Monday, March 31, 2014

Winning is a Group Effort

Winning is a Group Effort

iStock_000000803575MediumThe mechanics of our lawsuit against Erich Gliebe and the Board of Directors are starting to move in earnest now that the preparatory work has been completed. This has been accomplished by a relatively small group of people. To win will take the efforts of a larger collection of people. That’s where you come in, becoming a participant and joining theGROUP.
Our setting up a PayPal account and mailing address was a part of that preparation. We are NOW ACTIVELY seeking the help of those who care. We need to be sure that the last thing that DOESN’T happen is that this effort gets stalled to due lack of financial resources.
Achieving our financial commitments to this lawsuit is probably a bigger challenge than the case in itself as our evidence against the management is overwhelming.
Dr. Pierce once said that, “In America, one can only have as much justice as he has money to buy it with.”  There’s a lot of truth in that statement considering the thousands we’ve spent so far and will still have more to go. No matter how righteous our cause and just our case, we cannot get justice unless it is paid for and dearly at that. But the National Alliance is worth it and it’s that important to us.
We in NARRG didn’t want this lawsuit. We tried earnestly most of 2013 to open a dialog with Erich Gliebe to come to an agreement for an equitable exit plan. All we asked was that he and the other two Board members agree to talk about it. They literally snubbed us as they previously ignored the letters of many dozens of members who wrote to the Board to ask for redress of legitimate grievances.
That, of course, was not acceptable to us so…
This lawsuit is the last and final remaining chance of saving the National Alliance. In fact it is the ONLY option left.
We realize that it might be somewhat hard to think about giving a gift to NARRG with the foreknowledge that your money is going to end up in some lawyers pocket. The sad fact is however that without this help the National Alliance will never have a chance to ever become once again what it was before. We must first succeed here before we can begin the hard task of rebuilding the Movement.
This is it! It’s either NOW or NEVER.
Without your help Our Cause will disappear along with everything that Dr. Pierce left in place for us as the current management wishes to sell off everything that the good Doctor worked so hard to build for us. National Alliance is much more than just a name. It’s name was almost a brand that inferred high quality a little over a decade ago. That has been endangered due to years of poor management and reduction in the quality of some of the human material it possessed afterwards. Our aim is a correction of a situation too long left seriously unchallenged.
The NARRG team has borne the majority of the expense incurred in this suit thus far. However, since we announced the lawsuit and made preparations to be able to receive funding from others, we have already been receiving some encouraging support. And to all those who have given, you have our heartfelt thanks.
This post represents a concerted effort to fund-raise. We need your help and need it in the short term to keep up with our expenses.
We especially need some more larger gifts of $50 to $200. Each one of these received means a substantial amount of legal time and work that can be accomplished.
And if you’re one of those few who could afford more than $200 and up to $1,000 gift; that would be a Godsend as actually it is some of these types of gifts given by the NARRG team and its immediate supporters that have thus far been offered that have carried us to this point.
But please, for the majority of people who can only afford the smaller gifts of $10, $20 or more, these are very much in demand as added together they count up to a lot. What is important is that you do your best to help and become a part of the process and therefore a part of the solution.
It would be great if former members would take the suggestion of supporter Kurt Johnson who has commented on our website that former members should give what they were pledging each month as if this were you’re actual National Alliance pledge. And in a real sense that’s what it would be as NARRG is the National Alliance and a successful execution of this lawsuit will make it legal.
Your assistance is needed NOW please! Use either our mailing address for checks and money orders or take advantage of our convenient and easy PayPal feature. Expenditures are mounting and we’re doing our best to keep up with them. As mentioned earlier, the fund-raising is the most challenging part of this effort. If we can continue to raise the needed funds the lawsuit will take care of itself.
Join with Dr. Pierce’s brother Sanders Pierce and others at NARRG to help us win back our beloved National Alliance. He more than anyone would know what his brother wanted the National Alliance to be. If you haven’t already listened to Mr. Pierce’s March 14th interview, do so now here on this website and know that what we are trying to accomplish is history making and you can help be a part of it.  Our success within our circles and those of the enemy will be likened to a “Shot heard round the world!”
New Era for the National Alliance is at hand! Help your National Alliance to be reborn once again. ACT NOW!

