Wednesday, September 29, 2010

The New, More Racially Diverse US Army

The New, More Racially Diverse US Army

by Jeff Davis

Next time you see or hear that old “support our troops” mantra, you might want to think long and hard about what it is you’re supporting. There’s still a core of good quality Whites who hold everything together, but they must worship at the altar of Diversity and multi-culturalism like all federal employees. The minority portion of the United States military is largely a disgrace, and some of their bad habits like drug addiction are spreading to the less-disciplined Whites.

McClatchy News reports: “When Lt. Col. Dave Wilson took command of a battalion of the 4th Brigade of the 1st Armored Division, the unit had just returned to Texas from 14 months traveling some of Iraq’s most dangerous roads as part of a logistics mission. What he found, he said, was a unit far more damaged than the single death it had suffered in its two deployments to Iraq. Nearly 70 soldiers in his 1,163-member battalion had tested positive for drugs: methamphetamine, cocaine and marijuana. Others were abusing prescription drugs. Troops were passing around a tape of a female lieutenant having sex with five soldiers from the unit. Seven soldiers in the brigade died from drug overdoses and traffic accidents when they returned to Fort Bliss, near El Paso, after their first deployment. What Wilson had to deal with, however, was hardly an isolated instance. With the U.S. drawdown in Iraq, the Army is finally confronting an epidemic of drug abuse and criminal behavior that many commanders acknowledge has been made worse because they’d largely ignored it during nearly a decade of wars on two fronts.”

Don’t forget the Israeli advisers who introduced a flagrant disrespect for the rules of war by encouraging our soldiers to do “enhanced interrogations” or torture. Once ordinary soldiers start hearing stories about enemy combatants being tortured or murdered, it’s a safe bet discipline and professionalism will quickly disappear.

McClatchy goes on: “The Army concedes that it faces a mammoth problem. A 350-page report issued in July after a 15-month investigation into the Army’s rising suicide rate found that levels of illegal drug use and criminal activity have reached record highs, while the number of disciplinary actions and forced discharges were at record lows. The result, the Army found, is that drug and alcohol abuse is a significant health problem in the Army. Where the Army once rigidly enforced rules on drug use, it got sloppy in the rush to get soldiers ready for the battlefield… The number of misdemeanors that soldiers committed… rose to 50,523 in fiscal year 2009 — a sign, the report said, that good order and discipline were declining in the ranks. Five years earlier, the number was 28,388… The increase in drug abuse and bad behavior came at the same time that the Army enlisted thousands of recruits who in previous years would have been ruled ineligible because of drug or other criminal convictions. According to the report, nearly 20 percent of the soldiers who’ve enlisted in the Army since 2004 — perhaps as many as 10,000 — would not have been eligible for entry into the Army before. Wilson said he found a failure of leadership to be a major factor in the deterioration of his unit. When the brigade returned from Iraq in December 2007, many commanders were moved to other units, and new soldiers were rushed through the system to get them to the battlefield quickly, without the proper guidance. As a result, 37 of the 69 drug abusers in Wilson’s battalion belonged to one company of 200, he said. When he was a company commander a decade ago, having five soldiers test positive would have been considered a lot, he added.”

Our politicians have -so far- refused to consider bringing back a Draft. They remember the huge backlash during the Vietnam War from the usually silent White majority that resulted from the Draft back then. So now the Army has a record high percentage of blacks, Latinos, drug addicts, criminals and gang-bangers.

Very few Americans are paying attention to the atrocities and torture that this new more Diverse US Army has committed in Iraq and Afghanistan. White Americans need to consider that this same Army may be called on to restore order during race riots here in the US as the Depression gets worse, and it’s not entirely clear, whether or not they’ll defend the innocent or take the side of the looters.

The National Alliance,Gun Shows and a World Without Zionism

National Alliance Popular With Public At Gun Show
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-09-29 03:55:33 in category: General [ Print]

The Sacramento Unit of the National Alliance staged another very successful public relations outreach with an attention grabbing display at a major gun show in Sacramento CA over the weekend of September 25 & 26.

Utilizing a massive 24 foot display of recruiting materials and books, a full staff of members greeted and met with hundreds of visitors who came by the Alliance spot on the show floor over the course of the weekend. The local Alliance group gave away hundreds of free pieces of various recruiting materials and dozens of DVD's featuring Dr. Willliam Pierce's America is a Changing Country program. Young family people especially enjoyed being able to purchase White History Coloring Books for their children which are free of all the various multi-cultural garbage.

The reception of the public was exceptionally friendly and supportive and the Alliance enjoyed an especially smooth running show. This is just another proof that a significant percentage of the White public are ready for the race saving message of the National Alliance.

A detailed report of this event will be made available to members of the National Alliance through the monthly member's newsletter.

News Source: Jim Ring

Holocaust Industry Targets David Irving Once Again
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-09-29 03:46:03 in category: General [ Print]

WARSAW, Poland, Sept. 22 (UPI) -- A museum at the Auschwitz concentration camp in Poland has banned British Holocaust denier David Irving from giving a guided tour there.

A spokesman for the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum said Irving can visit as an individual, the Warsaw Business Journal reported. Irving, who is leading a group on a tour of Holocaust sites in Poland this week,

will be "closely monitored" at Auschwitz, Bartosz Bartyzel said.

Irving's itinerary reportedly includes Treblinka, the most notorious Nazi death camp. He has said Treblinka remains "genuine" and Auschwitz has been converted to a "Disney-style tourist attraction."

Irving does not deny that thousands or even millions of Jews were killed during World War II. But he denies Jews were killed systematically on the orders of Adolf Hitler.

News Source: Heather

One Step At A Time : Nationalist Victory In Sweden
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-09-29 03:36:51 in category: General [ Print]
The election was historic for the Swedish party which managed to take seats in its first elections. The party ran in eight locations, and ended up around 1% in the number of municipal elections.In Grass's municipality did the party best-performers and got 2.8% of the vote which gave a mandate.
I'm obviously very happy that we took the mandate already in our first elections less than a year after we registered our party name. In Grästorp we beat Sweden Democrats, and we got more votes than KD, MP and V were together so it's clear that I am satisfied, "said Daniel Höglund's SvP's party leader and now even local politicians in Grästorps municipality.

In some media, called the party "Nazi" and so on, what do you say?

