Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Immigration gets on the public radar

Immigration gets on the public radar

Kevin MacDonald

An important aspect of immigration has been that for the most part it has occurred under the radar. Despite importing over a million mainly poor people every year and all that implies in terms of need for housing, infrastructure, welfare benefits, and medical care,  immigration and refugee policy in the US is on auto-pilot, with the pro-immigration forces steadily removing every obstacle. Most White Americans do not experience it first  hand and have no idea about the elaborate infrastructure that the pro-immigration forces have erected.
It’s probably not true that a frog will allow itself to be boiled alive if only the heat is raised slowly enough, but it’s an irresistible image nonetheless.
However, the anti-borders forces — on the left and the right — have counted on such passivity among the public to incrementally erode the American people’s ability to decide who gets to move here from abroad.
They have devised endless opportunities to appeal deportation decisions, prevented the implementation of needed control measures, pushed relentlessly to pierce numerical caps, and created strong incentives against government functionaries saying “no” to those who want to come. The motto over the doorway of the immigration office might as well be “It ain’t over til the alien wins.” (Mark Krikorian, “Hitting the boiling point over the border“)
American are passive because immigration, especially legal immigration, is rarely in the news. The same goes for refugee policy. According to Refugee/Resettlement Watch, the process of importing refugees is a “very quiet effort” rife with corruption (e.g., leading to chain migration of relatives; see their fact sheet). It is also thoroughly incentivized so that it’s a very lucrative business for organizations like the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society and the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service (which describes the children pouring in from Central America  as “gifts,” perhaps because the job of overseeing their recruitment pays $214,000 in salary and benefits supplied by US taxpayers ["Lutherans: “The children are a gift” and we need a second lobbyist in Washington to make sure the gift keeps giving ]).
But the crisis in Texas has brought it all to the public’s attention and it’s quite clear that quite a large section of the public are not at all happy with it, to the point that, as Krikorian notes, illegals are not being resettled in states where Democratic senators are facing tough reelection campaigns. And they are being transported in the least conspicuous means possible, hoping the public won’t notice.

But the public is noticing. There have been vocal protests in a number of communities, such as Murrieta, CABoston (!), Tennessee, and elsewhere

The message here is that immigration, like lobbying, thrives in the darkness and dies in the sunshine. In fact, the numbers of Central American teenagers involved are trivial compared to the usual annual numbers for legal immigration, illegal immigration, and refugees. Unless one is personally affected by the onslaught or is a regular reader of sites like VDARE or the Center for Immigration Studies, immigration will be far down on your list of what’s important.
But the border crisis is big news so its definitely gotten the attention of pretty much everyone.
So I am thinking that this is going to have major political implications. It’s well known that White Americans are worried about becoming a minority and that being reminded that they are going to become a minority makes them adopt more conservative positions.
But, as with immigration generally, the media downplays the effects of immigration on speeding the day when Whites become a minority. As I noted elsewhere: “In all the Main Stream Media propaganda about the desperate need for an Amnesty/Immigration Surge bill, you never hear that the bill will speed up the day when whites are a minority.”
The far left LA Times and Newsday reach for the height of cynicism.
The far left LA Times (print edition, 7/28) reaches the height of cynicism with this cartoon by Jimmy Margulies while elsewhere scoffing at every traditional Christian religious belief, from homosexuality to abortion.
The media typically downplay the transformative effects of immigration and the negative consequences for White America. But, with the Camp of the  Saints invasion upon us and making all the daily newspapers and political talk shows, it seems to be dawning on Whites that their country really is being taken away. So there are protests. And even more than the protests, I suspect there is a lot of quiet anger and uneasiness about it that will find expression in the ballot box.
As Refugee/Resettlement Watch points out in an article on a Somali family that quickly grew to 12 children, it starts with stealth and ends with anger.
It’s interesting to watch the “pockets of resistance” grow in cities that were originally “welcoming” and now are becoming overloaded with needy migrants (legal and illegal).  It is a matter of numbers—a few migrants needing services kind of go under the radar until a tipping point is reached for the taxpayers. Cases like this one break into the news causing citizens to finally say, ‘whoa!’ what is going on here?  But, at that point it is usually too late for the community because the contractors are bringing in the relatives of the first seed population and anyone who complains is immediately labeled a xenophobic, racist, bigoted boob! and the complainers scurry for cover.  
Congolese family in Springfield, MA
Somali family in Springfield, MA
When Whites start worrying about becoming a minority, research shows that there is ashift toward political conservatism whose likely beneficiary (alas!) will the be Republican Party.  As the article discussed in the above link shows, Whites who are told about the impending eclipse of America as a majority-White country are more likely to want restrictions on immigration.
Indeed, Dick Morris thinks that the border crisis may completely “wipe out” the Democrats. Which I suppose would be good except that the Republicans will probably be nearly as bad. The usual suspects,  Rep. Paul Ryan and Sen. John McCain, were motivated by the crisis to again voice their support for amnesty and dramatic increases in immigration. George Will says the U.S. should “welcome” illegal children. 
Despite Republican evil, it’s definitely a positive that the upsurge at the border is making Whites more aware of immigration as an issue. And it’s hard to imagine a White who is worried about the surge voting Democrat.
There is talk, mainly by Democrats, of Republicans impeaching Obama if he  unilaterally gives amnesty to illegals. But even if the Republicans took over the Senate, as seems quite possible, they would still lack the 2/3 majority needed. But theycould vote to overturn his action. Of course, the pitch will be that Republicans taking a stand against immigration would play into Democrat hands for 2016 or later given the ever-expanding coalition of ethnic transformation — which is why impeachment talk is coming mainly from Democrats.  But hey, non-Whites are going to vote Democrat anyway. It’s all about race now. Or at least increasingly so, and the border situation will make it more so.
Besides, party politics is all about the short term. And for Republicans, the chance to take advantage of White anger over immigration may be too much of a temptation to resist. Even if they don’t talk much about the border crisis during the campaign, it may well shape voter attitudes given the research cited above.
And if the Republicans did get into power, there would certainly be strong voices advising them to start changing immigration policy if they hope to ever win another presidential election (even though all the big money will be pulling in the opposite direction). Certainly the Republicans can’t win without the enthusiasm of the White working class, and it’s no secret how they stand on immigration, since they are the ones most hurt by it. This could be their last chance.