In addition…

We are highlighting a Q&A made on a previous post that will shed some additional light on NARRG’s legal expenses:

Meet Board Member Ryan Maziarka

Meet Board Member Ryan Maziarka

Ryan Maziarka
The following link is an article that appeared in the Daily Pressnewspaper from the Newport News / Hampton, VA area in the March 23rd edition concerning National Alliance board of director member Ryan Maziarka who is one of the three defendants in NARRG’s civil action.

Busy Weekend

Busy Weekend

The SN movement has matured to the point where I spent Friday afternoon hanging out with friends visiting Alabama, all day Saturday at the League’s Alabama State Conference plotting the Montgomery rally against the SPLC, and now I should hopefully be meeting one of our readers in Tuscaloosa on Sunday.
Next weekend, we are traveling to Richmond, VA to meet up with our comrades there for a demonstration. It’s been quite a change of pace over the previous 12 years.
Note: There has been a change in mindset since Uvalda where Paul Bridges was run out of town.
No one cares about the SPLC anymore. There’s no reason to hide out and stay closeted on the internet and focus on “spreading ideas.” The internet is being used as an organizing, fundraising, and communication tool, not as an alternative reality.

Dr. Michael Hill: What is Southern Nationalism?

Major website publishes attack piece on whites who date Asian women

Thought Catalog is ranked as one of the top 600 websites in the USA.
One of the biggest website in the USA published an article attacking interracial relationships between white males and Asian women. It says that white men are the “most devious” of all people. It says that white men who date Asians are motivated by “racism and sexism,” while Asian women are “narrow sighted” for dating white men.
The article is significant because of the prominence of the publisher. is ranked by Alexa as 575th most popular website in the USA. It is also ranked as one of the top 1,000 websites in Canada, Australia, and is is within the top 500 in several Asian countries like Singapore and Malaysia. It is ranked as the 1,560th most popular website in the world.
They’re everywhere. I can’t walk half a yard down the high-fashion streets of Boston with my girlfriends without being visually assaulted by them. They are such an eyesore that I wish they would just put a big fat trigger warning on themselves, or just like wear one of those blankets that women from the Mid-East wear, jihads, or whatever, and cover up completely. Everytime I see one I can’t help but feel as though the Patriarchy is giving me a big fat Bitch slap on my rosy, supple 23 year old cheeks.
I am referring, of course, to WMAW couples: White Man – Asian Woman couples.
Like Jesus of the Christ, (excuse the Mexican shaming), but this just needs to stop!
Okay, so now you might be thinking like, Gosh Anne, why you gotta be all racist, they’re strong, independent yellow women, choosing their own partners in life. If they wanna date a white man, all the more power to them, right?
Wrong. The WMAW phenomenon is itself one steeped in Patriarchal values, sexism and racism. Ever since its breakout, it has caused white men to trick millions of Asian women into relationships in which they’re being heavily taken advantage of.
Asian women, are you too narrow-sighted to realize that the only reason the most privileged and devious group on this side of the Milky Way, White men, are trying to get all up in your wonton soup, is that they are heavily fetishizing you?
White men who chase after Asian Women are afflicted with something called, in laywomen’s terms, Yellow Fever, Asiaphilia or Hentai-ism. Unlike Scarlet fever, which, thanks to modern medicine was gotten rid of after like the First Spanish civil war, scientists back then had no clue how to cure its coeval cousin, the Yellow fever Pandemic. Even now, in 2014, or the Horsey year as you guys call it, we’re no closer to finding a cure.
Upon contraction of Yellow Fever, White men suddenly stop going after strong and beautiful white women like myself, and start trading us for our shorter, black haired and more yellow-hued sisters, namely, you people. Yellow fever is classed as a mental aberration and causes White men not only to date outside their own race, but also to see you Asian women as nothing but dehumanized, servile Toshiba robots.
White Men are in mass denial as to the severity of their illness, and try to mask it as a preference. When interrogated, they give a number of reasons and justifications as to why they suddenly begin crave girls of the more Animé persuasion, the most common being “Asian women are more pleasant than White women.”

