Tuesday, November 30, 2010

WIKILeaks Exposes Zionist Treachery

Corrupting Our Police:by Dr.William L.Pierce

Dr William Pierce - Corrupting Our Police .mp3
Found at bee mp3 search engine

Dr.William Pierce

Dr William Pierce - Labels .mp3
Found at bee mp3 search engine

Will SPLC return Madoff money?

Will SPLC return Madoff money?
Will SPLC return tainted $2.9 million received from Bernie Madoff”s right hand man?

From Social Contract Press…

The incredible Southern Poverty Law Center money machine just keeps rolling on and on, according to its latest Form 990 filing with the IRS and its Financial Statement.

But the SPLC is rolling in an increasingly bizarre direction. For example: why exactly is it piling up its extraordinary, illiquid, secretive, never-touched money mountain? This kind of thing risks unfavorable IRS attention. And why does it need a bank account in the Cayman Islands?

Donations to the SPLC in the year ending October 31, 2009, were down 11.1 percent—to a mere $28.8 million. But, because of a massive $32.49 million (19.6 percent) increase in the value of its securities portfolio, the SPLC’s “Net Assets” rose to $199.95 million.

In contrast, according to one report, many charities faced contractions in funds available of 20-30 percent over this period.

Operationally, things weren’t too bad for the SPLC either. Despite fundraising expenses of $5.677 million, according to the 990, and despite supporting 206 employees (payroll $12.312 million), the SPLC still managed to transfer a remarkable $4 million (the same amount as last year) to its reserves—its so-called “Endowment Fund.”

In contrast, many, probably most, foundations must have had to invade their reserves in the arduous conditions of 2008-9.

With most charities, the term “Endowment Fund” would mean a pool of funds to which access is restricted, perhaps to income or a small percentage of assets.

This is not the case with the SPLC. Only a tiny proportion of its assets are restricted. The nomenclature is just camouflage. As Dan Borochoff, President of the watchdog American Institute of Philanthropies, told Bill O’Reilly in 2001:

It’s not really an endowment [just] because the board called it that.1

What this means: approximately 13.9 cents of every dollar that the public gave to the SPLC in 2008-9 was promptly squirreled away into a management-controlled hoard from which, on the available public record, it never emerges.

The Picower Foundation, set up by Jeffry Picower, reliably reported to have been the biggest beneficiary of the Madoff scam,2 apparently gave the SPLC a total of $2.9 million.3

Picower was found dead in his Palm Beach swimming pool last fall. His estate is reportedly about to settle with the court-appointed Madoff trustee by returning at least $2 billion.4

Helpful suggestion: Madoff left many destitute elderly in his wake. The SPLC should return its Picower money to the Madoff trustee for their benefit. After all, it’s conventional for politicians to return tainted campaign donations. (Suggest this to the Madoff trustee.)

So what is the SPLC’s mad scramble for enrichment all about?

Does the controlling clique at the Center one day intend to throw off its mask, perhaps after Dees’ death, let fundraising wither, and draw out massive salaries with minimal activity—a pattern not unknown in foundations with inherited endowments? (My personal guess.)

Or must America continue to put up with its reckless and dishonest allegations stinking up our public discourse in order to keep the SPLC trough replenished? Are these people as crazy as they are mendacious?

Much more dirt on the SPLC!

Do a Google search for Morris Dees Divorce papers or court papers.

Netanyahu: African Immigrants “dillute the country’s Jewish character.”

Netanyahu: African Immigrants “dillute the country’s Jewish character.”
The Israel Parliament voted to build a massive 10,000 person detention center for illegal aliens from Africa. Israel is already building a massive wall along it’s Egyptian border and working with Egyptian border police to thwart illegal aliens from sub-Saharan Africa. In the past year Egyptian border police have shot and killed 15 sub-Saharan Africans illegally crossing into Israel.

Israel Interior minister Eli Yishai stated that only a tiny minority of the Africans are “genuine refugees.” Yishai also said that immigration would reduce Israelis to a minority in their own country.

The left-wing European media has gone ballistic, and printed hundreds of sob story articles about the alleged plight of illegal aliens from Africa.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lashed out at the European media, stating that African immigrants “dilute the country’s Jewish character.”

The European media is calling Israel’s illegal aliens “African job seekers,” and propaganda term that is even more insulting than “undocumented.” A large majority of sub-Saharan African immigrants legally living in Israel are on welfare and refuse to get jobs. There is no evidence that any new immigrants would do any different.

Ironically, many self-described Jewish organizations in the United States and Europe remain on the forefront of defending open borders and illegal immigration.

Photo: The Egyptian border. Israeli is replacing the existing barriers with an electric fence backed up by motion detectors and state of the art electronic surveillance equipment.

Monday, November 29, 2010

Update on the Edgar Steele Case November 2010

Update on the Edgar Steele Case November 2010
Posted under:General— @ 4:06 am

Update on the Edgar Steele Case November 2010

by James Buchanan

While millions of people all over America were getting together to enjoy Thanksgiving dinner together with their families, the pro-White political dissident Edgar Steele was sitting in solitary confinement in a federal prison falsely accused of plotting the murder of his wife, Cyndi Steele.

According to Larry Fairfax, Edgar Steele was going to have Fairfax murder Cyndi Steele and then Edgar was going to pay Fairfax with money from an insurance policy on Cyndi’s life. In a recent interview of Cyndi Steele by Jamie Kelso, Cyndi has revealed that the Steeles had canceled their insurance policies. This creates yet another gigantic hole in the government case against Edgar Steele. If anyone other than Edgar Steele were being accused, he would be released from prison by now.

A little over a year ago, Edgar Steele suffered a ruptured heart aorta, he was rushed to the hospital and escaped death by the narrowest of margins. After weeks in the hospital, Steele was able to return home in a greatly weakened condition. Cyndi Steele hired a handyman, Larry Fairfax to fix some pipes that been damaged by freezing water. The Steeles retained Fairfax to do work around their ranch while Edgar Steele was convalescing. Unknown to the Steeles, Larry Fairfax had previously worked as an informant for the FBI. Over the next six months, Larry Fairfax spied on the Steeles as a government informant.
Years earlier, Edgar Steele had defended the Aryan Nations from a civil lawsuit which ultimately took away the Aryan Nations compound from its owner, Richard Butler. Since that trial, Steele has defended a number of pro-White activists (often at no charge). Edgar Steele has also written a series of articles on his “conspiracypenpal.com” website exposing various government conspiracies and criticizing the state of Israel and its undue influence on our government.

Clearly Edgar Steele was not popular with Zionists or the many pro-Zionist Congressmen in our federal government. In an earlier case in Idaho, the federal government sent an informant to spy on Randy Weaver. After a year of spying, the federal informant eventually talked Randy Weaver into cutting off a shotgun barrel a quarter inch too short. After entrapping Mr. Weaver for a technical firearms violation, the Feds then tried to pressure him to become a government informant against the Aryan Nations. The federal government reportedly spent a million dollars and a year’s effort trying to turn Randy Weaver into a government informant. Weaver refused to go along with the government and the Feds responded by executing a raid and siege of Randy Weaver’s home in Ruby Ridge, Idaho in which federal agents killed Randy Weaver’s son and wife.

If the federal government was willing to go to that kind of extreme measure against someone, whom they wanted to turn against the Aryan Nations, how would the federal government feel about a lawyer who actually defended the Aryans Nations? The federal government was willing to break the law and even murder people in the past over the Aryan Nations. This means that the federal government is capable of ANYTHING based on their past behavior.

The government informant, Larry Fairfax was employed as a handyman at Steele’s ranch for six months. Apparently Fairfax was unable to discover ANY illegal behavior by Edgar Steele during this time. In April of 2010, Larry Fairfax declared bankruptcy as his main business failed with $600,000 in debt. Fairfax was behind on his mortgage payments and in danger of having his home foreclosed. It was at this time that Fairfax is believed to have stolen $45,000 in silver from secret hiding places on the Steele estate, some of which Fairfax had built as a handyman.

To cover up the theft of $45,000, Larry Fairfax hatched a plan to murder Edgar and Cyndi Steele with a massive car bomb. When the bomb failed to go off, Fairfax fell back on a second plan to claim that Edgar Steele was plotting to murder his wife. Someone apparently helped Fairfax fabricate fake tapes that used a simulation of Edgar Steele’s voice. Cyndi Steele listened to these alleged tapes of her husband (which were played to her by the Feds) and noted that whenever the conversation turned from what chores Fairfax was supposed to do to the alleged murder plot, the inflection in Edgar’s voice would disappear and the background noise would change, strongly suggesting that the tapes were fabricated.

In a series of interviews by Jamie Kelso of Cyndi Steele, it has been revealed that the Feds tried to bully Cyndi Steele into confessing that she was “cheating” on her husband. They claimed to have pictures of her with another man (which they didn’t). When Cyndi insisted that there was absolutely no truth to that, the Feds tried to claim that a Ukrainian client of Edgar Steele was an illicit girlfriend of his (even though Edgar was still recovering and required additional surgeries in spring of 2010). It was glaringly obvious that there was no reason for Edgar Steele to kill his wife and the Feds were trying to fish around to find a reason that would make a murder plot more believable.

Cyndi also revealed that they caught Larry Fairfax snooping around underneath their house one day, and after that they kept a very close eye on him. In May of 2010, Larry Fairfax borrowed the Steele’s pick up truck and swapped the relatively new tires off it for his truck.

Edgar Steele was arrested on June 11th for plotting to murder his wife. The bomb on Cyndi Steele’s car however was not found until June 15th when Cyndi took her vehicle to a Quick Lube for an oil change. Larry Fairfax was arrested June 15th for possession of an explosive device. Fairfax was questioned and admitted to putting that bomb on Cyndi’s car. A judge at Larry Fairfax’s preliminary hearing asked why he hadn’t filled up the pipe bomb with sand instead of gun powder. That of course assumes that Fairfax was acting as a police informant and not trying to murder Cyndi Steele to cover up his theft of a large quantity of silver.

According to the government, Steele was going to pay Fairfax for the murder of his wife with the money from an insurance policy. The policy reportedly covered accidental death, but no one has ever explained how an enormous pipe bomb exploding could possibly be considered an accidental death. An attorney such as Edgar Steele would know that a homicide does not count as an accidental death.

Even more important is the fact that the Steeles had canceled their insurance policies. Apparently Larry Fairfax was ignorant of this critically important piece of information. Clearly it’s time for the government to release Edgar Steele from prison and to charge Larry Fairfax with grand theft of $45,000 in silver and the attempted murder of both Edgar and Cyndi Steele.


