Saturday, August 20, 2011

White police officer killed in unprovoked racially motivated double shooting

White police officer killed in unprovoked racially motivated double shooting.

This McDonald security camera photo shows officer Jeremy Henwood buying lunch for a ten year old boy minutes before he is murdered. Photo from Fox News.

Jeremy Henwood, a white police officer in San Diego, California was murdered in an unprovoked attack by a black thug. The thug, Dejon White, is suspected of critically wounding another white police officer one day earlier. The only motivation appears to be racial hatred of white people.

Henwood was a captain in the US Marine Corps, who had recently returned from active duty in Afghanistan.

There has been a shocking rise in anti-police spree shootings in 2011. In every case that has been made aware to the staff at, the killer is black and the victims are white.

Officer Henwood was constantly trying to help the local community. Just minutes before he was killed he bought lunch for a young black child, whom he thought was being neglected by his parents.

After leaving McDonalds, a car pulled behind Henwood’s patrol car and flashed his lights. Henwood pulled over and rolled his window down.

Officer Martin Hanna was parking his car when a man walked up to the driver side window and shot him in the face. Dejon White is believed to be the perpetrator. Photo from NBC San Diego.

Dejon White, a local black male gangbanger pulled up next to Henwood and shot him to death.

As police hunted for Dejon White, he waited in the parking lot of another burger joint with his girlfriend and a shotgun on his lap. He was killed in a shoot out with police.

Officer Martin Hanna was maimed by a shotgun blast in the face at pointblank range. He is fighting for his life at a local hospital. Police believe the same thug shot him.

Thursday, August 18, 2011

A Letter to Ted Pike from David Duke

A Letter to Ted Pike from David Duke

My Letter to Rev. Ted Pike

The Rev. Ted Pike sent out an email letter to his supporter list that was quite critical of me and I believe it to be quite inaccurate and unfair. My beliefs were presented more in an ADL-style caricature rather than in their true nature. I am reluctant to write anything, but since his letter is public, I think it is important to deal with some of these issues publicly as they are vital in the struggle ahead of us. As I say in this letter. I will not stop supporting any project that Ted Pike is involved in that that helps in the fight against Zionism. But, I it is important to respond to this letter and I hope that he will come to realize and acknowledge my true positions and not simply parrot the attitude of the ADL against me. As I have said many times before, I believe in both my heart and mind that my position is the opposite of the Jewish-media-defined term, racism. In fact, I don’t seek to suppress any race but to empower every people to their own values and freedom!

One further note: If you agree with me, I urge all of you to write a very polite letter to Ted Pike and let him know why you think his letter against me is not beneficial to our cause, urging him to unity rather than division in our ranks! Ted Pike can be emailed at

Dear Ted,

We have corresponded for decades, and for decades I have promoted your articles, your books and your videos. I have recognized and praised your incisive exposé of both Zionism and the very root of its evil, the Jewish Supremacism of Judaism.

I just can’t understand your adopting of the Jewish interpretation of my message and criticizing me for saying things almost identical to what you yourself preach.

Perhaps we don’t agree with one another on every view, and I don’t think there are any two Christians who actually agree on every point of Christian theology, nor do we need to agree on everything. But we don’t need to snipe at each other either, while hatefilled Jewish extremists try to destroy us both and drench the world in evil. We should be brothers in the fight against Zionism.

Not once in three decades have I ever criticized you. I have done nothing other than promote your work to my own supporters. Even after a your inaccurate criticism of me a couple of months ago, I stayed completely silent in the vain hope that you would focus on the real enemy and not pick fights with your friends.

But obviously I am now forced to defend myself from some of your statements about me that really do nothing but aid the Jewish agenda. It is bad enough to be roasted daily by the Jewish supremacists and then have to endure it from someone I consider a friend.

I consider you a very intelligent, decent man and good Christian. I just can’t understand why you couldn’t realize that your public letter attacking my views for the preservation of European freedom and heritage, only serves the Zionist agenda!

Now, you are echoing these anti-White racists in what you are saying to me. So I am forced to answer you publicly as you have criticized me publicly, not simply to set the record straight with clarity on my own positions, but because our people must understand that to defend our existence, our rights and our very heritage as a people is not in any way unchristian or anti-Christian. And since a great portion of White people are Christians, and since the overwhelming proportion of Christians are White people, this is a devastating and destructive proposition that serves only the Jewish supremacists. It increases their power over us in the West and in turn it actually harms the other races of the world who are great affected by devastating Western military and social power.

Let me start with a clear example from your letter. You are basically attack me for openly trying protect and preserve our European Christian communities, but you say in your letter, that one of the primary goals of the Jewish supremacists is to seek the destruction of the European people. Any objective reader will realize pretty quickly that you take essentially the same things that I do in a letter of criticism of me! And ,I am confident that anyone who watches my videos and reads my books would say that I have a decent and fair-minded attitude toward other races and believe they are entitled the same rights of heritage and freedom as we Europeans are. I quote your exact words in your own letter, in your letter critical of me:

“The primary threat facing us is brutally simple: Jewish supremacists want to take over the world and establish their anti-Christ world government, centering in Jerusalem, Babylon the Great. (See, ‘Babylon the Great’ is Israel) But the white race contains proven characteristics of leadership, empire building, invention and originality. How do the elders of Zion intend to weaken and destroy such characteristics that might empower future revolt against their Zionist masters?

“It is undeniable that Jewish activists have encouraged genetic and cultural race-mixing. Through civil rights laws, media, academia, and on all social levels, Jewish supremacists have sought to dilute and disempower white and Christian culture and to promote multiculturalism and multiracialism at every level. This is irrefutable and well documented by Jewish historians. The Bible indicates that this agenda does not stem from benevolence. Instead, it is part of a diabolical anti-Christ attempt to create a more malleable, less independent world population whose societies are less inclined to defend themselves. The Book of Daniel says that under anti-Christ world government the “iron” people will be genetically united with the “clay” peoples. (Daniel 2:41-43) The Jewish multiculturalists will succeed.”…

“Christians must oppose the Jewish religious/Talmudic vendetta against Christianity, white culture and even American borders. Yet our enemy is not the various non-white peoples who are seeking a better life! (To his credit, Duke also acknowledges this.) …

“…At the same time, the Bible teaches that God has legitimized the general “bounds” of races, the right of founder peoples or religions to predominate in a nation or region. This has been universally respected through history. For example, most in the West without question accept Israel’s extreme immigration controls, defining itself as a Jewish and a religiously Orthodox nation.”

So while you say this is the Zionist goal and that the enemies of God and Jesus seek to genetically destroy the White race and all races, you condemn me for saying the same thing but for also daring to stand up and protect our people from this same Zionist genocide of your own people, Ted…?

You are suggesting that opposing this evil Jewish Supremacist, Zionist, Talmudic plan of genocide that I am not a good Christian, but if that is true then, by your own words, neither are you. You are doing not only harm to me but harm to myself but to your own self and your own stated beliefs!

You suggest how terrible it is of me to envisage White communities and nations, to evoke even what we had in Europe for thousands of years! You literally quote the slander of me by one of the most evil anti-Christian Zionists on the planet, Abraham Foxman of the ADL! Though you soften it a bit by saying that you “wouldn’t put it past the ADL to misrepresent Duke, as they have me.” Yet, you say, “Yet the ideal of forced extradition of black Americans to Africa has always permeated hard core southern racism.”

And by the way, Ted, I know you are from the far north, but we down south don’t need your condescending tone about “Southern racism.” I and every true Southerner reading this will be offended by your statement. And I think our my good friends in the North and all over the Earth will be offended by this slur on your Southern White Christian brothers!

The fact is that almost every leading founder of the United States, South and North supported the American Colonization Society which supported the idea that Whites should support Black people creating their own sovereign society and ultimately a nation. These men were concerned about the future of the America but they also expressed genuine concern caring about Black people as well and believed it was in their benefit to be free and devise whatever society that they could naturally and without interference.

Black self-determination has had huge historical Black support and is was supported by the most popular Black leader of the early 20th Century, Marcus Garvey. This wildly popular Black leader delivered a petition of millions of Blacks to Congress asking for help to establish their own homeland! As you know, and have talked about this fact yourself, Martin Luther King was nothing but a totally controlled Jewish puppet). Rev. Farrakhan, sponsor of the Million Man March, also supports separation and he is arguably the most popular Black leader in America even at this moment. So why do we need to force anything? It is only the Jewish power over media and government that literally keeps this peaceful and popular (though logistically difficult) solution to the race problem from occurring.