Saturday, March 29, 2014

The Truth About Michael Chertoff

Evil Jewish Witch Dianne Feinstein Says the First Amendment is a “Privilege”

Here you have the Jewish monster Dianna Feinstein at a senate meeting attempting to explain why everyone should not have freedom of speech on the internet, claiming that a right to publish online is a “privilege,” rather a right guaranteed by the First Amendment. This is from the fourth quarter of last year.
Jews are afraid of any and every person who wishes to question them. And as it is of course impossible for them to engage us, they must instead attempt to silence us.
These attempts are constantly shutdown, as even as far gone as America is, we still do hold the right to speech as sacred. But the Jews just keep on pushing, every chance they get, knowing that eventually we will crack.

Friday, March 28, 2014

Forward Study of the Jewish Charity Industry

Dr.Kevin MacDonald

A theme at TOO, most recently the early days of the Israel Lobby,  is that Jewish wealth and willingness to contribute to ethnic causes is a cornerstone of Jewish influence. Simply put, Jewish causes are lavishly funded and provide ample career opportunities. Now the Forward is beginning a series of articles on “the Jewish charity industry”: “26 billion: the Jewish Charity Industry Uncovered.“ 
The $26 billion dollar figure in the title refers to the net assets of the network of explicitly Jewish charitable organizations, which puts it in the same league as a major corporation. Annual revenue is around $12-14 billion. Assuming an American Jewish population of around 6.4 million, this implies assets per capita  of over $4000 and per capita annual giving of around half that. Based on an older survey indicating 2.3 persons per Jewish household, annual giving per household would be around $4600.
These numbers are certainly not earth shaking, but, when broken down to particular categories, they indicate that Jewish activist organizations are indeed well funded, especially when compared to the financial resources of organizations that oppose Jewish interests (probably well under $1 million for organizations explicitly dedicated to advancing the interests of White Americans).
Forward Caption:  Israel: Contributions to the functional agencies of the Jewish charitable network, broken down by category. Israel-related groups get the most.
Forward Caption:
Israel: Contributions to the functional agencies of the Jewish charitable network, broken down by category. Israel-related groups get the most.
For example, 6% of the $3.7 billion in  annual donations for “functional charities” is allocated for “General Advocacy” ($222,000,000 annually), and 38% goes to Israel-related causes  ($1.4 billion annually). Advocacy presumably includes the ADL which reported revenue of over $53 million in 2012—enough to fund over $31 million in employee salaries (including Abe Foxman at $688,188 ) and 28 regional offices.
That’s a lot of power in opposition to White interests given the virtual non-existence of organizations explicitly dedicated to furthering White identification and interests.
These numbers for donations to Jewish charity are underestimates because the IRS doesn’t require synagogues to file tax returns, and the same goes for schools and seminaries.  As a result, “the $12 billion to $14 billion in annual revenue, the Forward’s best estimate based on tax filings, is probably billions of dollars short of the network’s actual size.”
The other way in which such a report fails to get at  the scope of financial support for Jewish ethnic activism is that it does not include organizations that are not explicitly Jewish but are supported by Jews for ethnic reasons. As Norman Podhoretz notes, Jews are the financial engine of the left, but of course the vast majority of charity for leftist causes would not appear in the Forward article because they are not explicitly Jewish organizations. (The ethnic component of Jewish involvement with the left is discussed in Chapter 3of The Culture of Critique.) A good example is the SPLC which is largely Jewish-funded but would not be considered a Jewish communal organization. (In 2012 the SPLC reported revenue of over $37 million and salaries of over $16 million.)
Or consider the neocon infrastructure, such as the Foundation for Defense of Democracies: All of the identifiable donors are Jews, including a host of well-known Jewish activists like Edgar M. Bronfman ($1,050,000)  and Michael Steinhardt ($850,000) who co-founded the Birthright Israel program that brings Jewish young people to Israel for a dose of Jewish patriotism. Haim Saban, who is a pro-Israel fanatic but usually supports left-wing causes in the Diaspora, donated $10,000.
The same goes for the Republicans and Democrats, where Jewish funding promotes Israel and the liberal/left values of the Jewish community (likely at least 60% of Democrat funding, and at least 40% of Republican). Right now“Republicans who are considering a run for president are courting Sheldon Adelson [who donated more than $100 million in the last presidential election cycle] as a preliminary to everything else they must do to prove their worthiness, like kissing babies in Iowa or formulating a position on jobs.” And anyone with a half a brain knows that Adelson’s support begins and ends with what the candidate will do for Israel.
Ditto for David Gelfand’s donation of more than $100 million to the  Sierra Club on condition that it adopt a view on immigration in sync with the views of the organized Jewish community. (My gloss, but it’s hard to believe that his donation did not reflect the typical Jewish commitment to displacement-level immigration).
I could go on forever listing this sort of thing.
In other words, a lot of the most destructive Jewish funding is not included in these figures. And even though the donations to the explicitly Jewish organizations covered by the article are only the tip of the iceberg, there is no suggestion that the Jewish community is highly mobilized at this time, as indicated by the per capita data. A crisis in Israel would lead to a huge upsurge of Jewish funding, as it did during the 1967 and 1973 wars — as would any indication that White Americans are beginning to develop a sense of racial identity and beginning to assert their interests as Whites by developing explicitly White organizations which have the wherewithal to make a difference.