There is something that our opponents are taking to the lack of ability to argue against the party's positions but do not touch me much. We stand by our commitment to create a Swedish Sweden, where the Swedes' common interest is represented instead of the various special interests and if we are called Nazis and other persons who do not share the desire to influence it's not, "says Höglund.

News Source: Swedish reader

Ghoulish Israeli Organ Harvest Continues Unabated
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-09-29 02:53:33 in category: General [ Print]

The biggest health care firm in South Africa has been charged with cooperating with an Israeli-linked organ trafficking syndicate.
The South African government said that the head of the Netcare company and a director of the St. Augustine's Hospital in Durban, Richard Friedland, had been aware of illegal kidney trade at the hospital, but "nevertheless permitted these operations" to take place, South African daily The Times reported on Wednesday.

The police said that wealthy Israelis paid organ dealers between 2001 and 2003, the year when the ring was exposed, the German Press Agency (DPA) reported.

"Israeli citizens in need of kidney transplants would be brought to South Africa for transplants at St. Augustine's Hospital," read the charge sheet.

"They paid kidney suppliers for these operations. [The kidneys] were initially sourced from Israeli citizens, but later Romanian and Brazilian citizens were recruited as their kidneys were obtainable at a much lower cost than those of the Israeli suppliers," it added.

An Israeli middleman, named Ilan Perry, received between USD 97,676 and USD 118,607 to arrange for the operations.

This is while, those who provided the kidneys were paid approximately between USD 6,000 and USD 20,000.

Five notable South African physicians, working in Durban have also been charged in the illegal organ-trafficking case.

News Source: Jim Ring

September 28, 2010

They Are Just A Religious Community - With Different Bone Marrow
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-09-28 04:38:26 in category: General [ Print]

Diagnosed with lymphoma three years ago, former Boston police officer Stanley E. Graham Jr. has been trying to find a compatible bone marrow donor to save his life, but he faces roadblocks.

Graham’s heritage includes African-American, French Canadian, and West Indian. While potential donors do not have to share the exact same backgrounds, they should be compatible enough so the patient’s body does not reject the donated marrow. And among minorities, the list of potential donors is lagging, so much that some medical specialists say finding a suitable donor is like looking for a needle in a haystack.

“We have to keep believing that there is someone out there who can save my husband’s life,’’ said Lorraine Johnson-Graham. She has scoured national donor lists and helped sign up more than 230 possible donors in the Boston area, but nothing yet.

“My fear now is, how much more can he tolerate?’’ she said. Graham’s cancer has gone into remission four times since he was diagnosed, kicked back by potent doses of chemotherapy, but it flared up again in June. Graham, 61, of Boston, is undergoing more chemotherapy treatments.

Tomorrow, Johnson-Graham will again try to find a compatible donor for her husband and also recruit people to be on a national list of potential donors.

From noon to 4 p.m. during the 5th Annual Spirit of Boston celebration at Yawkey Club of Roxbury, Johnson-Graham will ask people to register with the Gift of Life bone marrow registry.

She plans to volunteer that day for the Swab a Cheek, Save a Life campaign, run by bone marrow recipient Evie Goldfine. The two women have worked together before, going to churches, schools, and other large gatherings to try to encourage people to become donors. The Boys & Girls Club of Boston is partnering with the campaign for a series of recruitment events later throughout the area aimed at increasing the racial and ethnic diversity of the bone marrow registry.

According to statistics from the National Marrow Donor Program, blacks constitute only 7 percent of its database, or about 600,000 registered donors. The percentage is the same for Asians, while Hispanics or Latinos make up 10 percent. By contrast, whites constitute 74 percent of the database, about 6 million potential donors.

Goldfine, who is Jewish, said she hopes to ignite a grass-roots recruiting campaign for minorities, the same type of campaign launched in the early ’90s that greatly increased her chances years later of finding a donor.

“Before that campaign happened, if you were Jewish and needed a bone marrow transplant, it was like being told to just go home and get your things in order.’’

In 2000, Goldfine was diagnosed with lymphoma, and five years later received a bone marrow transplant from a donor who signed up with the Gift of Life Registry.

Goldfine said she benefited from the efforts of Jay Feinberg, the executive director of the Gift of Life Bone Marrow Foundation.

In 1991, Feinberg was diagnosed with leukemia, and doctors told him that he had a less than 5 percent chance of finding a suitable match because at that time, few Jewish people registered as donors. Feinberg and his family and friends ran a campaign that over four years led to the enrollment of more than 60,000 people of various backgrounds as potential donors.

News Source: NAN

Ahmadinejad Continues To Be One Big Thorn In The Side Of The Jews
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-09-28 04:14:33 in category: General [ Print]
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Monday that the Sep 11, 2001, terrorist attack, like the Holocaust, has become a taboo topic for the West.
“The Holocaust was turned by the West into a holier issue than holy books and prophets, and no one was ever allowed to question its real dimensions,” Ahmadinejad said in a speech carried live by the news network Khabar.

Now there are attempts to turn the “9/11 incident into a similar taboo item”, he said.

Ahmadinejad has drawn criticism for repeatedly calling the mass murder of Jews in World War II a “fairly tale” and saying Israel should be relocated from the Middle East to Europe or North America.

On Monday, he reiterated doubts he voiced last week at the UN General Assembly over the elements behind the 2001 terrorist attacks in the US.

News Source: NAN

The Culture Of Corruption Strikes Again At The FBI
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-09-28 04:01:46 in category: General [ Print]
(Reuters) - FBI agents and several supervisors cheated on an exam about new rules for terrorism and criminal investigations and for collecting foreign intelligence, according to a U.S. Justice Department report released on Monday.
The report by inspector general Glenn Fine found that some FBI employees improperly consulted with others while taking the exam, and others used or distributed answer sheets or study guides that essentially provided the answers to the test.

A few FBI employees, including several supervisors and a legal adviser, exploited a programing flaw to reveal the answers on their computers, according to the investigation into four FBI offices around the country and several individuals.

The report found significant abuses and cheating involving at least 22 employees.

It marked the latest critical report of the federal law enforcement agency by the inspector general's office, which has questioned in the past whether the FBI has violated civil liberties as part of its terrorism investigations.

News Source: NAN

No Change : Obama, Like Bush, Sees Privacy As A Threat To The State
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-09-28 03:43:14 in category: General [ Print]

WASHINGTON – Broad new regulations being drafted by the Obama administration would make it easier for law enforcement and national security officials to eavesdrop on Internet and e-mail communications like social networking Web sites and BlackBerries, The New York Times reported Monday.

