Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Traitor Jonathan Pollard making headlines once again
Posted under:General — @ 12:30 am

Why Is Israeli Spy Jonathan Pollard Back in the News?

By Jeff Gates

Over the past two months, Benjamin Netanyahu has mentioned the fate of jailed Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard six times in meetings with President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The Israel lobby also mounted a letter-writing campaign on Pollard’s behalf.

When Pollard was arrested for espionage in the 1980s, Tel Aviv swore he was part of a “rogue” operation. Only 12 years later did Israel concede he was their spy the entire time. That insider espionage by a purported ally damaged U.S. national security more than any incident in U.S. history.

During an earlier term as Prime Minister, Netanyahu secured a verbal agreement from Bill Clinton in 1998 to release Pollard. Clinton then faced a rebellion among U.S. intelligence agencies aware of the damage done. Clinton backed down and Netanyahu backed off.

Pollard took more than one million documents for copying by his Israeli handler. When transferred to the Soviets, reportedly in exchange for the emigration of Russian Jews, that stolen intelligence shifted the underlying dynamics of the Cold War.

What has its entangled alliance with Israel cost the U.S.? The U.S. committed $20 trillion to Cold War defense from 1948-1989 (in 2010 dollars). Pollard negated much of that outlay yet even now Israel pretends to be an ally. Few believe it; many realize the U.S. has been played for a fool.

Why Now?

The timing could be a Christmas season plea for clemency after 25 years of imprisonment. Former Assistant Secretary of State Lawrence Kolb now claims the sentence was excessive due to a personal distaste for Israel by then Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger.

At trial, Pollard claimed he wasn’t stealing from the U.S.; he was stealing secrets for Israel—with whom the U.S. has a “special relationship.” Aware of the harm done by Pollard during the Reagan-era defense buildup, Weinberger pressed for a longer sentence than the prosecution.

From 1981-1985, this U.S. Navy intelligence analyst provided Israel with 360 cubic feet of classified military documents on Soviet arms shipments, Pakistani nuclear weapons, Libyan air defense systems and other intelligence sought by Tel Aviv to advance its geopolitical agenda.

Even while in prison, Pollard’s iconic status among pro-Israelis may have played a strategic role. Or was it just coincidence that Tel Aviv announced a $1 million grant to their master spy ten days before 911? Is that how Israel signals its operatives in the U.S.?

Could that explain the timing of Israel’s latest announcement? Could this news flurry be a signal to pro-Israeli volunteers (sayanim in Hebrew) that another operation is underway?

Timing is Everything

Tel Aviv routinely schedules its operations during political “downtime” in the U.S. The Suez crisis was scheduled for the last week of President Eisenhower’s 1956 reelection campaign. Fast forward to 2008 and Israeli troops invaded Gaza just after Christmas, killing 1,400 Palestinians before exiting just prior to the Obama inaugural.

That well-timed provocation generated more outrage at the U.S. as Israel’s reliable enabler. The carnage also catalyzed reactions worldwide that undermined peace talks

This latest news about Pollard coincides with another political downtime. The U.S. Congress has adjourned and the White House has shut down for the holidays. Plus WikiLeaks successfully removed peace talks from the news and restored talk of war with Iran.

If there is another “incident” in the U.S. or the E.U., will the evidence point to Tehran? Islamabad? Damascus? If the U.S. cannot be persuaded to invade Iran, can it be provoked to do so? Stay tuned.

What Next?

Tel Aviv may be growing desperate and for good reason. Israel and pro-Israelis were the source of the fixed intelligence that induced the U.S. to invade Iraq in response to the provocation of 911. Those facts are well known to intelligence agencies worldwide.

As with Pollard, Tel Aviv denies it.

With Pollard back in the news, anything is possible. Recall how long it took for a confession that he was an Israeli spy. Don’t hold your breath waiting for Tel Aviv to concede its role in provoking its primary ally to pursue a Zionist agenda in the Middle East.

Absent the mass murder of 911, would the U.S. now find itself at war in the Middle East? Absent another provocation, Americans are not inclined to expand these wars. At least not yet.

“I know what America is,” Benjamin Netanyahu assured a group of Israelis in 2001, apparently not knowing his words were being recorded. “America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in the right direction.”

Pollard has long been a rallying point for Jewish nationalists, Zionist extremists and ultra-orthodox ideologues. Only time will tell why he is back in the news. And whether this news is a means for moving the U.S. in the right direction.

Article Source:

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Kicking the Global Warming Dead Horse

by Jeff Davis

As airports all over the east coast and Europe are shut down by record blizzards and after the Climategate Scandal and the revelation that Global Warming “scientists” were hiding data from the public which showed that global temperatures were declining after 1998, you’d think that everyone would wake up to the fact that (1).the earth is NOT warming and (2).mankind is NOT causing significant Global Warming due to industrial pollution. Random variations in heat output from the sun completely overpower any effect that man has on the global temperature.

The Global Warming scam however has been driven deeply into the heads of many people so apparently we need to keep spreading the truth. Global Warming was a power grab by the Left. They planned to use this mythical problem as an excuse to heavily tax corporations (so they could get more money to fund all their usual liberal causes).

The Tory Aardvark blog reports: “As Britain braces itself for the coldest winter since 1927, the warming alarmists have already worked out the cause: Global Warning. Or Climate Change. Or Climate Disruption. Now the eco mentalists at the Potsdam Institute reckon that using their dodgy computer model and junk science they can prove just that. The overall warming of the earth’s northern half could result in cold winters. The shrinking of sea-ice in the eastern Arctic causes some regional heating of the lower levels of air – which may lead to strong anomalies in atmospheric airstreams, triggering an overall cooling of the northern continents, a study recently published in the Journal of Geophysical Research shows. ‘These anomalies could triple the probability of cold winter extremes in Europe and northern Asia,’ says Vladimir Petoukhov, lead author of the study and climate scientist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. ‘Recent severe winters like last year’s or the one of 2005-06 do not conflict with the global warming picture, but rather supplement it.’ ”

So colder is actually getting warmer, then, Vlad? World record blizzards are due to the fact that earth is getting warmer? Got any other liberal wisdom there like “Black skin good; White skin bad”?

Or could it just be that the entire thing has been a hoax from the very start in order to bring about an assumption of worldwide control of industry and the planet’s resources by the ruling liberal elite?

Might that be possible, Vlad?

The Tory Aardvark goes on: “You have to grant a certain grudging respect to these people, no matter how ludicrous their statements. All roads eventually lead to Anthropogenic (man-made) Global Warming! Sheer brazen effrontery does not even get close.”

Monday, December 27, 2010

Don't Ever Accuse Them Of Being Xenophobic

Associated Press= JERUSALEM (AP) — Israel has flown home 150 illegal Sudanese migrants in a secret operation that was the largest such deportation from the Jewish state, an Israeli official confirmed Tuesday.

The group, which left late Monday, was the biggest to leave since Israel began quietly deporting hundreds of African migrants a few years ago. The deportations are part of an attempt to stanch the influx of Africans slipping across Israel's porous southern border with Egypt.

The Sudanese left willingly, according to officials.

"We are aware that people expressed interest to go back," said William Tall, an official from the U.N. refugee agency. "I can confirm that no coercion was involved in their going back."

There was no official Israeli comment. An Israeli official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on the record, said a Christian organization helped coordinate the return of 150 Sudanese to Sudan via a third unidentified country.

It was the first time a special flight was arranged for African migrants to leave Israel, the official said. Migrants have previously been deported on commercial flights.

News Source: Jim Ring

The Anti-White Agenda Clearly On Display

A UCLA professor has given public speeches in support of the DREAM Act in which he has made inflammatory statements, including the suggestion that Hispanics should replace "old white men" in positions of power and that Republican leaders in the Senate who oppose the immigration bill are racists.

On the UCLA website, Kent Wong is listed as the director of the Center for Labor Research and Education at UCLA, where he teaches Labor Studies and Asian-American Studies.

On Dec. 13, Wong gave a speech at a pro-illegal immigration rally at McArthur Park in Los Angeles in which he endorsed the DREAM Act in racist terms, according to a video first surfaced by

Toward the end of his speech calling for the DREAM Act to be passed by Congress, Wong proclaimed to the rally, "When that day happens, the young people of the DREAM Act movement will go on to accomplish and do great things with our lives. You will go on to become lawyers, teachers, doctors and members of the U.S. Congress to replace those old white men. (Applause) You are the hope and future of this country. You represent the hope and future of your generation."

News Source: nasacunit

The World's Bully

Israel's Foreign Ministry on Tuesday condemned as "highly regrettable" Argentina's announcement of the previous day that it recognized Palestine as "a free and independent state" within its borders prior to the 1967 Six-Day War.

The decision was highly "damaging," foreign ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor said, "because they are in fact shattering the foundation of the peace process."

The recognition while peace negotiations are ongoing and no final peace deal has yet been reached "is contrary to the existing legal framework of the peace process," he added.

That legal framework states that a permanent and definitive solution to the conflict, including the establishment of a Palestinian state, can only be the outcome of negotiations and mutually agreed solutions, he argued.

He added the Argentine declaration did not affect the real situation on the ground, nor did it help the Palestinians because it did nothing to promote Israeli-Palestinian reconciliation.

