Friday, August 29, 2014

Freedom of Speech? Not for AntiZionists on US Campuses

The recent revocation of a tenured academic position at the University of Illinois on the American Indian Studies course to Professor Steven Salita because he dared tweet against the Israeli genocide in Gaza, has once again served as a perfect example of the tribalist Jewish Supremacist racist control of America’s higher educational institutions.
Professor Salita’s Twitter account contained such perfectly legitimate and accurate comments such as:
For this sin, his offer of a tenured professorship at the University of Illinois was revoked before he even took up the position—a move which was then lauded in the Jewish Supremacist magazine Tablet as “good thing” and “the rightful consequences of bigotry and violence.”
The university’s chancellor, Phyllis Wise, refused to approve his appointment, explaining that the university “cannot tolerate personal and disrespectful words or actions that demean and abuse either viewpoints themselves or those who express them.”
However, what the Tablet magazine and other Jewish Supremacist controlled media coverage of Professor Salita’s dismissal media control have all failed to mention, is the fact that the is a dedicated Jewish Supremacist pressure group—whose existence is completely hidden from the general public—whose sole job it is it suppress any anti-Israeli opinion at educational institutions.
This highly active organization is called the AMCHA Initiative, which, according to its own website, uses the results of its “research and analysis to inform university administrators and the public about the antisemitic incidents, the individuals and groups that are perpetrating them, and to pressure university leaders to act.”
AMCHA has a list of what it defines as “anti-Semitic activity” which includes “denying Jews their right to self-determination,” “demonizing Israel” and “promoting Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) against Israel.”
This is of course ironic, because the only people being denied the right to self-determination in Palestine are the Palestinians.
Nonetheless, the activity of AMCHA has resulted in a crackdown against any academic organizations even peripherally involved in the BDS movement, such as the Association for Asian American Studies, the American Studies Association and the Native American and Indigenous Studies Association.
In a recent letter to the University of California Board of Regents, the National Lawyers Guild described the way in which AMCHA operates:
They concoct demonstrably false narratives about specific campus events involving criticism of Israeli government policies, describing them as if they targeted, even violently so, Jewish students.
They then paint an overall picture of campuses in which Jewish students are under constant attack in a pervasively hostile environment – in direct contradiction of actual surveys of those students, who overwhelmingly report the opposite.
They write to UC chancellors and CSU presidents, citing falsified events, to demand that they condemn the speech of advocates for Palestinian rights and shut down their campus organizations.
They attack academic freedom of faculty members by similarly mischaracterizing expressions of personal views and pretending that the faculty purport to represent official university positions; and by proffering outlandish accusations against academic departments that sponsor speakers with whom they disagree, or that affiliate with academic associations that adopt certain positions on important issues.
America—and the world—will never be free until the power and ideology of Jewish Supremacism is broken forever.


  1. Americans...and in fact people world-wide...are beginning to open their eyes, are beginning to awaken to the increasingly irrefutable fact that Jewish interests of various sorts DO, in fact...control the world, i.e., their respective governments. In America ( the Peoples' Republic of America ), Jewish Zionist interests control the American federal government via the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee ( AIPAC ). This sinister, semi-secretive special interest lobby, comprised of Jews and their bought-and-paid-for gentile serfs who stroll the hallowed halls of the "American" Congress...wields immense power, exerts immense influence...upon American foreign and domestic policy. Via their control of American foreign policy they instigate wars in foreign countries, especially in the Middle East region. These wars, immensely costly in American blood and treasure, serve the self-serving interests of Jewish interests, not American interests. Some influential Jews ( "American" neocons ) have admitted that America's recent wars in the Middle East have been fought for the benefit of Israel, not their ignorant American proxies. The still on-going wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are prime examples of this. The Jews, a shrewd people to be sure, prefer to fight proxy wars when they can. In their mindset, it is better to spill the blood of others rather than their own. Yes...shrewd. This same sinister dynamic exists in American domestic policy as well, especially in the realm of economics, finance. Since its misbegotten founding in 1913, the Jewish-run Federal Reserve "Bank" has controlled the money supply of America, despite the fact that the American Constitution explicitly stipulates that only the American Congress should have the power to "coin money, and regulate the value thereof." The Federal reserve Act was passed on Dec. 23, 1913, while the American Congress was on Christmas recess. Hmm. A bit suspicious, is it not? Is it not suspicious, too, that virtually every chairman of this privately owned banking entity has been headed by a Jew? But this is not all to be said of the Jewish control over the fiscal policies of America. Virtually every "American" secretary of the treasury has likewise been a Jew. Current secretary of the treasury, Jack a Jew, as were his predecessors. Jewish interests also control the mass media...television, radio, and the print media ( publishers of books, magazines, etc.). These audio and visual organs of mass communication set the template for mass thought, thus, in time, mass action. Thoughts always precede action. First the thought, then the resultant action. As Adolph Hitler posited in his 1924 autobiography, Mein Kampf, to paraphrase: He who controls the thoughts of the masses controls their actions. The Jews, ironically, learned this lesson from their nemesis. Now it is they, the Jews, who control the mass media, in which case they can disseminate, thus twist or spin or outright suppress...any information that is an "inconvenient" truth to them. To conclude: Neither the nation of America, nor its Jewish media dumbed-down people...are the real masters of their fate, the captains of their ship of state. But astute well as people world-wide...have begun to open their eyes to the fact that their societies are being controlled...have long been a self-serving and hostile power that means them no good...seeks to control, enslave them...