The newspaper said the White House plans to submit a bill next year that would require all online services that enable communications to be technically equipped to comply with a wiretap order. That would include providers of encrypted e-mail, such as BlackBerry, networking sites like Facebook and direct communication services like Skype.

Federal law enforcement and national security officials say new the regulations are needed because terrorists and criminals are increasingly giving up their phones to communicate online.

"We're talking about lawfully authorized intercepts," said FBI lawyer Valerie E. Caproni. "We're not talking about expanding authority. We're talking about preserving our ability to execute our existing authority in order to protect the public safety and national security."

The White House plans to submit the proposed legislation to Congress next year.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

The Talmud's Dirty Secret

A National Prayer Network Special Report


By Rev. Ted Pike
28 Sep 10 (Update)

Editor’s Note:

This year, top Israeli Rabbi Moti Elon was indicted by police for sex crimes against minors. “Far from being the rabbi of an obscure Hasidic sect, the charismatic Elon is a high-profile leader, educator and media personality, representing the more mainstream religious Zionists and former head of the renowned HaKotel (Western Wall) Yeshiva. He comes from a family of high achievers in law, politics and academia that has drawn comparisons with the Kennedy clan.”

In 2006, Elon was restricted by an organization of rabbis in his contact with students, after confessing to sexual relationships with male students. Yet he continued to act as the president of a Talmudic academy in Jerusalem and did not fully honor the agreement. One Ha’aretz commentary says Elon “managed to turn himself into almost a kind of saint” –a fate certainly to be envied by American religious figures turned pedophiles.

Dr. Aviad Hacohen, dean of the Sha'arei Mishpat College, in 2007 reported that “95% of sexual offences in Jerusalem were performed by the religious and haredi.” “Several years ago, I began looking into the issue on a data-based level," said Hacohen. "It turned out that the law enforcement authorities, both the police and the prosecutor's office, were aware of the data but refused to expose it based on sectorial affiliation in order to avoid branding a certain group in the population…”

Since the following article was written in 2006, cases of Jewish leadership figures in Orthodox and Ultra-Orthodox Judaism being involved in homosexuality or pedophilia scandals continue to mount not only in Israel, but in New York, where Ultra-Orthodox are strongest. The reason is simple: some of the very greatest rabbis who wrote the Talmud were pedophiles.

Read this shocking and timely article for complete documentation.




By Rev. Ted Pike
11 Oct 06

For nearly a century, the Jewish-dominated Hollywood film industry and big media have conspicuously influenced Christian America away from Biblical morals and values. (See, "Jews Confirm Big Media Is Jewish")

Yet, with the hippie rebellion of the early sixties, the Jewish media found exponential opportunities to hasten America’s moral decline. Encouraging drugs and pornography it persuaded America that "free love" and living together outside of marriage were socially acceptable. With astonishing rapidity the movie, TV, and print media helped produce a generation of sexual libertines. By the end of the sixties, it hastened the sexual revolution to its next stage, homosexuality.

Now, more than 40 years later, even homosexuality has lost its attraction to many children and grandchildren of the hippie generation. Pedophilia (sex with little boys and girls along with child pornography) is the latest underground obsession sweeping America and the world.

Last fall, I alerted the nation to the power of the pedophile lobby in Congress; Sen. Edward Kennedy, long backed by homosexuals in support of the federal anti-hate bill, betrayed them to favor the evidently more powerful and rewarding pedophiles. (See "How Kennedy and His Pedophiles Weakened the Child Safety Bill")

Rotten Roots

What kind of moral foundations do Jews of the media rest upon, that they could consciously ignite and fan the flames of a sexual inferno that continues to ravage our once Christian society?

Virtually all the media moguls who founded Hollywood and the big three TV networks were immigrants, or their children, from predominantly orthodox Jewish communities in Eastern Europe.

In the late 19th century, most European Jews were a people of the book. But their book wasn’t the Bible. It was the Babylonian Talmud. To this day, the Talmud remains Judaism’s highest moral, ethical and legal authority.

Does the Talmud share Christianity's foundation of wholesome moral values? Hardly. Instead, the Talmud is the sleazy substrata of a religious system gone terribly astray; it is that code of Pharisaic unbelief Christ described as "full of all uncleanness" (Matt. 23:27). Shockingly, Judaism’s most revered authority actually endorses such sins as lying, oath-breaking, and indirect murder. And it even sanctions one of the greatest sins of all: child molestation.

Three Year Old Brides

When Christ accused the Pharisees of His day of being Satan’s spiritual children, He fully realized what they were capable of. Second century Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai, one of Judaism’s very greatest rabbis and a creator of Kabbalah, sanctioned pedophilia—permitting molestation of baby girls even younger than three! He proclaimed, “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and a day is permitted to marry a priest.” 1 Subsequent rabbis refer to ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia as "halakah," or binding Jewish law. 2 Has ben Yohai, child rape advocate, been disowned by modern Jews? Hardly. Today, in ben Yohai’s hometown of Meron, Israel, tens of thousands of orthodox and ultra-orthodox Jews gather annually for days and nights of singing and dancing in his memory.

References to pedophilia abound in the Talmud. They occupy considerable sections of Treatises Kethuboth and Yebamoth and are enthusiastically endorsed by the Talmud’s definitive legal work, Treatise Sanhedrin.

The Pharisees Endorsed Child Sex

The rabbis of the Talmud are notorious for their legal hairsplitting, and quibbling debates. But they share rare agreement about their right to molest three year old girls. In contrast to many hotly debated issues, hardly a hint of dissent rises against the prevailing opinion (expressed in many clear passages) that pedophilia is not only normal but scriptural as well! It’s as if the rabbis have found an exalted truth whose majesty silences debate.

Because the Talmudic authorities who sanction pedophilia are so renowned, and because pedophilia as “halakah” is so explicitly emphasized, not even the translators of the Soncino edition of the Talmud (1936) dared insert a footnote suggesting the slightest criticism. They only comment: “Marriage, of course, was then at a far earlier age than now.” 3

In fact, footnote 5 to Sanhedrin 60b rejects the right of a Talmudic rabbi to disagree with ben Yohai's endorsement of pedophilia: "How could they [the rabbis], contrary to the opinion of R. Simeon ben Yohai, which has scriptural support, forbid the marriage of the young proselyte?" 4

Out of Babylon

It was in Babylon after the exile under Nebuchadnezzar in 597 BC that Judaism's leading sages probably began to indulge in pedophilia. Babylon was the staggeringly immoral capitol of the ancient world. For 1600 years, the world’s largest population of Jews flourished within it.