"We have embassies and we have made our opinions known to the local authorities through our diplomats," the Foreign Ministry official told the German Press-Agency dpa.

News Source: Jim Ring

'Fair Housing' - Israeli Style

"In answer to the many questions, we say that it is forbidden in the Torah to sell a house or a field in the land of Israel to a foreigner," they wrote, referring to the Pentateuch - the first five books of the Bible.

The letter, which was signed mostly by state-employed rabbis, warns that "he who sells or rents them a flat in an area where Jews live causes great harm to his neighbours."

"After someone sells or rents just one flat, the value of all the neighbouring flats drops... He who sells or rents (to non-Jews) causes his neighbours a big loss and his sin is great," the letter said, in what was largely understood to refer to Israel's Arab minority.

"Anyone who sells (property to a non-Jew) must be cut off!!"

According to the Israeli news website Ynet, the letter is to be published in religious newspapers and distributed in synagogues across the country later this week.

News Source: Jim Ring

A Deal Between Wikileaks And Israel?

A number of commentators, particularly in Turkey and Russia, have been wondering why the hundreds of thousands of American classified documents leaked by the website last month did not contain anything that may embarrass the Israeli government, like just about every other state referred to in the documents. The answer appears to be a secret deal struck between the WikiLeaks “heart and soul”, as Assange humbly described himself once [1], with Israeli officials, which ensured that all such documents were 'removed' before the rest were made public.

According to an Arabic investigative journalism website [2], Assange had received money from semi-official Israeli sources and promised them, in a “secret, video-recorded agreement,” not to publish any document that may harm Israeli security or diplomatic interests.

The sources of the Al-Haqiqa report are said to be former WikiLeaks volunteers who have left the organisation in the last few months over Assange's “autocratic leadership” and “lack of transparency.”

In a recent interview with the German daily Die Tageszeitung, former WikiLeaks spokesperson Daniel Domscheit-Berg said he and other WikiLeaks dissidents are planning to launch their own whistleblowers' platform to fulfil WikiLeaks's original aim of “limitless file sharing.” [3]

News Source: Jim Ring

Germans To Foot Another Bill Tied To Holocaust Survivors

It never ends.

Germany is to double the amount of money it gives to Jewish Holocaust survivors for elderly home care, bringing the total to €110 million next year, as a wave of former victims reaches very old age.

A spokesman for the Finance Ministry confirmed to The Local on Tuesday that the ministry had decided “as a humanitarian gesture” to provide the extra money to the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, the New York-based organisation that distributes compensation money for Holocaust survivors.

Even with many Holocaust survivors dying each year, the need for home care – in which an elderly person is looked after by a carer at their own house rather than moving into a nursing home – would keep rising until 2014, the claims conference said, according to the Associated Press. After that, the number of survivors dying will outnumber those becoming frail enough to need care.

The funding boost for 2011 is expected to raise the number of needy survivors receiving subsidised care to about 70,000 from the present 58,000 worldwide.

The claims conference was rocked last month by the revelation that current and former employees were involved in a long-running fraud in which $42 million of money meant for survivors was siphoned off via phony claims. Some 17 people were arrested in connection with the scheme.

Sunday, December 26, 2010

A Time For New Methods

A Time For New Methods

ADV Broadcast Of December 25, 2010

Hello, and welcome back to another broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America's foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

It’s a sad thing when a country’s politicians exhibit all kinds of defective personality traits. The highest-ranking politicians make the simplest examples to cite. Democratic Presidents John F. Kennedy and Bill Clinton both suffered from their inability to keep their zippers up in the presence of most any young female. For the Republicans, former President Ronald Reagan was so enthralled with numerology, fortune-telling, and other superstitious nonsense that he would routinely base his very busy schedule on such hocus-pocus, setting up or canceling meetings and appointments based on the “alignment of the stars,” so to speak.

But what is worse than persons of questionable character running the government is the absolute circus of inactivity that IS the system of American government. With all of the nitpicking, congressional inquiries, interviews, haggling, and finger-pointing, it’s no wonder that we can’t address and deal with any problem we have in this country: questionable petroleum supplies, illegal drugs on the streets, crime, gangs, the state of the environment, the pitiful state of our educational system, and an economy that doesn’t produce anything but instead just pushes information around.

And note that these problems are just ones that almost any-old-Joe would say needed fixing. Problems that are important to White racialists are another can of worms altogether: the halt of non-White immigration, the geographic separation of the races in North America; the disproportionate Jewish presence in the mainstream media; and the cutting-off of all U.S. aid to Israel, just to name a few. Whatever may have been true in the past, our system of government is inadequate to solve our problems of today, and it is certainly inadequate for the needs of our White racial state of the future. I don’t know what that system will look like or should look like, and it wouldn’t hurt for some of our best minds to start looking into the problem now.

In his book Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler includes his thoughts on parliamentary democracy. As a young man, Hitler spent time in Vienna and often visited the national legislative house while it was in session. As I recall from reading the book some years ago, Hitler’s biggest complaint about parliamentary democracy – which is essentially what the American government IS – was on the lack of responsibility taken by members of the legislature. If something didn’t go as planned, a representative could – with a fair degree of truth – claim that it wasn’t his fault, that there were many other representatives who are to blame for it. On the other hand, if something went as a representative wanted, he was the first to claim credit for the success. This lack of negative responsibility is evident today in the United State Congress, where statistically incumbents maintain a large advantage over challengers, despite the incumbents’ many failures to fix problems that are in need of fixing, many of which I mentioned earlier in this broadcast.

Another problem that Hitler noted about parliamentary democracy was that each representative had an equal vote. Many of these legislators represented different positions on a given issue, and would argue with each other until they were blue in the face, trying to change each other’s minds about the issues. Therefore, the challenge for representatives was NOT to present facts and opinions about the issue that would be in the best interest of the country, but rather to garner enough votes so that a particular viewpoint prevails. These are two totally different approaches to policymaking, and I’d like to give you a simple analogy to explain what I mean.

Imagine a classroom full of children. Something has happened on the playground between two boys, and the two boys are making their cases to the teacher with the rest of the class quietly observing. The playground exchange between the boys took place over such a short time that none of the boys’ classmates saw the encounter in its entirety, and what is supposedly known by most of them is based mostly on hearsay and from what one or both of the boys said or did on the way back into the building after the bell.

Anyway, despite the lack of information on the part of the rest of the class, a large majority of them clearly favor one boy’s version of the story over the other’s. It turns out that that boy is more popular than the other one, and his personality is such that the rest of the class understand that he gets his way most of the time. Anyway, upon further questioning, the teacher finds that there are holes in this boy’s story that he cannot satisfactorily fill and, moreover, the teacher finds that hardly any of the class actually witnessed the encounter and so have no new information to add. In fact, the one student who says he saw the whole thing has a questionable character and is best friends with the favored boy.

The other boy’s story is more consistent and has few or no holes. Despite this consistency and this boy’s reputation for telling the truth and staying out of trouble, the class collectively rejects his version of the story.

What is the teacher to do?

As adults, we realize that the popularity of a student doesn’t make his opinion always right. We realize that no matter how many students may agree with a certain position, it might not be right. And we realize that often it is up to a conscientious teacher to make an appropriate decision, even if it is opposite to what a majority of the students want or believe is good for them. Parents experience the same scenario with their school-age children; the objection, “Well, everyone else’s parents let them do it,” doesn’t hold much water.

For a teacher to leave to the class a decision for the case I described above is analogous to what happens in the legislative halls of democratic nations. What is RIGHT is peripheral; what is BEST is peripheral; what is MOST POPULAR is what goes. Agreement carries the day; validity and correctness are, at root, immaterial. This isn’t to say that parliamentary democracies are incapable of doing what is right; it isn’t to say that the popular kid and his approving classmates are lying in order to set up the quiet kid for disciplinary action; it simply says that there is no guarantee that the choice of the majority is right or best.

So, in this day and age, the ideas with the biggest followings rule the roost. The issues that more people can get behind are the ones that take precedence over all others. And what that means is that the people who inform the rest of the population are in a unique position. They can give lots of publicity to a news event that draws attention to any issue under the sun. On the other hand, they can effectively ignore news events that attract notice in another direction. By selectively managing the news in this way, the people in the media affect the thoughts, beliefs, and votes of the electorate. And that means that they can, if they choose, control the lawmakers.

As if I and every other racialist haven’t said it a thousand times already, it is the Jews who are disproportionately represented among the owners, editors, and producers of essentially all of the major media corporations of America. With our governmental system being set up the way it is – that is, with “most popular” trumping “what is right” – we have given control of our government to the media masters. I believe that this is the very reason that the Jews were moved to acquire media power in the first place.

With our system, “most popular” has always trumped “what is right,” but our governmental system hasn’t always been so inadequate. In the early days of the American Republic, of course, there were almost no Jews on this continent, and so they were a non-issue in America. Especially during the time when America was expanding between the oceans, the electorate wasn’t too polarized on the pressing issues of the day, and what was popular and what was right were more closely aligned.

