Matt Hale: White-Rights Activist and (POW)
You may write him at:Matthew F.Hale
For those of you wishing to send him money,send it to this address:http://www.bop.gov/inmates/communications.jsp
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Insert Valid Committed Inmate Name
Insert Inmate Eight-Digit Register Number
Post Office Box 474701
Des Moines, Iowa 50947-0001
Only Send a Postal Money Order
Obtain a postal money order and include both the inmate's:
Full committed name AND complete eight-digit register number.
Full committed name AND complete eight-digit register number.
Non-postal money orders and non-government checks will be placed on a 15-day hold.
• Government feared growing influence, popularity of pro-white activist—so they set him up
By the Staff at AFP
The political railroading of Reverend Matthew F. “Matt” Hale constitutes—quite clearly—one of the most outrageous offenses against constitutional principles and the civil liberties guaranteed Americans by our founding fathers. Hale’s case is one American citizens concerned with police state tyranny need to know about.
The former leader of the avowedly pro-White and anti-Jewish World Church of the Creator—founded by the late Ben Klassen in 1973—Hale, an accomplished classical violinist and prolific writer and public intellectual, received a law degree from the Southern Illinois University School of Law in 1998. In 1999, Hale became an international celebrity of sorts when the state of Illinois refused to grant him a license to practice law on the basis of his political, racial and religious beliefs.
Speaking across the country from 2000 to 2002—often the subject of heated media coverage—Hale became widely known for his unswerving advocacy of preserving white civilization. Featured, among other places, on the “Today” show and “Good Morning America,” Hale was such anarticulate voice for his cause that hate groups such as the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center attacked him repeatedly and targeted him for destruction.
As a consequence—perhaps to no one’s surprise—on January 8, 2003, Hale was arrested by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and charged by the United States Department of Justice (DoJ) with allegedly having solicited the murder of Chicago-based federal judge Joan Lefkow during the time Judge Lefkow was hearing an ongoing civil lawsuit in which Hale’s church had been accused of having infringed upon another church’s trademark.
Most remarkable about Hale’s subsequent criminal trial (a classic study of the DoJ run amok) is that there was no evidence whatsoever of Hale’s guilt. Although accused of supposedly having solicited Tony Evola—a government informant posing as a supporter of Hale—to kill Judge Lefkow, no evidence was produced that this ever happened.
Hale neither asked Evola to commit murder, told him to commit murder or even implied he wanted Evola to commit murder. Instead, it was Evola—not Hale—who urged the judge be killed and Evola who solicited Hale to join his own professed plans. The only person who talked about killing anybody was Evola who was being paid thousands of taxpayers’ dollars for his efforts.
Not only did Hale not “solicit” the judge’s assassination but it is also an incontestable fact that he repeatedly rejected Evola’s suggestions.
Suffice it to say, however, many believed Hale’s conviction was almost assured, not because any evidence suggested he was guilty (which it did not) but precisely because many of the jurors (for personal racial and religious reasons) were already clearly inclined to be opposed to Hale because of his well-known political views.
On April 26, 2004, Hale was convicted on the fabricated charge and subsequently sentenced to 40 years in prison.
Thus, Hale’s is yet another case in which federal law enforcement concocted a non-existent crime to imprison an innocent man, determined to silence him for political and ideological reasons.
Hale has now been imprisoned for over 11 years, time spent entirely in solitary confinement. The wrong done to him is an atrocious injustice, andwhile there have been many in the history of American jurisprudence, the attack on Hale was clearly politically motivated.
Several appeals of his conviction have been filed but all have been denied by judges who refuse to rule in favor of a reputed “white supremacist” andcritic of Jewish power: The judges will not—or can not—acknowledge a person such as Hale can be innocent, regardless of the facts.
The judges have gone so far as to even lie about the facts of the Hale case in order to deny his appeals. Some observers have suggested that notsince the days of the Soviet Union’s famous show trials have such sham legal proceedings been so vividly demonstrated. And that is saying much considering many of the political railroad jobs seen in recent years in American courts.
