Wednesday, April 27, 2011

The Only Alternative : Physical, Geographical Separation

The Only Alternative : Physical, Geographical Separation

ADV Broadcast Of April 23, 2011

Hello, and welcome back to another edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

Today marks my son’s fifth birthday, and it is not only a joyous occasion, but it is also a time for me to reflect on the current situation our race and nation are faced with. And, of course, it also gives me reason to look back on my life, particularly back to my fifth birthday. Oh, how times have changed!

Back in 1968 when I turned five, life in America, especially for yours truly, was fantastic! I not only attended an all-White Kindergarten, but the entire elementary school – from grades Kindergarten through six – was completely White. And also amazingly, all the way throughout my school years and high school graduation, only once did I have any type of non-White in any of my classes, and that was an Asian girl in a ninth grade English course. And considering that I grew up in Parma, Ohio, a city that at one time boasted over 100,000 residents, those racial statistics are not only wonderful, but sadly a thing of the past, at least for the time being.

Racialist thinkers and others have been speaking out for many decades about how the United States has crested in terms of its strength relative to other nations of the Earth. Although we could point to events prior to the Second World War and discuss at length how they contributed to the overall weakening of the U.S., there can be no doubt in anyone’s mind that things have gone steadily downhill since the end of that war. In the years since that war, for example, manufacturing in the U.S. has undergone a precipitous decline and, in large measure, the manufactured goods that still ARE produced here get low quality ratings as compared to similar products from Asia. That is what happens when a nation is taught to let the dollar rule the roost. It takes the element of proud workmanship out of the economy. Corners are cut and the resulting product either doesn’t do what it claims to do or it doesn’t last very long, or both.

Anyway, aside from the economic and manufacturing decline in the U.S. over the last 60 years, the biggest and most influential change that has taken place is in the composition and quality of the American population. At the end of the Second World War, America was almost entirely White. Even as late as 1965, when the infamous Immigration Act was made into law, over 90% of the American population was still White.

That percentage has collapsed to something less than 70% today. In other words, in 2011, only about two of every three Americans is White. And the truth is actually worse than those numbers might suggest. Not taken into account by those numbers is the fact that the White population is an aging population, while the non-White population is younger and is reproducing at a far greater rate. Neither are the 12 to 15 million illegal immigrants accounted for by the official government statistics on citizenship. Furthermore, of those immigrating LEGALLY into the United States every year, the overwhelming majority are non-Whites.

Such facts bode ill for the well-being of the White race, not just in the Western Hemisphere, but also worldwide. The White civilizations of southern Africa have all but disappeared already; the United States is not far behind. And all of White Europe is having non-White immigration issues similar to those we are having on our southern border, except instead of being overrun by Mexican mestizos, our racial kinsfolk in Europe are being swamped with Turks, northern Africans, southern Africans, and immigrants from the Indian subcontinent.

If people look in the wrong place, though, they might think that the U.S. is still as strong as ever. I remember something I was told once by a member of my organization, the National Alliance, who had been having a conversation with an immigrant from India. When the member mentioned in passing that the U.S. was a weak and decaying nation, a look of genuine shock came upon the Indian’s face. The non-White then began to rebuff the Alliance member’s claim by asking such questions as, “Who has the strongest military?” “Who is most technologically advanced?” and “Who has the biggest economy in the world?” Indeed, if one measures a nation’s strength by its military prowess, by its advanced technology, and by its economy, then the United States definitely still IS the strongest country in the world.

The difference in opinion between the Alliance member I mentioned above and his Indian companion stems from the fact that the Alliance member based his statement on the racialist worldview of the National Alliance, which – among other things – states that no multiracial society can be a strong or stable or culturally significant society. In other words, we in the White Racialist Cause generally and the National Alliance specifically look at the composition of a society as being more important in the long run than its present outward forms. We look at a society from the inside, which will then affect what is visible to everyone else from the outside. If we take the other view and look at a society based first on its external attributes – like its military and its economy – then we will reach a completely different conclusion, as our member’s Indian companion did.

A good historical example of what we are talking about here is shown by the Roman Empire in its latter days. Rome had the strongest military machine in the world. It certainly had the best technology that was available at the time. The goods and products that flowed along the roads of Imperial Rome were matched for quantity – if not quality – nowhere else in the world. To someone who looks at what is visible from the outside, Rome had everything going for it: a strong military, a strong economy, a well-developed civil infrastructure, and an organized system of government and administration.

But the core of Rome was rotting, despite the apparent power of its outward forms. The Roman holdings in Europe, although populated by Whites who were kinsfolk to the Romans, had a different culture and worldview that went largely untouched by the presence of the few Roman administrators in the northern provinces. The Roman holdings in Africa and the Middle East were composed almost entirely of non-Whites. Fewer and fewer native Romans were being born because the Roman birthrate sank as the luxury and license that characterized the latter Empire replaced the order and discipline of the early days of Rome. More and more non-Romans – whether they were Goths, Germans, or Celts from the north or darker-skinned people from the south – were seen in the capital city of the Empire and in the Roman Army.