Ohio Sheriff Sends Mexico the Bill for Illegals in His Jail

Ohio Sheriff Sends Mexico the Bill for Illegals in His Jail, Gets Put on Cartel Hit List

Daily Stormer
July 30, 2014
This is a fantastic interview with an Ohio sheriff discussing the massive influx of invaders into Ohio, and the way that the Federal government is banning local law enforcement from enforcing laws, literally suing them for any attempts to deal directly with the crisis.
He also mentions the rapes that these people are committing, the fact that we are harming ourselves, our old people, our children, by letting these savages inside.
Then he explains that he sent a bill for the expenses illegals cost him while in his jail to the Mexican President, and got put on a drug cartel hit list.

AP Poll:Majority of Americans want illegal aliens deported

ImmigrationAP Poll: Majority of Americans want illegal aliens deported

AP Poll on immigration:
68% disprove of how Obama is handling the border and illegal immigration
29% said they have no faith in either party to handle immigration appropriately
53% said the US has no moral obligation to offer asylum to people who allege persecution in their native country
89% said illegal immigration was a serious problem
Support for the TEA Party movement has increased from 28% to 36% in the past two months

Obama regime paying citizens $7k a month to house illegal aliens

Obama regime paying citizens $7k+ a month to house illegal aliens

The Texas-based nonprofit Catholic Charities is currently seeking out foster families for the migrants, most of whom come from Central America. A spokeswoman for the organization told Breitbart Texas that foster families can receive monthly payments for housing adult immigrants who are under 23-years-old.
“Most of our children are 15 to 17-years-old,” she said. “But some stay in our program until they are 22-years-old; if they’re still working on getting their high school diploma, they can stay until they’re that age.”
The revelation that some of the migrants receiving foster care are adults will likely come as a surprise to many; the mainstream media has largely portrayed the border crisis as involving only children and family units.
The spokeswoman mentioned that foster families will be given $40 per day to care for each migrant they take in from Catholic Charities. The assistance is funded by the federal government, as Breitbart Texas previously reported.
Foster parents have the ability to collect more than $7,400 per month, considering that they can house six immigrants at any given time.
The spokeswoman said that the illegal immigrants are provided with taxpayer subsidized education, health care, transportation, and an “allowance.” She was not specific about the amount of such an allowance or how often it is administered.