“No War for Israel” Site Relaunched

Lovers of peace around the world will be glad to hear that the “No War for Israel” website, first made popular during the criminal Zionist-created war against Iraq, has been re-launched.
The revamped website, which can be found here, will continue to serve as an archive on the Zionist manipulations which led to the Iraq war, but will also now be regularly updated to monitor and expose the Zionist Supremacist conspiracy to generate other wars, particularly against Syria and Iraq.
There is a contact page on that website as well, where would-be contributors can submit articles.



Christian groups are celebrating with the news that the Federal Bureau of Investigation appears to have scrubbed the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) from its hate crimes webpage, where the controversial group was listed as a resource and referred to as a partner in public outreach.

A letter to the U.S. Department of Justice, drafted by Lieutenant General (Ret.) William G. Boykin, Executive Vice President of the Family Research Council (FRC), calls such an association "completely unacceptable."
Signed by fourteen other conservative and Christian leaders, the letter calls SPLC "a heavily politicized organization producing inaccurate and biased data on 'hate groups' – not hate crimes." It accuses the SPLC of "providing findings that are not consistent with trends found in the FBI statistics." Where the FBI has found hate crimes and hate groups declining significantly in the past ten years, SPLC claims hate groups have increased 67.3% since 2000. Where once SPLC's hate list was reserved for groups like the Aryan Nation and the KKK, in 2010 SPLC started citing as hate groups those Christian groups that oppose same-sex marriage or believe homosexuality is not inborn, or are otherwise critical of homosexuality. Among the Christian groups targeted by SPLC was FRC.
In the fall of 2012, Floyd Lee Corkins, armed with a loaded semi-automatic pistol and 100 rounds of ammunition, entered FRC headquarters not far from FBI headquarters in downtown Washington, D.C. Corkins shot the front desk security guard and tried to gain entrance to the upper floors where he intended to kill FRC employees. Though wounded, the front desk security guard subdued Corkins, who became the first person ever convicted under the Washington, D.C., domestic terrorism law. Corkins said he got the idea of killing FRC employees from reading the SPLC hate list and made use of a map of the FRC office found on the SPLC website.
The Boykin letter concludes that "it is completely inappropriate for the Department of Justice to recommend public reliance on the SPLC hate group lists and data." The letter demanded that all ties between the FBI and SPLC be severed.
SPLC has come under severe criticism from the left and the right in recent years.
Writing in the left-wing website Counterpunch, Alexander Coburn called SPLC founder Morris Dees "king of the hate business." Coburn wrote, "Ever since 1971, U.S. Postal Service mailbags have bulged with Dees' fundraising letters, scaring dollars out of the pockets of trembling liberals aghast at his lurid depictions of hate-sodden America, in dire need of legal confrontation by the SPLC." In fact, so prolific is Dees at direct mail that he is in the Direct Marketing Association Hall of Fame.
Writing at the Harper's Magazine blog in 2007, Ken Silverstein said, "What [the SPLC] does best... is to raise obscene amounts of money by hyping fears about the power of [right-wing fringe] groups; hence the SPLC has become the nation's richest 'civil rights' organization."
