Matt ever asked anyone to commit murder. Matt is an innocent man that has suffered at the hands of our corrupt government, the corrupt FBI and our corrupt justice system.
2. The government had Tony Evola, a government informant which they paid $75,000 to tape conversations with Matt over a 2 year period to attempt to get evidence that they coud use to put Matt away.
3. On these tapes, never once did Matt ever ask this informant to kill anybody. In fact, Evola was confused as to who the government wanted Matt to ask him to kill. He thought the target was a man.
4. When the government realized that Evola thought the target was a man, they had him send Matt an email referring to the target as being femala( Evola was mentally challenged), being female.
5. Matt was not present for the entire jury selection even though he never waived that right. He was only present for 48%. The law is that he be present for the entire jury selection.
6. When evola testified in the trial, because nothing on the tapes revealed Matt asking evola to kill the judge, Evola testified that he asked Matt if he wanted him to kill the judge and Matt nodded.
7. Matt suspected that Evola was a government informant, he wasn’t concerned because he knew that he would always follow the law and never do anything illegal.
8. Matt was very naive and believed he was safe from prosecution because he always followed the law. Matt went to law school to become an attorney and make legal change in the government and our court system.
9. Just recently, Matt discovered that the jury foreman had testified in another unrelated case that he had disobeyed the judges order not to read anything about Matt or listen to the media. After being accepted as one of the jurors, he went home and did in fact follow the media coverage about Matt and the case disobeying the judges order. He had run home and removed a note on his door saying he was going to be a juror on Matt Hales trial because he was afriad one on Matts supporters might harm him or his partner( he is gay).
10. Matts attorney had a list of over a hundred witnesses and never called one to testify. When Matt told him that he wanted to testify, his attorney told him that he wasn’t prepared to do that.
11. The judge, James Moody allowed another mans crime into Matts trial. It was very obvious that the judge was prejudice against Matt as was the prosecutor. They probably had coffee before walking into the court room.
12. Matts attorney Thomas Durkin of Chicago told the jury they should find Matt guilty on moral charges. He told the jury that he didn’t like and how disgusting Matt was so many words.
13. The last statement the prosecutor said to the jury is that the government had evidence that Matthew Hale ordered one of his organization to go out and kill and injure many people. This is totally untrue. There was never any evidence presented at trial that Matt ever asked anybody to kill anyone. Matt’s attorney never objected, the judge never said anything to the jury asking them to disallow that statement.
14. The trial was tainted and prejudiced, the jury foreman was homosexual, feared Matt supporters. He went into the jury room ready to find Matt guilty before hearing any evidence (there was no evidence).
15. The judge sentenced Matt using the sentencing guidelines used to sentence a terrorist. Matt isn’t a terrorist. He gave Matt a 40 year sentence, Matt has been in solitary confinement for 11 years. He is innocent of any crime and Judge Moody, the prosecutor, and the government know it. Matt has asked repeatedly to have a lie detector test to prove his innocence and has been refused. Recently, he sent David Bindi, the prosecutor that took the place of David Weisman, the prosecutor that prosecuted Matt, a letter asking for a polygraph and was refused. They know it would show that Matt is innocent.
16. We are looking for an attorney in Colorado that does Federal appellate work that also does pro bono work to help Matt. If any of your listeners can help Matt in finding help, please contact me at evelynhutcheson1938@gmail.com. We asking for donations for Matt’s Defense fund and the publishing of his book. My address for donations is:
Evelyn Hutcheson
200 Carlson Ave. 25 H
Washington, IL 61571


Donations


Help Matt fight back by donating to his costly legal funds. Send your donations to:
Evelyn Hutcheson
200 Carlson Ave. 25 H
Washington, IL. 61571



Subscribe to the ‘FREE MATT HALE!’ Newsletter


To subscribe to our newsletter and receive all of Matt’s messages, press releases, and legal updates, just send an email to:





Nationalists Demand Freedom for Gary Yarbrough Outside the American Embassy in London

Sven Longshanks
Daily Stormer
January 19, 2015
image-1
Gary Yarborough, unjustly imprisoned by ZOG in a top security dungeon for 30 years was supposed to be let out in 2014.
But because an anonymous somebody made a few posts on an internet forum calling themselves ‘Gary Yarborough’ his parole has been refused.
This callous injustice needs publicising in every way possible and a group of British nationalists chose to do just that, outside the American embassy in London.
Featuring rousing speeches from Jez Turner, Peter Rushton and others, this video of the event is well worth watching as unlike most other rallies, there were no idiot Antifas there to interrupt proceedings.

Friday, January 16, 2015

George Soros Bankrolls Ferguson Protests

George Soros Bankrolls Ferguson Protests

Ferguson, and the broader anti-police movement it has spawned in America, is just another example of the tremendous negative impact that Jewish influence is having on our society.
Jewish billionaires like George Soros and Sheldon Adelson openly and brazenly use their money and influence to corrupt our political system and foment hatred and resentment by blacks against Whites:
“There’s a solitary man at the financial center of the Ferguson protest movement. No, it’s not victim Michael Brown or Officer Darren Wilson. It’s not even the Rev. Al Sharpton, despite his ubiquitous campaign on TV and the streets.
Rather, it’s liberal billionaire George Soros, who has built a business empire that dominates across the ocean in Europe while forging a political machine powered by nonprofit foundations that impacts ..
In all, Mr. Soros gave at least $33 million in one year to support already-established groups that emboldened the grass-roots, on-the-ground activists in Ferguson, according to the most recent tax filings of his nonprofit Open Society Foundations.
The financial tether from Mr. Soros to the activist groups gave rise to a combustible protest movement that transformed a one-day criminal event in Missouri into a 24-hour-a-day national cause celebre.”