As an example of their evil, Babylonian priests said a man's religious duty included regular sex with temple prostitutes. Bestiality was widely tolerated. So Babylonians hardly cared whether a rabbi married a three year old girl.

But with expulsion of the Jews in the 11th century AD, mostly to western Christian lands, Gentile tolerance of Jewish pedophilia abruptly ended.

Still, a shocking contradiction lingers: If Jews want to revere the transcendent wisdom and moral guidance of the Pharisees and their Talmud, they must accept the right of their greatest ancient sages to violate children. To this hour, no synod of Judaism has repudiated their vile practice.

Sex with a “Minor” Permitted

What exactly did these sages say?

The Pharisees justified child rape by explaining that a boy of nine years was not a “man” (See, "Judaism and Homosexuality: A Marriage Made in Hell") Thus they exempted him from God’s Mosaic Law: “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination” (Lev. 18:22) One passage in the Talmud gives permission for a woman who molested her young son to marry a high priest. It concludes, “All agree that the connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not." 5 Because a boy under 9 is sexually immature, he can't "throw guilt" on the active offender, morally or legally. 6

A woman could molest a young boy without questions of morality even being raised: "…the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act." 7 The Talmud also says, "A male aged nine years and a day who cohabits with his deceased brother's wife acquires her (as wife)." 8 Clearly, the Talmud teaches that a woman is permitted to marry and have sex with a nine year old boy.

Sex at Three Years and One Day

In contrast to Simeon ben Yohai's dictum that sex with a little girl is permitted under the age of three years, the general teaching of the Talmud is that the rabbi must wait until a day after her third birthday. She could be taken in marriage simply by the act of rape.

R. Joseph said: Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. (Sanh. 55b)

A girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by cohabitation. . . .(Yeb. 57b)

A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabited with her she becomes his. (Sanh. 69a, 69b, also discussed in Yeb. 60b)

It was taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai stated: A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest, for it is said, But all the women children that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, and Phineas (who was priest, the footnote says) surely was with them. (Yeb. 60b)

[The Talmud says such three year and a day old girls are] . . . fit for cohabitation. . . But all women children, that have not known man by lying with him, it must be concluded that Scripture speaks of one who is fit for cohabitation. (Footnote to Yeb. 60b)

The example of Phineas, a priest, himself marrying an underage virgin of three years is considered by the Talmud as proof that such infants are "fit for cohabitation."

The Talmud teaches that an adult woman’s molestation of a nine year old boy is "not a sexual act" and cannot "throw guilt" upon her because the little boy is not truly a "man.” 9 But they use opposite logic to sanction rape of little girls aged three years and one day: Such infants they count as “women," sexually mature and fully responsible to comply with the requirements of marriage.

The Talmud footnotes 3 and 4 to Sanhedrin 55a clearly tell us when the rabbis considered a boy and girl sexually mature and thus ready for marriage. "At nine years a male attains sexual matureness… The sexual matureness of woman is reached at the age of three."

No Rights for Child Victims

The Pharisees were hardly ignorant of the trauma felt by molested children. To complicate redress, the Talmud says a rape victim must wait until she was of age before there would be any possibility of restitution. She must prove that she lived and would live as a devoted Jewess, and she must protest the loss of her virginity on the very hour she comes of age. “As soon as she was of age one hour and did not protest she cannot protest any more.” 10

The Talmud defends these strict measures as necessary to forestall the possibility of a Gentile child bride rebelling against Judaism and spending the damages awarded to her as a heathen - an unthinkable blasphemy! But the rights of the little girl were really of no great consequence, for, "When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (three years and a day) it is as if one put the finger into the eye." The footnote says that as “tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.” 11

In most cases, the Talmud affirms the innocence of male and female victims of pedophilia. Defenders of the Talmud claim this proves the Talmud's amazing moral advancement and benevolence toward children; they say it contrasts favorably with "primitive" societies where the child would have been stoned along with the adult perpetrator.

Actually, the rabbis, from self-protection, were intent on proving the innocence of both parties involved in pedophilia: the child, but more importantly, the pedophile. They stripped a little boy of his right to "throw guilt" on his assailant and demanded complicity in sex from a little girl. By thus providing no significant moral or legal recourse for the child, the Talmud clearly reveals whose side it is on: the raping rabbi.

Pedophilia Widespread

Child rape was practiced in the highest circles of Judaism. This is illustrated from Yeb. 60b:

There was a certain town in the land of Israel the legitimacy of whose inhabitants was disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Romanos who conducted an inquiry and found in it the daughter of a proselyte who was under the age of three years and one day, and Rabbi declared her eligible to live with a priest.

The footnote says that she was “married to a priest” and the rabbi simply permitted her to live with her husband, thus upholding “halakah” as well as the dictum of Simeon ben Yohai, “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest.” 12

These child brides were expected to submit willingly to sex. Yeb. 12b confirms that under eleven years and one day a little girl is not permitted to use a contraceptive but “must carry on her marital intercourse in the usual manner.”

In Sanhedrin 76b a blessing is given to the man who marries off his children before they reach the age of puberty, with a contrasting curse on anyone who waits longer. In fact, failure to have married off one’s daughter by the time she is 12-1/2, the Talmud says, is as bad as one who “returns a lost article to a Cuthean” (Gentile) - a deed for which “the Lord will not spare him.” 13 This passage says: “… it is meritorious to marry off one’s children whilst minors.”

The mind reels at the damage to the untold numbers of girls who were sexually abused within Judaism during the heyday of pedophilia. Such child abuse, definitely practiced in the second century, continued, at least in Babylon, for another 900 years.

A Fascination with Sex

Perusing the Talmud, one is overwhelmed with the recurrent preoccupation with sex, especially by the most eminent rabbis. Dozens of illustrations could be presented to illustrate the delight of the Pharisees to discuss sex and quibble over its minutest details.