For the record I have never in my life supported forced extradition of anyone in America with one exception, people who are illegally here in the first place. Frankly that they should be deported immediately and our government has the legal obligation to enforce our laws to do this. I have always maintained that after the Jewish supremacists are deposed from both the levers of media and government control — that both Blacks and Whites will overwhelmingly embrace this great dream of living in a society that fully supports their own particular expression of humanity and culture and values. Again, Ted, the only force that has stopped a fair and just solution for the race problem has been the Zionists who profit from a racially and culturally fractured society.

Also Ted, I am appalled at your attack on my reference to peaceful European communities with your “litany of European wars” reference, That itself is a racist-tinged argument. Every people and every nation on the planet have engaged in aggressive wars, but the civil harmony of homogenous parts of Europe is legendary. I am painfully aware of the faults within our people and I have always said that Europeans biggest historical faults are 1) The fratricidal wars of our people, including the Zionist fomented, catastrophically destructive and murderous Second World War, and 2) Our inability to recognize the existential threat posed by the Jewish extremists who have infiltrated our lands.

In my last video I referred to the safe, nonviolent peaceful European communities, I was obviously speaking about the civil and social life of Europe. I was contrasting the racially driven riots of Great Britain, and France and Italy and the obscenely high crime rates of the non-Europeans across the European populated world. Of course everyone who has spent time in still intact, pristine European populated regions of Europe, knows this. Most often, even if you accidentally forget your iphone somewhere it will more than likely still be there when you come back, wholly unlike the Babylonian polyglot societies blighted by mass immigration.

I know that you know that the mass immigration of non-Europeans into Europe and America has produced enormous amount of criminal activity and violence as well as societal strife and conflict, just as the Zionist multi-racialists knew would happen. And such today even fuels misguided support for Zionist Israel because the media says that Israel is fighting the same enemy. Of course the fact is, that Zionist power structure around the world has supported mass non-European immigration into Europe and America while stringently protecting the Jewish racial demographics of Israel. They boast of it. But now you are saying that for me to oppose this Zionist agenda, makes me a dangerous person.

I even though I go out of my way to stress that I don’t blame immigrants for seeking a better life, but that we have a right to preserve our homelands and protect our borders and homelands.

This division in anti-Zionist ranks is absolutely appalling. You will notice that in my long term activism of over 40 years, I have never attacked anyone who stands up against the Zionist power. Although my particular Christian beliefs might diverge from some particular views of yours, I have never publicly disagreed with you on any matter, and only helped and promoted you in every way.

And Ted, I am not attacking you now, I am simply defending myself and all of the European people who must have the same rights of survival as any other race on earth. I seek no harm or suppression to any other peoples, no matter how you or Abraham might twist what I say.

Also I do believe in intrinsic, real differences between the races in physiological traits, intellect, and even what is called character traits that have different expressions in culture. The fact that God respects all races, even all life on earth, is not a refutation of the facts of race and DNA, but a confirmation of it. By preserving these creations we are honoring God not refuting him. I am very careful to never use a characterization of superior or inferior in regard to any people. That is not necessary to say, it is suffice to say that we have differences and that those differences should be respected, not suppressed.

I think the fact that you try to strike against me because of your interpretation of my scientifically borne beliefs about nature and evolution is not really appropriate here. Christians and anti-Zionists have all kinds of views on many subjects, you don’t have to suggest someone should be shunned or not listened to because they have a specific opinion in one area that is different from yours. If you want to debate evolution with someone fine, but that is really not the subject here.

I have read your writings for decades now. And, I have seen you praise, quote and even feature the work and writings of ant–Zionists who themselves were Marxists, even communists, and yet you did so with nary a word of their affiliations. I have seen you feature the writings of anti-Zionists for their good work who did not believe as you do that the earth and universe was created in 7 days. Some even say that the immense age of the earth and the stars and almost infinite expanse of the universe is a testimony to God and not a refutation. Can we really afford to make enemies of other people on certain views of Science or interpretations of the Bible in the face of the worldwide, globalist evil destroying the lives, health, morality, and freedom of billions of the world’s people.

No, in your reporting the works of these other anti-Zionists, there extraneous beliefs weren’t even an issue, and why should they be? Why should I be any different?

I suggest that the difference with me is that the Jews have so demonized me, it is almost a form of self-defense from Jewish power to criticize me. It’s like saying, “I am no anti-Semite, no racist, that David Duke, he’s the racist anti-Semite.”

You admit the incredible “anti-Zionist power” of my videos, which many people say are among the best in the world to wake people up to the evil of Jewish Supremacism. As you know I have incredible videos exposing the anti-Christian evil of Christian Zionism. So why do the work of Abraham Foxman and give them the chance to possibly say that “even fellow ‘anti-Semites’ like Ted Pike says David Duke is racist and racial supremacist. When you say these things, and put doubts in people’s minds about me, you are weakening the anti-Zionist message I speak. Abe Foxman must have had a good laugh when he read your letter. Why give comfort to our enemies, Ted?

You had a Black preacher from Haiti visit you. As you know, he and no other prominent Haitian Black man would dare to condemn the Haitian bloody and vicious revolution. They all, in fact, honor the Black revolution in Haiti. They celebrate a revolution that raped and murdered almost every one of 40,000 White men, women, children, even White babies in their cribs, on that fated island. That revolution sent the once jewel of the Caribbean into the utter darkness of superstition, illiteracy, massive disease and infant mortality, cruel tyranny, human abuse and the ascendency of primitive and savage voodoo over the Christian message carried by the French.

I wonder if you mention that in Haiti, that every significant person, including your preacher friend, must salute the revolution of unspeakable evil that has led directly to the unbroken human suffering of Haiti. In your letter speaking of your bond with this Black preacher, why didn’t you condemn him for supporting the revolution that committed a genocide of the White population of a whole nation?

Of course, it is not necessary for you to do that, but nor is it necessary to shake your finger at me!

It is really a betrayal of a friend, a supporter, a brother Christian in the fight against Zionist evil. Save your vitriol for the real enemies of Jesus, Ted, not for a man who has made a lot of real sacrifices to stand up, and who has made a life of tireless work to stand up for the truth. For the sake of God and all people, don’t do the work of the Zionists for them!

You know that the Zionists hate me as much as any man living. I get dozens of obscene and horrific death threats from insane Jewish supremacists practically every day of my life. They have done everything they can to suppress me, defeat me politically, smear an besmirch my name and reputation. Their minions have, more than once come for me in mobs endeavoring to tear me limb for limb. Of course. I can show you thousands of scathing Jewish words written about me, and what is said about me in the Jewish media. Must I now read your words of condemnation too?

I am just man with many faults and many flaws. If they could revile and slander the kind and perfect Jesus, slandering a mere man like me is child’s play for them. If they could make people not speak a kind word of Jesus, for quote, “fear of the Jews,” it is easy for them to do the same to me, just a simple and fallible man.

But Ted, although I must protest what you have done. I will not tell people to turn their backs on you. When you do good work exposing Zionism, I will applaud, I will help spread it to the masses, I will encourage good people to support that effort.

I will not let you make you my enemy! You are not my enemy, and I refuse to see you as such.

I will not condemn you but ask you to kindly reflect and reconsider what you have written here. I will not strike back at you, and will continue urge people to support any worthy project you have that is good for the Anti-Zionist cause. I will not only turn the other cheek to you as a brother in the cause in the true spirit of Christ, I will repay your blows with nurture of your work and continue to help scatter your seeds of wisdom to fertile soil. And, I will always be there to defend you from the blows you suffer from the Jewish supremacists. I will always line up by your side when the Jewish supremacists come to besmirch either your character or end your life.

I know that the sum of your work is to defeat the Jewish supremacist evil that so corrupts the world and leads it to degeneracy, ugliness, war and hatred. What you think of me, or say about me is of little importance compared to that vital task. In fact what anyone thinks of me is unimportant in the greater scheme of things. Long ago, I knew that I would be reviled for telling the whole truth as I knew it. I knew it was the price I had to pay.

But, I humbly ask you to spend your time, your considerable writing and speaking skills going after our common enemies, rather than disparaging a true brother to you and your work.

With Sincerity and Christian Love Toward You,

Dr. David Duke

One further note: If you agree with me, I urge all of you to write a very polite letter to Ted Pike and let him know why you think his letter against me is not beneficial to our cause, urging him to unity rather than division in our ranks!
Ted Pike can be emailed at

Segregation Improves Minority Education

Liberals oppose policies that work and are committed to policies that fail.