Here is the link to the November 9th, 2010 Jamie Kelso Radio Show featuring Cyndi Steele. Audio file. Duration 57 minutes.
Jamie Kelso, Nov. 9, 2010: Cyndi Steele : Voice of Reason Broadcast Network

Here is the link to the November 11th, 2010 show, featuring Cyndi Steele. Duration 57 minutes.
Jamie Kelso, Nov. 11, 2010: Cyndi Steele : Voice of Reason Broadcast Network

Jamie Kelso, Cyndi Steele, and Mr. Hoyt, (the Steele’s attorney) tell their extraordinary story during the third interview below:
The November 15th, 2010
Jamie Kelso, Nov. 15, 2010: Cyndi Steele : Voice of Reason Broadcast Network
November 16th, 2010
Jamie Kelso, Nov. 16, 2010: Cyndi Steele : Voice of Reason Broadcast Network

November 22nd, 2010: Jamie Kelso interviews Cyndi Stele.
Jamie Kelso, Nov. 22, 2010: Cyndi Steele : Voice of Reason Broadcast Network

November 26nd, 2010: Jamie Kelso interviews Cyndi Stele.
Jamie Kelso, Nov. 26, 2010: Cyndi Steele : Voice of Reason Broadcast Network

To help Edgar Steele go to this website:


Sunday, November 28, 2010

Anti-white music featured on SNL.

Anti-white music featured on SNL.
Last night’s Saturday Night Live featured an illiterate black rapper known for anti-white outbursts and gratuitous use of profanity and racial slurs.

Power by Kanye West on Saturday night live.

The system broken, the schools closed, the prisons open
We ain’t got nothin’ to lose, ma’fucka, we rollin’
Huh? Ma’fucka, we rollin’
With some light-skinned girls and some Kelly Rowlands
In this white man’s world, we the ones chosen
So goodnight, cruel world, I see you in the mornin’

In other words, blacks are cruelly mistreated by white men. However, the rap star shamelessly expresses his desire for “light-skinned girls” in the same verse. The rapper also brags about drinking and driving in the song.

While singing, the rapper wore a golden crown and several pounds of gold chains and armbands. On each side he had a black woman dressed as an ancient Egyptian, even though he prefers “light skinned girls.”

Awakened by David Duke a Long Time Ago

Awakened by David Duke a Long Time Ago
Posted under:General— @ 8:48 am

The following is a heartfelt letter from John, a young man who was ultimately awakened by Dr. Duke. Not only does the letter show what immigration has done to many areas of the United States, it shows how David Duke had the presence of mind to see the future and to stand up for our heritage long before it became popular to do so. Dr. Duke says so correctly that it is not hatred or racism to want to preserve your community, your rights, your nation from this kind of degradation. It is the height of love and responsibility! This letter says a lot about America and great deal about Dr. David Duke. — Duke Staff

Awakened by Dr. Duke a long Time Ago

Dr. duke wouldn’t remember me. The only time I ever saw him in person I was around 13 years old. That was over 35 years ago. He came to my small southern town to make a speech. There was maybe 50 people who showed up to hear him. The protesters were bused in from a major city. Lots of black and many whites also.I remember barely hearing what he had to say over the shouts by the organized counter demonstrators.

He (Dr. duke) warned of Mexican immigration and what it would mean for us in the future. I can’t say I remember the entire speech, but that did stick out in my mind.
I remember thinking that I had never actually seen a Mexican in person. If it was a problem, it wasn’t in my small town.

Let me tell you what that small southern town looks like today. Mexicans outnumber Whites 2 to 1. Most all the old family businesses in the downtown are gone. The town didn’t even have one police officer 30 years ago. Today there are murders, robbery and rape. Drugs have ruined the lives of many young whites.

I use to ride my bike all over town. The only rule I had was be home for supper and before dark. Now you see no kids outside at all, it’s not safe. My only worry was when I might have to snap a bushel beans for my mom again.
The street I grew up on was all White. it was a working class neighborhood with many cotton mill workers. I have a lot of found memories there.

A couple of years ago, I wanted my kids to see where I grew up. I drove down the street and I could not believe my eyes. All the homes are run down, homes still had the same paint, some 50 years old. Barking pit bulls and fences. Blacks and Mexican’s hung out in the street. Old broke down cars parked on the roadside and in the yards.

I was happy my grandfather, who won the Silver Star at Iwo Jima, wasn’t here to see the old house he built, with his own hands.
Dr Duke has worked his entire life for good. He has suffered greatly and paid the price. What has anyone else done?

Maybe the man depicted on the Confederate memorial in the town center? DR DUKE AWOKE ME. God makes Few men like David Duke.


Friday, November 26, 2010

Immediacy vs. Vision

Support the pro-White Cause! Purchase your holiday gifts online from National Vanguard Books and Resistance Records at www.natvanbooks.com and www.resistance.com

ADV for November 27, 2010
Immediacy vs. Vision
by Erich Gliebe

Hello, and welcome back to another broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

As many of you know, I don’t have much patience for political conservatives, so it shouldn’t surprise you that I don’t pay much attention to what conservative political commentator Bill O’Reilly has to say, at least most of the time. Now, although O’Reilly characterizes himself as a “traditionalist” rather than a “conservative,” from the White Racialist point of view, there isn’t much difference, and so it is easier to just lump O’Reilly in with the other uptight conservative cranks, as long as we acknowledge that he differs from other conservatives on a few more-or-less minor points.

Anyway, O’Reilly’s recent column “How can voters elect two who are so different?” had an interesting title, and I couldn’t help but read it. It was in print in many newspapers around the country, but you can also find it online at: http://www.billoreilly.com/currentcolumn

As the title of the column suggests, O’Reilly wonders at the mentality of the American electorate which, in less than ten years’ time, elected two very different men into the White House. As you will find for yourself if you read his column, O’Reilly characterizes former president (and now author!) George W. Bush as essentially a reactionary president. That is, Bush was one who simply reacted to the situations (or crises, depending on your point of view) that arose. He didn’t have much of a vision for a new America. He wasn’t a rule-changer. He wasn’t a boat-rocker. He was just a guy who dealt with (or tried to deal with) whatever problem came his way during his time in the White House. And now that his administration is over, he feels his obligations to just about everything and everyone are over, as well. As O’Reilly somewhat indelicately put it in his column, George W. Bush “…simply wants to sell some books and go back to the golf course.”

O’Reilly points out that President Obama, on the other hand, is at the other end of the action-reaction spectrum. Where Bush only reacted, Obama acted (or tried to). He wanted this changed. He wanted that changed. America needed (and still needs, in his mind) a major overhaul. The U.S. is still a long way off from being the country President Obama thinks it should be, and there is a lot of work ahead of us.

And while the American electorate was willing to give Obama a chance to implement his lofty ideals when they voted for him two years ago, the results of the most recent election show that lofty idealism can go only so far. Without concrete results to back up high-sounding ideals, people look elsewhere in pretty short order.

Now, that last comment is more of a criticism of the general run of humanity than it is of ideals and idealists. As White racialists guided by a worldview of ideals, we have firsthand experience with being marginalized by the masses as a result of our relative lack of concrete results…as perceived by the masses, anyway.

For example, one White racialist ideal is that we want a country with a homogeneous White population. We say that such a nation will experience less tension of virtually every sort, as compared to the current society today: less social tension, less ideological tension, and less economic tension, to name a few. We claim that there will be a lower crime rate, better schools, and safer streets in a Whites-only nation. If that nation is led by a principled White government, we contend that that nation’s international prestige will be very high, if only because that government would minimize its involvement in matters that don’t concern it, in addition to being honest and forthright in its dealings with all other nations.

The behavior of this hypothetical White government, of course, would stand in stark contrast to that of the current multiracialist government of the United States, which constantly dabbles in matters that it has no business being a part of, in the international arena. Furthermore, its dealings with foreign nations have a scheming and manipulative nature, playing favorites to some and playing antagonist to others, as everyone outside the U.S. and many inside the U.S. have observed.

Anyway, as attractive as this White racialist ideal is to many White people, when it has come to some concrete results, we have come up short, at least in the popular White mind. Since such a society doesn’t yet exist, the best we can do is to draw on situations that we feel approximate an all-White nation.

We can point out the lack of social tension and any measureable crime rate in small, rural, White communities, but that doesn’t carry a lot of weight with White people in the cities, whose faces are rubbed in the disastrous consequences of multiracialism every waking minute of the day.

We can point out the relative lack of non-White drug gangs and their activities in places like Norway and Sweden, but what effect does a few million snowbound Whites who are a stone’s throw away from Santa’s hideaway have on those White mainstreamers in the U.S. who are up to their ears in the chaos of racial diversity?

And we can cite historical examples, like back when Europe and the United States were overwhelmingly White, when schools and communities and businesses and FAMILIES were all-White, and when you didn’t have to monitor every single thing that came out of your mouth for fear of offending someone. But none of that means a hill of beans to your average White man or woman who just wants to see some results right HERE, right NOW.

And, at some level, who can blame these folks? All of us White racialists want an all-White society – led by an all-White government, and with an all-White media – right HERE, right NOW. But such a drastic change takes time, particularly when the men who are in control of the existing System have worked long and hard in an effort to make the existing System immune to changing it in the way we White racialists want. It’s a tall order, and change isn’t forthcoming in a hurry.

And so the White American voter dismisses White racialist ideals as lost causes and turns to the next newest thing that is allowed to take the stage by the Jews who control the American media. If, instead, more White Americans stuck with us and our ideals for a while, things might move in the direction we all would like. And the more things move in our direction, the more they will keep moving in our direction, and the faster they will do so. Because there is no doubt in my mind, despite whatever rejection and setbacks Our Cause has experienced up to the present time, that virtually all White people would say their lives had improved if suddenly our vision of an all-White nation was realized.

Now, no matter what White racialists think about Bill O’Reilly’s views on various other issues, we have to admit that he is on target with the assertions he makes about Bush and Obama in his recent column. And that’s because O’Reilly has hit on a fundamental truth about the average human being at this stage in the evolution of the species, a truth I’ve hinted at already, and that is:

Most people think and live in the short term. If something is presented to them that it is going to make their lives better in the very near future, they will support it. But they will only support it for a short time. If the results aren’t obvious almost immediately, they’ll turn away and look for something else. And that is why those who preach the necessity of planning and hard work over an extended period of time – years or decades, perhaps – have a hard time gaining a massive public following. The White Racialist Cause is a case in point. No results, no following.