Pro-censorship mayor pressures billboard owner to remove political sign

Pro-censorship mayor pressures billboard owner to remove political sign


Pro-Censorship advocate Springville Mayor William Isly
By Kyle Rogers
Springville Mayor William Isley, an opponent of first amendment rights, successfully pressured a billboard owner to take down a sign. The sign is purely political in nature, protected by the first amendment of the US Constitution, and was paid for by a customer.
On Monday, January 12th, Mayor Isley publicly declared that he would “examine all legal avenues available to seek the removal of the sign.”
The sign was taken down today, January 14th. Isley indicated that the billboard owner and the owner of the land were pressured to remove the customer’s sign. Isley came to watch the sign being removed in person. He gloated about his victory other freedom of speech to media.
The owner of the billboard says he has also received threatening phone calls from anonymous people.
In theory, it is illegal for an elected official to use his office to silence the 1st amendment rights of an American citizen. However, no one is ever prosecuted anymore.
During Reconstruction, Congress passed a law making it illegal for an elected official to use his office to suppress any constitutionally protected right of US citizens. The law was aimed at protecting the rights of blacks. Groups like the Ku Klux Klan were accused of using intimidation to suppress the rights of newly freed black slaves. Now we see Mayor Isley doing the same thing that the Ku Klux Klan was accused of doing after the Civil War.
What is particularly obnoxious about Isley’s actions is the timing. We just saw the anti-free speech terrorist attack in Paris, killing 23 people, followed by an unprecedented Unity March. On January 11th, over forty world leaders marched to show their alleged support for freedom of speech. One day after this unprecedented march, when support for free speech was at an all time high, Mayor Isley declared war on freedom of speech here in the USA.
Ironically, by suppressing the free speech rights of the signs’ owner, Isley has generated massive free publicity for the sign in local media and online. The removal of the sign is the number one story in the Birmingham media market right now.
Springville, AL only has about 2,500 residents. The office of mayor is only a part time job. William Isley also runs a CPA business in Springville, AL.
You can contact William Isley at his city hall office at (205) 467-6134.

Affirmative Action Gone Wild



The end result of radical affirmative actions programs.
Xadrian McCraven has a criminal record that includes numerous convictions. He is known to be connected to criminal street gangs. Yet the state of IL hired him to work for the Department of Children and Family Services.
In 2012, he was fired for sending hundreds of lewd e-mails.
Then he was hired by the IL Department of Corrections and given a salary of $111,432. When it was discovered that he lied on the application about having a criminal record, he was fired. Now the state is demanding that he be re-instated.
His name also appears on a list compiled by the notorious Rod Blagojevich. This is the former Illinois Governor that was accused of selling government jobs. Public records show that McCraven has donated $1,500 to Democratic candidates.
Illinois officials still want to fire a man with a troubled work history, criminal convictions and a history of street gang affiliations from his $111,432-a-year job in the Illinois system.
Shaer said McCraven has a long and troubled history working for the state. In fact, he has been fired twice from state jobs.
Corrections officials fired McCraven in January 2014 after a newspaper reported he had been arrested many times. He’d previously been fired, in 2012, from the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services.
Published reports indicated he was fired in 2012 after it came to light that he had been sending hundreds of lewd and inappropriate emails.
McCraven appealed that firing, and Gov. Pat Quinn’s administration decided to rehire him because of the cost of fighting the appeal, Shaer said.
In order to achieve racial balance, the city of New York has dramatically reduced standards for corrections officers. 35% of new corrections officers hired in NYC last year have major red flags.
One applicant to be a New York City correction officer had been fired from his last job as a security guard for stealing. Another admitted he had regularly socialized with gang members. Another had debts of more than $400,000.
Yet all those candidates and dozens like them were hired last year to be part of the force overseeing nearly 11,000 inmates on Rikers Island, according to a year-long city probe of jail hiring practices released Thursday.
The probe found systemic problems with the Department of Correction hiring system, including no recruiting strategy for the past six years that allowed an alarmingly high number of hires who had arrest records, gang ties or other red flags that are markers for corruption.
Department of Investigation Commissioner Mark Peters said the chronic problems of violence, smuggling and bribery that plague the city jails can all be traced to the character and qualifications of the employees.
“Unless you have consistently qualified correction officers, solving the other problems we care about is an almost insurmountable task,” Peters said.
“This is just a function of, for a decade, hirings and screenings and investigations being ignored.”
City investigators randomly pulled 153 application files of guards hired last year and found that 54 — or 35 percent — “presented significant red flags that should have either precluded their hiring outright or required further follow-up.”

For-Profit Nursing Home In Viral Video Is Understaffed and Run By Criminals, Yet Still Receives Medicare Funds

Antifa is nowhere to be found in regards to anti-white racism. The viral video of 20-year-old black man Jaydon Hayden viciously ass...