Segregation Improves Minority Education

by Jeff Davis

The problem with liberalism and political correctness is that it has no basis in reality, and therefore is incapable of achieving real-world results. Liberals assume that all the races are equal and if we pour an incredible amount of money into educating Blacks and Latinos, they will eventually catch up to the White average. So far, after over five decades of de-Segregation Blacks appear to be getting worse, and Latinos are doing little better.

Down through the years various people have sometimes, in their desperation to actually get something done, gone so far as to attempt to return to the old ways that worked –like Segregation.

As is often the case, we have to go to the foreign media to find out what is happening in our own country. The U. K. Daily Mail reports: “A high school has defended its decision to segregate students by race and gender. The scheme, at McCaskey East High School in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, separates black students from the rest of the school pupils, and then further breaks it down into black females and black males. The separation is only for a short period – six minutes each day and 20 minutes twice a month – but it has drawn criticism for raising the spectre of racial segregation. Today the school’s principal defended the policy. Bill Jimenez said the school noticed that black students were not performing as well as other students, and that research had shown that same-race classes with strong same-race role models led to better academic results.”

The liberals will no doubt want to boil Mr. Jimenez in oil. It’s never about actual results for the liberals; it’s always about imposing liberal dogma. The Communists, who were behind the liberal drive for de-Segregation, wanted little Black children and White children in the same classrooms so that the little White girls would get pregnant by the Black boys once they turn teenagers, and the “evil White race” would be destroyed.

All us White people, who don’t like Communism and race-mixing, are supposed to be ignored by the two-party system and all our complaints about the mixed-race public schools being too dangerous for White children are to be ignored.

The article goes on “Mr Jimenez admitted that no other students were divided by race at the school, but he added that academic data dictated the school take a different approach with its black students. He told ‘One of the things we said when we did this was, “Let’s look at the data, let’s not run from it. Let’s confront it and see what we can do about it”.’ ”

You’re in trouble now Mr. Jimenez. They liberals will try to find some way to put you in jail. They simply can’t let people say things like that out loud.

Back to the Daily Mail: “The idea came from Angela Tilghman, an instructional coach at McCaskey East. She said statistics had shown about a third of McCaskey’s African-Americans scored proficient or advanced in reading on last year’s Pennsylvania System of School Assessment tests, compared with 60 per cent of white students and 42 per cent of students overall. In mathematics, only 27 per cent of black students scored proficient or advanced. McCaskey East High School The separation at the school in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, is only for a short period – six minutes each day and 20 minutes twice a month – but it has drawn criticism for raising the spectre of racial segregation.”

My guess is that the brief morning Segregation is just so the teachers can take attendance during home room. Ditching school is a major problem for Blacks and any additional pressure for them to attend is a good start. One of the key discoveries was that “research had shown that same-race classes with strong same-race role models led to better academic results.” I bet the results would be even better if corporal punishment were reinstated, which is a necessity in an average classroom full of Blacks. Having a large Black man, who won’t take any back talk from the street punks –excuse me, students, is clearly a good idea.

The liberals will of course ignore the opportunity to improve minority performance through Segregation since they want Black, Brown and White students all in the same class and they want nothing but Brown babies for the next generation.

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Why can’t White nations limit immigration to Whites, the way Israel only allows Jews in?

Why can’t White nations limit immigration to Whites, the way Israel only allows Jews in?

Greece to Build Wall to Keep Out Turks

by Jeff Davis

A Reuters article reports: “The U.N. refugee agency voiced concern on Friday that Greece’s proposed 12.5 km-long fence at its border with Turkey will shut out asylum-seekers fleeing violence and abuse in their troubled homelands. The fence could lead illegal migrants, including people in need of international protection, to resort to even riskier routes with the help of unscrupulous human traffickers, it said.”

But, wait a minute? Isn’t Turkey supposed to be a noble ally of the West, since they agreed to let their territory be used as an air base to bomb other Muslim countries, especially Iraq and Iran? I guess Ralph Waldo Emerson had it right: “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.”

Reuters goes on: “Greece said on Monday it planned a fence at its border with Turkey in the Evros region to prevent a wave of immigrants flowing into the debt-choked country. Nine out of 10 illegal immigrants use Greece as their springboard into the European Union.”

Notice that Greece is not even a final destination. I guess the first wave of Turkish illegal aliens overwhelmed the Greek welfare system and the Turks now move on to more prosperous nations.

Why do these so-called Asylum seekers get to invade prosperous nations?

All the majority White nations of the world should refuse to accept ANY alleged Third World asylum seekers. Instead, an international arrangement should be made so that asylum seekers from Turkey will be accepted into an equally poor Third World nation. Even if we have to bribe some Third World dictators into accepting these “asylum seekers,” it would be money well-spent and only a tiny fraction of the cost of supporting a gigantic Third World population with an average 80 point IQ in a White nation.

This way, whiny bleeding heart White liberals won’t have an excuse to go off screaming about “people are dying” if we don’t let them into White nations. In fact, if a policy like this were announced tomorrow, the number of Asylum seekers from the Third World would likely drop off 100 percent.

If a potential “refugee” from Turkey, knew that he would wind up in Uzbekistan instead of Germany with a nice apartment and a welfare check, he would never have left his goat herd.

Monday, August 15, 2011

Quote of the Day

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer

Saturday, August 13, 2011

Being Proactive In Dire Times

Being Proactive In Dire Times

ADV Broadcast Of August 13, 2011

Hello, and welcome to this week’s broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

Just in the past week there have been a number of events worth discussing; the rioting in England; “flash mobs”; the deaths of 30 American service members, who were killed when their Chinook helicopter was shot down in Afghanistan; the plunging and roller coaster ride of the stock market; and the trial of Black serial killer Anthony Sowell, just to name a few.

And, as always, rather than taking a reactionary approach to the above listed events, let’s be proactive and see just how we can benefit the most from what is happening.

I will be discussing the economy and flash mobs in upcoming broadcasts, so let’s take a look at the rioting taking place across the pond in England. Now anyone watching the news – even the most faint-hearted liberal – should see how obvious it is that the British riots are about race. The burning and looting of London appears to have been ignited when police shot and killed a 29-year-old Black man named Mark Duggan last week. The rioting and looting, primarily by Black and other non-White thugs, then spread from London to the suburbs, and then on to other cities like Manchester and Liverpool.

The non-White mobs were not only burning cars and looting shops, but were robbing and attacking White people who were unfortunate enough to get caught in the cross hairs. A widely-viewed photograph from the riots which has been making the rounds shows a young White male being robbed and stripped of his clothes by a perverted Black thug. This was the worst civil unrest Britain has seen in years.

Obvious to anyone that these were racially-motivated riots, as expected, the Jewish-controlled mainstream media has barely even mentioned the racial aspects of the unrest. And British politicians are even worse, blaming the turmoil on everything but the obvious ingrained hatred that many Blacks and other non-Whites have for our race.

London’s former mayor, Ken Livingstone, blamed the criminal rioting on “the economic challenges young people face and the disenfranchisement many feel.” What a joke! All one has to do is look at the culture of crime in the native countries where these non-Whites originated. Take a look at the out-of-control gang-raping and savagery now occurring regularly in places like Congo and Kenya. And the mainstream media and politicians are trying to tell us with a straight face that the young Black hoodlums are up in arms about a shaky stock market. Unbelievable!

So how can these events benefit us? Well, we need to use them as educating and recruiting points for every White person to whom we are disseminating our message. And that message is the need for White living space and the fact that the only way our race can survive is by the geographical separation of the races.

The best recruiting period in the history of the National Alliance was during and immediately after the 1992 riots in Los Angeles, which occurred after four White police officers were acquitted in the beating of career Black criminal Rodney King. Well that was 19 years ago. I think the climate for our message is much riper today.

In regards to the Chinook helicopter, this was shot down west of Kabul by the Taliban, killing 30 Americans, including 22 Navy SEALS, well, that’s part of war. You can’t go into another country and shoot people without expecting to be shot at yourself.

It’s a shame the mostly White servicemen (I’ve only seen one non-White identified among the victims so far) lost their lives in a war that has absolutely nothing to do with “fighting for our freedom.” And with the victims being Special Forces, the American dead are perhaps more idealistic than the average soldier, although clearly misinformed as to the true purpose of the war.