Outraged by Hale’s treatment, outspoken American nationalist William A. “Bill” White vocally supported Hale on his own website and, likely as a consequence, was himself targeted by the authorities and charged with “soliciting” the murder of one of the jurors in the Hale case—an echo of the original trumped-up charge against Hale. The government clearly figured that since a phony charge of this type had worked in Hale’s case, it might work again—and it did: White is himself now sitting in prison.
Despite everything, Hale won’t give up. In many respects, he is precisely what the controlled media monopoly falsely claimed about the terrorist Nelson Mandela: a man of peace with great love for his people who has endured years in solitary confinement at the hands of an oppressive government.
Those who value the traditional American concept of liberty—as opposed to criminal tyranny—should rally behind Hale’s bid for freedom. He will soon be filing another motion for his release.
Welcome to the Free Matt Hale website. As I am the subject of this endeavor and have the liberty to do so, I thought it appropriate and indeed worthwhile that I personally address you on this site bearing my name. In the main, however, I will let the various legal documents soon to appear on this site speak for themselves, for there is no better evidence of my innocence than the plain facts of my case as remarked upon by these legal documents. Let me though succinctly summarize the facts so that some if not all of the myths about my case may be quickly dispelled as I have longed to do that for many years:
1) I have never, in any respect, solicited the murder of anybody. While that is generally recognized by all objective observers of my case, it bears repeating by yours truly as it is, and has been, commonly but mistakenly held that I was "entrapped". For entrapment to exist though, the person in question must have, however, ACTUALLY COMMITTED A CRIME but that he was induced to do so by a government informant. Well, quite simply, I was NOT entrapped because I did not commit a crime -- the agent provocateur Tony Evola TRIED to get me to do so, but he failed. No entrapment occurred in this case, as outrageous as the government's conduct certainly was, because Evola solicited ME (not me him) and I simply turned him down.
2) Long before the events giving rise to my arrest on January 8, 2003 occurred, I KNEW THAT EVOLA WAS A GOVERNMENT INFORMANT. This will be surprising news to many of you but this is one of the reasons why this website was created, to finally enable the truth to be told. It was not remotely told at my trial due to dereliction of duty of the lawyers who represented me and for years I was physically restrained from writing you as I am doing now. So let me repeat: I knew that Evola was an FBI informant, quite specifically, at the very time that I supposedly solicited him to murder a federal judge. Did my jury hear the evidence that proved this? No, because my "lawyers" withheld it. Since I knew that Evola was an FBI informant, I obviously, as any rational and sapient person would have to conclude, did not solicit him to commit murder or intend that he did so. The case, or alleged case against me, was built upon the premise that Evola was some kind of trusted confidant or right-hand man and the media and others have repeated that ad nauseam. In reality, Tony was an obvious phony and thus I am obviously innocent.
3) Now for the clincher, if such should be thought necessary: NEITHER EVOLA NOR I WERE EVEN TALKING ABOUT A FEDERAL JUDGE on the key date in question and thus the very foundation of the case --even more than Evola's status --is a total myth. The widely quoted exchange between Evola and I on December 5, 2002 referred to a "rat, Jew rat", not a judge and there is overwhelming evidence - -that my jury once again never heard --that this was not a judge at all but rather a lawyer who was involved in the pending trademark case litigation. Thus, not only did I not solicit Evola to murder anybody or intend that he do so, but the alleged target of the alleged solicitation forming the basis for the federal charges, and for which I have been consigned to a 40 year federal prison term, was not a federal judge at all.
I could write more of how my jury (and the public) have been denied critical and conclusive evidence demonstrating my innocence but I believe that I have already revealed enough to shock the conscience of any moral and ethical person. The good and hopeful news is that I have pending a petition for habeas corpus on the basis that my lawyers at trial, by indeed withholding evidence from the jury proving my innocence, violated my Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel. Many, if not all, of the upcoming legal documents to be posted on this site will be from this pending case for habeas corpus, so I invite you to review them. Please stay tuned, my friends, for the imminent updates to this site that I have indicated. Please also spread the news of this cause of justice itself. My family and I deeply appreciate your support in this ordeal of several lifetimes that we have suffered. We remain unbowed.
- Rev. Matt Hale"