The rabbis endorsing child sex undoubtedly practiced what they preached. Yet to this hour, their words are revered. Simeon ben Yohai is honored by Orthodox Jews as one of the very greatest sages and spiritual lights the world has ever known. A member of the earliest "Tannaim," rabbis most influential in creating the Talmud, he carries more authority to observant Jews than Moses.

Today, the Talmud’s outspoken pedophiles and child-rape advocates would doubtlessly spend hard time in prison for child molestation. Yet here is what the eminent Jewish scholar, Dagobert Runes (who is fully aware of all these passages), says about such “dirty old men” and their perverted teachings:

There is no truth whatever in Christian and other strictures against the Pharisees, who represented the finest traditions of their people and of human morals. 14

Aren’t Christ’s words more appropriate?

Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. (Matthew 23:27, 28.)
(Adapted from Ted Pike's book, Israel: Our Duty, Our Dilemma)

1 Yebamoth 60b, p. 402.
2 Yebamoth 60b, p. 403.
3 Sanhedrin 76a.
4 In Yebamoth 60b, p. 404, Rabbi Zera disagrees that sex with girls under three years and one day should be endorsed as halakah.
5 Sanhedrin 69b.
6 Sanhedrin 55a.
7 Footnote 1 to Kethuboth 11b.
8 Sanhedrin 55b.
9 Sanhedrin 55a.
10 Kethuboth 11a.
11 Kethuboth 11b.
12 Yebamoth 60b.
13 Sanhedrin 76b.
14 Dagobert Runes, A Concise Dictionary of Judaism, New York, 1959.

Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.

Learn much more about the threat of liberal Jewish activism at Google's video site shows Rev. Pike's videos, The Other Israel, Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians, and Why the Mid-East Bleeds, in their entirety, free of charge. Just search for "Ted Pike".

TALK SHOW HOSTS: For interview with Rev. Pike on this subject, call 503-631-3808.

Please visit

National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015



Back to Top

Sunday, September 26, 2010

The Power of the Jewish Lobby

A Straight Look at the Jewish Lobby

By Mark Weber

For many years Israel has violated well established precepts of international law and has defied numerous United Nations resolutions in its occupation of conquered lands, in extra-judicial killings, and in its repeated acts of military aggression.

Most of the world regards Israel’s policies, and especially its oppression of Pal estinians, as illegal and outrageous. This international consen sus is reflected, for example, in numerous UN resolutions condemning Israel, which have been approved with overwhelming majorities.

“The whole world,“ said United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan, “is demanding that Israel withdraw [from occupied Palestinian territories]. I don’t think the whole world... can be wrong.” [1]

Only in the United States do politicians and the media still fervently support Israel and defend its policies. For many years the US has provided Israel with crucial military, diplo matic and financial backing, including more than $3 billion each year in aid.

Why is the US such a staunch bastion of support for Israel?

Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa, who was awarded the 1984 Nobel Peace Prize, has candidly identified the reason. Speaking to an audience in Boston, he said:

“But you know as well as I do that, somehow, the Israeli government is placed on a pedestal [in the US], and to criticize it is to be immediately dubbed anti-Semitic … People are scared in this country, to say wrong is wrong because the Jewish lobby is powerful -- very powerful.” [2]

Bishop Tutu spoke the truth. Although Jews make up only two or three percent of the US population, they wield immense power and influ ence – much more than any other ethnic or religious group.

As Jewish author and political science professor Benjamin Ginsberg has pointed out: [3]

“Since the 1960s, Jews have come to wield considerable influence in American economic, cultural, intellectual and political life. Jews played a central role in American finance during the 1980s, and they were among the chief beneficiaries of that decade’s corporate mergers and reorganizations. Today, though barely two percent of the nation’s population is Jewish, close to half its billionaires are Jews. The chief executive officers of the three major television networks and the four largest film studios are Jews, as are the owners of the nation’s larg est newspaper chain and the most influential single newspaper, the New York Times... The role and influence of Jews in Ameri can politics is equally marked...

“Jews are only three percent of the nation’s population and com prise eleven percent of what this study defines as the nation’s elite. However, Jews constitute more than 25 percent of the elite journalists and publishers, more than 17 percent of the leaders of important voluntary and public interest organiza tions, and more than 15 percent of the top ranking civil ser vants.”

Stephen Steinlight, former Director of National Affairs of the American Jewish Committee, similarly notes the “disproportionate political power” of Jews, which is “pound for pound the greatest of any ethnic/cultural group in America.” He goes on to explain that “Jewish economic influence and power are disproportionately concentrated in Hollywood, television, and in the news industry.“ [4]

Two well-known Jewish writers, Seymour Lipset and Earl Raab, point ed out in their 1995 book, Jews and the New American Scene: [5]

“During the last three decades Jews [in the United States] have made up 50 percent of the top two hundred intellectu als... 20 percent of professors at the leading universities ... 40 percent of partners in the leading law firms in New York and Washington ... 59 percent of the directors, writ ers, and producers of the 50 top-grossing motion pictures from 1965 to 1982, and 58 percent of directors, writers, and producers in two or more primetime television series.”

Vanity Fair magazine in October 2007 published a list of what it calls “the world’s most powerful people” – a lineup of the one hundred most influential media bosses, bankers, publishers, image makers, and so forth, who determine how we view ourselves and the world, and who – directly and indirectly -- shape our lives and our futures. Jews made up more than half of the powerful men and women on the Vanity Fair list, reported a leading Israeli newspaper, The Jerusalem Post. [6]

The influence of American Jewry in Washington, The Jerusalem Post has also noted, is “far disproportionate to the size of the community, Jewish leaders and US officials acknowledge. But so is the amount of money they contribute to [election] campaigns.” One member of the influential Conference of Presidents of Major Amer ican Jewish Organizations “estimated Jews alone had contributed 50 percent of the funds for [President Bill] Clinton’s 1996 re-elec tion campaign.” [7]

Mother Jones magazine compiled a listing of the 400 leading contributors to the 2000 US national elections. Seven of the first ten were Jewish, as were twelve of the top 20, and 125 of the top 250. [8]

The single biggest donor to American politicians is Israeli billionaire and media mogul Haim Saban. In January 2007 it was revealed that he had donated approximately $13 billion to various US political candidates. [9] The New York Times has noted Saban’s ardent devotion to the Jewish state: “He has since emerged as perhaps the most politically connected mogul in Hollywood, throwing his weight and money around Washington, and increasingly, the world, trying to influence all things Israeli. 'I’m a one-issue guy and my issue is Israel,' he said.” [10]

A Grip on Hollywood

“It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture,” acknowledges Michael Medved, a well-known Jewish author and film critic. “Any list of the most influential production executives at each of the major movie stu dios will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names.” [11]

One person who has carefully studied this subject is Jonathan J. Goldberg, editor of the influential Jewish community weekly Forward. In his 1996 book, Jewish Power, he wrote: [12]

“In a few key sectors of the media, notably among Hollywood stu dio executives, Jews are so numerically dominant that calling these businesses Jewish-controlled is little more than a sta tistical observation …

“Hollywood at the end of the twentieth century is still an industry with a pronounced ethnic tinge. Virtually all the senior executives at the major studios are Jews. Writers, pro ducers, and to a lesser degree directors are disproportionately Jewish -- one recent study showed the figure as high as 59 per cent among top-grossing films.