That is why we need to reach out to as many White military personnel as possible with our message of truth and hope. Many of them can be recruited into Our Cause. I suggest starting with family members and friends who may be serving in the military. For starters, give them a copy of our research report on Jewish media control, entitled “Who Rules America?” Many National Alliance members have served in the military, including the Special Forces. I believe many Whites who are currently serving in the military are ripe for our message. Now let’s reach out to them ASAP.

As I’ve mentioned before, service in the U.S. military has a two-pronged effect on the men who enlist. One effect is that it pushes men to act, rather than just sit around and think. The other effect is that the hypocrisy and misguided priorities that virtually define U.S. military service these days bring about in men a revulsion for the two-faced society that forces those priorities upon all whom it touches, will or not.

Now, of course, there are plenty of people out there who feel revulsion towards the United States government due to its policies on any number of issues. Many times before on these broadcasts I have stated my opposition to the federal government’s present stance on racial mixing, legal and illegal immigration, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and our government’s ridiculous subsidizing of the rogue state of Israel, to name just a few. Other times, I’ve complained about what I consider to be the government’s sins of the past: siding with the Soviet Union against National Socialist Germany in the Second World War, for example. And I’m honest enough to admit that most of these past and present actions and policies anger and frustrate me because of their effect on my gene pool, the White race, not only in the United States, but worldwide as well.

But you don’t have to be a racialist to be angry with the government for one reason or another. I’m sure you’ve heard some of the vitriolic talk out of the modern-day versions of the Peace-niks and Hippies who appeared on the civil rights scene during the 1960s and 1970s. Today, those folks are steaming mad about the U.S. wars in the Middle East and about the hypocrisy of the government on issues related to the wars, and I’ve heard them let loose in a tirade of profanity and threatened violence against the government. And they aren’t the only ones. Some Christian fundamentalists, convinced that the government’s policy on abortion is going to bring God’s wrath upon the country, are hating the government with every ounce of their being, and in the meantime preparing for the end of time, whatever that means.

Anyway, I mentioned a few minutes ago that one effect military service has on men is that it causes them to look at the world from a standpoint of action, rather than from a standpoint of passivity. That is, military service teaches men that inaction is undutiful, that it is better to dare greatly and fail than to remain passive and wonder whether or not, by your actions, you could have made a difference. Whereas many men might think of action and turn away before the critical moment, military men are taught to see things through to the end.

I should add here that you shouldn’t think that I am criticizing the U.S. military’s efforts to build men of action: far from it. A life of principled action is one of the guiding principles of the worldview of the National Alliance, and it is an idea that we constantly stress to our members. And that is because it is an historical fact that those who act, by definition, end up being the movers and shakers in any society. Given that the National Alliance seeks the creation of a monoracial White society that differs in nearly every way from the society we find ourselves in today, it is only natural that we promote conscious activity among our members, and we target active people in every field of endeavor in our recruiting efforts.

The trouble, then, isn’t really with the United States military branches preaching a life of action. That’s just good common sense for any organization that wants to achieve certain goals. The trouble comes about when a man’s military experiences lay bare the hypocrisy of the American government today and leave him confused and in a state of desperation. Let’s look at this in a little more depth.

Ever since President Harry S. Truman integrated the Armed Forces by executive order in 1948, the military has been a breeding ground for the same forces of conflict that have plagued schools, workplaces, and neighborhoods that are racially integrated. It is a simple fact that people of different races have a hard time trusting each other; it is the instinct of every organism to interact with its own kind and integration, rather than open doors between the different races, has more often than not caused people to isolate themselves from others. It has caused people to “stew in their own juices,” you might say, and that seems to be what happens to a lot of servicemen who are subjected to the military’s policy of integration.

Furthermore, as in the wider society, the government has pursued a re-education policy that treats non-Whites as the perpetual victims of Whites. This policy, as it has done in the civilian world, has taught non-Whites to resent White people and – ironically – the government which non-Whites mistakenly believe to be a pillar of White power. Serial killer John Allen Muhammad is a perfect example of this: a Black man who grew to hate the government.

And at the same time, just as the military’s re-education policy – that is, the propaganda – has caused non-Whites in the armed services to see themselves as victims, it has also caused White servicemen to see themselves as victims, as being the recipients of unfair and discriminatory practices that penalize them for being White. Those Whites, like Timothy McVeigh, learn to resent and hate the government, just like the non-Whites do.

The upshot of all of this, then, is that the integration efforts in the military have increased racial tensions rather than eased them and – what’s more – such efforts have taught many servicemen, both White and non-White, that the government isn’t something to be revered and defended, but rather something to be reviled and attacked.

But I don’t believe that it is the integrationist-multiculturalist efforts within the U.S. military that are driving more military men to violent action in society. I think the main factor is the obvious hypocrisy of the policy of the U.S. government with regard to the use of the military. That is, what is professed to the world isn’t what is going on, and when you are the ones who are asked to live the hypocrisy and get shot at or blown up while doing so, it puts the whole society into a new light for a fraction of the men in the armed services.

For example, the military professes to be protecting the United States. Well, what has happened in Afghanistan and Iraq over the last ten years or so hasn’t quite fit the bill, no matter how the government talking heads and the Jewish media have tried to twist it. By and large, the men and women who have served in the Middle East have only a vague notion of why they were sent there. Since there is no concrete goal, most of them just try to get through the day without dying, which makes for a bad state of mind after a while. It leads to hatred towards a bullying government that sent them to a hell on Earth to waste away their lives kicking in doors in the middle of the night looking for “insurgents.” Even if that anger toward the government is at a subconscious level, the pent-up energies that are generated will more than likely find their way to the surface at some point, as they did in the case of Nidal Malik Hasan, a Muslim Army psychiatrist who opened fire on his fellow GIs at Fort Hood.

And it is at this point that the military’s policy of encouraging action can cause problems. Some military men and women – like McVeigh, Muhammad, and Hasan – will see it as honorable, will see it as their duty, to stand up against the power structure that lies about its purpose and sends American military personnel to meaningless death in foreign lands. To die in the service of a great idea is one thing; to die in the sands of Afghanistan for any reason is something different altogether. I predict that we are going to hear more and more reports of military men who “snap.” It is simply a consequence of the hypocritical and multicultural world that our enemies have thrust upon us.

We in the National Alliance want a different world and a different society, a society that is free of hypocrisy and double-talk, free of half-truths and hidden agendas. We want a White society in which we can once again be ourselves and interact with our own kind. You can help bring that society into being. Think about it.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

Friday, August 12, 2011

Former child actor says pedophilia is Hollywood’s biggest problem.

Media Firestorm Follows Alliance Literature Distro In Cincinnati

Media Firestorm Follows Alliance Literature Distro In Cincinnati

DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP, Ohio -- The neighborhood that was the scene of a murder-suicide last week was blanketed Tuesday morning with racist fliers.

Police said Amanda Borsos was shot and killed Aug. 3 by her ex-boyfriend, Troy Penn, in Deerfield Township. It was Borsos' 17th birthday.

The fliers were left on cars in the area where Borsos was killed. The fliers were addressed to "White Parents," with a headline that read, "Don't Let Your Daughters Date Blacks, It Might Be A Matter Of Life And Death."

Borsos was white. Penn was black.

"Some bigot came in the middle of the night, skulking in the middle of the night, putting this on people's cars," said resident Greg Stanforth.

The flier specifically references Borsos. "Last week another young white woman learned too late that the 'wonders' of diversity are not what they are made out to be by the establishment," read the flier.

At the bottom of the fliers is a phone number and website address for the National Alliance, a white separatist political organization.

Below, a few other links for stories resulting from this literature distribution.

Riots & Race in Once Great Britain!

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Pennsylvania Judge Convicted in Alleged 'Kids for Cash' Scheme

ADL Tightens "Domestic Terrorist" Noose Around Christians

ADL Tightens "Domestic Terrorist" Noose Around Christians

By Rev. Ted Pike
10 Aug 11

In attempting to end free speech and criminalize Christians, the Anti-Defamation League (architect of hate laws worldwide) is promoting two contradictory agendas. First, it warns Congress that Islam is highly vulnerable to extreme interpretation by Muslim terrorists. At the same time it derides “Islamophobe” Christians for fearing Islam and Sharia law! ADL characterizes anti-Jihadist evangelicals (even if they are staunchly pro-Israel) as “haters,” whose inflammatory criticism of Islam inspires anti-Islamic terrorists like Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik.