A critical analysis published recently by Professor George Yancey of North Texas University concluded that SPLC targets only those groups its leaders disagree with politically while leaving liberal groups who use extreme language alone.
A 2013 article in Foreign Policy concluded that SPLC exaggerates the hate crimes threat, saying SPLC is not an "objective purveyor of data," instead calling them "anti-hate activists" and suggesting that their reports need to be "weighed more carefully by news outlets that cover their pronouncements."
Though SPLC sits on a bank account of $250 million and raises some $40 million a year in direct mail, some have suggested that the decline of racist groups and therefore the need to tap new sources of funds might have led Dees and his colleagues to target Christian groups as new sources of revenue. Weekly Standard writer Charlotte Hays says, "...several critics with whom I spoke speculated that the last might represent another of Dees's efforts to tap via mailing lists into a well-off and easily frightened donor base: gays."
What has concerned Christian groups in recent years is that their inclusion on the hate list and the use of the hate list by the FBI is unfair and even dangerous to their civil liberties. After all, holding the view that gayness is not inborn and opposing same-sex marriage are hardly against the law.
FRC president Tony Perkins said, "We commend the FBI for removing website links to the Southern Poverty Law Center, an organization that not only dispenses erroneous data but has been linked to domestic terrorism in federal court. We hope this means the FBI leadership will avoid any kind of partnership with the SPLC."
Read Boykin's letter to the FBI at:

‘Shocked’ Anti-Defamation League Slaps FBI ‘Diss on Hate Crimes

Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner, March 27, 2014
The Southern Poverty Law Center, which has labeled several Washington, D.C.-based family organizations as “hate groups” for favoring traditional marriage, has been dumped as a “resource” on the FBI’s Hate Crime Web page, a significant rejection of the influential legal group.
The Web page scrubbing, which also included eliminating the Anti-Defamation League, was not announced and came in the last month after 15 family groups pressed Attorney General Eric Holder and FBI Director James Comey to stop endorsing a group–SPLC–that inspired a recent case of domestic terrorism at the Family Research Council.
“We commend the FBI for removing website links to the Southern Poverty Law Center, an organization that not only dispenses erroneous data but has been linked to domestic terrorism in federal court. We hope this means the FBI leadership will avoid any kind of partnership with the SPLC,” Tony Perkins, FRC President, told Secrets.
“The Southern Poverty Law Center’s mission to push anti-Christian propaganda is inconsistent with the mission of both the military and the FBI, which is to defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States,” he added.
The Anti-Defamation League, however, was “shocked” by the FBI’s move, made without any notice. It’s work with the FBI has not been questioned.
Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, told Secrets, “We are shocked, surprised and disappointed that this would be done without any consultation with groups such as ours who have been working closely with the Federal Bureau of Investigation on issues of hate crime. We look forward to having further conversations with them on this issue.”