“The combined weight of so many Jews in one of America’s most lucrative and important industries gives the Jews of Hollywood a great deal of political power. They are a major source of money for Democratic candidates.”

“As a proud Jew,” writes Joel Stein, a columnist for the Los Angeles Times, “I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood … I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.” [13]

Reflecting their role in the American media, Jews are routinely portrayed as high-minded, altruistic, trustworthy, compassionate, and deserving of sympathy and support. While millions of Ameri cans readily accept such imagery, not everyone is impressed. “I am very angry with some of the Jews,” complained actor Marlon Brando during a 1996 interview. “They know perfectly well what their responsibilities are... Hollywood is run by Jews. It’s owned by Jews, and they should have a greater sensitivity about the issue of people who are suffering.” [14]

A Well-Entrenched Factor

This intimidating power is not a new phenom enon, but has long been an important factor in American life. In 1972, during a private White House meeting, President Richard Nixon and the Rev. Billy Graham spoke frankly about the Jewish grip on the media. “This stranglehold has got to be broken or the country’s going down the drain,” said Graham, the nation’s best-known Christian evangelist. “You believe that?,” Nixon responded. “Yes, sir,” said Graham. “Oh, boy,” replied Nixon. “So do I. I can’t ever say that, but I believe it.” [15]

In 1978, Jewish American scholar Alfred M. Lilienthal wrote in his detailed study, The Zionist Connection: [16]

“How has the Zionist will been imposed on the American people?... It is the Jewish connection, the tribal solidarity among themselves and the amazing pull on non-Jews, that has molded this unprecedented power ... The Jewish connection covers all areas and reaches every level. Most Americans may not even sense this gigantic effort, but there is scarcely a Jew who is not touched by its tentacles…

“The extent and depth to which organized Jewry reached – and reaches – in the U.S. is indeed awesome … The most effective component of the Jewish connection is probably that of media control … Jews, toughened by centuries of persecution, have risen to places of prime importance in the business and financial world… Jewish wealth and acumen wields unprecedented power in the area of finance and investment banking, playing an important role in influencing U.S. policy toward the Middle East … In the larger metropolitan areas, the Jewish-Zionist connection thoroughly pervades affluent financial, commercial, social, entertainment, and art circles.”

Foreign Policy Role

Jews in Israel feel free to act brutally against Arabs, writes Is raeli journalist Ari Shavit, “believing with absolute certitude that now, with the White House, the Senate and much of the American media in our hands, the lives of others do not count as much as our own.” [17]

In Britain, a veteran member of the House of Commons candidly declared in May 2003 that pro-Israel Jews had taken control of America’s foreign policy, and had succeeded in pushing the US and Britain into war in Iraq. Tam Dalyell, a Labour party deputy known as “Father of the House” because he is the longest-serving Member of Parliament, said: “A Jewish cabal have taken over the government in the United States and formed an unholy alliance with fundamentalist Christians … There is far too much Jewish influence in the United States.” [18]

Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, has spoken with blunt exasperation about the Jewish-Israeli hold on the United States: [19]

“I've never seen a President -- I don't care who he is -- stand up to them [the Israelis]. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn't writing any thing down. If the American people understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don't have any idea what goes on.”

Today the danger has never been greater. Israel and Jewish organiza tions are prodding the United States into new wars against Israel’s en emies.

To sum up: Jews wield immense power and influence in the United States. The “Jewish lobby” is a decisive factor in US support for Israel. Jewish-Zionist interests are not identical to American in terests. In fact, they often conflict.

As long as the “very powerful” Jewish lobby remains entrenched, there will be no end to the Jewish-Zionist domination of the US polit ical system and the American media, the Zionist oppression of Palestinians, the Israeli threat to peace, and the bloody con flict between Jews and non-Jews in the Middle East.


1. On April 8, 2002, in Madrid. Quoted in Forward (New York), April 19, 2002, p. 11.

2.  D. Tutu, “Apartheid in the Holy Land,” The Guardian (Britain), April 29, 2002.
(,10551,706911,00.html )

3. Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State (University of Chicago, 1993), pp. 1, 103. 

4. S. Steinlight, “The Jewish Stake in America's Changing Demography: Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy,” Center for Immigration Studies, Nov. 2001.
( )

5.  Seymour Martin Lipset and Earl Raab, Jews and the New American Scene (Harvard Univ. Press, 1995), pp. 26-27. 

6. N. Burstein, “Jewish power dominates at 'Vanity Fair',” The Jerusalem Post (Israel), Oct.12, 2007.
( )

7. Janine Zacharia, “The Unofficial Ambassadors of the Jewish State,” The Jerusalem Post (Israel), April 2, 2000. Reprinted in “Other Voices,” June 2000, p. OV-4, a supplement to The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.

8. A. Cockburn, “The Uproar Over the Israel Lobby,” May 5 (or 8), 2006.
( )
( )

9. “Israeli Billionaire Saban is Biggest Donor to US Politicians,” Ynet News (Israel), Jan. 23, 2007.
(,7340,L-3355786,00.html )

10. A. R. Sorkin, “Schlepping to Moguldom,” The New York Times, Sept. 5, 2004.
( )

11. M. Medved, “Is Hollywood Too Jewish?,” Moment, Vol. 21, No. 4 (1996), p. 37.

12. Jonathan Jeremy Goldberg, Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment (Addison-Wesley, 1996), pp. 280, 287-288. See also pp. 39-40, 290-291. 