Why ADL's conceptual schizophrenia?

To pass Christian-persecuting “anti-terrorist” laws, ADL must first magnify the threat of Islamic terror. The many instances of Islamic-based violence provide high-octane arguments to persuade Congress to limit freedom. But the agenda of portraying the religious right as a threat to freedom and diversity – arguing that violence-inciting Christians should also be penalized under anti-terrorist laws, must also go forward. Thus, ADL expresses abhorrence at Christian criticism of Islam.

Only by coordinating creation of new legislation spawned by fear of Islam, and at the same time heightening public fear of “Christian” terrorism, does ADL believe it can accomplish sweeping anti-terrorist laws that will envelop both Jihadists and Christians.

ADL, in statements such as the following, recently testified before the Senate Department of Homeland Security, warning that radical Islam is a top security threat.

“Americans motivated by radical interpretations of Islam constitute a growing and increasingly dangerous domestic terror threat. Since the September 11 terrorist attacks, nearly 200 Americans have been charged for their roles in various bomb plots and conspiracies in the U.S., as well as for providing material support to Islamic terrorist groups.

American Muslim extremists fueled by hatred of Jews and Israel have planned a number of terrorist attacks within the U.S.

About one fourth of those arrested since the September 11 attacks have been converts to Islam who embrace the most extreme interpretations of the religion.

The shooting at Fort Hood demonstrates the particular danger posed by so-called "lone wolf" extremists who, though unaffiliated with terrorist groups, share their radical interpretations of Islam and ideological goals

An increasing number of American women motivated by radical interpretations of Islam have been involved in terrorist activity ranging from planning terrorist plots, to raising funds and provided material goods to foreign terrorist organizations.

American Muslim ideologues living abroad are increasingly using their online pulpits to reach and influence audiences in the U.S. with ideologies of extreme intolerance and violence.

Now listen to ADL reverse itself.

Abe Foxman, in yet another warning to the general public of how dangerous Christian/conservative criticism of Islam is, said this past week,

Adherents of this ideological Islamophobia view Islam as an existential threat to the world, especially to the ‘West.’ Moreover, they believe that leaders and governments in the Western world are consciously or unconsciously collaborating to allow Islam to "infiltrate" and eventually conquer democratic societies. Left-wing ‘multiculturalist’ sentiments tear down traditional European culture, they argue, allowing Muslim immigrants to replace it with ‘their own’ culture and values. The result, they claim, will be the demographic, cultural and, eventually, political suicide of the West -- unless action is taken to stop it.

Foxman says the American right is in the throes of anti-Islam hysteria, comparable to emerging early 20th century anti-Semitic (Nazi) movements in Europe! “This belief system goes far beyond anti-Islamic prejudice based on simple religious or racial grounds. In a sense, it parallels the creation of an ideological -- and far more deadly -- form of anti-Semitism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries on the backs of the previously dominant cultural and religious forms of anti-Semitism.”

Such Nazi-like bigotry among evangelicals, Foxman suggests, is proliferating rapidly. He says “many people hold views similar to Breivik's. In the United States, we have seen frequent manifestations of this ideology, including the eager promotion by anti-Islamic zealots of a growing conspiracy theory about "creeping Sharia law." The obvious danger to Americans and Europeans is that, as this movement grows and solidifies, more people may become motivated to violence by this hateful ideology.” (, “Norwegian Attacks Stem From a New Ideological Hate”)

Should Anti-Muslim Words Be Illegal?

ADL defames Christian speech as providing the fuel to ignite bias-motivated violence against Muslims and even politicians who support Muslim rights.

Can the words of American Christians be held against them in federal court?

Yes, says Rep. Louis Gohmert. He warns that under Title 18 Sec. 2a of the “Hate Crimes” Section of the Civil Rights Act of 1965, a pastor or talk show host or other person can be indicted if their words “induce” someone to commit a violent hate crime.

This section of the Civil Rights Act was largely unenforceable until passage of ADL’s Federal Hate Law in 2009, the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act. As an amendment to the Civil Rights Act, the federal hate law now gives the government enforcement powers of Sec. 2a. The hate law gives Islam special protections from hate crimes not afforded to Christians. (Watch the NPN films "Stop The Pedophile Protecting Hate Bill!"and “Holder Admits: No Equality Under Hate Bill.”) If the US Justice Department believes anyone’s public speech has promoted an anti-Islamic hate crime, Gohmert suggests, there is nothing restraining prosecution of the speaker as a federal hate criminal.

What does restrain enforcement of Section 2a? A decade of criticism from the religious right has generated a very high level of suspicion of hate crimes law. Fearing a challenge to its blatant unconstitutionality, ADL is reluctant to pursue its enforcement with the persecutive zeal it has displayed in other hate-law countries.

Making Christians into Criminals

ADL also lacks strong public consensus that criticism of Islam is very, very bad and that evangelicals are primary offenders. ADL and the Jewish-dominated media (See, Jews Confirm Big Media is Jewish) and the educational establishment must persuade a new generation of Americans that Islamocriticism is not free speech but “hate speech,” outside protection by the First Amendment. Can most Americans really be conditioned to believe that those who criticize or even vilify Muslims are themselves “domestic terrorists?”

If ADL is unexposed and uncontested, it is well within the power of Jewish supremacists to create massive negativity against “Islamophobic” Christians. We have already witnessed Jewish media power to transform public attitudes toward abortion and homosexuality. With Republicans in Washington restraining new ADL legislative initiatives, ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center are wasting no time influencing such bodies as the Department of Homeland Security, Senate Homeland Security Committee, FBI and Justice Department to consider including anti-Muslim Christians on the “domestic terrorist” watch list.

ADL ceaselessly pressures and indoctrinates—sometimes in seeming contradiction to itself—both governments and societies toward its long-term persecutive objectives. Jewish supremacists in media, education and government have already lowered America’s moral and patriotic values and subdued criticism of the nation they work for, Israel. As ADL strains to achieve its ultimate goal, the destruction of Christianity under a Judaic new world order, its task is to bring society into such agreement with its twisted values that eventually passage of harshly anti-Christian speech crime laws will be a mere formality.

Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.

TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.

National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015

Saturday, August 6, 2011

The Real Threat To America

The Real Threat To America

ADV Broadcast Of August 6, 2011

Hello, and welcome back to another edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

I have just finished listening to the national news on the radio and heard an excerpt from a talk just given by the head of the U.S. Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano. In the wake of the massacre of dozens of Norwegians by a lone Zionist terrorist that had been conditioned by a Jewish-controlled, pro-Israel media, Ms. Napolitano claimed that American citizens face a continued threat from “White supremacist and neo-Nazi groups.” Napolitano’s statement, of course, is so ridiculous it’s quite laughable.

There are a lot of threats that Americans are faced with every day, but the threat from pro-White groups is so far down the scale, it’s non-existent. In fact, I will say that an anti-White dingbat like Janet Napolitano being in the position of Homeland Security chief is one of the biggest threats Americans are facing.

Perhaps the biggest threat to the well-being of all Americans, is that of the countless corrupt politicians and lawmakers – like janet Napolitano -- who occupy their positions of power at the pleasure of a Jewish-controlled news and entertainment media.

Some of the nation-wreckingpolicies that I hold Janet Napolitano and her colleagues responsible for are:

- The planned gutting of America’s industrial base, with millions of manufacturing jobs exported overseas to Asia.

- The open borders policy which makes it more than easy for thousands of illegal, non-White immigrants to enter the U.S. on a daily basis.

- The dumbing down of educational standards, in which American students’ expectations are brought down to the lowest common denominator to compensate or the failures of low I.Q. Blacks.

- The fact all major American cities – except perhaps Salt Lake City, for obvious reasons – are being held hostage by non-White crime.

- The deaths of thousands of Americans and the seriously wounding of tens of thousands of others in the sands of Iraq and the mountains of Afghanistan, not to keep America “free,” but to secure a future for the Zionist state of Israel.

Janet Napolitano, of course, like all other high-ranking politicians, hold their positions at the pleasure of powerful Jews, and thus must continue on their destructive policy-making behavior. That is why Napolitano will attempt to cast fear into the minds of Americans about non-existent threats from honest, hard-working racially conscious White Americans. And while Napolitano is misleading trhe American public with her bizarre claims, illegal immigrants, or rather invaders, from Mexico and the Third World are wreaking havoc on America's infrastructure.