So, as racialists, what are we to do?

Well, we might want to take an approach that is somewhere between what Bill O’Reilly said George W. Bush took and what President Barack Obama is taking. Bush was reactive, responding to the situation at hand but offering no vision to Americans about a better life. Obama, on the other hand, has been extremely pro-active, preaching immediate change and a better society just around the bend, if only we do this, and this, and this.

Neither of those approaches, by itself, sits well with the majority of people, educated or not, intelligent or not, wealthy or not. To offer no vision of a better life is, in essence, to admit that you have no goals and no real idea of where you’re going. That sounds a lot like the kind of man George W. Bush seems to be.

And when you promise big-time change in the time frame of a few months or a few years, you are either telling the whole world that you really have no clue about how things are done in the real world, or you are knowingly lying to them. With President Obama’s relative lack of political experience prior to entering the White House, it is quite possible that, sure enough, he really had no clue about how things are done in the real world of international and domestic politics.

So the approach we need to take in Our Cause needs to ride the line between both of these extremes. We need to deal with the situations that arise from day to day and week to week. We need to keep up with current events and inform our kinsmen of the relevance of those events to the racial situation of the White race worldwide. We need to be active every day, setting little goals and accomplishing them, dealing with every obstacle in its appropriate time: either right now or sometime later, depending on the circumstances. We need to have our fingers on the pulse of the System and, simultaneously, on the pulse of the race so that we will be ready to act however we need to at the most opportune time to tilt the scales in favor of our people.

But at the same time, we also need to hold before our people the vision of what is to come if they keep the faith, without deluding them that a White man’s paradise is nearly upon us, because it isn’t, and to say so is a lie. But all great religious and political movements throughout history have held up for all to see a vision that embodies the ideals of the movement. The vision – even without being completely realized at the moment – and the ideals inspire the faithful with hope to continue the struggle, and they speak to the fence-sitters as to what the movement is all about and where it intends to go. Furthermore, the vision and ideals are open-ended enough that the fence-sitters and the newcomers can imagine – and then fill – their own personal place in the movement.

To be honest, the majority of people today are more moved by the former of these two approaches than the latter. That is, more people are interested and inspired by immediate action than by long-term visions and lofty ideals. Immediate action is more real, more concrete. People feel like they are doing something, contributing, and they look forward to seeing the results of their labors. And as long as the results they are expecting arrive in a relatively short amount of time, they will keep working. Enthusiasm will build, and more people will jump on the bandwagon, eager to be a part of a successful enterprise.

But when the results aren’t immediate, or if they are miniscule in scale compared to the results that were expected, the opposite effect occurs. Enthusiasm wanes, and most people (not all people) lose heart and quit after all-too-short a time.

So we need to work in the moment, but still hold onto the vision of a safe and progressive future for our people. Small numbers of the masses will come to us, lose heart, and go again. In the meantime, we will strengthen our community of the minority of our people who don’t need immediate results to keep them going. And if we keep working in line with our ideals, in time, we will reach our goals.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

How Nations Die.

Thursday, November 25, 2010

News Blurbs for Thanksgiving Day 2010

Moving Up From The Basic 'Tar On The Driveway' Scam
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-11-25 06:46:30 in category: General [ Print]

A 'shameless' Romanian gipsy who stole at least £113,000 in benefits to fund a life of luxury has been jailed for three years.

Illie Schian, 47, bought sports cars, motorcycles, quad bikes and electrical goods with money he received from British hand-outs.

Using taxpayers’ cash, he even built his family a nine-bedroom mansion in Romania, complete with marbled floors, a spa bath, servants’ quarters and two kitchens filled with modern appliances.

He is also accused of involvement in a people-smuggling ring that sent around 180 children to Britain to beg and steal.

The fraudster amassed a £20,000 nest egg in a Romanian bank account before he was finally caught by police.

Schian, from Enfield, North London, applied for political asylum under an assumed name when he arrived in the UK 11 years ago, claiming he had been persecuted in Romania because he is a gipsy.


News Source: nasacunit

Who Needs Standards?
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-11-25 06:39:39 in category: General [ Print]

Depending on whom you ask, West Potomac High School's latest change to student grading is either another sign of a coddled generation or a necessary step to help struggling kids.

The dreaded F has been all but banished from the grade books.

The report cards that arrived home late last week showed few failing grades but instead marks of "I" for incomplete, indicating that students still owe their teachers essential work. They will get Fs only if they fail to complete assignments and learn the content in the months to come.

The change in educational philosophy is intended to encourage students to continue working toward mastery of material rather than accepting a failing grade and moving on. Schools throughout the Washington area and the nation have made other moves to improve grading methods, especially as they affect low-performing students, though few have gone so far as West Potomac High, in the Alexandria section of Fairfax County.

"It's a huge paradigm shift," said principal Clifford Hardison, who recalls that when year-end grades were tallied last June at West Potomac, he counted nearly 2,000 Fs, with a large group of teens racking up more than one failed course.


News Source: nasacunit

Schools To Lose Federal Funding If Jews Aren't Happy
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-11-25 06:30:27 in category: General [ Print]

After a six-year campaign, the U.S. Department of Education announced that Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 will now be interpreted and enforced to protect Jewish students from anti-Semitic harassment, intimidation and discrimination. Title VI requires that federally funded schools ensure that their programs and activities are free from discrimination based on “race, color, or national origin.” If a school violates Title VI, it can lose its federal funding. In a letter dated October 26, 2010, Russlynn Ali, Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights in the U.S. Department of Education, announced that “anti-Semitic harassment can trigger responsibilities under Title VI. While Title VI does not cover discrimination based solely on religion, groups [such as Jews] that face discrimination on the basis of actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics may not be denied protection under Title VI on the ground that they also share a common faith.”

The Education Department’s letter makes clear that disciplining the perpetrators of anti-Semitic bigotry may not be enough to rectify a hostile environment for Jewish students; other remedial steps could include “publicly labeling the incidents as anti-Semitic,” and educating teachers and students about the history and dangers of anti-Semitism and recognizing when anti-Semitism occurs. In addition, the Education Department’s letter clarifies that schools must “take prompt and effective steps reasonably calculated to end the harassment and prevent its recurrence.”

In October 2004, the ZOA filed a Title VI complaint with OCR on behalf of Jewish students at the University of California, Irvine. The complaint alleged that students had been subjected to years of anti-Semitic harassment, intimidation and discrimination that the university knew about but failed to redress. OCR decided that the ZOA’s complaint should be investigated, rendering it the first case of anti-Semitism that OCR ever agreed to investigate under Title VI. But shortly after the investigation began, new leadership came on board at OCR, which resulted in a change in the way that the agency interpreted Title VI. OCR decided that Jews were strictly a religious group and not also an ethnic that would be entitled to the protections of Title VI. As a result, after the case was pending at OCR for approximately three years (despite the fact that cases are typically resolved in six months), the agency dismissed the ZOA’s case against UC Irvine, primarily on the basis that OCR lacked jurisdiction over many of the allegations of the complaint.


News Source: NAN

Remember Roger, Never Challenge Their Martyrdom
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-11-25 06:19:15 in category: General [ Print]

Fox News President Roger Ailes has apologized to the Anti-Defamation League for using the term “Nazi” to describe NPR officials in an interview with The Daily Beast, and the ADL has accepted his apology, Politico reports. Ailes told The Daily Beast, “They [NPR] are, of course, Nazis. They have a kind of Nazi attitude. They are the left wing of Nazism. These guys don’t want any other point of view.”

But in a letter to ADL National Director Abe Foxman, Ailes wrote, “I was of course ad-libbing and should not have chosen that word. But I was angry at the time because of NPR’s willingness to censor Juan Williams for not being liberal enough.”

Holocaust survivor Foxman replied: “I welcome Roger Ailes’ apology, which is as sincere as it is heartfelt. Nazi comparisons of this nature are clearly inappropriate and offensive. While I wish Roger had never invoked that terminology, I appreciate his efforts to immediately reach out and to retract his words before they did any further harm.”


News Source: nasacunit

He Was Right, The World Will Know
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-11-25 06:12:05 in category: General [ Print]

A mayor has provoked outrage by allegedly claiming Adolf Hitler had the ‘right idea’ about dealing with Germany’s gipsies.

Mike Eckersley is said to have made the remarks at a council equalities meeting, which was immediately halted.

Fellow councillors called for him to quit and for David Cameron to throw him out of the Tory party.

Mr Eckersley, who is mayor of Prestatyn in North Wales, has offered an apology, claiming he simply referred to the Nazis rather than praised them.

However, Christine Evans, an independent councillor who chaired the meeting, said he had spoken of how Hitler got rid of the gipsies.

‘He definitely used the term Hitler when talking about the traveller issue and the thrust was suggesting that we should move the travellers out the country,’ she said.

An estimated 220,000 gipsies were murdered in the gas chambers or worked to death during the Second World War.


Spiro Agnew on the Nattering Nabobs of Zionism

Spiro Agnew on the Nattering Nabobs of Zionism
Posted under:General— @ 12:30 am

Just for the record -

Former Vice President Spiro Agnew Protested the Zionist Domination of America

In the 1970s and 1980s Spiro Agnew was one of the few public officials who had the guts to speak out against the Zionist problem plaguing America. During an appearance on NBC’s Today Show with Barbara Walters he warned that a “Jewish cabal” controlled America’s news and information. In 1976 he courageously called for the United States to withdraw aid to Israel, citing their horrifying treatment of Christians. Again in 1982, he blasted Zionist power in a letter to activist Hans Schmidt expressing “outrage” over “the domination of this country by Zionists” the “Zionist control of our media” and “the 70 years of indoctrination” that has “brainwashed the western world.”

Some of Agnew’s quotes along with his letter to Hans Schmidt are reproduced below:

Spiro Agnew: “The people who own and manage national impact media are Jewish and, with other influential Jews, helped create a disastrous U.S. Mideast policy. All you have to do is check the real policy makers and owners and you find a much higher concentration of Jewish people than you’re going to find in the population. By national impact media I am referring to the major news wire services, pollsters, Time and Newsweek Magazines, the New York Times, Washington Post, and the International Herald Tribune. For example, CBS’ Mr. (William) Paley’s Jewish. Mr. Julian Goodman, who runs NBC, and there’s a Leonard Goldenson at ABC. Mrs. Katherine Graham owns the Washington Post and Mr. Sulzberger the New York Times. They are all Jews!
You go down the line in that fashion…not just with ownership but go down to the managing posts and discretionary posts… and you’ll find that through their aggressiveness and their inventiveness, they now dominate the news media. Not only in the media, but in academic communities, the financial communities, in the foundations, in all sorts of highly visible and influential services that involve the public, they now have a tremendous voice.