But even as early as the middle of the 19th Century, the media were starting to play too big a role in pushing the country one way or another. The question of Black slavery resulted in an especially sharp division throughout the country. And the media at that time – that is, the newspapers – played a prominent role in the debate on that question. Unfortunately, because our nation couldn’t come to a consensus on what SHOULD have been the slavery non-issue, we White Americans fought and died over who was right about it, to the tune of more than 600,000 dead American Whites, more Americans than have died in all the rest of America’s wars combined.

So it is clear that a consensus can’t always be achieved, and it’s clear that the media’s power over the masses must be held in check. What’s the solution, which we’ll hopefully be able to implement when we have secured a White homeland?

Here are a few ideas worth considering.

I do believe that people need to have a chance to voice their concerns and opinions, but also I am firmly convinced that the ultimate decisions must be made by a single person, after consultation with various advisors and after careful consideration. This is especially true for the “big” decisions, the ones that will affect the entire country. At the discretion of the chief executive, “smaller” decisions can be made by other individuals, designees of the chief executive, each of whom is a specialist in a particular field of knowledge and policy. Each of these individuals – including the chief executive – would be completely responsible for the outcome of his decisions, and would continue in office or be sacked, as appropriate. It’s not as though there wouldn’t be any freedom in such a system; the many questions at the local level could often be addressed by local people, except in the case of certain policies that are mandated from above.

Earlier, I said that in a democratic system, there is no guarantee that decisions made by popular vote are best for the society. This truth holds equally well for a system like what I’ve just described. There is no certainty that individuals can make better decisions than groups can. But at least the right individual can be guided by what is best for the society in the long run, whereas democratic representatives as a whole cannot. And at least there would be accountability; if something goes wrong, we’ll know right who to turn to.

It would do us well to remember that every successful business is run in just the way that I am proposing for the government of our future White homeland. There are a CEO and a few hand-picked people at the top. There are (hopefully) competent managers all along the chain of command, and throughout the company there are people who believe in it and who contribute to its success. And the successful companies are the ones who take care of their employees and who listen to their ideas and concerns.

The armed forces of any country are set up similarly. Can you imagine a democratic armed forces, with every member of the services getting an equal vote, and the most votes determining policy? What a joke! But our government is set up this way, which is one reason it doesn’t work and why we’ll need something different when our race goes its own way.

Nothing is perfect, but the system of government we currently have in the U.S. will have to go. As I’ve said elsewhere, that government can continue to exist once we have secured our White homeland. I’m simply saying that the National Alliance’s view for a White government in that homeland will be a little different than the noisy and chaotic democracy we have in America today.

Now, once we’ve secured our homeland and set up our government, finding the right type of men for such positions and deciding who should go into what position and how that should be done...those are perhaps the biggest questions of all. We don’t know the answers yet, but we’re working on it.

Certainly, we can’t have men with serious character flaws leading our society of the future. Government is a complicated business, and we need men of principle, men who understand the long-term needs of our people, and men who are selfless and totally dedicated to our race. But with a sure and workable form of government that is run by patriotic men and women who make decisions not based on what is popular but on what is best for the race in the long run, I think we’ll be able to solve some the so-called intractable problems that we just push around today.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Securing Our Gene Pool Means Saving Our Children

Securing Our Gene Pool Means Saving Our Children

ADV Broadcast Of December 18, 2010

Hello, and welcome back to another broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

In a constant effort to push the society destroying phenomenon of multiracialism on everyone but their own kind, the Jewish-controlled media once again missed the boat on the murder case involving millionaire heiress Lydia Nord, primarily in its being rooted in the fast-growing miscegenation movement.

Lydia Nord, a White woman from Lorain County, Oho, comes from a family in which her late father built a velvet coffin of monetary wealth as a result of the fruits of the European work ethic built into him through his ancestry.

Apparently, the late Eric Barker Nord, the woman’s father, was one of these philanthropists who loved to donate some of his bounty to charitable organizations. It is always good to help those who need a bridge to a better life in which they can become self-sustaining, but when the motivation is clearly “White guilt,” then one has to question if such a “noble” act is worthy of any kind of praise and really has utility in the grand scheme of things. Over the years, the Nord family has donated tens of millions of dollars to charities.

Lydia Nord was jailed for her connection to the murder of a local Black man in the Cleveland Flats District, after a confrontation at a rap concert. She was one of two arrested as suspects. The other was her Black boyfriend, one Clifton Robinson. The victim was stabbed and had his throat slashed.

Before anyone cautions to note that just because she had a black boyfriend, it doesn’t mean that such a relationship was the cause of one or the other or both being the alleged murderer in this case, think again. They might or might not be guilty. However, there is a pattern here and it goes against the normal grain of this proliferation of miscegenation in American society that is rapidly heading toward making “mongrel” the dominant race.

Lydia Nord’s late sister, Michele Thornton, also had a penchant for getting cozy with Black men. Thornton not only turned her back on White men, but turned her back on White America in general when she moved with her Black pompadour to Black-dominated Jamaica. All that got her was her and her 8-year-old daughter getting stabbed to death, a double murder the Jamaica authorities never convicted anyone of, making the circus-like atmosphere surrounding the O.J. Simpson trial in the mid-1990s look like child’s play.

Any parent listening to this who thinks there is nothing harmful in his white child wanting to get a Rastafarian hairstyle or listen to the latest reggae or rap on his I-pod, think again. In fact, don’t just think – intervene. There is something that can be detrimental to a White child’s growth, or lack thereof, in something that looks so “harmless.” as there does not seem to be any harm in providing more and more welfare for those who want to do nothing but destroy and thanklessly demand more.

Buying into the rap culture or the ghetto culture or the urban culture constantly pumped at American children by the Jewish-dominated media is merely a gateway to more devastating elements, not only on a personal level such as the murder of a family member or the involvement in the alleged murder of others, but also on a whole societal level because it perpetuates and spreads the attitude like a virus. If this were not so, how is it that the hip-hop culture has come to be so popular in predominantly White suburbs?

Of course, it is so because it spreads like wildfire. Two or three White kids with trendy parents with “White guilt” allow their children to listen to such so-called “music” and they in turn brainwash two other White children and so on; before you know it, the whole school or neighborhood is following what Nietzsche had predicted over 100 years ago – the “trans-valuation of values.” What has been good is now all of a sudden bad and what was bad for so long is now good. What is white is black and what is black is white, etc.

There was a time when White women felt shame about race mixing. Back in the 1970s, if a young college-aged girl would be at a dance club with a group of white friends, male and female, and a black man would ask her to dance, she would not only say “no,” but also be embarrassed and even scared. She wouldn’t dare tell her father what happened.

Now, White women, like Lydia Nord and her late sister feel no shame about hanging on Black men. In fact, it is chic or fashionable to do so. What caused the transformation? The Jew media’s constant attack on White males, and the university’s professors, psychologists, and lawyers pushing for White women to leave their White men or not even get together with them to begin with, causing White men to just walk away from the situations.

Thus, by the 1980s we had scores of young White girls living with their mothers only and collectively having resentment toward White men. White men are for the most part more reserved when it comes to approaching women, partly because they are naturally wired to suppress their immediate gratification for long term interests, and partly because they have been trained through European values to treat women with dignity.

Black men, on the other hand, do not prolong gratification. They are extremely aggressive toward women, particularly White ones. White women misconstrue this as affection and attention, “the type of attention my White father never gave me,” and thus turn their backs on all White men.

It might be added that these Black men talk to these White women in very a nasty manner, which the women accept as “normal.” However, if a White man would talk in such a way (even though in most cases they wouldn’t) it would be cause for the women to get out the meat cleaver.

The Nord case is unique in that the two sisters, Lydia and Michele, grew up in a two-parent home. Apparently Mr. Nord remained married to their mother until he passed. This is an example of even when in a “healthy “ situation, White girls and boys are in danger of such undesirable life events simply because of the power of the controlled media that instills this type of White guilt into people like Mr. Nord.

Our enemies want miscegenation for everyone but themselves. They have a superiority complex, a self-proclaimed “Chosen People.” There are Jewish only online and agency dating services. Jewish parents constantly pound into their children not to date or marry outside their own kind. When I pick up a copy of the Cleveland Jewish News, I’m quite enamored with their warnings decrying the dangers of interfaith marriage, and how important it is for Jews to marry fellow Jews.

Of course, we are certainly in agreement with that. We definitely do not want Jews to enter our gene pool. It sickens me to see cases like beautiful White model Christie Brinkley marrying the bizarre-looking Jewish musician Billy Joel and having an even more bizarre-looking mixed-race daughter, who shows absolutely no resemblance to her mom.

It’s also important to point out that almost no family is immune to the race-destroying forces that lurk. I recently attended the eighteenth birthday party of the son of a long-time acquaintance. While I was downstairs playing Fusball with some relatives, I had the horrific experience of listening to thirty consecutive minutes of Gangsta rap “music,” which was being played by the birthday boy’s high school classmates, all of whom were White. I went upstairs and told his father what they were listening to. He just shrugged his shoulders and proclaimed, “That’s all they know.” It almost sounded like a surrender.

Now, should we blame the catastrophic amount of miscegenation taking place today among young Whites solely on them? I don’t, although in the end they make the ultimate bad decision. Do we blame the Jewish media bosses? Well, they obviously have their hands on the trigger, but they’re just employing – either fully consciously or partly consciously – a survival mechanism for their own people by getting the goyim to mix their blood. No. I place a lot of the blame on White parents who have allowed an alien people to steer their own children toward racial extinction.