And while millions of hard-working White Americans are paying into the government trough without receiving benefits, the truth is that illegal immigrants who wind up in medical facilities for treatment basically have insurance right now. By law, medical facilities are required to provide emergency care and other services to illegal immigrants. And even though the federal government gives hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to hospitals to reimburse medical costs for catering to illegal immigrants, billions every year have to be absorbed by hospitals or simply written off on taxes. In other words, by providing medical care to illegals RIGHT NOW – when there is as yet no such thing as government-funded, universal health care – our taxes are used to pay for those expenses AND, in addition, whatever isn’t covered by our taxes results in higher medical costs for the rest of us, who ARE here legally and who CAN pay or who DO have private insurance.

There are two underlying issues coming to a head here. One is that of fairness. In the midst of every media voice and most of the political world demanding that the United States government and its people give to illegal immigrants everything they demand – including citizenship, medical insurance, welfare benefits, free education, high-paying jobs, and so on – there is the issue as to whether all of that whining and demanding makes sense in terms of what is fair to the rest of us.

Let’s consider one question related to fairness: Does a nation have the right to choose to exclude some people from the ranks of citizenship? If the answer is “yes,” then the open-borders people in the media and elsewhere have no leg to stand on, and all of their open-borders nonsense goes right down the drain. Historically, civilizations have consistently answered “yes” to that question, as we can clearly see from still-existing structures like Hadrian’s Wall in northern England and the Great Wall of China, as well as by the many historical documents by which this or that Gentile king gave the boot to the butt of every Jew in his kingdom.

On the other hand, if the answer is “no” – that is, a nation should have no right to exclude anyone from its ranks, as the Jewish media continue to push for – then where do we draw the line? Should every single person on the planet have the right to immigrate to North America and become an American citizen? Obviously, with nearly seven billion human beings on the planet, that situation isn’t possible, so there HAVE to be criteria to keep some people out. Hard decisions have to be made with regard to what must be done and how, and since our recent ancestors couldn’t find it within themselves to make those decisions and see them put into practice, that unpleasant job falls to this generation of Whites. Our actions over the next decade will show whether or not we have the courage to stand up for the survival of the White race.

Now, White racialists generally – and the National Alliance in particular – advocate that the criterion of race should be the one that governs which immigrants get into the United States and which ones don’t. This criterion, we believe, is the one that is most consistent with the known facts of biology and with what is presently understood about culture, civilizations, and history. The Jews and their allies, on the other hand, have absolutely NO criterion by which immigrants should be differentiated, other than the overwhelming message we get from the Jewish media is that it is somehow WRONG and UNFAIR to try to prevent more non-Whites from entering the country. And, of course, the federal government’s refusal to enforce the security of our borders only reinforces the perception in many people’s minds that the government cares more about the welfare of penniless mestizos who don’t speak English than it does about those of us who are already here and working our tails off just to make ends meet. We are told by those with access to the microphones that we aren’t being FAIR if we try to exclude non-White immigrants, when the truth is that a non-White flood will result in our extinction, an event which I and many others think is quite unfair.

So fairness is one issue here, and the other is one of political will. Political will is the determination to accomplish what you say you are going to do. It is the desire and ability to “walk the talk.” I remember a few years ago, former President George W. Bush stated that he wanted NASA to put a man on Mars. I remember laughing out loud when I first heard that on CNN and saying to myself: “What an idiot! As if, aside from the expense, America any longer had the will to complete such an undertaking!” Unlike most honest and intelligent observers, George W. Bush apparently had no understanding that it isn’t merely money that makes things happen, it is also will and a feeling of a common purpose. Those things weren’t universal back in the 1960s and 1970s, when the Apollo missions were taking men back and forth to and from the Moon, but they were prevalent in a much larger fraction of the American population, which was still around 90% White at the time. That population is less than 70% White now, and there is no unity of purpose, and thus there is a corresponding lack of political will.

Consider again the illegal immigrant situation. The laws against illegal immigration are on the books, but the government doesn’t have the political will to enforce them, and the American population doesn’t have the political will to demand enforcement from its government, which is hamstrung by the Jewish media.

Of course, the lack of political will today is evident in more places than with illegal immigration. Consider the welfare state, which is a problem so convoluted and pervasive that it is virtually impossible to analyze and summarize fully, certainly not in as small a space as this broadcast allows. So I will paint with a broad brush and, as a result, oversimplify somewhat. Nonetheless, for any nation to allow tens of millions of able-bodied citizens to sit idle, with nothing to do but receive government-subsidized housing, spend food coupons on soda and junk food, and breed into being more members of the welfare army… is to condemn such a nation to death. The government lacks the political will to enforce any type of accountability within the welfare system, just as it lacks the will to address the non-White immigration issue.

And so the fear of the most outspoken critics of President Obama’s universal health plan is that the legislation will open the floodgates of tax dollars and that – yet again – the abuses of the legislation will simply be overlooked… because the government lacks the will to take a strong line and do so. It is so much easier to knuckle under and give in to abuses of universal health coverage or illegal immigration or the welfare system because to take a strong stance is to bring upon the politicians’ heads the condemnation of the Jewish media.

And from the viewpoint of a corrupt politician, who would want to fight that battle? Every other politician knuckles under to the media, and any of them who didn’t would be hounded out of office, as was Illinois Representative Paul Findley in 1983, after his public criticism of America’s brown-nosing of Israel.

So the proposed government-funded medical insurance is viewed by opponents as legislation that will further burden the working people of America, beyond the burdens imposed by such things as illegal immigration and the welfare state, which the current System and its worldview and its political prostitutes don’t have the will to straighten out.

What we want in the National Alliance is a new nation: a White nation that is guided by the ideals of progressive racialism. This nation would be led by true leaders who make decisions that are likely to ensure the survival and progress of the White race and who have the will and stamina and toughness to see to it that those decisions become actual realities in the life and work of our new White society.

Whether this nation would have a universal healthcare system or a welfare system, I can’t say; there are a multitude of other things that need to be taken care of before such questions can be answered. Certainly, there is a precedent of a liberal social policy within a racialist state in the example of National Socialist Germany from the last century: liberal in the sense that the state tried to ensure the prosperity of all elements of the German population, within the confines of what is in the best interests of the German nation, without letting the individual becoming MORE important than the society. Of course, Hitler made accountability a key feature of German social policy, a feature that – as I’ve mentioned – is totally lacking in American social programs today. Liberal social policies are also prominent throughout most of White Europe today, and they work – so long as the population is overwhelmingly White and the people buy into the attitude that one must work, if one can, before one can eat. Here again, that attitude is nonexistent among those who benefit most from the American government’s lack of political will.

Anyway, if you agree with me and the other members of the National Alliance that a White nation guided by progressive idealism and possessing a will to action would be far superior to the floundering insanity that IS the United States today, then you owe it to yourself and your children to bend your will toward that end. Check out our organization and our program of racial renewal, and then make the commitment to contribute to our people’s future.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

Jews Don't Like When The National Alliance Tells The Public Who Rules America

Jews Don't Like When The National Alliance Tells The Public Who Rules America

This rural Franklin County town is better known for its annual fall festival and eclectic mix of natives and transplants, including Grammy Award-winning folk musician Ray LaMontagne, than it is for intolerance of any stripe.

That's why police here are taking seriously reports of anti-Semitic pamphlets that began surfacing in town around Wednesday, when a copy of the booklet "Who Rules America?" was left at a Jewish woman's home and business, according to media reports.

"Something like this would appear to be very out of character for the town," Ashfield Police Chief Patrick Droney told The Republican/'s media partner, abc40.

"It was very surprising to me," said Droney, who couldn't be reached for comment Friday evening.

More pamphlets reportedly were found on Thursday and Friday, though it wasn't immediately clear if Jewish residents were targeted.

Friday, August 5, 2011

Hundreds of black thugs terrorize and assault white people at Wisconsin State Fair.

Hundreds of black thugs terrorize and assault white people at Wisconsin State Fair.

As people were leaving the fair, hundreds of black thugs began attacking white people at random. Dozens of white people were attacked and several were hospitalized. Black thugs also pounded on cars driven by white people as they left causing large scale property damage. One victim was knocked off of a motorcycle and other victims were pulled out of cars and beaten. Black thugs also rampaged through the fairground looting the prizes at carnival games.

Milwaukee has been the scene of numerous racially motivated mob attacks against white people in the recent past.

Racially motivated black on white violence is completely out of control. If the races were reversed, this would be the biggest news story in the western world.