Our policy in the Middle East in my judgment is disastrous, because it’s not even handed. I see no reason why nearly half the foreign aid this nation has to give goes to Israel, except for the influence of this Zionist lobby. I think the power of the news media is in the hands of a few people…it’s not subject to control of the voters, it’s subject only to the whim of the board of directors.” — Source


Letter to Hans Schmidt recently made public courtesy of National Vanguard:

M. Hans Schmidt
303 E. San Rafael Drive
Palm Springs, California 92262

Dear Mr. Schmidt:

Thank you for sending me your letter of August 26th and the enclosures. Having been for a long time in the vanguard of those who protest the domination of this country by Zionists, I am always encouraged to see that others share my outrage.

Even in the face of these horrible actions by the arrogant state of Israel, the broad spectrum of American opinion leaders seem to cling to the fallacy that Jews, because of the so-called Holocaust, can do no wrong. The 70 years of indoctrination that began with the years that immediately followed the Balfour Declaration have brainwashed the western world, and Zionist control of our news media has kept the fields green for Israel.

The vituperation of organized Jewry is zealous to say the least. As one who has endured 10 years of well-organized attacks in the media and in the courts, I can attest to that. One can assume only that Israel is more important to these people than their own country.

I also like President Reagan, but he must develop a more positive attitude on this subject. Reagan must be told that the tail cannot continue to wag the dog. The American people are prepared to follow a strong leader who will refuse to protect a welfare state that insults its donor.

Kind regards.


Spiro T. Agnew — Source


By Rev. Ted Pike
24 Nov 10

Yellow plastic arches looming above streets from Taiwan to Tripoli mean McDonald’s USA. In the same way, identical terms in hate laws throughout the Western world are the logo of their architect: the Jewish Anti-Defamation League. ADL recently boasted of having masterminded the whole idea of hate laws, particularly in America.

ADL was privileged to lead a broad coalition of civil rights, religious, educational, professional, law-enforcement, and civic organizations that worked in support of the HCPA [Hate Crimes Prevention Act] for more than a decade. A pioneer in advocating for hate crimes legislation, the League published its first model hate crimes statute almost 30 years ago. Forty-five states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws based on or similar to the ADL model. ("ADL Welcomes First Indictments under Federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act," adl.org)

Hate laws set up Christians and free thinkers for prosecution, making free speech into hate speech. To understand and combat hate laws, lovers of freedom must be able to recognize the twisted terms that show up in all hate crime educational materials and legislation. Virtually none mean what they suggest or promise. They are cleverly contrived to disempower Western majority populations’ Christian values; to fragment society into separate groups with different legal privileges and punishments; and to silence critical speech about sexual morality and minority religions. In short, there is no legislative tool more powerfully equipped to destroy Christian civilization today.

Here is a concise dictionary of the devious “doublespeak” ADL weaves into hate laws worldwide.

Affirmative Action – Unequal rights and advantages in employment and education given to ethnic minorities and women as a result of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Ostensibly meant to right historical wrongs, affirmative action undermines Christian society by moving it away from laws for individuals to laws for groups. It says people are deserving because of the class they belong to, not what they do. This inherently discriminatory principle continues to drive "civil rights" legislation today, especially in favor of blacks, Latinos, and women.

Anti-Semitism – To ADL, this term is not limited to belief that Jews are evil or deserve to die. It refers to: mere criticism of matters Jewish, including Jewish dominance of big media (See, Jews Confirm Big Media is Jewish), finance, and Congress; criticism of Israel; questioning the accuracy of the six-million figure of Holocaust Jewish dead; agreement with the New Testament claim that Jews masterminded the crucifixion of Christ; quotation of unflattering statements by Jews.

Attack on Israel – Any strong criticism, even if constructive or well-intentioned, of the Jewish state.

Bias (includes Bigotry and Prejudice) – Negative attitudes—primarily rooted in Biblical values—that are critical of homosexuality, Judaism, Islam, abortion, political liberalism, and other anti-Christian establishments that ADL believes it is wrong to oppose.

Bias-Motivated Crime (Hate Crime) – Any violation of US law motivated by a politically incorrect bias such as “homophobia;” such a crime deserves triple penalties compared to the same crime committed for a random or more personal reason. (In many countries mere public criticism of federally protected groups is also a hate crime.)

Blood Charge – The “anti-Semitic” New Testament statement that Jewish leaders masterminded and the Jewish population demanded the crucifixion of Christ. This is defined as the seminal cause of anti-Semitism over the past 2,000 years, leading to the Holocaust. It is defined as a source of continuous “anti-Semitism” and “irrational hatred” of Jews by Christians, making Christian countries inherently unsafe, violence-prone, irrational and racist.

Bullying – Criticism of homosexuality, Judaism, Jews or Israel, Islam, or minorities (other than whites or Christians) on campus, especially when it causes emotional discomfort to students who are part of such groups. Cyber-bullying – The same, only online.

Censorship – Attempts by Christian parents and leadership groups to restrain ADL/liberal promotion of homosexuality, pornography, sex education and secularist “respect for diversity” in public schools. (This term, of course, does not refer to ADL's right to silence any form of Christian speech or of criticism of Israel on campus or online.)

Civility – ADL-suggested restraint in public criticism of President Obama and Democrats in Congress.

Civil Rights – Special rights and privileges in employment and housing given to blacks, Jews, Muslims, Hispanics, homosexuals/transgenders and women—not afforded to white, straight males or anyone with politically incorrect “biases.”

Civil Rights Act of 1964 – Basis for all US federal hate crimes legislation. Exalts certain favored groups above majority. Opens door for yet more classes to acquire such preference.

Conspirators -- Millions of Americans, particularly Tea Party activists, who are intent on defeating Pres. Obama's agenda and unseating Democrats in government through vehement criticism. (See, ADL Blasts 'Paranoid' Right)

Cyber Hate -- Criticism of matters Jewish or of Israel online; quoting Bible passages against homosexuality online; distributing photographic evidence of abortion procedures online; etc.

Delegitimization of Israel – “Anti-Semitic” Biblical claim that God abhors occupation of His Holy Land by a nation of disobedient Jews (See, Israel: On the Way to Empire in the Mideast); “terrorist” claim that Israel acquired most of Palestine through violent theft and expropriation of 800,000 Arabs to concentrations camps; demand that dispossessed Palestinians be allowed to return and reoccupy stolen lands; statement that Israel at present is a racist and fundamentally unjust state which should be dismantled and replaced by a state equally participated in by Jews, Muslims, and Christians, all of whom are beneficiaries of its Abrahamic legacy.

Domestic (homegrown) Terrorists – (According to ADL/SPLC's MIAC directives to police) Not just Muslim saboteurs but U.S. "anti-government" protesters, including supporters of Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin, members of the Constitution Party, "militia" activists, "white supremacists," proponents of a Constitutional Convention, "militant" opponents of abortion, and opponents of illegal immigration and the New World Order, NAFTA, federalization of the states, restrictive gun laws, and confiscatory taxation. (Infowars.com, “Secret State Police Report: Ron Paul, Bob Barr, Chuck Baldwin, Libertarians are Terrorists”)

Discrimination – In public schools, criticism of homosexuality, Judaism and Israel, Islam, etc. In business, refusal to hire a known homosexual or firing him or her because of their sexual activity. In housing, refusal to sell or rent to any of the above.

Diversity – Participation in a non-Christian sexual behavior or religion. Membership in a sexual, ethnic or religious group outside the white Christian majority. Respect for diversity -- Acceptance of such divergent groups or lifestyles, particularly of homosexuality.

Equality (as promised in hate crimes bills) – Special rights and privileges for Jews, blacks, Latinos, women and homosexuals, with no such rights implied for the majority.

Gender Identity -- The sex one perceives oneself to be, regardless of designated sex at birth; this gender identity should be respected by society and determines where a person should go to the bathroom, whom they can marry, and how they should be treated. If a person’s biological gender is different from their gender identity, society is responsible to ignore it.

Genocide – In a Jewish context, genocide can happen through delegitimization of the Jewish state and also through Christian conversion of Jews which kills Jewish souls.

Hate – Bias or criticism against specially protected groups.

Hate Crimes Statistics -- Reports by police of alleged hate crimes, the great majority of which have never been adjudicated in court, most consisting of altercations and name-calling yet considered actual hate crimes by police and government and used as proof of an "epidemic of hate" in America and the world.

Hate Speech -- Speech critical of protected groups, which should not be protected under the First Amendment; a form of psychological abuse of a persecuted community which government must end, even at the cost of others’ freedom.

Harassment (Intimidation) – Public criticism of protected groups (especially in government and public education); even if not accompanied by any threat of physical violence, such criticism of historically oppressed groups creates feelings of fear and intimidation and therefore must be outlawed and ended.

Hate-free environment – Public spaces, especially college campuses, where criticism of protected groups is not tolerated; in these spaces, it is unacceptable to speak against abortion (thus traumatizing post-abortive women), minority religions (upsetting their adherents), homosexuality (causing "mental anguish" to homosexuals), or other “historically marginalized” groups. The consciences, religious beliefs, and free speech of the white, Christian majority are not as important as the freedom from hurt feelings (and the lurking threat of violence) for minorities. Eventually, all of society should be a “hate-free environment.”

Holocaust – The indisputable fact that six million Jews were killed during World War II. Any questioning of this fact is evil and defames the memory of Jewish dead. Such Holocaust denial is an “anti-Semitic” hate crime worthy of loss of freedom and civil rights, deportation and imprisonment for more than six years.

Homophobia -- Criticism of homosexuality.

Perceived Gender or Ethnicity – How others view you, regardless of how you view yourself, in regard to gender or ethnicity. Even if the bias-motivated attacker incorrectly perceives the victim’s gender or ethnicity, he must be punished as a hate criminal with triple penalties. The real crime is having biased thoughts.

Persecution of Jews – Vicious, primarily Christianity-incited verbal, social, and physical attacks on Jews for nearly 2,000 years, the ultimate hate crime.

Proselytization – Christian attempts through evangelism to destroy Jewish souls and cultural/ethnic identity. Successful proselytization leads to belief in the false prophet Jesus.

Racial profiling – Consideration by police (resulting in action) of the fact that members of certain specially protected groups (such as blacks) have a much higher rate of crime per capita than the majority population or may be illegal aliens (Latinos).