13. J. Stein, “How Jewish Is Hollywood?,” Los Angeles Times, Dec. 19, 2008.
(,0,4676183.column )

14. Interview with Larry King, CNN network, April 5, 1996. “Brando Remarks,” Los Angeles Times, April 8, 1996, p. F4 (OC). A short time later, Brando was obliged to apologize for his remarks.    

15. “Nixon, Billy Graham Make Derogatory Comments About Jews on Tapes,” Chicago Tribune, March 1, 2002 (or Feb. 28, 2002)
( );
“Billy Graham Apologizes for ’72 Remarks,” Associated Press, Los Angeles Times, March 2, 2002. “Graham Regrets Jewish Slur,” BBC News, March 2, 2002.
( ) The conversation apparently took place on Feb. 1, 1972.

16. A. Lilienthal, The Zionist Connection (New York: Dodd, Mead, 1978), pp. 206, 209, 212, 218, 228, 229.

17. The New York Times, May 27, 1996. Shavit is identified as a columnist for Ha’aretz, a Hebrew-language Israeli daily newspaper, “from which this article is adapted.”

18. F. Nelson, “Anger Over Dalyell's 'Jewish Cabal' Slur,” The Scotsman (Edinburgh), May 5, 2003; M. White, “Dalyell Steps Up Attack On Levy,” The Guardian (London), May 6, 2003.
See also: M. Weber, “ Iraq: A War for Israel” ( ) 

19. Interview with Moorer, Aug. 24, 1983. Quoted in: Paul Findley, They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel’s Lobby (Lawrence Hill, 1984 and 1985), p. 161.

#2016  Revised, updated: Feb. 2009

About the author
Mark Weber is director of the Institute for Historical Review. He studied history at the University of Illinois (Chicago), the University of Munich, Portland State University and Indiana University (M.A., 1977).

This essay, and others in this series, are available in handy leaflet format, ideal for wide distribution. They can be ordered, postpaid, at these prices:
20 copies, $3.00 :: 50 copies, $7.00 :: 100 copies or more, 13 cents each

Post Office Box 2739 · Newport Beach, California 92659

Are We On The Verge of Bankruptcy?

States and Cities on the Verge of Bankruptcy

by Ian Mosley
Looks like California, Illinois, and New York are going to get some competition in the race to bankruptcy. Pennsylvania is coming up fast on the outside and seems to be battling for at least third place.
The Financial Times of London (the best sources for news of the American economy are all British) tells us: “The state of Pennsylvania has stepped in to help its capital city Harrisburg avoid a default by advancing next year’s state aid so that the money can be used to make a $3.3m bond interest payment due this week. On Sunday, Ed Rendell, the governor of Pennsylvania, announced a $4.3m cash transfer and said missing the bond payment was not an option….Harrisburg’s strains have been closely watched as other US local governments and states struggle to close gaps in their budget amid falling tax revenues in the downturn.
Note that this is just to pay interest. Not to rebuild bridges or provide anything useful like firefighters or sewage treatment or electricity. It’s not even to repay the loan itself. This cash transfer is being done only to pay interest. Harrisburg was recently listed in a Top Ten Declining American Cities article on the Huffington Post. Even liberals are writing it off as a lost cause and basket case.
The Times article notes “For many months, Harrisburg officials have been debating how to handle its debt burdens and whether the city should follow a handful of other cities that have filed for bankruptcy. Harrisburg has already defaulted on $282m of debt in an incinerator project that the city partially guaranteed. The $3.3m payment due on September 15 is an interest payment on the city’s general obligation bond sold in 1997. Such municipal debt is sought out by many investors in the $2,800bn US municipal bond market because the GO bonds have a reputation as being safer than many other types of bonds. Payments take priority over other spending. A default on such a GO bond could have knock-on effects across the municipal bond market, increasing the interest payments that are demanded by investors and leading to a reassessment of default risks.”
There are almost three trillion dollars in municipal bonds for the US!!! Municipal bonds used to be reserved for special building projects. Today, however, with the ever-growing Third World parasite population in every big city and Third World people running the big cities, some big cities are resorting to borrowing money for routine expenses. Add to that the continuing Bush-Obama Depression, and we may soon see the first cities that fail to pay off their bonds.
In the Age of Obama, however, the bill has come due. Decades of slow deterioration are starting to catch up with America on every level, including our major cities. Everything is collapsing because everything is so riddled with corruption, incompetence, deceit, arrogance and madness.
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania is now a town with only one industry: state government, which has one financial foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel. There is no tax base any more since the minorities have clustered in from New York, New Jersey and Mexico and the White people, who work in the private sector, who actually create wealth, have fled. State and city bureaucrats are essentially parasites, and parasites cannot feed on other parasites.
Once a city fails to pay off a bond on time, its bond rating will plummet making it difficult if not impossible to borrow more money in the future. Many of these mayors and city councils were crossing their fingers hoping the economy would turn around and tax revenue would climb back up. Given the continuing state of the economy, a bankruptcy for many cities is almost certain.
While this all sounds terrible, and it is pretty terrible, we need cities and states to start going bankrupt to wake up White people to the fact that Diversity doesn’t work. If White people want the US to return to the prosperity of the 1960s, we need the same demographics as the 1960s, which means a lot fewer Third World people.

News source:

White schools, White Excellence, True Potential

ADV Broadcast Of September 25, 2010

Hello, and welcome back to this week’s broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America's foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

In the past few weeks, school has resumed all around the country. Summer break is over, and thousands of dedicated teachers across America are hopeful that this year they’ll be able to make a difference in the lives of their students. Most students even begrudgingly admit that they don’t mind school yet at this early stage; it’s good to see all of their friends again, and some of them are even interested in learning something. The high school and college football seasons are getting under way, too, and that always seems to bring out the school spirit at America’s educational centers. At this time of year, school is new and exciting, and there hasn’t been enough time for something really bad to happen yet.

It is a well-known phenomenon that many moms cry when one of their children goes off to school for the first time. The child has a brand-new backpack and maybe new clothes as well and, of course, pictures are taken. How many of us are in family picture albums, dressed up and smiling before leaving home on that first day of school? Anyway, relinquishing the care of one’s child is never easy, and sending young Bill or Molly off to a large and impersonal school is especially hard on moms. And, given the state of America’s schools today, White moms have more reason to cry than ever before.

