Sunday, September 29, 2013

Police state horror in Florida. Lakeland Police Chief defends shocking behavior during traffic stops

An attractive young female is stopped for a broken headlight. She is then subjected to what most would describe as extremely unnecessary harassment by a male Lakeland police officer. The department is defending the actions and admits that it is routine.
Zoe Brugger was simply giving her boyfriend a ride home from work. She had a broken headlight, and was pulled over by Lakeland Florida police. What should have been a routine “fix-it” ticket turned into a roadside nightmare. I guess Lakeland Police decided they were going see one set of high beams one way or another from Ms Brugger. To add insult to injury, an FBI investigation investigation concluded that the Officer’s actions were appropriate.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation now seems to be the Female Body Inspectors. The findings of the FBI are as insulting and as outrageous as the original incident.
State Attorney Jerry Hill who called the incident at the time “illegal” and “inappropriate.” The State Attorney said there was no way the search was appropriate.
Officer Dustin Fetz was issued a one day suspension and was being ordered to attend retraining. It was originally reported that the suspension was for the search. The FBI was requested to investigate the matter further. However, the UK Mail’s investigation revealed that Fetz’s suspension was not for the search, but for not recording the incident. He was technically suspended not for making Miss Brugger shake out her bra, but instead for not using his microphone to record audio during the traffic stop – or for several previous stops he made, according to theLakeland Ledger.
This is outrageous. First having to shake out one’s bra because the officer doesn’t believe its contents are part of your body, then the public shake-out on the side of the road, and then to be given deceptive information on the disciplinary action of the officer on the incident, and then have the FBI rule that this whole incident was legal?
Lakeland Police Chief Womack stated that Lakeland’s policies would be changed as a result of the incident. However, Womack’s words were just as insulting as the original search:
In a nutshell, they said there were no civil rights or color of law violations. I don’t believe we’ll have any further issues in this manner with this officer. ”This is not to say that clothing of any kind will never be manipulated, but it will only be done by a same gendered officer and will only be done for articulable reasons

1 comment:

  1. Alas, there is nothing new about this shameful incident conducted by law-enforcement officers who, presumably, swore to protect and up-hold the mandates contained in the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution, specifically the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of "unreasonable search and siezure." Unfortunately, law enforcement agencies throughout Amerika have become increasingly emboldened in their abuses of the formerly free citizens of this "Land of the Free." The intention of the Founding Fathers of this erstwhile free Republic was that its citizens were to be the masters of the government whose purpose is to serve and protect them, not the reverse. When the government of a "free and open society" abuses its citizens...that society is no longer free and open but, rather, a slave and closed one, like Stalin's Soviet Union or Mao-Tse-Tung's Red China, among other despotic states. American law enforcement entities have, in recent decades, been accorded much too much power...power that they abuse to abuse the citizens they purportedly serve. This sad and sorry state of affairs will, so this writer perceives...only worsten in time. Americans are now a debased, ignorant people who do not know their lawful rights, ignorance that is fully exploited by rogue cops. Again...ignorance is NOT bliss...and can be deadly to citizens who know not their rights...