Racial Quotas – Government requirements that businesses, education institutions, government agencies, etc., prefer members of favored groups with hiring and admissions advantages, fulfilling prescribed numbers.

Racists -- Individuals, particularly in white Christian culture, who advocate the superiority of white Christian civilization and morality. Zionism and the State of Israel, however, reflecting the exalted ethics of Judaism, do not exemplify such bigotry.

Religion (As Protected by Hate Laws) – Judaism and Islam, as minority religions in America, are protected while Christianity, a historically overgrown and persecutive religion, is not.

Sexual Orientation – Homosexuality and sexual deviancies which merit special hate crimes protection. Heterosexuality, preferred by the majority, is granted no protection.

Stereotypes – Broad, negative descriptions of blacks, Jews, Latinos, homosexuals or Judaism and Islam. It is permitted, however, for ADL to make sweeping negative generalizations against critics of Israel, portraying them as “anti-Semitic,” or against Christians, calling them homophobic, intolerant, bigoted, hateful, etc.

Tolerance – Non-criticism of Judaism, homosexuality or Islam.

Targeted Groups – Classes meriting special federal protection from verbal or physical “hate crime” attacks.

Transgender – A person who has had or merely intends biological sex change; anyone involved in gender-crossing or gender-bending requires special consideration by society and must be treated as a member of the gender with which they currently identify, regardless of whether it aligns with their biology or with their past or future gender identity.

Triple Penalties – The standard level of punishment merited by a hate crime under hate crimes law. Implication: A bias-motivated assault is three times as bad as a conventional assault.

Violent Radicalization -- Becoming violent under influence of bias, particularly cyber-hate.

Xenophobia – Fear and mistrust, particularly by the white majority, of vastly disproportionate numbers of historically alien people which ADL encourages to settle in host countries, increasing "diversity" and diluting those cultures.

Zero Tolerance for Hate – Acceptance of free speech rights of homosexuals and religious minorities on campus but not for the rights of “homophobic” or Christian critics.


It is very clear that ADL hate laws—ostensibly meant to end bias—are themselves the epitome of bias. Virtually nothing ADL says, in public statements or the hate crimes legislation it writes, can be taken at face value. A manipulative, anti-Christian, anti-America agenda is always right below the surface. At this moment, the most glaring example of such duplicity is ADL’s bill HR 6216 which seeks to add “religion” to the protected classes in the Civil Rights Act. (See, 'Don’t Criticize Jews and Muslims' Bill Enters Congress)

In this bill, ADL has no intention of giving special rights and protection to all religions from bullying on tax-supported American campuses, but only to “harassed minorities:” Judaism and Islam. (We wish to point out that no religion should receive this twisted “protection” from criticism; we would oppose this legislation even if it gave special protection to Christians above the rights of atheists.)

Continue to protest this extremely dangerous legislation, now in the House Judiciary Committee. Come to Truthtellers.org Action Page for the names of the pivotal Republican committee members. Call them all with this message:

“Please oppose HR 6216, which would add “religion” to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It gives Jews and Muslims special protection from criticism on campus but doesn’t give such protection to Christians. This is more biased hate crimes legislation from the Anti-Defamation League to take away free speech and make Christians hate criminals.”

Call 877-851-6437 toll-free or 202-224-3121 toll.


Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.

TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.

The freedom-saving outreach of Rev. Ted Pike and the National Prayer Network is solely supported by sale of books, videos and your financial support. All gifts are tax-deductible.


National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

TSA to put uncooperative passengers on “Extremist” list.

TSA to put uncooperative passengers on “Extremist” list.
As a further insult to injury the TSA will be added uncooperative passengers to an “extremist” list filed with the Department of Homeland security. The novel 1984 has finally come to life.

From Canada Free Press…

The memo, which actually takes the form of an administrative directive, appears to be the product of undated but recent high level meetings between Napolitano, John Pistole, head of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA),and one or more of Obama’s national security advisors. This document officially addresses those who are opposed to, or engaged in the disruption of the implementation of the enhanced airport screening procedures as “domestic extremists.”

The introductory paragraph of the multi-page document states that it is issued “in response to the growing public backlash against enhanced TSA security screening procedures and the agents conducting the screening process.” Implicit within the same section is that the recently enhanced security screening procedures implemented at U.S. airports, and the measures to be taken in response to the negative public backlash as detailed [in this directive], have the full support of the President. In other words, Obama not only endorses the enhanced security screening, but the measures outlined in this directive to be taken in response to public objections.

The terminology contained within the reported memo is indeed troubling. It labels any person who “interferes” with TSA airport security screening procedure protocol and operations by actively objecting to the established screening process, “including but not limited to the anticipated national opt-out day” as a “domestic extremist.” The label is then broadened to include “any person, group or alternative media source” that actively objects to, causes others to object to, supports and/or elicits support for anyone who engages in such travel disruptions at U.S. airports in response to the enhanced security procedures.

For individuals who engaged in such activity at screening points, it instructs TSA operations to obtain the identities of those individuals and other applicable information and submit the same electronically to the Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division, the Extremism and Radicalization branch of the Office of Intelligence & Analysis (IA) division of the Department of Homeland Security.

For “any person, group or domestic alternative media source” that actively objects to, causes others to object to, supports and/or elicits support for anyone who engages in such travel “disruptions” at U.S. airports (as defined above) in response to the enhanced security procedures, the [applicable DHS administrative branch] is instructed to identify and collect information about the persons or entities, and submit such information in the manner outlined [within this directive].

Are you angry yet?

Sunday, November 21, 2010

News Blurbs for Nov.21st.

Nov Redistribution of Liberty
By “Mark Andrew Dwyer”

November 20, 2010

In case you wonder while boarding a plane, where have your Constitutional rights gone, I have the answer for you: they have been redistributed.

You have to “voluntarily” submit yourself to humiliating procedure that borders with sexual assault as a precondition to your exercise of your right to travel. Your genitals may be inspected, a TSA agent may wander with her hand under your wife’s skirt, and even your kids may be exposed on what you thought was child molesting.

And all this nonsense takes place while millions of Mexican illegal aliens, loyal to their La Raza (The Race) and not to our nation, violate America’s border and the immigration law as they please because, we are being told, any meaningful enforcement would create “a war zone” and offend Mexico.

As if this weren’t enough, verification of voter’s eligibility by means of proof of citizenship and photo ID has been deemed a violation of Constitutional right to vote, even though untold thousands of non-citizens fraudulently cast their votes in federal, state, and local elections.

As if this weren’t enough, either, Muslims are given free pass on importation and exercise of laws and customs of their half-religious and half-political Islam that are so incompatible with what our Constitutional Republic stands for, and – despite history of terror attacks and threats – they cannot even be suspect at the airports because, according Liberal orthodoxy, that would amount to racial profiling and discrimination.

And if all these weren’t enough, the “Liberal” apologists for the intrusive government, who maintain that passenger’s “safety” trumps all other considerations, will flatly reject any idea that passengers safety is also more important than the “Liberal” ideology that in a futile attempt to prove all people equal stops us from making obvious statistical connections between the flyer’s profile and the risk he poses to his fellow travelers. This submits our individual liberties to “Liberal” ideology (since our liberties yields to our safety which yields to “Liberal” ideology) – an un-Constitutional doctrine that was very much in order in Soviet Union (where it most likely have originated from) but is totally out of place in the U.S.

Continue Reading »

Posted in Big Brother, Left Wing, Police State Comments (0)

Nov Republicans finally targetting “birthright citizenship.”
“Birthright Citizenship” is not a right granted in the constitution, as left-wing Democrats say, but a right granted by activist judges acting as dictators.

With a large crop of new Republicans coming into the House, many have finally found the courage to fight against it.

There is a strong momentum to ban “Birthright Citizenship” around the world. The following foreign nations have also outlawed “Birthright Citizenship” in recent years: Britain, Ireland, France, New Zealand, and India.

From Sacramento Bee.

Posted in GOP, Illegal Aliens Comments (0)

Nov Rahm Emanuel outsmarted by his own tenant! May be barred from running for mayor of Chicago.
Was it greed or stupidity? Why would a man who made $16 million between the years of 2000-2008 alone, rent out his Chicago house when he was planning to run for mayor of Chicago.

The radical leftist Rahm Emanuel left Obama’s side to run for his “Dream job” of Chicago mayor. However, he allegedly lied to election officials about who was living in his house. He may now be barred from running.

While serving as Obama’s chief of staff, Emanuel foolishly rented his house despite being a multi-millionaire and despite plans to run for local office.

His tenant, businessman Rob Halpin, is refusing to leave because he wants to run for mayor too.

Halpin may have successfully thwarted Emanuel from being a candidate. After Halpin refused to leave, Emanuel allegedly lied to elections officials, claiming he was in fact living in the house. Emanuel had to be re-instated as a member of the local electorate after having been in DC with Obama.

But Adam Lasker, the chairman of the Chicago Bar Association’s Election Law Committee, said Emanuel’s legal challenge “might not save him. His real problem is not that he left Chicago, but that he decided to rent out his house here. This left him with no legal place in the city in which to reside. By contrast Barack Obama, who does not live in his Chicago house but has not rented it out, would be eligible.”

Photo Right: Is this man a genius politician or just a pawn? Rob Halpin is running for mayor of Chicago and may have successfully disqualified Emanuel by renting Emanuel’s house.

Posted in Chicago, Left Wing Comments (0)

Nov Haitians bite the hand that feeds.
Violence in Haiti is so bad that American charity workers are fleeing for their lives and several nations are considering removing their UN contingents.

Since the earthquake that killed over 15,000 people, volunteers in Haiti have found a population that absolutely refuses to do any labor to help improve their condition. Charities had to fly in white volunteers just to unload planes full of aid. White charity workers are now performing such menial tasks as painting, while tens of thousands of Haitians sit idly nearby. Now Haitians are actually attacking volunteers and UN workers who have been feeding, sheltering, and clothing them.

Rather than work to improve their conditions, tens of thousands of Haitians have left their still standing homes in the country side and moved to tent cities. They do this to live off of the free food. Tent cities continue to grow instead of shrink.

Never has there been a natural disaster in Europe or Asia when the population had yet to even begin cleaning up nearly a year later. Nor have we witnessed a foreign government holding shipping containers full of aid hostage and making the charities pay for them to be released.

From KSL.com

Two Utah volunteers working in Haiti fled that country because of increased rioting. They are home now but hope to return to help expectant mothers and their babies survive.

The new organization MamaBaby Haiti has members from throughout the country. The Utah volunteers who are part of it remain concerned about their patients who live in a country still devastated by an earthquake and now, disease.