  2. Hmm. An oddity here: Although Jews comprise only about three percent of the American population, they comprise 33 percent of the justices on the High Court...the U.S. Supreme Court. There is only one sitting black justice on the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Clarence Thomas. What gives here? The Jews are avid proponents of diversity everywhere else in American society, yet they are disproportionately represented in the hallowed halls of the highest court in the land. Again, waz up wid dis? Why do Jews predominate in the highest court in America? Could the reason be that Jews do, in fact, control America and her socio-political processes? Moreover, are Jews racist? Blacks comprise about 13 percent of the American population, yet there is only one black justice on America's High Court, but there are three sitting Jews on this same court. Again...waz up wid dis? Racism?

  3. In a years ago interview conducted by the Jewsmedia, current U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder opined that Americans are "cowards" regarding the everlasting Race Question. His premise was that Americans are too craven to honestly and forthrightly discuss this ages-old issue. Indeed!! Eric Holder and his black racist ilk are the ones who are too cowardly to discuss this issue, because he knows that, truth be told...he would be forced to admit the inconvenient fact that blacks who play by the rules can, and in fact do...succeed in the American marketplace. There are, in fact, many black millionaires in America. For example, blacks excel in almost every sports enterprise in "racist" America. Black football players ( the NFL ) earn millions of dollars a year tossing a ball around. Likewise, black basketball players earn millions of dollars a year for nothing more than playing a game...tossing a ball around. The vast majority of whites in America...or, in fact, the not make such an astronomical amount of money for playing games, i.e., children's games. But then, the half-black ( mulatto ), Eric Holder, is a white-hating racist extraordinaire who still carries the heavy chip of black slavery around his ample neck over a century after the white president, Abraham Lincoln, freed his ancestors. Holder, like his boss, Kenyan-born U.S. "President" Obama...was never a slave to anyone. If anything, Holder is more than likely the product of whitey-conceived affirmative action. Holder may, in fact, not be qualified to hold his position as U.S. Attorney General. But then, qualification for a job is no longer a factor in guilt-ridden white society...the power-brokers of white society who, although they never owned a single slave...nonetheless still feel guilty for the sins of their long-dead grandfathers who did own them. Incidentally, only about six percent of antebellum whites owned slaves. The American Civil War was fought, free the black slaves owned by the white elitists of that time. The average Southern Confederate soldier never owned a black slave. Truth be told, it was only the white elitists of that well as...wealthy blacks and, of course, Jews...who owned black slaves during that time. The American Civil War that endured from 1861 to 1865, the genocidal war that after the smoke of war cleared had cost the lives of over 600,000 whites...was waged at least in part to free the black slaves. Question: If blacks owned white slaves would they fight a brutal, bloody civil war to free THEM? No. Although blacks claim to love each other, they kill each other with wanton randomness every day and night of the week. It is only when a white kills a black that the black tribal instinct arises, with the help, of course, of the white gentile-hating Jews and their