And as the Lydia Nord case demonstrates, it doesn’t matter how successful they are or how much wealth a family has gathered, if they cannot protect their own genetic code, then they have failed in life, because their lineage will come to an end.

My prediction is that Lydia Nord will probably cut a deal with prosecutors, testify against her Black boyfriend, and get a reduced prison sentence. But the tragedy doesn’t end here.

For every Lydia Nord and Michele Thornton that we hear about, there are thousands of others that get unnoticed. It’s happening everywhere; in every community; rural, urban, or suburban.

Being involved in the German-American community, I’ve witnessed firsthand the sons and daughters and grandchildren of WWII German SS and Wehrmacht soldiers, as well as those of former Hitler Youth members, engaging in miscegenation. Daughters and granddaughters are sent off to universities, where they “hook up” with Black athletes or non-White immigrants and eventually marry them. Or, they’re brainwashed into thinking that a career is more important than raising a family and extending their lineage, and thus have no children. It’s disheartening to see so many middle-aged Whites – even White racialists – with no children.

I would like to see Whites-only online and agency dating services. There should be no reason why such entities do not yet exist if there are Jew-only dating mechanisms. Perhaps someone listening out there can start one. Change can come only through acting. Now is the time to join or support the National Alliance so that the return to natural relationships, families, and White living space could be mobilized.

White racialists have been preaching it for generations: there is a hidden agenda to destroy our race. Whether it is fully conscious on the part of our enemies or only partly conscious makes no difference. What we must do is have the courage to admit to ourselves that there is an agenda afoot, and we must then be brave enough to seek out the answers that are available – however painful they might be – and then take whatever action is necessary; namely, work in concert to form a new White nation.

Acknowledge the agenda and DO something about it.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

Sunday, December 19, 2010

Dream Act Defeated: Let’s Start the Deportations!!

Dream Act Defeated: Let’s Start the Deportations!!
Posted under:General— @ 2:11 am

Dream Act Defeated: Let’s Start the Deportations!!

by James Buchanan

Democrats fell well short of the 60 votes necessary to pass an illegal alien Amnesty euphemistically called “the Dream Act” which would have been a nightmare for ordinary Americans. I guess it’s not enough that illegal aliens are quickly bankrupting California, costing that state $13.1 billion per year according to FAIR. It’s not enough that we have record high unemployment in many states, and it’s not enough that Mexican drug criminals killed another Border Patrol agent in Arizona just a couple days before this vote.

The Democrats want to flood the US with needy Third World people so that they can create a permanent majority for their party, and the Republicans are normally too gutless to stop them. The only thing that saved us from this latest Amnesty attempt were the howls of protests from ordinary Americans and the recent electoral victories by the Tea Party. While all the Democrat Senators are secretly in support of an Amnesty Bill, they still need White votes to get reelected, and they would rather put their own personal interests ahead of the interests of the Democrat Party.
One recent news article notes “Senate Republicans today shot down the DREAM Act, an immigration measure that would have helped undocumented students who came to the US before age 16 to become legal residents after five years by completing higher education or military service. The final tally of today’s procedural vote was 55-41, but the measure needed 60 votes to advance. Senate Republicans argued that the bill amounted to amnesty, that it would impede the enforcement of immigration laws and that it failed to address the larger problem of border security. ‘Here we are in the final days of a lame-duck, some say dead-duck Congress, considering a bill that would create a major problem to the effective enforcement of immigration laws. People are not happy with us,’ Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., said this morning on the Senate floor.”

The John and Ken Show has pointed out that one-third of the illegal aliens in the US, 6.66 million, could have gotten Amnesty through the Dream Act. The law was written loosely enough so that illegals who utilized Internet Diploma mills, could have scammed their way into getting citizenship. Then the chain-migration would start in which the “Dream Act” beneficiaries could bring in their family members, not to mention the inevitable flood of even more illegal aliens, which always results every time the US government grants an Amnesty.

This defeat of the Dream Act is a HUGE victory for the White people of America. Most likely we’ve put off the threat of an Amnesty by at least six years, and there’s a good chance once SB1070 goes into law and other states follow Arizona’s example, we might be able to finally start deporting a serious number of illegal aliens from the US.

Monday, December 13, 2010

Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody?

Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody?
Posted under:General— @ 12:30 am

None Dare Call it White Genocide

The case for a new discourse of genocide in our lands

By Christian Miller

The overarching goal of the “open borders” movement is to flood millions of non-Whites into all traditionally White nations. Make no mistake – this is not mere coincidence. It is White genocide by design, worldwide in application. The United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Australia: White people founded and populated these nations. All of these nations operated under the implicit mandate, if not explicit by law, that they existed as White nations for the posterity of the White founding stock. All of these nations had overwhelmingly White populations for the preponderance of their national history. Now, in the beginning of the twenty-first century, all of these traditionally White nations face demographic upheavals through massive non-White immigration. The White populations of these countries are slated to become minority populations in just a few generations.

Why is the push for unrestricted immigration focused so strongly and so specifically upon the traditionally White nations? Some say the traditionally White nations are economically advanced and therefore desirable destinations for immigration. This observation is mostly accurate. However, it does not explain the entire story because there are many other advanced nations that are traditionally non-White, yet face no pressure to absorb foreign populations.
Japan is one of the most highly advanced economies in the world. It is a well-known and well-documented fact that Japan faces a grave population decline. There are not enough young Japanese to assume the lower rungs of the workforce. The elderly Japanese population looms on the horizon, destined to strain the retirement and pension system. The Japanese reproductive rate is far below the replacement rate. Over time, Japan’s population will continue its precipitous descent. Under the orthodox globalist economic doctrine, Japan’s situation beckons for a massive influx of cheap foreign labor. Yet somehow the international political discourse barely broaches the topic of massive non-Japanese immigration to Japan. There is no strong international or domestic pressure (or imperious demand) for Japan to import millions of Africans or South Americans. Japan is not singled out for genocide via massive non-Japanese immigration. Japan is not the target. Japan is free to remain Japanese. It is only White nations that are targeted for genocide.

Egalitarians claim “the race problem” will disappear if the traditionally White nations assimilate and interbreed with non-White populations. Some imagine this will produce a utopia of brown-skinned beauties – society without race by homogeneous default. Others recognize this scenario as the systematic eradication of the White race – White genocide. To bolster the credibility of the latter position, put the shoe on the other foot.

Assume for the sake of argument that in a stunning reversal, political correctness dictates that Africans are racist oppressors. Africans disproportionately enjoy material niceties, unfairly subjugate other races, and an invisible “African privilege” pervades the air which mysteriously oppresses all other races. In this hypothetical world, institutional racism means that Africans are predisposed to success and worldly gain from birth, as a result of the current political power relationship. Now, follow the usual prescription for healing with plans for coercive diversity and watch the fireworks begin!

The continent of Africa can solve “the race problem” by a massive influx of non-Africans. These non-Africans will assimilate and interbreed with Africans over time. The end result will be a utopia of mocha-skinned beauties – society without race by homogeneous default. Everyone will hold hands in unity, hatred will be a thing of the past, and racial oppression will no longer be an option.

A sharp mind quickly realizes the solution to “the race problem” in the African example is actually the Final Solution for Africans. That is, the systematic eradication of the African people – African genocide. No rational Black man will agree with such a genocidal campaign. No reasonable Black man will stand by and cheer on the destruction of his or her fellow Africans. No race deserves genocide. Every race has the right to exist biologically, ethnically, and culturally.

International law defines genocide as an international crime against humanity, with grave punishment for violations. As far as the international recognition of the reality of race, ask the ghosts of Saddam Hussein or Wilhelm Frick if the Kurds or Jews, respectively, are mere social constructs. Race is an internationally-recognized reality and is a major factor in the crime of genocide. In the future, the political and economic elites that are responsible for the policies of White genocide may face trial before an international tribunal. The 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II states:

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

The present immigration and political policies of many traditionally White nations, especially the United States, are in violation of part (c) and possibly part (d). White nations have been subverted to conditions that heavily favor non-White immigration, restrict White birthrates, and encourage and support non-White birthrates, and are thus calculated to bring about the physical destruction of the White race. There are many quotations of politicians, professors, and pundits advocating this very point – the end of the White race. Genocide is not always an act of traditional murder. The United Nations Convention on Genocide covers violent genocide with parts (a) and (b). However, the remaining definitions cover indirect and incremental methods to clarify that any form of genocide is punishable under international law.

The United States employed an explicitly pro-White immigration policy for the entirety of its two centuries of existence until the treasonous 1965 Immigration Act, which reversed this safeguard and subverted American immigration policy to discriminate against White Europeans in favor of non-White immigration. Prior to the 1965 Act, American immigration policy favored White European immigration to maintain the status quo of the American population. The behind-the-scenes architects of the 1965 Act realized that overwhelmingly non-White legal immigration would inevitably reduce the White American population over time. The political front men of the 1965 Act, such as Ted Kennedy, falsely assured the American public that the new immigration policy would not upset the racial balance of America. In 1965, America was approximately 89 percent White. Just a few generations later, America is around 65 percent White. In one more generation, White Americans will be a minority in their own country.