National Prayer Network


By Rev. Ted Pike
25 Mar 14

For more than forty years two arch liberal Jewish "civil liberties" fronts have promoted hate crimes laws, ceaselessly attempting to ensnare members of the Christian/conservative right as "haters."  They are the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center.  ADL is best known as architect of hate crimes laws worldwide.  Following passage of its U.S. federal hate crimes law, the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act, ADL boasted: " Our legal experts pioneered hate crime laws and work to implement them nationwide." ("Problems to Solutions: Building a Better World, ADL Annual Report,"
SPLC ("ADL South"), despite its name, has generally favored a more emotional approach toward suppressing the Christian/conservative right.  They describe Christian watchdog groups, such as Family Research Council and the National Prayer Network, as "hate groups."  They even provide online maps of our locations.
Yet the ADL/SPLC agenda of condemning bias against groups they promote (and protect against hate crimes prosecution), such as Jews, blacks, homosexuals, and Muslims, may be becoming wearisome even to long-time partners in hate crimes enforcement.  On the federal level, these may include the FBI and U.S. Department of Justice.
Astonishingly, the FBI has removed both ADL and SPLC as NGO (non-government organization) resources for its hate crimes web page. ADL's Abe Foxman vows to contest this affront.  Yet, at least for the moment, an era of greatest influence of ADL over the FBI may be cooling.  In fact, the desire to cooperate with ADL's hate crimes agenda also seems to be on the decline as ADL annually complains that many U.S. states fail to supply statistics of hate crimes.  Also, the ardor of foreign nations for ADL's hate laws agenda is undeniably cooling.  Here is a brief history.
When Pres. Clinton appointed Janet Reno head of the U.S. Justice Department, one of her first acts was to require FBI director William Sessions to forge a very close working relationship with ADL.  This helped facilitate passage of the Hate Crimes Statistics Act.  It requires police departments in all U.S. states to provide the U.S. government (and ADL) with statistics of hate and bias crimes.  Such statistics are fraudulent because only the smallest percentage of such "crimes" have been adjudicated in court to determine if they are true crimes.  A large percentage consist of nothing more than name-calling and minor acts of discrimination.  Yet such "statistics," annually touted by ADL, give the impression ADL desires: that an "epidemic of hate" is ravaging America.  This has necessitated not only prompt passage of ADL hate laws by states but ADL's dream: a federal U.S. statute.
ADL's propaganda, facilitated by obedient police departments everywhere in America, was spectacularly successful.  By 2000, legislators in 45 U.S. states had practically lined up to pass hate laws that, ADL assured them, would "send a strong message that hate crimes will not be tolerated in America."
Having persuaded Canada to pass ADL's federal hate crimes law in 1971, ADL convinced Australia and New Zealand to do the same and then dozens of nations in Europe.  By 2005, ADL's European hate crimes gestapo, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, was in full operation with 55 member nations passing ADL hate laws and pledging to supply ADL with the same unadjudicated statistical "evidence" of rampant hate crimes.  From 2004 to 2007, ADL was riding high as the global hate laws promoter, receiving a wealth of police and government statistics worldwide.  This empowered ADL to persuade Congress to authorize creation of ADL's Department of Global Anti-Semitism in the U.S. State Department.  Operating entirely on ADL statistics (and U.S. taxpayer dollars) and with full government authorization, the department promised to "eradicate" such "anti-Semitism" as the Biblical claim that Jews masterminded crucifixion of Christ, any "strong" criticism of Israel, and questioning the accuracy of the six-million figure of Jewish Holocaust dead.
Yet, although ADL has successfully saddled almost every western nation with hate laws, it is clearly becoming harder for ADL to obtain cooperation.  By 2009 ADL complained that European nations increasingly failed to supply statistics.  As a result, OSCE has virtually collapsed, with publishing its last article about OSCE in 2011. In turn, the Department of Global Anti-Semitism, no longer receiving statistics from OSCE, has become little more than a nametag on a door in the U.S. State Department.
Such lack of cooperation by OSCE nations undoubtedly results from the inconvenience of collecting statistics.  Yet, increasingly, many nations may be starting to realize that hate laws only benefit ADL's rise to power at the expense of freedom.  Clearly, long-term resistance to hate laws by groups such as Paul Fromm's Canadian Association for Free Expression and the National Prayer Network is having its desired effect: postponing complete loss of freedom long enough for slow-learning politicians and governments to gradually perceive the destructive and persecutive effects of hate laws and who is behind them.
Unfortunately, many hundreds of federal, state, and provincial hate laws worldwide, while easiest to enact, have proven virtually impossible to repeal.  Legislators who passed hate laws lacked courage and independence of mind, and without those characteristics it is exponentially more difficult to repeal these Orwellian laws.  Also, because ADL is extremely protective of the legal ground they have gained, they vilify as anti-Semitic or discriminatory any legislation that suggests going back to traditional legal systems.  This is exactly the role ADL has been playing behind the scenes, as legal efforts in Kansas, Arizona, and now Missouri attempt to protect Christian business owners from harshly punitive, ADL-orchestrated state "nondiscrimination" laws. Such laws may fine Christian bakers, printers, photographers, etc. hundreds of thousands of dollars for not lending their creativity to homosexual "weddings."
Encourage the FBI!
The FBI has shown great courage in removing ADL and SPLC as NGOs they consult; but, considering ADL's staggering power to defame through accusations of anti-Semitism, we could well expect an apology to ADL/SPLC with reinstatement.  To help prevent this, call the FBI at 202-324-3000and tell them: "Congratulations on your courageous decision to remove ADL from your website.  Please do not be intimidated by ADL's inevitable attempt to portray the FBI as anti-Semitic, as they have done to countless truth-telling Americans."

Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.
To contact Rev. Ted Pike call (503) 631-3808 or email
The freedom-saving outreach of Rev. Ted Pike and the National Prayer Network is solely supported by sale of books, videos and your financial support. All gifts are tax-deductible.

National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015

White Man March 2.0
Preparing for White Man March 2.0

Stop White Genocide, Knoxville TN - March 15 2014

Over at Radix Journal, Gunnar Davey has written a dismissive article on the White Man March.
I’m going to withhold judgment on the movement until it holds a few more events. In the meantime, I attribute most of the mistakes highlighted in this article to inexperience with activism.
There’s plenty of room for improvement in the White Man March. At this point, I am of the view that almost anything would be an improvement over the status quo in the White Nationalist movement. I think the movement needs to shift away from the internet, which has dominated it for the past twenty years, and back toward the real world. I also see more potential in addressing criticism than more Nietzsche essays.
Here are some practical suggestions for the organizers of White Man March 2.0 which is scheduled for April 19th:
1.) Learning From Experience – The flaws of the first White Man March on March 15, which attracted the bulk of the criticism above, are so obvious that the organizers of the next event are well positioned to improve on their previous outing.
- Don’t wear masks in public while holding a “Diversity = White Genocide” banner. This fatally undermines your moral message and sends a signal to the public that even you believe that your message is morally illegitimate.
- Don’t post stickers in toilet stalls and upload them to event threads on the internet. The only thing this accomplishes is inviting mockery. There are much better targets in public places for stickers than men’s restrooms. The League has posted SECEDE stickers in all kinds of public places all over the South.
- Don’t allow uniformed groups to hijack your event. This will inevitably invite harsh criticism from within the movement. Stick to business casual at public events. Avoid creating unnecessary distractions with flags and attire.
- The “Diversity = White Genocide” banners that were used in the White Man March were clearly visible, but some of the signs that were used by activists were homemade. I’m not sure how these banners are being distributed to WMM activists, but there is no reason why the signs can’t be improved by having them designed by companies like VistaPrint orSigns on the Cheap and distributed in the same way.
Of the previous White Man March events than I have seen, the one in Knoxville strikes me as the best done and should be the model for the next event. Even here, there is some room for improvement in the filmmaking department.
2.) Event Control – This was a problem at the previous White Man March and seems to have been caused by a lack of experience, organization, and coordination. It is mainly due to hosting a global event, which is something that I would not recommend, that was open to any White Nationalist to participate at any location of their choosing.
Here are some recommendations:
- Create a Facebook event for official White Man March locations. Set the privacy settings to “Friends of Guests” or “Invitees Only.” Plan your event well in advance. Make sure your activists are all on the same page well in advance.
- Have a point man in charge of each official location – Knoxville, Harrison, Olympia, etc. – and charge them with the responsibility of enforcing a general set of guidelines. Make sure you have a designated spokesman to talk to the media.
- If you want to hold a roadside demonstration like in Knoxville, don’t do it unless you have a minimum of five people. You will also need someone with a camera and video camera to take photos and video of the event.
3.) Messaging – Personally, I believe “Anti-Racist = Anti-White” is more effective and less hyperbolic than “Diversity = White Genocide.”
I also think that spreading this message in the real world with billboards, roadside demonstrations, and hanging banners from overpasses generates much more publicity and is a lot more effective – particularly when you stand behind your message in public, shoulder to shoulder, with other pro-Whites like in Knoxville – than spamming “The Mantra” in internet comment sections.
4.) Yard Signs – If you are going to deploy yard signs for the White Man March, it needs to be centrally coordinated to ensure the event stays on message. Set up a PayPal account. Raise money. Design your signs through VistaPrint or Signs on the Cheap. Order the signs. Distribute them to your activists like the banners.
5.) Large Metro Areas – If you are going to participate in the White Man March, you need to understand beforehand that the reaction that you will likely get from the public will vary tremendously depending upon your location.
The so-called “anti-fa,” for example, are much stronger in large metro areas like Portland, New York City, Chicago, and Washington, DC than in small and mid-size towns like Harrison, AK or Florence, KY.  They’re much stronger in the Northeast and West Coast than in the South, Midwest, or Interior West.