Sunday, July 27, 2014

Outspoken Publisher Wins a Victory for Free Speech

Outspoken Publisher Wins a Victory for Free Speech

• Olaf Childress files suit against cops—and wins.
By Olaf Childress —
More than three years after Montgomery, Alabama police brutalized this citizen, who was exercising his constitutionally-protected God-given rights, the guilty culprits finally got a much-welcomed slap on their wrists.
The case began on February 19, 2011, at the sesquicentennial Jefferson Davis Inauguration Event, which included a parade to the Alabama capitol’s steps. On that day, this publisher’s good friend and longtime First Freedom (TFF) subscriber Tyrone Crowley had dressed up as Davis and delivered the words of the Confederate States of America (CSA) president’s inaugural address before a crowd of more than 1,000.
The Jefferson Davis Inaugural Parade Reenactment, which was sponsored by the Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV), formed up before the fountain circle where Dexter Avenue begins in downtown Montgomery. My daughter, Irene, Jeb Lessley and I were handing out copies of our special February 2011 TFF edition, which recounted what had transpired at that location exactly 150 years earlier.
Donate to us
But today’s Cultural Marxists cannot build their new world order until what once caused the South’s secession and the CSA’s formation is down the memory hole, so not bothering to even consider that we were supporting this inaugural reenactment parade, the SCV officer in charge asked a couple of off-duty policemen to stop us from handing out literature.
Because I refused to meekly obey that pair of Montgomery cops’ order to leave, the officers grabbed both my arms, dragged me around the corner and, assisted by four additional police goons and two SWAT members, shoved my face against a plate glass wall while twisting my arms up behind me, buckling on leg irons and handcuffs.
They then hauled this aging journalist off to spend the entire day with no food or water, nor toilet or place to sit, stripped to his underwear in a cold, wet cell.
While sitting in jail a few blocks away, I missed the parade and Tyrone’s delivery of Davis’s acceptance speech in this cradle of the Confederacy. “Disorderly conduct” is what they eventually decided to charge me with.
I was fined $500 at Montgomery Municipal Court following the “offended” SCV officer’s complaint about the content of this newspaper. And while not specifically denying my right to free speech, the two arresting cops claimed that my mere presence at the parade created a disturbance. But because I had not acted disorderly in any way, I appealed to the next higher venue.
Montgomery’s Circuit Court, realizing the delicacy of this argument, assigned the very able and competent attorney Mary Oliver, originally from New York but now relocated to Montgomery, to assist my attorney, L.A. Cobb, who resides at some distance in north Alabama.
Since the SCV officer had not criminally moved against my free speech rights by asking me to leave, I only wished to charge those arresting officers, the ones who roughed me up and jailed me even though they had not seen any disturbance. The police alone were guilty of that day’s atrocities against my rights as an American.
The trial lasted three days before a jury came back with the decision that the police had violated my First Amendment rights. Though the  jury awarded me no compensatory or punitive damages, the case had always been about bringing out the truth, not getting money.
The City of Montgomery—having failed to successfully defend its clients against my allegations of unlawful police brutality in denying me my constitutional rights—must pay their expenses and all court costs.
Today’s problem is not in the difficulty of convening a jury of our peers, but that so many Zionistas up to no good with their “teaching tolerance” 24/7 get such access, herding the public into a compromised and unthinking obedience, thus “bringing in the sheep” to the mediacracy’s drumbeat.
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. Let’s begin by sanitizing the media, making the public more aware of such un-American agencies as the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center by outing subversive informants like Abe Foxman and Morris Dees.
AFP Newpaper Banner
Olaf Childress is the publisher of the monthly news and commentary newspaper, The First Freedom ($25 for 1 year or 1 silver dollar. P.O. Box 385, Silverhill, AL 36576.)
- See more at:

The Torah Deception:Jews Don't Follow the Old Testament

The Torah Deception: Jews Don’t Follow the Old Testament

Sven Longshanks
Daily Stormer
July 28, 2014
The Torah Shebichtav – The Pentateuch, is clearly not meant to be studied. It stays sitting on a table in the synagogue, to fool gullible gentiles into believing that the Jews follow it’s laws.
An extremely common deception that a lot of people are under, is that today’s Jews are followers of the Christian Old Testament. However nothing could be further from the truth. The Jews follow the Talmud, which is the nullification of everything that is the Old Testament of the Christian Bible. They get away with this deception because they call both the Pentateuch of the Christian Old Testament and the Talmud, ‘The Torah.’ So, when they say that their holy book is the Torah and that they follow the Torah, unsuspecting non-Jews assume that they mean the Christian Old Testament.
Johann Andreas Eisenmenger wrote extensively about the customs of the Jews and the wild ideas of the Talmud in the 18th century. His book ‘The Traditions of the Jews’ was quickly banned when first published, yet has remained known and used ever since as an authoritative source for Jewish scholars themselves, who often cite his work.
He had this to say about the relationship between the Jewish adult male and the Christian Old Testament:
‘At fifteen years of age, he enters on the study of the Gemara, which is a sort of supplement to the Talmud, containing disputations and decisions on the Talmudic text and for the most part, the remaining studies of his life are employed on this work only. Very rarely do the Jews turn over the Prophets and much more rare is it to find a Jew who studies, or has any tolerable knowledge of them. There are many of them who look not once into a prophetical book in the whole course of their lives.’
The Torah Shebe’al Peh – The Talmud, is clearly in a form that is meant to be as easy to use for the Jew as possible. These books are what the Jew really refers to when he says he follows ‘the Torah.’
Bearing this in mind, criticising the Jews by using passages from the Old Testament and claiming them to be the doctrine of the Jews, is about as accurate as citing passages from the Vedas to describe the teachings of the Muslims. Far worse behavior is described and encouraged in the Talmud for the Jews than was ever carried out by the Israelites of the Old Testament.
By being inaccurate and using the Old Testament as a source for Jewish doctrine, we are actually helping the Jews to maintain their deception of being followers of Mosaic law, rather than the followers of a Satanic supremacist doctrine that claims all Non-Jews were created to be their slaves.
Its the Talmud that permits Jews to take body parts from Non-Jews, not the Old Testament.