Illegal aliens create further demographic chaos, as White Americans are crowded out and out-bred by millions of mestizo illegal aliens from South America. Despite overwhelming public desire to seal the border and to deport and deny entry to illegal aliens, the federal government has willfully ignored its mandate to protect against all threats, foreign and domestic. Non-White legal immigrants and tens of millions of mestizo illegal alien invaders will dispossess the White American majority in the next few decades. White Americans will become a minority in their own nation.

Overwhelmingly non-White legal immigration and millions of non-White illegal aliens are inherently destructive to the White American population. Welfare and social benefit policies financially reward the generally poorer non-White groups for having large broods of children. Preferential hiring policies set aside jobs for non-Whites. Lax enforcement of employment law allows non-Whites to undercut the wages of educated White American citizens. The appalling aspect of these trends is that most of these policies, such as welfare, food stamps, and free emergency medical care, are predominantly financed by White American taxpayers. These White American taxpayers labor under conditions calculated to bring about their genocide as the progressive income tax discourages the most productive White Americans from having children.

Educated, self-reliant, and law-abiding White American taxpayers face the greatest disincentives to having large families. Instead, these White taxpayers work hard but are forced to financially support criminals, illegal aliens, and welfare abusers. The taxes paid by hardworking White citizens are transferred to illiterate illegal aliens to bankroll large broods of anchor babies that will produce an ever-increasing amount of welfare obligations and future criminals. The White American population dwindles while the non-White populations exponentially increase, further straining the welfare system, crowding prison cells, diluting educational standards, and destroying formerly safe White neighborhoods. White Americans face incremental genocide by design, which is precisely why so many fail to recognize the creeping trend. Genocide need not be associated with machetes, firing squads, or executions. The type of genocide White Americans face is far more subtle, which makes it all the more dangerous.

To deny White citizens of White nations the right to preserve themselves – biologically, ethnically, and culturally – is the true example of racism and hatred. Genocide is never acceptable. What can be more racist than the systematic eradication of an entire race? White Americans need not be ashamed of identifying on a racial basis, as every other race in America has a political license to do so. La Raza, the League of United Latino American Citizens, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai B’rith are all bound by racial or ethnic ties.

White Americans are now approaching minority status in the nation their forefathers fought for and built from the ground up. If the current birthrates continue, White Americans will be a minority group in a few generations. White Americans must be free to object to the immigration policy of White genocide without being shouted down as “racists,” a term which has lost potency due to its use as a political tool to silence White advocacy. “Racist” is a thinly-veiled attempt to silence a person who wishes to protect his or her race from extinction – a person who opposes genocide. “Racist” is an empty slur meant to shut down debate, silence White people, and obfuscate the reality of White genocide.

White Americans must be free to describe racial injustices committed against White people. Introduce the term “anti-White” to mainstream political discourse in the only way possible – by starting with private conversation. The mainstream media attempts to mold public opinion, but when there is an seismic shift in American thought, the press has no choice but to bow to popular pressure. Demand an end to White genocide and anti-White policies.

White Americans have the same claims to identity, organization, advocacy, and existence as does any other group in America. Take a principled, adamant, and vocal stand against White genocide. Talk to neighbors and inform friends. Write letters to editors, television producers, media figures, and especially politicians. Let the muffled White voice clear its throat and speak up clearly and forcefully after decades of silence. Turn the tables and take back the moral high ground. The truth is dangerous, which is precisely why slurs like “racist” are currently used to shout down reasonable opposition to White genocide. Brush aside such denunciations, or better yet, mount the offense with a counterattack.

Anyone who opposes a return to traditional American immigration policies is pro-White genocide. Anyone who supports amnesty for tens of millions of illegal aliens is pro-White genocide. The current American immigration policy discriminates against White Europeans and is pro-White genocide. There is nothing more racist than genocide, because it is the destruction of an entire race. If someone shouts “racist!” in a petty attempt to silence debate, explain that a real racist is someone who wants to commit genocide against the White race. Stop White genocide one conversation, one talking point, one letter, one complaint, one comment, one remark, and one person at a time. Stay on a consistent message against White genocide.

The White race of the future, if there is to be one, will be grateful.

Sunday, December 12, 2010

Cheering Isn't Enough

Cheering Isn't Enough
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-12-12 00:05:27

ADV Broadcast Of December 11, 2010

Hello, and welcome to this week’s broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of the National Alliance. I’m your host and Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

You know, as a nation, America has only been around for a little more than two hundred years, having been founded in 1776. Of course, White men had begun to build and maintain a civilization here in the Western hemisphere some time before that. The White settlement in Jamestown, Virginia was founded in 1607 and a band of pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock in Massachusetts in 1620. From that point on, until 1776, America was a possession of the British Empire, and the White culture that had been fostered here by the British went on without a hitch when the American colonists declared their independence from England in 1776. We then fought two successful wars against the British – the American Revolution and the War of 1812 – in order to preserve that independence.

Of course, there were other White ethnicities in the country at the time of the American Revolution, but the stamp of White culture brought here by the British was predominant. For example, they gave this country its primary language. Our system of government and our judicial system as well are based on British models. We’ve discussed on these programs many times in the past how today’s powers-that-be are attempting to turn this White world on its head by, for instance, allowing more and more Latinos into the country and by turning our White system of justice into a Politically Correct nightmare based NOT on evidence and law, but rather on dubious “eyewitness” accounts and a mindset of fashion and conformity imposed on an unsuspecting public by the Jew-dominated media.

At any rate, the British elements on which the country was founded – in addition to the other numerous White ethnicities that came to the United States in the decades following the American Revolution – were hard-nosed and practical people. They worked hard and they played hard, and within a century after the Declaration of Independence, they had built – with little more than their hands, their brains, and their desire – what was then the most powerful nation on Earth.

The attitude of vigorous health and optimism that pervaded America in the first century of its existence was captured by one of the greatest observers in history, the American poet Walt Whitman, who wrote this poem in 1860 called “I Hear America Singing”:

I hear American singing, the varied carols I hear,
Those of mechanics, each one singing his as it should be blithe and strong,
The carpenter singing his as he measures his plank or beam,
The mason singing his as he makes ready for work, or leaves off work,
The boatman singing what belongs to him in his boat, the deckhand singing on the steamboat deck,
The shoemaker singing as he sits on his bench, the hatter singing as he stands,
The wood-cutter’s song, the ploughboy’s on his way in the morning, or at noon intermission or at sundown,
The delicious singing of the mother, or of the young wife at work, or of the girl sewing or washing.
Each singing what belongs to him or her and to none else,
The day what belongs to the day – at night the party of young fellows, robust, friendly,
Singing with open mouths their strong melodious songs.

That was the 1860 poem, “I Hear America Singing” by the man who was probably most in tune with the fabric of American life during the latter half of the 19th Century, Walt Whitman. On the eve of the Civil War – which would start the very next year, in 1861 – Whitman perceived the energy of Americans and the essential joy that they took in their work and in their lives in general. Unfortunately, that energy and lust for adventure carried over to the Civil War, which claimed the lives of 620,000 of our young men, which was between 1.5 and 2 percent of the population at the time.

I’d like to emphasize what kind of loss that war meant to our nation and our race. Even if we use the lower number of 1.5 percent, with the current American population of about 300 million, a 1.5% loss over a four-year period would mean 4.5 million, war-related, male deaths. The Civil War was indeed a costly one, not only in terms of the White genes that were destroyed, but also in terms of what that war did to the American national psyche, which in my estimation has never quite been the same. Although the anger and resentment that stemmed from issues that caused Civil War have diminished, new angers and resentments have grown out of the old ones and have, more or less directly, led us to the present chaotic state of American society and to the uneasiness that remains always in the backs of the minds of perceptive and concerned White Americans.

But the attitude of hard work and discipline that allowed White America to become the dominant nation on Earth in the mid-19th Century continued on after the tragedy of the Civil War. Our ancestors tamed what was left of the West in a matter of decades. Our industrial and manufacturing base grew to not only be the most advanced in the world, but also the most productive. Millions of acres of land, particularly in the Midwest and the Great Plains states, were enlisted in the service of private agriculture, in which citizens with the ambition and the will to raise both a family and a farm were given free rein to manage their affairs as they saw fit. Indeed, millions of our European ancestors – often the most restless and energetic ones – made the long trip across the Atlantic in order to seek their fortunes as productive members of the great White nation in the Western Hemisphere.

All the way up to and after the Second World War, this unflagging energy and a commitment to building a better life were dominant features of the American mentality and the American way of life. Even up through the infant space program and the final Apollo landings on the Moon, this achievement-based frame of mind prevailed.

But that viewpoint, which was essentially a sense of “who we were” in the mind of ordinary Americans, began to be noticeably undermined during the Civil Rights Era from the 1950s through the 1970s.