The net effect of the many White ethnicities all mixed together in Rome and the rampant multiracialism was that Rome lost its vision of who it was and what it intended to do in this world. The view of the world that the Romans carried with them to all parts of the Empire as they conquered and civilized new lands was forgotten. The Roman practice of allowing conquered peoples to continue to worship their own gods, although it was a powerful expedient to consolidating Roman control over the provinces, eventually contributed its part to the dissolution of the Empire; once the armor of Rome had begun to crack and had become apparent throughout the western Empire, the old and familiar gods and goddesses of the native pagan religions gave non-Romans a respected voice to listen to and a spiritual vision that didn’t need the administrative genius and military prowess of Rome. The countless ethnicities, races, religions – each with its own tendencies and temperaments – could not remain a united Empire, once Rome had begun to doubt itself. Despite its apparent wealth and power, on the inside Rome was a rotting corpse.

Here, I am not advocating Rome’s conquering and civilizing of new territories or the implementation of its government, administration, and way of life onto foreign peoples. Conquering other peoples through martial ardor is simply the way things have been done since the beginning of the human species. It wasn’t always a bad idea, as when one ethnicity conquered other tribes of the same race but different ethnicity. Such tribes, with similar gene pools and similar cultural traditions, then combined into larger and stronger states that made for effective instruments to protect the common gene pool.

The problem with conquering other peoples comes when a nation or tribe conquers other tribes of a different race. I suppose it was fun to conquer a technologically or culturally inferior people, but it wasn’t too many years from a historical perspective that the conquered people got the last laugh. No matter what barriers might have been put up to keep the conquerors and the conquered separate, such barriers eventually collapse, and the conquerors and the conquered blend together through intermarriage into a hodgepodge people with a mishmash of cultural traditions, some from the tastes and religion of the conquerors and some from the native culture of the conquered.

The Indian subcontinent provides a perfect example of how conquering other races can go dreadfully wrong. The subcontinent was populated exclusively by the dark races up until about 1500 B.C. Most of the people living in India at the time were the dark-skinned Dravidians, although allegedly there were much smaller communities of Mongoloids and Australoids. Anyway, around 1500 B.C., light-skinned Aryans from what is now Iran and southern Russia came south and conquered the Indian natives. Many natives were driven toward the southern tip of the subcontinent, while others were enslaved by the Aryan conquerors. The Aryans set up the caste system, which was intended to maintain the separation between the conquerors and the conquered.

As with all systems of this type, though, the caste system imposed by the Aryans upon themselves and upon the non-Whites of ancient India failed. The same thing happened in the U.S. South, where segregation laws were enacted in an effort to prevent the mixing of Whites and Blacks. Asides from the fact that those laws are now history, the truth is that they didn’t work all that well in the first place; there was still racial interbreeding going on underneath the table, so to speak, and the resultant production of mulattos.

More or less the same thing happened in southern Africa – in Rhodesia (now called Zimbabwe) and South Africa – where the apartheid system stayed in place for a short time. That system too has gone by the wayside, but it too worked only marginally well when it was in, in terms of preventing interbreeding between Blacks and Whites.

The pattern here is obvious: No matter how many social or political barriers are in place to prevent the mixing of the races, there are always those who will find a way around the system, whether it is because they can’t control themselves or because they find it exciting to flout the system, to “color outside the lines,” if you will. The only alternative that we in the National Alliance see – if we truly wish to maintain the racial integrity of the various peoples of the Earth – is physical, geographic separation. No exceptions.

Racial separation is such a simple idea, and it wouldn’t be all that much trouble to implement it. With a little political will and a few economic incentives, the job could be done within a few years, although undoubtedly there would be some sacrifices that would need to be made and some growing pains to work through. Of course, the biggest problem would be to get enough people to commit to the venture and, with the Jewish media firmly committed to a multiracial and mongrelized America, it doesn’t look like that is going to happen anytime soon.

But we today would do well to consider again the case of Rome near the end of its time as a significant political and cultural entity. Its government was well-organized, it effectively administered throughout the Empire, and the Roman army appeared invincible. But on the inside, Rome was rotted.

The United States sits in this same position today. The federal government gives us the impression that it has everything under control, that it is monitoring the situations on both the domestic front and the international. The U.S. boasts a military that has every high-tech, whiz-bang gadget imaginable; the average American sitting at home can’t fathom how any force in the world could vie competitively with all of that technology. And you can find statistics to show that the American economy, in spite of the depression of the last few years, is still the biggest economy in the world.

But all of these outer trappings are masking the truth. The truth is that, like Rome, the core and soul of America is rotted. As in Rome, the mosaic of races and religions and ideas and values in the U.S. has destroyed whatever unity and common purpose once existed. As in Rome, there is no longer a united vision in America as to what the nation is and what it should do. As with Rome, the American house still looks pretty well kept from the outside, but the inside is filled with termites, mice, and other vermin, and there is significant structural deterioration and water damage. As with Rome, America is going down, but the crash will be much bigger than the one the world heard when Rome imploded.

It is clear from the many examples provided to us by history that the path the U.S. is on will most definitely result in the crumbling of the United States into chaos. It is inevitable, and merely a matter of time… unless the country can be divided into distinct and separate racial states.

THAT is our most pressing and immediate need. Whatever you can do to help the National Alliance achieve that goal, THAT’S what you need to do now.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

No comments:

Post a Comment