From Milwaukee NBC, TMJ 4…

Witnesses tell Newsradio 620 WTMJ and TODAY’S TMJ4 of a mob of young people attacking innocent fair-goers at the end of the opening night of State Fair, with some callers claiming a racially-charged scene.

Milwaukee Police confirmed there were assaults outside the fair.

Witnesses’ accounts claim everything from dozens to hundreds of young black people beating white people as they left State Fair Thursday night.

Authorities have not given official estimates of the number of people involved in the attacks.

“It looked like they were just going after white guys, white people,” said Norb Roffers of Wind Lake in an interview with Newsradio 620 WTMJ. He left the State Fair Entrance near the corner of South 84th Street and West Schlinger Avenue in West Allis.

“They were attacking everybody for no reason whatsoever.”

“It was 100% racial,” claimed Eric, an Iraq war veteran from St. Francis who says young people beat on his car.

“I had a black couple on my right side, and these black kids were running in between all the cars, and they were pounding on my doors and trying to open up doors on my car, and they didn’t do one thing to this black couple that was in this car next to us. They just kept walking right past their car. They were looking in everybody’s windshield as they were running by, seeing who was white and who was black. Guarantee it.”

Eric, a war veteran, said that the scene he saw Thursday outside State Fair compares to what he saw in combat.

A police sergeant told TODAY’S TMJ4′s Melissa McCrady that the number of calls describing injuries are still coming in, so they could not give an accurate number of people who were injured.

That sergeant explained that some injuries were serious, and local hospitals were attending to the injured.

As of early Friday morning, Milwaukee Police said they had no one in custody.

One woman told police that she was sitting in her car with a window down when some teenagers reached through her window and started attacking her.

“I think once we get all the info in it’ll be just like that, like what happened in Riverwest,” said the police sergeant.

West Allis Police ask you to call them at 414-302-8000 if you have any information.

Eric: “I feared for my life”

Eric, who asked Newsradio 620 WTMJ not to use his last name, talked about the incidents that happened as he, his wife and a neighbor left the fair Thursday.

“We exited at the Schlinger and 84th exit, and we walked south about a block, and then went up and got our car, came back up and around down Schlinger. When we made a left hand turn, we were stopped in traffic. I looked toward the bridge, right before you get on the freeway, and all I saw was a road full of black kids, jumping over people’s cars, jumping on people’s hoods, running over the top of them.”"

The Milwaukee ABC station was much less honest than the NBC station. They admitted that “hundreds” of thugs attacked people, but censored all mention of race. Read Article.

Thursday, August 4, 2011



By Rev. Ted Pike
2 Aug 11

Editor note:

Last month the Anti-Defamation League held a special conference for students from US law schools. Its purpose: training a new generation of lawyers as enforcers of the many aspects of ADL’s thought and hate-crimes agenda. ADL also continues to massively involve itself in hate crimes training in every US police department. Such is a sobering reminder that although the National Prayer Network has intensely warned against ADL for 25 years (especially through more than 750 radio interviews and 100s of anti-hate law articles), America—and Christians—still remain largely oblivious to ADL’s threat to freedom. The majority of blame for such ignorance may be placed at the feet of Christian conservative leadership. Out of fear of being called “anti-Semitic,” the religious right has never warned tens of millions of constituents of their most deadly enemy.

With this in mind I believe it is time to repost the following 2009 article. The federal hate bill it warns of became U.S. law, but the ever-expanding threat of ADL erosion of freedom continues unabated.


By Rev. Ted Pike
11 May 09

Federal hate crimes bill S. 909 has now passed the House of Representatives and is in the Senate Judiciary Committee. As we anticipate Tuesday morning’s probable Senate Judiciary hearing on this bill, we should ask, “Who is behind this unthinkable, pedophile-protecting bill?”

Leaders of the Christian conservative right quickly respond, “Liberals and the homosexual lobby!”

Yes, these two groups lead a list as long as your arm of hate bill supporters. They inhabit the perverted legislative whore-house called “hate crimes law.” Yet they did not design and build the house. To know who did, visit, the website of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith. There, ADL proudly boasts of their “model anti-hate law” and persuading 45 US states to adopt it.

ADL’s orchestration of hate laws in over 55 Western nations, in addition to the US, is a long, dark story. This article presents a brief chronology of their conspiracy to steal freedom of speech. That attempt is now reaching a momentous climax, for good or evil, in the US Senate.

What is ADL?

B’nai B’rith (Sons of the Covenant) is an international Jewish religious, fraternal and educational, liberal activist organization. It describes itself as the heart and soul of organized world Jewry. It was founded in New York City in the mid-nineteenth century to further Jewish interests and community in America. In 1913, their Anti-Defamation League was created, ostensibly to combat emerging anti-Semitism.

ADL/B’nai B’rith does not represent the thinking of all Jews. Most American Jews are liberal (AP reported 81% voted for House Democrats in 2009); but a minority vehemently oppose ADL’s secularist agenda and bullying tactics. Rabbi Daniel Lapin warns that ADL (which he calls secular Judaism) is “in relentless attack” on evangelical Christians. His website has even listed a toll-free number for Christians and conservatives to call and report harassment and accusations of “anti-Semitism” from ADL. (1)

Today, there are roughly 200,000 members of B’nai B’rith International (with chapters and lodges in 55 Western nations). Many are Jewish activists who work behind the scenes in governments to pass hate crimes legislation and run hate crimes bureaucracies. ADL efforts have been spectacularly successful. Whether in California, Canada, Iceland, England or Australia—ADL’s terminology, twisted definitions and pretexts for hate crime indictments are identical. ADL phrases such as “bias-motivated hate crime,” “gender identity,” “actual or perceived sexual orientation,” etc., are enshrined in the hate crime laws of most Western industrialized nations today. If a yellow plastic arch rises from an urban horizon in Beijing, you know it comes from McDonald’s in America. So, too, we recognize ADL when pastors in Holland or Australia are indicted for “hate speech,” slapped with severe penalties and physically and financially exhausted in endless attempts to get free from hate crime indictment. ADL of America and Canada, ADL Europe, and ADL Australia are the super-powerful architects and enforcers of hate laws on three continents.

How powerful is ADL? Congressman John Rarrick (in the Congressional Record December 6, 1971) quoted Senator Jack Tenney of California: “The FBI and CIA are tinker toys compared to ADL.”

A History of Hate for Christian Values

Let’s trace ADL/B’nai B’rith creation of hate laws over the past 38 years.

1971. After ten years lobbying, B’nai B’rith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress persuaded Ottawa to enact their federal “anti-hate” law, the Canadian Human Rights Act. Its Sec. 319 and subsequent provincial hate laws criminalize any speech even “likely” to cause hatred or contempt against specially federally protected groups—especially homosexuals, Jews, Muslims, immigrants, but never Christians.

1985. ADL began massive programs to end “bias,” “hate,” and Christian “homophobia” in American businesses, local governments and schools. Since its inception, ADL’s World of Difference program has instructed, according to ADL, “more than 375,000 elementary and secondary school teachers, responsible for nearly 12 million students” toward “tolerance” of homosexuality.(2)

1988. ADL sponsored a nationwide competition open to all law students in America, to craft a “model” anti-hate law for the US. Jewish law student Joseph Ribikoff won first prize with his proposal to criminalize all Christian/conservative leaders who criticize homosexuality as well as all loyal members. (3) Through the 1990s, ADL persuaded roughly 45 states to adopt some version of its refined model hate law. Visit for detailed charts about states’ implementation. During this time ADL also established hate law bureaucracies throughout Europe.

1990. ADL was convicted in a California court of violating the civil rights of more than 10,000 conservatives, pro-lifers, members of the political right and Muslims on whom ADL had spied over the years, keeping secret surveillance files. (4) My father and I were listed in these files gathered in cooperation with West coast police departments.

1990. Congress passed ADL’s Hate Crimes Statistics Act. It mixed synagogue with state, making ADL the hate laws teacher to the US Justice Department, FBI and every police precinct in America. Since then, ADL’s twisted definitions, hate law enforcement methods, and criteria for statistics reporting inform the thinking and reflexes of the US law enforcement system. (5)

1998. ADL introduced its Hate Crimes Prevention Act to Congress, confident of easy passage. Republican leaders in the House and Senate instructed everyone to vote for it. Yet independent-thinking Republicans, dominating Conference between the House and Senate, examined the bill closely. Aghast at its sinister intentions, they stripped it out. Since then, ADL’s federal hate bill has been reintroduced and defeated by Republicans in every session of Congress. Today, with a Democrat-dominated government, ADL eagerly anticipates victory: an ADL-dominated hate crimes bureaucracy in America, ending free speech and persecuting Christians from a hate crimes command center in Washington.