There was joy in the homecoming after a frightening escape from Haiti.

People crowd the streets, which are overrun with waste. Haitians still need everything. MamaBaby Haiti set up a clinic to help mothers and newborns survive. But some citizens are turning against the people who came to help them, believing aid workers brought cholera with them.

Melody Pendleton, a MamaBaby Haiti midwife said, “It was like, come on people, just get in the ambulance and let’s go! It’s time, right now! We cannot wait; it’s time, right now. So, we did.”

Protesters will allow only ambulances to pass, so the women pretended to be patients. A Catholic priest and U.N. workers from Chile and Uruguay got them safely to the Dominican Republic.

Celeste Burr, a MamaBaby Haiti midwife trainee said, “There were times when we all felt frightened, and we were thinking about the what-ifs, but it wasn’t often.”

Posted in Black Culture, Black rule, Haiti Comments (0)

Nov Country music star Trace Adkins is a Confederate.
From The Political Cesspool

It remains to be seen whether or not men will ever again walk this Earth who possess the kind of valor and gallantry that animated those who were citizens of the Confederate States of America. In fighting for our people on the radio airwaves, my very best efforts are like filthy rags when compared to the kind of sacrifice made by even the most obscure Confederate soldier. In attempting to protect our families from Federal tyranny they risked all in service to a Cause far greater than themselves. The South truly represented everything that was glorious about the American experiment that our Founding Fathers envisioned.

Trace Adkins thinks so too:

Country music superstar Trace Adkins stopped by the formal commencement of Tennessee’s sesquicentennial commemoration of the Civil War Friday where he did a little dreaming out loud of a day when the U.S. federal government shows more respect for state sovereignty.

Adkins, whose great-great-grandfather fought in the war, said he believes the period of remembrance underway to honor the 150-year anniversary of America’s bloodiest conflict is a unique opportunity to reconnect people to their heritage and teach children about history and the sacrifices their ancestors made for their most cherished beliefs.

Adkins also revealed — for the first time in public, he said — that as a statement of allegiance to states’ rights and tribute to the men of the Confederacy who fought to defend the concept, he refuses to cut his hair.

Now that we can save some money by not shopping at Sears, how about using a little of that extra cash to go out and buy a Trace Adkins CD?

DC Prospers While Nation Wallows in Depression

DC Prospers While Nation Wallows in Depression
Posted under:General— @ 2:01 am

DC Prospers While Nation Wallows in Depression

by Jeff Davis

There is in fact an island of prosperity in this country, free of the Obama Depression, where the shopping malls are still crowded, home values are still sky high, and there’s not a food stamp in sight. It’s the area surrounding Washington D.C., and all those bureaucrats and government workers are living high on the hog off your tax dollars.

An article from WTOP.com reports: “The D.C. area makes plenty of Top 10 lists, and this one shows its residents make the big bucks. According to a new report from Newsweek, seven of the nation’s 10 richest counties are in this region. Virginia’s Loudoun County takes home the top spot, with its median household income exceeding $114,000 per year. Seventeen percent of Loudoun households make more than $200,000, while only 16 percent earn less than the national average household income of $50,000. The survey, based on 2009 data from the U.S. Census Bureau, names Loudoun neighbor Fairfax County the No. 2 breadwinner in the country. The county was the first in America to hit six figures with its median household income, and more than half its homes make more than that number now.”

Notice that the government refuses to lay off employees and cut back as it should. In California over a million people in the private sector have lost their jobs while the number of people caught up in mass lay offs by the California state government is zero. DC is even more arrogant in maintaining its opulent lifestyle thanks in part to lavish budgets provided to Congress.
The article continues “Fairfax County has traditionally been home away from home for many diplomats and officials who want to live in a rural community close to Washington, D.C.,” Newsweek explains. Maryland makes its entry onto the list with Howard County at No. 3. Thirty percent of its employed population earns six figures. The rundown on the rest of this area’s well-to-do counties goes like this: Arlington County at No. 5, Montgomery County and its median household income of $94,420 at No. 6 and Maryland’s Calvert and Charles counties at Nos. 9 and 10. The other counties on the list sit close to New York City in either New Jersey or New York state.”

Who, exactly, are these government workers who are still living high on the hog? Most of them, of course, are connected to the Democratic party in some way, or else they were brought in during the first eight years of the century by the neocons, or during the eight years before that by the Clintons, or even before that by Bush the First, so one way or another almost anyone who who was hired in the past 18 years is working a patronage job created by bad people.

Then there are the high-grade civil servants. I don’t know what the highest GS grades are these days, but these soulless bureaucrats are often involved with ensuring that Blacks and Latinos are forced into every big company or corporation according to government-mandated racial quotas (and not according to their abilities).

Most government employees in Washington DC and environs are either non-Whites of various kinds or Jews (of course) and/or dyed-in-the-wool liberals. Their prosperity is not ours, and their America is not ours. You get to lose your job, lose your home and end up living under a bridge or in a tent city. Government blacks and liberals get to go to the mall and jewelry stores in their new SUVs while previously productive Whites sit idle praying that a job turns up. Welcome to Obama’s America.

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Stop The Hate : Separate

Stop The Hate : Separate
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-11-20 23:14:42

ADV Broadcast Of November 20, 2010

Hello, and welcome back to another broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

Every week on this program, we talk in depth about all of the ways in which the current System isn't working. The non-White illegal immigration crisis, high crime rates, chaos in the public schools, the decline of American industrial might... all of these are indicators that America has taken a wrong turn.

And what's worse than all of these failures is that we seem to be unable to right the ship, to get back on the Path. Indeed, many Americans are so convinced that our problems are insoluble that they have given up and have decided not to worry about them. Instead of working to implement possible solutions, millions of Americans have resigned themselves to getting the most out of life while they have it and HOPING that the world doesn't turn upside down during their lifetimes. That is, most Americans are strictly "status-quo" people, whether they admit it or not, and whether they like the label or not.

Much of this passivity that we see in the American population -- as a whole -- derives from two main factors, one internal and one external. The first of these is the internal one, and it is that most people are simply NOT innovators. People are born with an essential conservatism. They can't help but prefer that things continue going on in the same way they have been going. After all, once you've figured out how to live in a society by a given set of rules, it's a lot of trouble to change your way of thinking and your patterns of behavior. That's why people tend to view with suspicion any society whose values and guiding principles are different from those of the prevailing society.

This suspicion of "differentness" is illustrated by the popular American perception of the Islamic culture, with its regimented schedule for prayers, its required pilgrimages to Mecca and other holy places, and its sunup-to-sundown fasting during the month of Ramadan. These misgivings about Islam are, of course, deliberately cultivated by the Jewish-dominated American media, which also does its utmost to portray the White Racialist Cause in the same sort of light -- that is, as an oddity that demands changes that will negatively overturn everyone's lives forever. Of course, we White racialists DO demand changes that will fundamentally alter the foundations of White civilization, but we believe those changes will be positive ones and that White people will eventually embrace those changes with enthusiasm.

Anyway, as I've said on this program before, this instinctual propensity to resist change was one of the key obstacles that the Jews and their allies had to overcome in tearing apart the feeling of White community that prevailed in this country for the first 150 years of its existence. That obstacle was no small one, but now that it's been cleared away and things are going in the direction they want them to, all that the Jews have to do is to keep the ball rolling. The mindset of the masses now is that racial diversity is something positive, or at least something that everyone "knows" one is supposed to feel good about. The onus is now on us, the active White racialists, to take on the multiracial mindset of the passive and largely-unmoving population in our efforts to push through our ideals and our goals.

In taking on the passive mindset of the White masses, though, the National Alliance isn't actually catering to those masses. Of course, we are attempting to reach every White person in the world with our message of inspiration and hope, but we are most interested in stoking the fires in the minds and hearts of the energetic White minority, the movers and shakers of the White population. If we teach the masses, too, that's great, but our strategy toward them right now is somewhat like an artillery barrage that precedes an infantry attack: we're mainly just trying to "soften them up" in preparation for the radical changes that will take place throughout society later. Those radical changes, obviously, will be powered and spearheaded by the White minority that I mentioned earlier, and it is primarily this minority that we in the National Alliance are trying to influence at this time.

Besides the resistance to change that is innate in the vast majority of the population, the other main factor that contributes to the passivity of the population, the external factor, is the example of activism (or non-activism, as it were) provided by the government that ostensibly leads the country. By its very nature, a democratic form of government is incapable of making hard decisions. In a legislative hall in which every viewpoint is given the opportunity to take the floor on every issue, almost never will a really tough decision be made. A decision that will require substantial sacrifice is almost never given the time of day. It is always easier to put off a ticking time bomb -- to pretend it doesn't exist and to hope it will magically go away -- than it is to grit one's teeth and defuse the bomb, despite the risks inherent in doing so.

And if a tough decision ever IS made by an elected body in a mass democracy, it almost always occurs after weeks -- perhaps even months -- of debate, and there are always many dissenters from the final decision. A quick decision is a rarity, and although a majority might agree that the long-debated resolution is best in the long run, everyone has either major or minor objections to the plan, and the voicing of those objections then leads to a fragmented and unfocused carrying-out of the decision. As soon as complications occur, the impetus behind the original decision fizzles out and no lasting change is evident.

And so those of us who pay attention to political goings-on watch with frustration as our government refuses to address problem after problem. The illegal immigration issue, which would be a relatively easy "fix" -- compared to, say, stamping out terrorism -- gets ignored. On every issue, there is talk and more talk and still more talk... but nothing ever gets done.

In this era in which positive change is needed for our people to survive, a mass democracy is a system of government based on talk, not action. In this era of instant communications and mass media, mass democracy is a system of government in which the power resides, not in the people nor even in the people's elected officials, but rather in those who have seized control of the channels of information and who bend that information to suit their own purposes. And in this era of multiculturalism and racial tension, mass democracy is a system of government that feeds mutually-hostile viewpoints, leading to the half-hearted putting forward of half-measures and half-solutions.

So it's no wonder that life in what used to be a thriving and vigorous White civilization in the Western Hemisphere is bordering on meaningless for those who still profess to adhere to the creeds that founded it. These things don't bother us White racialists, however, because we see that the entire System and its ideals are founded on false premises, the first of which is that no individual is better suited than any other to be a productive citizen of the nation.

We racialists believe this premise to be completely at odds with historical reality. Plugging just ANYONE into a society doesn't necessarily improve the society -- or the individual, for that matter. Quite to the contrary, history has shown that a close compatibility between the many members of a given society has the biggest and most lasting positive effect on both the society and the closely-related individuals that make it up.