Major University study finds African Americans to be incredibly racist
But a new study of 212 black college students made available to Secrets found little open-mindedness: Blacks don’t like it when other blacks associate with whites, to the point of refusing help to an African-American experiencing “a run of bad luck” — just because they have white friends.
The study in the April edition of the authoritative journal Social Psychological and Personality Science found the so-called “black code” alive and kicking, prompting blacks far more than whites to frown on one of their own if they associate with the other race.
“Having cross-race friends made black [examples] seem ‘less black,’” wrote two psychology scholars in their study of students at an unnamed historically black college. “However, having cross-race friends did not necessarily make white [examples] seem ‘more black.’”
Authors Leslie Ashburn-Nardo of Indiana University-Purdue University Indiana and James D. Johnson of the University of the South Pacific said the findings could undermine efforts by blacks to push into the corporate world if they are concerned about how their African American friends perceive them. The reason: “Their success will inevitably involve close associations with whites.”
They wrote: “Blacks sometimes strategically imply that they have connections to whites in an effort to increase their probability of success in the corporate world. Doing so may be a means of distancing themselves from negative group stereotypes or perhaps a ‘disarming mechanism’ to enhance their acceptability in the eyes of white employers or colleagues. Regardless of motive, such strategic out-group alignment may put blacks at risk for identity denial from fellow in-group members.”
The study tested the “black code,” in which “relationships with whites must be kept at arm’s length maintaining a silent us against them mindset. Blacks who appear too friendly and comfortable around whites are viewed with suspicion; their blackness in question.”
It looked at how the 1,200 black college students perceived racial identity of blacks with white friends, and also their empathy for blacks facing hardship who have white friends.
The present experiment examined identity denial and reduced empathy for in-group (vs. out-group) targets as a function of the racial composition of their social networks. Black participants rated in-group (Black) targets as more weakly racially identified and expressed less empathy for in-group targets with cross-race close friends versus same-race close friends or no friends. Furthermore, the effect of social network composition on empathy was mediated by perceived racial identity. These findings were limited to the in-group target. Although the out-group (White) target was rated as more weakly identified when shown with cross-race close friends versus same-race close friends or no friends, neither social network composition nor perceived racial identity predicted empathy for the out-group target. These findings extend previous research on identity denial and suggest that, for Blacks, closely associating with Whites undermines the usually robust pattern of in-group empathy.

SPLC President Richard Cohen Abandons Sinking Ship

OH GLORIOUS DAY! After all these years, where were you when  the stock of the Poverty Palace crashed and collapsed under the weight of i...