2004. Acting on authority of ADL’s Pennsylvania hate law, ADL national executive board member and Philadelphia DA Lynne Abraham arrested and imprisoned for 21 hours 11 Christians for the “hate crime” of peacefully witnessing to homosexuals. Penalty if convicted of the seven charges would be 47 years in prison and $90,000 fines each. After 3 months they were acquitted.

2004. ADL introduced their No Place for Hate program, which boldly encourages American families to embrace homosexuality, same-sex marriage, etc. No Place for Hate literature is promoted in Barnes and Noble bookstores and at local chapters across the nation. One piece encourages families with young children to invite a homosexual couple for an evening of dinner, fun and fellowship. This, ADL says, will help destroy any “homophobic” attitudes developing in their young minds.

2004. ADL Europe and B’nai B’rith International set up a 56-member hate law bureaucracy in Europe, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). They also persuaded the European Union and Council of Europe to promote the ADL hate law agenda. As part of OSCE, ADL created the International Network Against Cyber-Hate (INACH) dedicated to ending online “hate speech” (really, free speech, such as criticism of homosexuality and Israel). (6)

2006. ADL persuaded Congress to create its Global Office of Anti-Semitism in the US State Department. Every year this ADL front reports on an “epidemic” of anti-Semitism gleaned from ADL statistics gathered worldwide. In last year’s report to Congress, it accused Christians who believe the New Testament account that Jewish leaders had Christ crucified of being “classic anti-Semites”—as was Adolf Hitler. (7) In Canada, any public statement that Jewish leaders killed Christ is considered the hate crime of anti-Semitism, punishable by a minimum $5,000 fine and prison if repeated.

2007. The ADL-inspired Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Act was introduced into Congress. It would set up a federal commission to study and make legislative recommendations to Congress on how to end Christian, conservative, and far right “hate speech” that streams the internet, possibly inciting violent hate crimes. It was unanimously passed by the House. (8)

2008. ADL, through Jewish lesbian activist and state Rep. Sheila Kuehl helped pass California’s SB777, banning criticism of homosexuality in public schools. If any child now criticizes sodomy, he will be expelled. If a teacher or administrator does, they are fired. (9) At the same time, ADL submitted an extensive amicus brief to the California Supreme Court in favor of same-sex marriage. (10) It undoubtedly influenced the Court’s pro-homosexual decision.

2009. With another Jewish activist group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, ADL directed Missouri state police to consider white Christian conservatives, Ron Paul supporters, tax and immigration protestors, pro-lifers, etc., as possible domestic terrorists. (11) Soon after, Janet Nepolitano, who recently delivered an extensive and flattering speech to an ADL convention, issued a very similar directive from the Department of Homeland security, warning America of this threat from the Christian conservative right. (12)

2009. ADL’s federal hate crimes bill passed the House of Representatives 249-175. (13) The Senate version will probably be considered in the Senate Judiciary Tuesday, May 12 at 10am EDT. (14)

ADL Hate Laws Target Christians

Get the picture? Do you see the trajectory of ADL’s hate law agenda? It means persecution of Christians and other free thinkers.

ADL is a cesspool of anti-Christian, anti-freedom social “civil rights” initiatives. For decades its pipeline of legislative sewage has flowed directly and interminably into Congress. If Americans defeat one ADL-inspired bill, ADL has lined up six more. But unlike most evangelical Christians, ADL will never, never give up—until it has created an “anti-hate” bureaucracy in America, like Canada’s, ending free speech.

What is ADL’s ultimate objective? National director Abraham H. Foxman, author of Never Again? The Threat of the New Anti-Semitism, is a devout Orthodox Jew. In 1991, he angrily vacated his seat in the Orthodox synagogue of Teaneck, New Jersey, because he felt its members and leadership were not praying for Israel as passionately as they should! (15) Foxman says he earnestly looks forward to Israel’s Biblically prophesied “messiah.” Christians know this is not Jesus Christ but that prophesied “man of sin” (John 5:43) whom Jesus said Jews would someday accept in place of Himself. Contemporary Jewish activists, like Foxman, think “the messiah is the Jewish people”— i.e., when Jewish power finally ascends over Christians and Gentiles, Jewish power by itself will make “messiah” happen.

Why does Foxman promote homosexuality, same-sex marriage, pornography (he gave pornographers Hugh and Christy Hefner special “free speech” awards)? (16) Why do ADL and other Jewish “civil liberties” groups, such as the ACLU (17), Southern Poverty Law Center, People for the American Way, etc., do all they can to tear down our crosses, Ten Commandments, manger scenes, Christian symbols (18) and passionately support the killing of 50 million babies through abortion? For that matter, why did the Jewish forefathers of these Jewish supremacists invent and facilitate Communism and socialism (liberalism)—dedicated to breaking down the capitalist free enterprise system? (19) Why does Jewish-dominated media (20) relentlessly corrupt our morals and those of our children, casting aspersions (as in the Da Vinci Code) on the deity and legitimacy of Christ? (21)


The Jewish supremacists of ADL/B’nai B’rith know that if Christian nations remain strong, virtuous and industrious, they will never realize their messiah in sovereignty over the nations, ruling the world from Jerusalem. (22)

Even if Christian or conservative leaders know of such demonic aspirations, they will never say it. ADL has them convinced they will be ruined if they do—smeared as “anti-Semites” and abandoned by Israel-first followers who have been conditioned to loathe any hint of criticism of "God's chosen people."

If America is to survive, this must change. ADL has brought us the very brink of slavery—intending to herd America into a one-world, international police state. A great abyss of darkness lies just before us.

But it’s we who should push ADL back into this abyss of its own making. Everyone, leaders and followers, should speak out against ADL now! When we collectively identify ADL as the greatest threat to freedom in our history, it will be ADL, not us, who will be ruined.


Unless otherwise noted, the following are articles I have written, posted in the archives of

1. “Rabbi Lapin: Christians Under ‘Relentless Attack’ by ‘Secular Judaism’” August 19, 2005.
2. “How the Bible Became ‘Hate Speech’ in California,” October 30, 2007. “ADL Expands Pro-Gay Education for Teachers” August 12, 2008.
3. Ribikoff’s prize-winning proposal is thoroughly documented in my 82-minute video, Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians, viewable on the homepage at
4. ibid.
5. ibid.
6. "Global Hate Crimes Gestapo Being Created ," September 20, 2005.
7. “Bible is Hate, says US Government,” April 9, 2008
8. “In Search of 'Homegrown Terrorists',” November 5, 2007
9. “How the Bible Became ‘Hate Speech’ in California,” October 30, 2007
10. “Did ADL Influence California’s ‘Gay Marriage’ Ruling?” May 19, 2008
11. “Missouri MIAC Documents Scandal Leads to Advisory on SPLC and ADL,” Americans for Legal Immigration, March 26, 2009,
12. "Chorus of Protest Grows Over Report Warning of Right Wing Radicalization,", April 15, 2009.
13. "Hate Bill Passed in House!," April 30, 2009.
14. "Hate Bill Hearing Next Tuesday?," May 6, 2009.
15. “ADL's Foxman: Man of Faith?,” February 27, 2006.
16. “Talmud: Wellspring of Jewish Pornography Industry,” October 24, 2006, “Pedophilia: The Talmud's Dirty Secret,” October 11, 2006, “Judaism and Homosexuality: A Marriage Made in Hell,” September 6, 2006.
17. "ACLU Top Heavy with Jews," October 4, 2006.
18. “ADL’s 'December Dilemma',” December 5, 2007
19. “Jewish Activists Created Communism,” June 11, 2007
20. “Jews Confirm Big Media is Jewish,” June 28, 2006
21. “The Jews Behind the Da Vinci Code,” May 26, 2006.
22. “Israel: On the Way to Empire in the Middle East,” August 1, 2006— Israel’s Biblically-prophesied ascendance is considered in depth in my 60-minute video The Other Israel, viewable at the NPN Theater at Even more extensive development of this Biblical eschatology is found in my book, Israel: Our Duty, Our Dilemma, available at

National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015

SPLC President Richard Cohen Abandons Sinking Ship

OH GLORIOUS DAY! After all these years, where were you when  the stock of the Poverty Palace crashed and collapsed under the weight of i...