What that means, of course, is that racially homogeneous states have been among the most stable and durable societies down through the ages. When a nation that formerly was homogeneous begins to introduce into its body politic individuals of alien races, the society tends to destabilize and, eventually, crumble.

This trend of racial homogeneity leading to a stable and productive society is not limited to the White nations of the Earth. Japan and China, two Asian nations boasting long histories of stability and culture, are excellent examples. Even today, the African country of Botswana -- which is peopled exclusively with the Black tribe called the Tswanas -- has the most stable economy and lowest crime rate of any Black-ruled African nation.

But for the White West, it has been more and more racial diversity, especially since the end of the Second World War. And we're seeing the disintegrative effects of racial diversity all through the Western world, right now, right before our very eyes, in real time, even as the media controlled by our enemies tries to cloud the picture and make us see things through rose-colored glasses.

We might not notice the effects of the darkening population as much here in the United States because we have always had a number of non-Whites living here, too. We tamed the land and largely kept ourselves apart from the Indians. Later, we foolishly brought African slaves to our shores and, ever since, although the non-White presence has become more pronounced with each passing year, many White Americans still remain blind to the peril we face. This blindness doesn't afflict as many of our White cousins in Europe, many of whom remember clearly the day when to see a non-White face was a rare occurrence.

One hundred years ago, the crime rate all over Europe was, by today's standards, unbelievably low. Even fifty years ago, Britain had such a low crime rate that British policemen had no need to carry firearms. That's not the case in the multiracial polyglot of conflict that Britain has become today. With all of the non-White illegals and violent criminals, it has become the norm for Bobbies to carry guns.

I'll bet you've never even heard of a Swiss criminal. Several decades ago, Switzerland didn't have any, but today they do...although they aren't Swiss, at least not racially. They are non-White immigrants or the offspring of immigrants, and they don't particularly care to play by the rules that have long made Switzerland the most peaceful and law-abiding nation in Europe.

Now, perhaps you think it isn't fair for me to blame rising crime rates throughout the White world on the rising numbers of non-Whites that have invaded White living space. There can be no denying that as the number of non-Whites has increased, so has the crime rate, but some of you may question if one of those phenomena CAUSED the other. Did the additional non-Whites CAUSE the crime rate to increase, or is the correlation a coincidence?

Well, my opinion on that issue is that -- on the average -- non-Whites don't have the same respect for private property that Whites are brought up to have and, in addition, non-Whites don't have the same sense of personal accountability that Whites have. For these reasons, they are more likely to commit crimes. And I believe, too, that a large number of non-Whites get a certain thrill of satisfaction from thumbing their noses at the White man's culture and the White man's rules. Consequently, there is a certain machismo in being a non-White criminal in a White society. So I'm not surprised that the crime rate is rising along with the non-White population.

But, for the sake of argument, let's assume that high numbers of non-Whites and high crime rates are NOT related. They ARE occurring together, of course, but let's assume they aren't related. If that's the case, then there must be some other explanation for the correlation. Perhaps there is tension between Whites and non-Whites, and that tension is somehow leading to more instability throughout society, which drives the crime rate up.

That's a fairly plausible explanation, and certainly one that sounds a lot more Politically Correct than my earlier one, which seems to suggest that there is something inherently criminal about being a non-White. In truth, I don't think there is something inherently criminal in being non-White, but I do believe that there is something genetically programmed in non-Whites that -- when they find themselves in a White society -- leads them to exhibit what we Whites call "criminal activity." In essence, the basic rules that govern their behavior and ours don't quite match up.

Well, whatever the correct explanation, there is definitely a problem that is related to Whites and non-Whites living in such close proximity. Why not change that right now? Why not separate the races? Let's stop pointing fingers and assigning blame and just separate. In my mind, the solution is so simple, and it never ceases to amaze me that people who are smart enough to know better call the National Alliance's program of racial separation a program of "hate." Clearly, our program -- which promotes the separation of the races so that each race can follow its own bent -- is not one of "hate," although the plan of the current System -- which is to mix all of the races and thereby obliterate them -- makes a very strong case for the "hate" label.

Many times throughout history, the mixing of races has resulted in the downfall of great civilizations. The mixing often started when one group conquered another and kept the conquered peoples around to tend the fields or keep house. Sometimes, as in the case of the United States, Egypt, and Portugal, slaves of an alien race were brought in and eventually disrupted the social fabric.

Initially, the civilizations we are discussing here suffered no ill effects, or at least no glaring ill effects. Of course, White racial consciousness was affected, as is obvious from the eventual slackening of segregation standards and consequent miscegenation. Shortly thereafter -- at least on a historical time scale -- the civilization collapsed; it was overrun by a more purpose-driven race or it simply shrunk away into nonexistence over time.

In the United States -- indeed, in the entire White West -- we see this same historical pattern being played out. Non-Whites now make up a substantial portion of the population. Racial mixing is on the rise. And next -- unless we separate the races -- will come the collapse.

The first stages of collapse are already evident. The economic power and technological edge that have for centuries been the undisputed "hammers" of the White West are nearly gone. A shocking percentage of our heavy industry has vaporized, leaving us largely at the mercy of nations like China that continue to invest more money, more people, and more resources into both technology AND heavy industry.

We in the National Alliance are out to save our race, and the first step is to safeguard the gene pool that we have been given by our ancestors. It would be nice if we could save our civilization, too, but our race comes first. As long as our gene pool is intact, everything else can be done in good time.

So whatever you've heard or may hear, the National Alliance is NOT a White supremacist organization; it is a White SEPARATIST organization. All we ask is that our race be left alone on our own land to live according to the guiding light within us.

Separation: it's the best for us, and it's the best for other races, too. The enemy is he who demands and forces racial proximity and racial integration. The enemy is he who promotes interracial relationships through his near-monopoly in the media world. The enemy is he who seeks to destroy races. If you're looking for hate, THAT is where you'll find it.

But if you're looking for racial self-determination, look no further than the National Alliance. We want a system that WORKS, and racial separation is the first step toward such a system. We WILL separate the races, no matter what it takes, and I urge you to join us in that noble effort.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

Terrorism by Sexual Humiliation

Terrorism by Sexual Humiliation and the Jews Behind It

Terrorism by Sexual Humiliation

By Ralph Iver


TSA: The Systematic Humiliation of American Citizens, and the Jews Behind It

The terrorists have won. And they are the TSA.

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has been transformed into Terroristm by Sexual Assault. Internet news and blog sites are now flooded with stories and debates over the backscatter porno scanners at the airports, and the punishing direct touching of sexual organs of individuals who “opt-out”, be they men, women, or children. The employees of the TSA have become legalized felony sex offenders. Millions of United States passengers are now victims of sexual humiliation.

I received an emailed article today that has been the “straw that broke the camel’s back”. The story was written by a young mother who boarded an airport in Dayton, Ohio with her infant, and with her she had a bottle of breast milk. Because she had flown before she knew she would be called to step aside with the breast milk for a routine that has already been degrading enough since Americans lost their backbone on 9/11/01. She wrote the following excerpt of the physical “search” preformed on her by a female TSA employee:

She patted my left arm, my right arm, my upper back and my lower back. She then said, “I need to reach in and feel along the inside of your waistband.”

She felt along my waistline, moved behind me, then proceeded to feel both of my buttocks. She reached from behind in the middle of my buttocks towards my vagina area.

She did not tell me that she was going to touch my buttocks, or reach forward to my vagina area.

She then moved in front of my and touched the top and underneath portions of both of my breasts.

She did not tell me that she was going to touch my breasts.

She then felt around my waist. She then moved to the bottoms of my legs.

She then felt my inner thighs and my vagina area, touching both of my labia.

She did not tell me that she was going to touch my vagina area or my labia.

She then told me that I could put my shoes on and I asked if I could pick up the baby, she replied Yes.

She then moved back to my belongings to finish scanning them with the paper discs for explosives. When she finished she said I was free to go.

I stood there holding my baby in shock. I did not move for almost a minute.

I stood there, an American citizen, a mom traveling with a baby with special needs formula, sexually assaulted by a government official. I began shaking and felt completely violated, abused and assaulted by the TSA agent. I shook for several hours, and woke up the next day shaking.

This woman was essentially raped.

I am withholding this young woman’s blog address as she has expressed the wish to protect her family, but at the same time has a need to warn people.

How many other passengers have had their travel experiences trashed on account of the emotional trauma of sexual violation? How many will carry both the emotional and physical memory of being touched or x-rayed through their clothing for some pervert’s viewing for years to come, even the rest of their lives. Later in this mother’s post she states she intends to use counseling services for her traumatic experience and it will be paid for by the TSA. The Terrorists by Sexual Assault.

With this story in front of me, 9-11-01 no longer means a damned thing to me. 9-11 has been turned into nothing but a shtick to gain ultimate control over the Citizens of the United States.

Deliberate violation of peoples’ sexual privacy is an act of power over. Sexual predators hold emotional power over most of their victims forever. Predators are repeat offenders, even if they commit their crime no more than once, for the memory of their crime recurs in mind, emotional, and/or bodily memory of the victim throughout their lives. Ask any victim of rape how she or he feels about sex with a loved one after the crime. Ask elderly people who remember being molested as children how their experience affected their lives. Even people who were violated at such a young age they have no conscious memories later develop personality disorders that rob them of normal living for decades. All victims of sexual offenses battle the demons inserted by their perpetrators for untold lengths of time.

The employees of the TSA have been transformed into organized ritual abuse sex offenders. All of them. The whole point of sexually assaulting passenger in the “pat down” is to punish and force people to walk through the XXX-ray scanners. This is about mass control in the worst way.

Chester the Molester

Who would be attracted to this kind of employment? Who would be attracted to apply for a job where he or she would sit if front of a computer screen leering at the images of one naked body after another for hours a day? Who would be attracted to a position where they would put their hands onto the bodies of numerous people, their breasts, their buttocks, their penises, and their vaginas? Who would do such a thing? And who would do it for any amount of money? Even of children? There are now hundreds, if not thousands of personal accounts, both written and video, exposing the abusive attitudes of TSA personnel, including one where a man beat his own chest and yelled, “I have power! I have power!”

Exactly. TSA cannot possibly attract workers who have any real consciences. The TSA attracts people who seek to exert their power over other people. Sure, TSA can do criminal background checks and exclude people who have felonies of sex offenses. But they can’t exclude the people who have escaped discovery by courts of law. How many victims of sexual offenses have never turned in their molesters or rapists? How many never speak of the offense their whole lives? Theirs are the predators free to work at the TSA. Those are the men and women who stare at your body if you are coerced into stepping in the the scanner. Those are the men and women who touch your private parts, and touch your children should you refuse the scanner. Six in one, half a dozen in the other: It’s all criminal.