I’m not going to go into much detail about that era today, as we’ve done that many times before on earlier broadcasts of American Dissident Voices. I will, however, sum up that era from the White Racialist point of view. Essentially, the Jewish influence in American society – which began in the printed media during the 19th Century, expanded into the film industry in the early 20th Century, and all the while was worming its way into behind-the-scenes positions of power within our government – became too much for White America to handle. And although the Jews certainly had an agenda that was detrimental to the interests of a strong White America and to the White race as a whole, they certainly can’t be held responsible for ALL of the disasters that has befallen our race in the United States over the last century or so. Too often, our people were so caught up in their hard work and their achievement-oriented lifestyle that they didn’t bother to pay close attention to what was happening to the structure of their society, both in terms of its racial makeup – as Americans like Lothrop Stoddard tried to warn us about in the early 20th Century – AND in terms of the decisions of our government related to immigration, racial mixing, foreign allies and enemies, and so on – all of which American White racialists from the end of the First World War have been harping about ever since.

And where are we today? Today, the American racial situation is nightmarish in scope. The atomization of White American society is essentially complete, with non-White races holding a near monopoly on racial unity and cohesiveness. Our government’s obsequious worship of the State of Israel and of Jews in general is total and unchallengeable. Our long-mighty industrial and military superiority are gone, both having been sent to the Orient, either by greedy and bourgeois capitalists in order to make a fast buck, or by race-conscious and traitorous Asians or Jews that we foolishly made privy to our technological knowledge.

And, perhaps worst of all, White Americans seem to have lost the ethic of discipline and hard work that, in former times, rose up like a gale force wind when a problem stood in their way. Instead of DOING, for example, we are more content with WATCHING. Kids spend endless hours in front of a television or computer screen, watching Jew-approved TV shows or playing Jew-approved video games or sitting mindlessly and watching pointless YouTube videos or searching through MySpace.

The rot isn’t limited to the young, obviously. Rather than doing something productive or even exercising, adults instead watch Jew-approved movies and mixed-race spectator sports events. In so doing, they gorge themselves on nutrient-deprived, processed foods that do nothing but add rolls of fat to their waistlines and throw their blood sugar and cholesterol levels all out of whack. The so-called “average” American today is more obese and less healthy in body, mind, and spirit than was the “average” American in any previous era. And all of this while allegedly living longer! The trouble is that the medical community has simply figured out more ways to keep people alive longer. So life might be LONGER, but is it BETTER than in earlier times? Does a longer life make for a more QUALITY life? I’m not so sure.

Anyway, the state of things that exists today is one that our European-American ancestors who came over from the “Old Country” in the 19th Century would shudder to behold. And what we need to start to fix things is a good dose of that White work ethic that conquered this continent; that “can do” attitude that blows through obstacles and that doesn’t stop until the desired result has been achieved. As a whole, our race has lost this work ethic or – perhaps I should say instead – it is still with us, but it lies submerged under an alien baggage of half-truths, downright lies, and misplaced priorities.

Partly because I believe in the immutability of the White race-soul and partly because – as the head of an organization whose purpose is to salvage the remaining pure elements of the race – I have to be hopeful and optimistic about our future, I believe that our work ethic is NOT gone, but merely hidden. White racialists, in general, subscribe at least to the former of these, and the active ones certainly subscribe as well to the latter. After all, how does one change what one IS? The outward fa├žade is subject to change, but the essential core of what a White person IS contains, I believe, an element of wanting to do the right thing and the willingness to work hard to ACTUALLY DO the right thing.

The problem, of course, is that our society doesn’t provide the right environment for progressive racial action: securing our racial boundaries, for example, or building a self-sufficient White economy or a strong and in-depth White system of national defense. The National Alliance intends to create such a society, in which the pervading ideological climate will be conducive to addressing issues such as these and, in general, doing everything else necessary to elevate the White racial gene pool generation after generation for as long as we can…preferably, for as long as the universe exists.

And to create that new and homogeneous White society, we need ACTION. We need DOERS, not watchers. We need White men and women who are fed up with watching our biological challengers have their way in every facet of American life. We need White men and women who are sick of backing down in the face of Jewish media pressure every time something noble – ANYTHING noble – gets public attention.

You know, it’s somewhat ironic that today I’m calling for action and energy in order to get our race back on track, because – as I mentioned earlier – it is partly our ancestors’ action and energy that put us where we are today. Where our ancestors were long on hard work and results, they were short on assessing and comprehending the changes that were going on in society. That narrowness of focus even comes out in Walt Whitman’s poem that I quoted earlier, in the line that reads:
Each singing what belongs to him or her and to none else.
In other words, our ancestors were so wrapped up in their industriousness that they left untended the guardianship of the nation, and the Jews were more than happy to step up to the plate and take the reins of power. What we need today is a uniquely White combination of industriousness AND vigilance that will not only allow us to take back our world, but also to make sure that never again is that world threatened by those who would destroy us. And I believe that those who would attempt to destroy us in our future White world are the same ones who are trying to destroy us today…and who are doing so with remarkable success.

We’ve talked before on American Dissident Voices about sports, simply because the Jewish media have pushed spectator sports so far into the public sphere that almost no one can completely escape noticing at least some of what is going on in the sports world, with various teams or players or what-have-you.

As is obvious from watching TV or from hearing the office conversation at work or from seeing all of the sports merchandise in seemingly every retail establishment, there are millions of sports fans out there, and many of them are willing to spend big bucks and big chunks of time to demonstrate their allegiances. It’s refreshing sometimes to observe the passion that some fans have for their favorite team, and sometimes I think, “Wow. You know, if White people would feel about their race like they do about their favorite football or baseball team, we could sweep the Jews and the non-Whites away and clear a place for ourselves in no time at all.” That’s a positive and refreshing thought. But it is pure fantasy.

And the reason it is pure fantasy is because we don’t need fans of the White race, and I’ll tell you why. Do you know what fans do? They cheer. They hope. They watch the game, and they often drink too much alcohol and eat junk food while doing so. If the game ends in victory, they celebrate. If not, they cry in their beer and hope for better things in the future. And then they go back to their lives, having ACTIVELY done nothing to help their team win.

Now, you could argue with me that cheering DOES have an effect on a team winning or losing, and I won’t deny that. But it IS true that a fan does NOT win the game, and nor does he lose the game. Not even the poor Chicago Cubs fan who interfered with a foul ball in the Cubs’ 2003 National League Championship Series with the Florida Marlins lost the game for the Cubs. As I recall, the next Marlins batter hit what should have been an inning-ending double play…which the Cubs shortstop booted. THAT is what led to the big inning for the Marlins; that is, the TEAM had every chance to recover from the so-called “Bartman incident.”

No, being a fan involves many things – including taking ribbing from fans with other allegiances, at times – but it doesn’t involve the crucial ingredient necessary for a renaissance of the White race: responsibility.

And THAT is why we don’t need fans of the White race. Instead, we need active players in the game of life, in the game of reviving the body and spirit of our race… so that we can achieve the possible destiny that is within us.

With hard work and devotion and vigilance, we can win.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

South Africa: Black Entitlement is Cause for Brutal Crimes

South Africa: Black Entitlement is Cause for Brutal Crimes
Posted under:General— @ 7:00 pm

Steve Hofmeyr – Black Entitlement Is Cause for Brutal Crimes

December 6, 2010

Over the weekend Steve Hofmeyr stated something on his Facebook page that is on the mind of many South Africans, especially white South Africans. Its the matter of the entitlement that is ingrained into South African black population from a young age. From politicians to the street cleaner that see the white man in his nice house, driving a car and believe with all their hearts its only because he is white that he has those things. That’s just not true.

As white people tend to generalise about blacks so does the blacks about whites. When have you heard a ANC politicians say to the people they have to pull up their socks and work hard to achieve that what was achieved by others? A very small minority of whites South Africans have what they have today because someone gave it to them. The majority have achieved all this through hard work – first in school, then university/college, then in the work place or being a entrepreneur.
Ons MOET veralgemeen. Meeste swartes wat ek ken is nie geweldadig nie, maar alle swartes wat ek ken slurp die PROPAGANDA VAN ENTITLEMENT op, presies dit wat jong moordenaars nodig het om hul brutaliteite te regverdig.

Dan kry ek die antw in die volgende berig: dat ons die swart matrieks vergewensgesind moet wees as hulle dop. Hoekom? Want niemand sal ooit skuld he aan hul eie lamsakkigheid solank hulle ander daarvoor kan blameer nie. Swartes (God weet, seker nie almal van hulle nie, maar meeste wat ek waarneem) voel geregverdig en ‘entitled’ in alles, vanaf kwotas/lae matrieksyfers tot grondregte/ brutaliteit.

Translated: We MUST generalise. Most blacks that I know is not violent , but all blacks what I know suck up the PROPAGANDA OF ENTITLEMENT up, precisely what young murders need to justify their brutality.

Then I find the answer in the following article: that we should be forgiving if they failed. (in other words they must be exonerated from failing matric) Why? Because no one will ever take responsibility for their laziness so long as others can be blamed. Blacks (God knows, probably not all of them, but most that I observed) feel justified and entitled for everything, from kwotas/low matric pass-rates to property rights/brutality.

But what is getting the whites in such a ‘knot’ is that black criminals use this thinking to justify cruelty when they commit a crime. Instead of just stealing or do whatever they do, most of the time they seek out to hurt, humiliate and torture their victims. This whole rant from Steve Hofmeyr came because of the systematic murder of the Potgieter family that lived on a farm in the Free State. The father Attie Potgieter, who was the steward of the farm, was hit over the head then stabbed. His wife Wilna and their little three year old girl was killed execution style with a bullet shot in the back of the head. If that was not bad enough the murderers left a message at the gate when they left saying – that they killed the farmer and they will be back. Just because this man was a farmer he was killed but why kill his wife and three year old? They could have just waited for him outside if they wanted to rob him, no it is obvious their intent was to murder the whole family toward what gain we can only speculate.