Stephen Walt: "AIPAC" and Jewish Dominated Media Behind Israeli Terrorism

Stephen Walt: “AIPAC” and Jewish Dominated Media Behind Israeli Terrorism

American professor of international affairs at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, Stephen M. Walt has joined the growing list of public figures to openly identify the Jewish Lobby as being responsible for America’s “morally bankrupt” foreign policy in supporting Israel while it murders Palestinian civilians.
At least 15 people were killed when Israeli fire hit a UN-run school in Gaza, while three more people were shot dead by Israeli soldiers at a demonstration in the occupied West Bank. Emergency services spokesman Ashraf al-Qudra said around 200 people were injured in the strike on the school run by the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) in the northern town of Beit Hanun. An AFP journalist at a nearby morgue said the bodies arriving from the scene included a mother and her one-year-old baby. UN Secretary General said Ban Ki-Moon said UN staff were among the dead and injured in the shelling of the school.
At least 15 people were killed when Israeli fire hit a UN-run school in Gaza. Emergency services spokesman Ashraf al-Qudra said around 200 people were injured in the strike on the school run by the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) in the northern town of Beit Hanun. An AFP journalist at a nearby morgue said the bodies arriving from the scene included a mother and her one-year-old baby. UN Secretary General said Ban Ki-Moon said UN staff were among the dead and injured in the shelling of the school.
Walt, who is best known—and hated—by the Jewish lobby for his book The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy which he coauthored with John Mearsheimer, has never been shy to speak out about the influence of the Jewish lobby before, but the latest series of outrages—which include the bombing of a UN school in Gaza which killed 15 civilians and injured more than 200—has clearly provoked Walt and others into openly blaming the Jewish Supremacists.
In an article published in the Huffington Post, Walt boldly declared that “AIPAC Is the Only Explanation for America’s Morally Bankrupt Israel Policy,” he went on:
The official name for Israel’s latest assault on Gaza is “Operation Protective Edge.” A better name would be “Operation Déjà Vu.”
As it has on several prior occasions, Israel is using weapons provided by U.S. taxpayers to bombard the captive and impoverished Palestinians in Gaza, where the death toll now exceeds 500.
As usual, the U.S. government is siding with Israel, even though most American leaders understand Israel instigated the latest round of violence, is not acting with restraint, and that its actions make Washington look callous and hypocritical in the eyes of most of the world.
This Orwellian situation is eloquent testimony to the continued political clout of AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) and the other hardline elements of the Israel lobby.
There is no other plausible explanation for the supine behavior of the U.S. Congress—including some of its most “progressive” members—or the shallow hypocrisy of the Obama administration, especially those officials known for their purported commitment to human rights.
Walt went on to point out the real reasons for the Zio-murder machine’s attack on Gaza:
And why did Netanyahu decide to go on another rampage in Gaza? As Nathan Thrall of the International Crisis Group points out, the real motive is neither vengeance nor a desire to protect Israel from Hamas’ rocket fire, which has been virtually non-existent over the past two years and is largely ineffectual anyway.
Netanyahu’s real purpose was to undermine the recent agreement between Hamas and Fatah for a unity government. Given Netanyahu’s personal commitment to keeping the West Bank and creating a “greater Israel,” the last thing he wants is a unified Palestinian leadership that might press him to get serious about a two-state solution. Ergo, he sought to isolate and severely damage Hamas and drive a new wedge between the two Palestinian factions.
Walt also pointed out that the real cause of the crisis in the first place is not, as the Jewish-dominated mass media lies, “Arab terrorism”, but in fact Jewish terrorism, Jewish colonialism and the Zionist ethnic cleansing of Palestine:
Behind all these maneuvers looms Israel’s occupation of Palestine, now in its fifth decade. Not content with having ethnically cleansed hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in 1948 and 1967 and not satisfied with owning eighty-two percent of Mandatory Palestine, every Israeli government since 1967 has built or expanded settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem while providing generous subsidies to the 600,000-plus Jews who have moved there in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention.
The conflict in Palestine, as seen through the Jewish goggles of John Kerry-Cohen and the Jewish Supremacist-controlled mass media.
“Israel under siege”– actually, Gaza is under siege by Israel. This is the conflict in Palestine, as seen through the Jewish goggles of John Kerry-Cohen and the Jewish Supremacist-controlled mass media.
Walt then goes on to say outright that the only reason why the US government continues to back Israel, is because of the malign controlling power of the Jewish lobby in Washington DC.
Meanwhile, U.S. politicians and policymakers continue to back a brutal military campaign whose primary purpose is not to defend Israel but rather to protect its longstanding effort to colonize the West Bank.
Yet as soon as fighting starts, and even if Israel instigates it, AIPAC demands that Washington march in lockstep with Tel Aviv.
Congress invariably rushes to pass new resolutions endorsing whatever Israel decides to do.
Even though it is mostly Palestinians who are dying, White House officials rush to proclaim that Israel has “the right to defend itself,” and Obama himself won’t go beyond expressing “concern” about what is happening.
The explanation for America’s impotent and morally bankrupt policy is the political clout of the Israel lobby.
Barack Obama knows that if he were to side with the Palestinians in Gaza or criticize Israel’s actions in any way, he would face a firestorm of criticism from the lobby and his chances of getting Congressional approval for a deal with Iran would evaporate.
Similarly, every member of the House and Senate—including progressives like Senator Elizabeth Warren—knows that voting for those supposedly “pro-Israel” resolutions is the smart political move.
They understand that even the slightest display of independent thinking on these issues could leave them vulnerable to a well-funded opponent the next time they’re up for re-election.
The lobby is still able to keep roughly $3 billion in U.S. aid to Israel flowing each year; it can still prevent U.S. presidents from putting meaningful pressure on Israel; and it can still get the U.S. to wield its veto whenever a resolution criticizing Israel’s actions is floated in the U.N. Security Council.

Saturday, July 26, 2014

White man killed in random racial hate crime in Stuttgart,Arkansas


Hate Crime MurderWhite man killed in random racial hate crime in Stuttgart, Arkansas

Twenty year old Daniel Ruffin was walking his dog in Stuttgart. He passed a group of black males and one of those males decided that it would be really fun to murder a white person. He shot Ruffin, who died of his wound shortly after.
The gunman and his accomplices didn’t steal anything. Ruffin was killed purely for the thrill of it.
The gunman was arrested and charged. Two of the accomplices were allegedly arrested and quietly set free without charges. The police chief is black and local residents claim one of the accomplices is his own son.
Family and friends of Dabiel Ruffin took to social media to cry foul.
A source close to the investigation says the son of Stuttgart Police Chief Michael Smith was one of the people there when Daniel Ruffin was shot, but that he is being questioned as a witness not a suspect in the case.

Trove of Leaked FBI, Fusion Center and DHS Documents Provide Insight Into Antifa, Charlottesville, Political Bias, and the Erosion of Civil Liberties

On June 22nd, a group of anarchist hackers called DDoSecrets  dumped 270 gigabytes  worth of internal documents belonging to regional...