What is the illegality of sexual assault? There are different levels of assault. There’s one called a “simple” assault. If you touch another person in a non-sexual way and they don’t want you to touch them, you just committed a misdemeanor should they decide to press charges. Try touching a cop and see what happens.

Sexual assault is non-consensual sexual contact. Wait a minute–the TSA states that when you purchase a flight ticket, you consent to having your naked image viewed or your body touched. WRONG. Any form of coercion, including the requirement of submission to this kind of search, nullifies “consent”. Travelers are being blackmailed into choosing one basic human right at the expense of another: Airline customers are now being forced to choose between their right to freedom of movement by means accessible to them (including public transportation such as flying) and their right to privacy. Choosing to eat over being housed, or being housed over being able to eat is not a choice. It is the loss of human dignity either way. Having to give up the right to one’s own sexual privacy so that they can travel a long distance by air is not a choice. It is an abusive situation. This is not consent. It’s coercion. Airline customers now must choose between the right to privacy or the right to freedom of movement. Imagine how travelers who must fly to a funeral today are forced to add sexual trauma to their pain of grief.

Aggravated sexual assault involves violence. This is a felony. Yes, there now more passengers who have submitted to searches who have gotten the hell beat out of them by exuberant TSA thugs. As bad as this is, there is one level of this felony people often forget. Any sexual touching of a child 14 or 13 (depending on the state) and under is a felony offense. That means every TSA employee that has put their hands onto the bodies of children to search them has committed a felony. Not all pedophiles get caught. Most of them don’t. Just ask their adult victims.

Imagine what is happening to flyers who are themselves victims of previous sex crimes. Every one of them is being re-traumatized. Beyond them, more victims are being created every time another person stands in a scanner or stands for physical assault. Do TSA workers ever wonder if one of their victims will remember their name and look them up?

Why hold the TSA employees responsible? They are “only doing their job”. That’s what they said at Nuremberg. What was the response of Nuremberg when Nazi soldier said they were “only following orders”? Should all employees do whatever their supervisors tell them to do, no matter how criminal the act? Ever hear of Refuseniks? Even Israel has refuseniks. Some US soldiers refused to fight in an illegal war in Iraq. If the TSA employers told their workers to steal from passengers, lowlifes the bunch of them are, they’d do that, too.

Why would TSA employees do this to American citizens? I’ve been to many airports in cities. Chicago, DC, New York–could it be the minorities that work there take delight in inflicting their angry harm on mostly white passenger who have the funds to fly while they don’t? Certainly, jealousy (another word for greed) is a powerful emotion–powerful enough to turn a government employee into a criminal. How much do gropers and leering predators get paid? Enough to afford a plane ticket? Hardly.

I have another observation about this. A few days ago I stopped for gas at one of the cheapest stations in an area where there is a high population of Hispanics and Muslims. Every time I go, most of the customers are Hispanic, many Arab, and the people who own the pumps are Middle Eastern. On top of their pumps is a small placard advertising jobs with the TSA. An add located in an area frequented mostly by foreigners. Yes, there are a lot of foreigners working the airports that I use. How is it in high alert years that the US government would exponentially increase the employment of foreign-born people’s, especially while US Citizens lose their jobs? These people don’t care about Americans. They are not from here. They are paid mercenaries. I’m seeing a lot of articles on the internet where Muslim women are allowed to avoid both the scanner and the extremely invasive search while American passengers are forced into it. Americans are specifically being singled out.

Who Would Dream Up Such a System of Invasion of Privacy?

How about two Jews?–Michael Chertoff and Janet Napolitano

Did the prono screeners come about because of the underwear bomber? Think again. Think sex, money, and power. Dual citizen of Israel, Michael Chertoff, former head of the FBI and the Department of Homeland “Security” ordered the first batch of naked body screeners in 2005. That was FIVE YEARS before the underwear bomber. Chertoff retained this company, Rapiscan past his DHS appointment as his client of his consulting firm, Chertoff Group (or should I say grope?) With their foot in the government’s door, Chertoff used his former titles to expand their business and the prostitution dollars in his own pocket. Chertoff, the Israeli citizen, is using his high level, American-tax funded positions to bring about a widespread sexual invasion of privacy against the American public while he lines his pockets. Chertoff has gained this power over the American public through the constant fear-mongering inflicted on American since 9-11.

You gain power over others through fear. Fear of another terrorist attack, fear of anthrax, fear of bird flu, fear of mad cow disease, fear of swine flu, fear of the DC snipers, fear of the mortgage crisis, fear of financial collapse, fear of the shoe bomber, fear of the underwear bomber. If you want power over others, you never let up on inflicting fear. And if you really want power, you sexualize it. This is what Michael Chertoff, former director of the Department of Homeland Security has done to the American people.

Janet Napolitano is telling American citizens if they don’t want to submit to coercive sexual invasion, then they can choose not to fly. Amazingly, she was the attorney who represented sexual assault victim, Anita Hill, during the Clarence Thomas hearings. If anyone should know about the traumatizing effects of unwanted sexual touching or leering, it’s this woman. That she would tell airline customers to submit or get off is breathtaking. Is that not how predators treat their victims?

With an attitude like that it is no surprise she was chosen to succeed Michael Chertoff. It disgusts me that a graduate of the University of Virgina, founded by Thomas Jefferson, would have no sense of constitutional, civil, or basic human rights. She must have studied them so that she could deny them. However, being a descendant from both parents of a tribe that ritualizes blood sexual humiliation of all its male infants, it’s clear she has an agenda of control over the innocents of America. By supporting sexual predation at the airports, she is a predator herself.

What does the Jewish religion have to do with sexual predation? One hell of a lot. These are people who have for thousands of years unified themselves in a most disgusting way–by amputating the foreskins of all of their own sons. Until recently, circumcisions have been done without anesthesia, for circumcisers didn’t’ believe infants had feelings, or if they did, would not remember it. All bodies retain the memory of physical trauma whether or not the brain has developed to a stage to mentally remember or make sense of it or not. In fact, pre-lingual traumas can be the worst kind for human beings grow up not understanding what is wrong with them.

But the mothers of circumcised infants do remember. They do not protect their own birth children from the knifing of the most painful and humiliating kind. Mothers are supposed to protect their babies from harm. Yet, Jewish mothers promote the worst harm of all.

Victims often become predators. It is no wonder the entire Jewish race is so messed up. It is no wonder they are most always involved one way or another in violent conflicts such as the genocide of the Palestinians, or inflicting and promoting sexual humiliation of non-Jews through the Jewish-dominated pornography business, or continue to participate in human trafficking of Eastern European women into sexual slavery in Israel, or poisoning the minds of Westerners against family integrity and marriage commitments through their control of television and Hollywood. It is no wonder they co-created and promoted the legalization of sexual offense at our nation’s airports.

And it is no wonder Jews are known for the intensity of their audacious greed. Holding money is a way to hold power–and they aren’t just greedy for money. Money is not enough. Having power over other people is the endgame. Setting up backscatter scanners all across the United States and Europe is not just about making money, although profit is part of it. Obtaining power over masses of other people in the most effective way is the real goal: Power over through sexual humiliation.

What is Really Being “Sacrificed”?

“There has to be some sacrifice”, we are being told. Sacrifice for what? Of what? The loss of sexual and personal safety in exchange for safety? The loss of on of the most basic human rights in order to enjoy another basic human right? How about the US Government stop making enemies around the world, meanwhile target-search only those people who would be dangerous?

I’ll tell you what’s being sacrificed: The American People as a whole. We are being turned into a nation of sexually traumatized victims. This form of humiliation is now affecting millions of people.

One way to destroy a people is to destroy their pride as a people. Overt war doesn’t work as well as covert humiliation. Victims of war will rally together, help each other, share their pain with one another, vow to stand up to their enemies together, even be identified internationally as a group of people through their experiences as victims. Yet, history demonstrates that the very worst of war experiences are not the deaths, but the humiliation victims experience at the hands of their perpetrators. The worst kind of humiliation is sexual, especially if it is public. This is the reason the United Nations have come to define rape as a form of torture. Gang rape, for example, is a way to degrade and destroy not only the victim, but her people as well.

Mass sexual humiliation programs an entire generation of people to feel shame. Sexual trauma is a form of brainwash, and in fact is often used along with other forms of torture for brainwash. Sexual trauma is hypnotic. The effects last for generations. Mass trauma in a shameful way at the hands of dark forces changes the way a whole group of people sees itself–and that view is one of a loss of self-respect. This is what happens to individual victims of sexual violence, and it happens to whole groups of people who are victims together. Individual victims of sexual violence experience long-term, often lifelong shame, depression, anxiety, unexplained fears, low-self esteem, loss of personal pride, loss of trust, loss of safety, loss of identity–the list of profound change is endless. The worst crimes that can be committed against human beings are those that target humiliation. Victims live, most often silently, in the shadow of shame. Their lives are poisoned, and the poison spreads to those around them.

Victims of sexual humiliation have had the reverence for their lives striped from them, and they often feel they can never rebuild a life of reverence. Since 9-11-01, we Americans have lost so much regard for ourselves as a people in the face of constant re-traumatizing with the latest fear. The numbness such constant terrorizing of us by our own government and its lapdog media is deliberate–all for the purpose of controlling all of us. Topping it off with sanctioned sexual terror of mostly the middle class at the airports is intended to render us helpless and transform our numbness into deep shame. Silence all too often comes with sexual shame. It is in being profoundly silenced we will ultimately lose ourselves as a people, and as a nation.

Silence is never golden. We must not submit to the US Government’s infliction of psychic trauma upon our entire citizenry. We must stop the literal striping of our rights, one by one. None of us can stop this monster alone. We have to band together and refuse to be separated. The line in the sands are not between American across political lines. The real line is the one between our nation’s people and the people who have usurped the powers of our government. Anything that does not honor our long history of the American People with Backbone must cease. For ourselves, for our children, and for future generations, we must collectively take a brave stand.

Article Source: Heresies Examined

Trove of Leaked FBI, Fusion Center and DHS Documents Provide Insight Into Antifa, Charlottesville, Political Bias, and the Erosion of Civil Liberties

On June 22nd, a group of anarchist hackers called DDoSecrets  dumped 270 gigabytes  worth of internal documents belonging to regional...