Ek weet nie hoe die wereld dink ons moet transformeer, intergreer en ons vooroordele moet laat vaar en oulike verdraagsame Christene moet bly terwyl SWARTES N WIT 3-JARIGE KIND IN DIE KOP KAN SKIET NIE. Jammer as ek die kleur beklemtoon, maar ek sukkel om daardie aaklige wittes op te spoor wat saans oor swartes se mure .. klim en dit aan hulle kinders doen. Ek gaan al weer uiters bitter hierdie naweek in.

I don’t know how the world thinks we must transform, integrate and let our benefits go and be cute enduring Christians stay while BLACKS SHOOT A WHITE 3-YEAR OLD CHILD IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD. Sorry if I emphasise color of race, but I am struggling finding those horrible whites that jumps over blacks walls during the night .. and do this too their children. I am again going very bitter into this weekend.

His voice joins a couple of others who have had the guts to stand up against the farm murders, one of those are Afriform who have released a statement stating that the ANC should shoulder the blame for the murders.This is not the first time Steve Hofmeyr received attention for his honest opinion. One of the first times was when he wrote a letter to the ANC youth league leader, Julius Malema, a very condemning letter, telling him exactly what Steve thinks of his ‘speeches’ and singing a song about ‘Kill the Boer’ – ‘Kill the Farmer’. Until the black population get rid of the idea they can all achieve riches of someone else’s hard work. This all will continue and the divide between black and white will only grow because the white population can only take so much before they also have nothing or leave seeking refuge where they are appreciated, leaving the masses to fend for themselves.

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Emergency Amnesty Alert!

Emergency Amnesty Alert!
Harry Reid is trying to get the “DREAM ACT” illegal alien amnesty bill passed before the current session ends! The bill would grant amnesty to an estimated 2.1 million illegal aliens.

Harry Reid is desperate and pulling dirty tricks. The Democrats just added an amendment to the bill to give a one time $250 Social Security bonus check to senior citizens. This desperate attempt to buy off the elderly just shows how unpopular this amnesty bill is.

Reid is expected to force a cloture vote by the end of the week. A cloture vote is needed to block any Republican filibuster.

Your phone calls have been instrumental in thwarting amnesty bills for the past four years! Take a moment to call the offices of your US Senators now and demand they vote against cloture of the “DREAM ACT.”

Two Democratic Senators, Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Mark Pryor of Arkansas, have pledged not to vote for closure and not to vote for the bill if it gets closure. However Reid believes he has found two Republican sell-outs to achieve his 60 votes. If the session ends before cloture is obtained, Reid will be unlikely to get cloture when the next session starts.

The two Republicans that Harry Reid believes will vote for cloture are Republican Sens. Dick Lugar of Indiana and Bob Bennett of Utah.

If you live in Indiana or Utah, call their offices now. Tell their staff that you are a resident of the Senator’s state and vote in every election. Then tell them that you will campaign for whoever runs against them in the next election if they vote for cloture.

Lugar, Richard G. – (R – IN)
(202) 224-4814

Bennett, Robert F. – (R – UT)
(202) 224-5444

Lame Duck Congress attempting to pass Dream Act amnesty this week!

Lame Duck Congress attempting to pass Dream Act amnesty this week
Posted under:General— @ 12:30 am

How Bad Will Harry Reid’s Dream Act Hit You?

‘I urge you to send in your faxes and make your phone calls at to stop this insane amnesty from becoming law’

By Frosty Wooldridge

If the Dream Act passes, do you have any idea how much it will cost you, the American taxpayer? It will cost untold billions of your dollars and throw this country into a greater tailspin. It will increase illegal immigration faster than anyone can imagine.

My friend, former Congressman Tom Tancredo, knows the ultimate cost. He fought mass illegal immigration for ten years in Congress. He’s still fighting.

Can you tell us what we face if we allow Senator Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to pass the Dream Act during the lame-duck session?
“When Congress convenes for its lame duck session on November 29, it will be asked by Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid to vote on an amnesty bill deceptively called “the Dream Act” by its open borders supporters. If passed, it will be a nightmare for the rule of law and a death knell for genuine immigration reform.

“That this amnesty bill is being taken up by the lame duck session of a Congress that has been soundly repudiated by the American people is bad enough. Lame duck sessions ought to consider only emergency bills with broad bipartisan backing, not contentious measures that can only be passed by politicians who can ignore the will of voters. But that is eerily in keeping with the dishonest character of the long debate over the “Dream Act.”

“I say the debate is dishonest because the bill’s true intent is hidden behind humanitarian appeals, deceptive numbers and misrepresentations. Most dishonest of all is the insistence that enacting this amnesty for over two million individuals will not have any incentive effect for others who will rationally calculate that they can get the same thing for their children if they can smuggle them across our border.

“For the past thirty years, each amnesty has been sold to Congress as “the last amnesty,” and each one lays the groundwork for the next. That anyone chooses to believe the opposite is testimony to the power of self-deception.

“Ostensibly, the proposal will bar deportation and grant a path to citizenship to an estimated two million individuals who were brought to the US as children by their illegal alien parents. Any person up to the age of 35 can apply for this prize merely by enrolling in college or the military. They don’t have to finish college, they merely have to enroll for two years—and if they drop out of a two-year college program, they can apply for a waiver under the law’s “hardship” provisions. No one can be deported once an application is made, even if it takes years to adjudicate.

“Contrary to the packaging, this is not an amnesty for “kids trying to go to college” unless a 34 year-old who came here at age seven and stayed illegally for 27 years can be called a kid. Criminal aliens convicted of marriage fraud, visa fraud, multiple DUI’s, voter fraud and other “minor crimes” will be eligible for this amnesty.

“A second dishonesty is in the estimated number of illegal alien who may qualify. The number widely used is 2.1 million. Why should we be skeptical of this number? First, there is the rudimentary fact that the federal government does not know how many illegal aliens are in the United States today and continually low-balls the number to minimize the problem. The official US Census estimate of 11.3 million is a laughable figure. Independent estimates not constrained by political expediency have ranged from 20 million to 35 million. In 2006 TIME magazine estimated that three million new interlopers cross the border each year. Visa overstays alone are at least five million.

“A second reason for doubt about the number is the immigration bureaucracy’s poor record in making such estimates. In 1986 when Congress was considering the amnesty included in the Immigration Reform and Control Act, a federal interagency task force spent weeks studying the data from several sources. They concluded that perhaps 2.2 million people might qualify under the provisions of the act. Ten years after it passed, over four million had been granted amnesty.

“A third reason I can confidently predict that the number who “qualify” for amnesty under the Dream Act will be at least double the official estimate is the absolute certainty of epidemic document fraud in student visas, ID cards, utility bills, rent receipts and pay stubs. Document fraud was rampant after the 1986 amnesty and the technology for producing fake documents is far better today than in 1986.

“The cold truth is that any illegal alien under the age of 40 will be able to obtain passable documents showing he came here with a parent at an early age and has been here all that time. Moreover, aliens sitting today in Mexico City, Cairo, Budapest or Singapore will be able to purchase such documents after arriving here in 2011.

“The main argument in favor of pursing this nightmare is that “we should not blame children for the sins of their parents.” But not “blaming” the children does not justify rewarding the parents’ actions and offering powerful incentives to others to follow their example. The children should blame the parents for their unlawful actions, but this law asks us to thank them instead.

“There is a perverse logic in the “Dream amnesty” legislation, which runs like this. Since the open borders lobby has been successful in blocking enforcement of our immigration laws so that the parents who entered our country illegally fifteen years ago were never sent home with their children, we owe it to their children to give them citizenship. By most standards this is called rewarding bad behavior, which is a sure formula for getting more of it.

“Transparency is the new watchword of good government, but somehow immigration law is exempt from this standard. There is hardly anything about this proposal that can survive the spotlight of honest scrutiny. Only a lame duck Congress could get away with such hypocrisy and chicanery.”

I urge you to make sure you send in your faxes and make your phone calls at this week to stop this insane amnesty from becoming law.

You can reach Mr. Tom Tancredo by clicking here.

Listen to Frosty Wooldridge on Wednesdays as he interviews top national leaders on his radio show “Connecting the Dots” at at 6:00 PM Mountain Time. Adjust tuning in to your time zone.

Sunday, December 5, 2010

Reaping A Mighty Harvest

Reaping A Mighty Harvest
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-12-04 23:40:51

ADV Broadcast Of December 4, 2010

Hello, and welcome back to another broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

Today’s broadcast will be a speech I had given a while back to the Boston Local Unit of the National Alliance.

As Chairman of our organization, I am pleased to be here today to witness the beginning of great things to come for our people in the New England area. Since colonial times, Boston has been a hotbed of idealism. On December 16, 1773, the Sons of Liberty boarded British ships in Boston harbor and dumped overboard all the tea they could get their hands on. They did this – not because their White sons and daughters were being brainwashed into mixing their blood with that of non-Whites, and not because Massachusetts was being swamped with non-White immigrants who disrupted the economic and social fabric of the colony – but because they didn’t want to pay the tax on tea.

And, really, it wasn’t even the tax itself that was the issue; it was that the British government had imposed that tax on the colonies without the colonies being represented in Parliament. Presumably, if the American colonies had been represented in the British legislature, they might have accepted a modest tax on tea and other goods. But the colonists weren’t represented, and so the White men and women of honor stood up and did something about it.

It’s hard to imagine today that a main cause of the American Revolution was taxation. And if our ancestors were justified in revamping their society and setting up a separate country because of taxes, how much more justified are we today in working to secure a White homeland? What is taxation compared to the fact that the only race that has any true concept of what freedom means is on the verge of extinction?

Of course, the answer is that taxation is nothing compared to the life of a people. And you in the New England area have recognized and accepted that fact and, you are collectively standing up and doing something about it.

But the Boston Tea Party of 1773 was essentially a protest. It sent a message to the British government that the colonists were upset, but it didn’t have any teeth behind it. Had King George III taken a different course in the aftermath of the Boston Tea Party, the American Revolution might have been avoided. Had he allowed Parliamentary representation for the thirteen colonies and repealed the taxes he had imposed on them, we Americans today might be sipping afternoon tea, eating scones and plum pudding, and flying the Union Jack. But he didn’t do any of that, and so the stage was set for more conflict.

At first, few colonists wanted to break away from England. Never is the status quo easy to reject, never is it easy to put aside the present way of things to search instead for a different way of things – a future we can sketch in rough outline, but whose details are hazy at best and, in many cases, totally uncertain. And never is it easy to make the conscious choice that, in order to bring into being a better future, we must fight against the present and those who support it – those who are determined to sustain it at any cost.

This is why revolutionary political causes are promoted most avidly by young people. Many older people cannot see enough of the big picture to break free from their habitual ideas, even when those ideas can be shown not to apply to the present. Such people look upon new political causes – and those who struggle on their behalf – as being critical not only of the old system, but also of those who, for many years, supported that system and who handed it down to the next generation. They look upon all those who reject the current way of things as a bunch of ingrates, a pack of whiners who “don’t know how good they have it.”

Certainly, that’s how the British government viewed the rebel Americans after April 19, 1775, when the revolutionary spirit of Boston-area Whites flared up against the British west of the city. Those men and women at Lexington and Concord, and all those who sacrificed over the following years, knew that – if they were going to change things – they were going to have to struggle. They knew that many of their neighbors would cling to the old system and remain faithful to England. They knew that the choice they had made would bring heartache, loss, and hardships. But they chose to fight because White men and women of honor can’t stand to be told to live their lives in a certain way. White men and women must be in control of their destinies; White men and women must be free.

That’s what we in the National Alliance are trying to accomplish here in Boston and around the world. The White race is no longer in firm control of its own destiny; the White race is not free. Most of our people have been deluded into believing that freedom is totally about the individual. They believe that an individual should be able to do whatever he wants, and they believe this because our enemies, who control most of the vital channels of information, have told them so in a thousand different ways every day of their lives.

But when it comes to a group of people, a race, wanting to be free, to do what it wants to do – what it must do to survive – our mainstream kinsmen immediately call up everything else our enemies have taught them: freedom and a sense of destiny for a group is definitely not OK.

That is why the formation of Local Units like the one we now have in Boston is crucial to the success of the Alliance’s mission. Not only are we pooling our strength so that we can get more done in a local area, but we also are emphasizing the all-important idea that we are – firstly and most importantly -- a group, and that the freedom for which we are fighting is the freedom of another group – namely, the White race.

It isn’t that we oppose individual freedom; it’s just that those freedoms are worthless if our race lacks the freedom to choose its own destiny. Of course, the individual freedoms, such as freedom of speech and freedom of assembly, are necessary for us to spread our message to others, but – at root – the national Alliance doesn’t exist to protect those freedoms. The National Alliance exists to protect the gene pool of the White race and , later on, to ensure that that gene pool gets better and better with each passing generation. Once we’ve secured our White homeland, formed a racially conscious government, and put in place a social structure dedicated to safeguarding and elevating our people, then we can worry about restoring and protecting many of the individual freedoms that have been taken from us as individuals over the last century.

But, for all of our emphasis on “the group,” we also fully acknowledge the responsibilities of the individual. Now that a Local Unit exists here in Boston, no member of that Unit should think that he can slack off and let everyone else in the Unit do the work to bring the Alliance’s message to the White people of New England. On the contrary, the formation of a Local Unit should spur him into contributing more than he did before. Just think of what can be done now that Boston-area Alliance members have committed to working together! The possibilities are limitless.

Years ago, when Dr. Pierce commissioned me to form and lead the Cleveland Local Unit, he gave me a few pieces of advice. “Keep it going,” he said, “Just keep it going. The enthusiasm will wax and wane; sometimes things will be going strong, and other times it will seem like nobody wants to do anything. But don’t give up. Keep the flames burning, and it will become larger and stronger. Eventually, you’ll be able to tackle projects that you can’t dream of now.”

That’s the advice that I have to give you today. At the time the Cleveland Local Unit was formed, there were no other Local Units… anywhere. Our Unit was the only one in the whole country; I had no experience in running a Local Unit and no one whose example I could follow. So I just kept Dr. Pierce’s advice in mind; keep it together; keep it moving; don’t let the setbacks take the wind out of your sails; try new things and learn from your experience as to what works and what needs to be changed. So I did my best, had some successes and some… “learning experiences,” shall we say? But I knew in my heart that I was doing the right thing; I took my lead from Dr. Pierce and his example that – when it comes to the life and death of one’s people – a true White man will always choose to try something at which he might fail than to stand aside and do nothing out of fear of being ridiculed.

Now that we’ve formed our Boston Local Unit, we need to keep it going no matter what. We’ve got a toehold in New England, and we need to expand it, first into a foothold and then into much more. We’ll slip occasionally, but we’ve got to get right back up and go at it again. If we do that, it won’t be very long before this Local Unit will be doing all kinds of outreach activities, including holding its own European cultural festivals. And the Boston Unit has the advantage that it can learn from the experience of other Units. They don’t have to reinvent the wheel; they can follow patterns that other Units have found to work, and they can also devise their own patterns – new patterns – that might help other Units.

Let’s not deceive ourselves: keeping a Local Unit together and keeping it productive is not easy. It’s not going to require time and sacrifice, and not just from the Unit Coordinator. His job is to oversee and direct the Unit’s activities, but what we need is an abundance of energy and input from every member of the Unit, an enthusiasm like a wave that will carry the Alliance’s message to new beaches and new islands.

Paul Revere wasn’t a warrior; he wasn’t a great general who led thousands of his countrymen into battle against an oppressor from across the ocean. He was a silversmith, an ordinary, well-informed citizen – an individual – who chose to get involved in the patriotic cause of the American colonies, not because it was going to make him more money as silversmith, but because he believed in that cause. To the best of my knowledge, Paul Revere never fired a weapon in battle, but he did do something that helped make possible the formation of a new country; he helped organize a group of men who, when the time was right, warned the other colonists about British aggression. His efforts contributed to the American success during the fighting at Lexington and Concord on that first day of the American Revolution.

Like Paul Revere and his comrades, we in the Alliance need to organize and inform. The war we’re waging now is a war of ideas, a war for the hearts and minds of our people. The way to wage that war is to do what the Alliance has been doing around the country and what we are beginning to do here in Boston: band together and work as one.

Just as the American patriots of the 18th Century discovered, not everyone will be willing to join our struggle for a new and better world for our race. Many will remain loyal to the old regime; some will join us and later turn traitor. Some – namely, those who believe only in themselves and their wealth – will support neither us nor our enemies; instead, they will tread water and observe as the struggle pans out, waiting to see which side will eventually offer them the greatest gain.

But these setbacks won’t deter us. Like the so-called “witches” in the Salem Witch Trials of 1692, the persecutions we face from our enemies today are based on falsehood, misunderstanding, and – most of all – fear. The good news is that the White minority that our message is directed toward doesn’t put much fath in the name-calling that we are subjected to by alarmist newspapers and head-shaking newsmen. Many of those we are trying to reach, like the many sane New Englanders who had doubts about the claims of the witch hunters, already have strong misgivings about the present way of things, but they are too timid to voice those misgivings and they don’t know where to turn. If we push ahead with the Alliance’s message in a clear, convincing and professional manner – with a smile on our faces , a direct look in the eyes, and a firm handshake – that message will resonate with more and more of those honest a nd well-meaning Whites. In time, and by persisting despite the obstacles, our efforts will reap a mighty harvest, just like the farmers of Lexington and Concord eventually reaped a grand harvest, a new White independent nation: the United States of America.

I wish the best to the Boston Local Unit of the National Alliance. Work together to build the Alliance community here in New England. There is a great and glorious future that lies ahead of us, if we just make the choice to create that future.

Thank you.

SPLC President Richard Cohen Abandons Sinking Ship

OH GLORIOUS DAY! After all these years, where were you when  the stock of the Poverty Palace crashed and collapsed under the weight of i...