There is really no good way to sugarcoat the truth here. On the average, the state of America's schools is dismal, both academically and racially.

Based on standardized test scores, the U.S. ranks last among industrialized nations in nearly every category tested, particularly in math and science. Even the students in some countries that most Americans consider to be Third World and that they can't locate on a world map are ahead of the U.S. by a significant margin.

During the years following the Soviet Union's launch of the first Earth-orbiting satellite Sputnik, America kicked its math and science educational programs into high gear. That emphasis on math and science helped send us to the Moon, and it set the foundation for all of the high-tech gadgetry that we take for granted today. In the late ‘60s and early '70s, America was king of the technology mountain, and we could have maintained that position if our values hadn't gone all out of whack.

That math-and-science edge has today been totally lost at the elementary, intermediate, and secondary levels. Any high-tech advantage that we might yet hold in the U.S. occurs at the graduate levels in our universities, and most of that work is done by math, science, and engineering doctoral candidates from South Asia, the Orient, and the Middle East. The White man has effectively lost his grip on the science that he once used to master the globe.

Not that our shortcomings and failing achievement in math and the sciences are the most important things in the West today. But the problem is that math and science are the tools by which we maintain and extend our place in the universe. If philosophy and literature provide, in part, our reason for being, and if language is the glue that binds a cultural entity together, then math and science are the means by which a group lives and flourishes. Math and science allow us to gather information, fight disease, create weapons and a physical infrastructure, and manage our resources. The truth that Western technology is now in the hands of over two billion South Asians and Chinese is a sobering thought indeed.

But enough of the gloom-and-doom. Worrying about the mistakes of the past – beyond the simple truth of learning from them -- won't do much to help us today. Let's just all make the commitment to each other that when we have finally achieved our White racial homeland, any technological advances we create will be guarded most jealously. There will be no throwing open of the doors of our technical institutions to eager and energetic non-Whites who may come knocking with their hats in their hand. Our response to them will be a kind but firm refusal.
In addition, our response to in-house espionage and the selling of national technological secrets will be immediate and swift. Assuming there still is such a thing as jury duty at that time, that will be a jury on which you’ll want to serve. No month-long, drawn-out trial with endless delays. No; two days, tops, and then you’ll be back at your place of reliable employment in a White economy during the day and tending your garden in your White neighborhood in the evening.

If the state of math and the sciences in the United States is cause for alarm -- in the sense that non-Whites are putting their knowledge of our science to use against us -- the state of literature, philosophy, and the arts is enough to turn the stomach of any healthy White. With very few exceptions, the so-called "liberal arts" in American educational institutions today are a sickening affront to White standards of decency and progress. From graduate courses in gay and lesbian art down to whole elementary schools collecting six million soda can tabs to commemorate the six million Jews who DIDN'T die in German concentration camps, the anti-White tirade of hate is so pervasive that it is perceived as normal by the unsuspecting public. And to the extent that history and the arts are closely tied to values -- and values, of course, determine individual and group behavior -- perhaps the anti-White bias that is rampant in our schools today is a worse tragedy than the slipping away of our technological edge.

It is true that the Jews have done much to contribute to the inversion of values that has taken place in America over the last hundred years. Their push to gain control of the media in the early 20th Century was a success. One newspaper at a time, one film company at a time, and one book publisher at a time, the Jews were able to tighten their grip around the thoughts of America, and then bend those thoughts to their own purposes.

Against much initial resistance, for example, they were able to get America into the Second World War against anti-communist Germany. The power of the Jews over the electorate -- via the media -- and their power over American politicians -through their money and key advisors -- was clearly evident given that the supposedly-freedom-loving U.S. was allied to that Soviet beast of a man who personally oversaw the selective extermination of some 60 million freedom-loving Whites within the confines of the Soviet Union -- most of them Russians and Ukrainians, but also ethnic Germans, Latvians, Lithuanians, and others.

Now, White American society a hundred years ago, although it was much better than our own today, DID have some weaknesses. For example, that society tolerated non-Whites in its midst, and history has clearly demonstrated that the only way to prevent miscegenation between differing gene pools is physical isolation. We White racialists have learned that lesson, and it's a mistake we won't repeat when we once again have firm control of our destiny.

Another debility a hundred years ago was that, largely due to popular religious instruction, White Americans had too warm a spot in their hearts for Jews, tending to think of them as oppressed victims rather than as oppressing victimizers. Such views about the so-called Chosen people had been handed down for many years previously and were widely held, even by non-religious Whites.

We will seek to remedy those weaknesses and others in our monoracial White homeland of the near future. But let's not lose our train of thought.

Jewish power became even more evident following the war, when television – under their guidance -- began to pollute the minds of America. And shortly after the so-called "Greatest Generation" had torn down the foundation of Germanic power that had traditionally protected the heart of Europe, the Civil Rights Era tore down the psyche of what was left of traditional America.

During the Civil Rights Era, what had never been questioned WAS questioned, and what had never been doubted WAS doubted. The Jewish media managed the whole assault on our values, letting raceless and rebellious Whites spout their nonsense, and letting the vitriolic non-Whites march and burn and riot. The Jews gave them air time and interviews, pretending to be disinterested reporters of the news but truly acting all the while as the power-wielding purveyors of anti-White values. And it was at this time, too, that the onslaught against our schools began in earnest.

Now, to be fair, we can't hold the Jews solely responsible for the insanity that pervades our schools today. They turned our more-or-less pro-White values on their heads with their media power and by their leading of integrationist movements during the Civil Rights Era, but once that beachhead was secure, the cancer began to grow mostly on its own. Sure, the Jewish media made sure that things kept moving in the direction they wanted, but Pandora's Box had been opened.

The ugly lesbians with the butch haircuts who had come out of the closet and found their voices during the protests of the 1960s and 1970s kept up their strident cries for "justice" and "equality." The Black agitators who had urinated in the streets of Birmingham turned their attention to school boards, college admissions offices, and voting precincts. And, after the Immigration Act of 1965 destroyed the pro-White racial quotas that -- up until that time -- had been the basis of immigration legislation, the non-Whites began to pour in. And White America would never be the same.

Unfortunately, some Whites -- who under other circumstances would have turned out to be fine racial citizens -- collapsed from the effects of the anti-values and the brainwashing. The White children in the newly-integrated schools, after the initial shock had worn off, began to adapt. In many cases, White children turned against their parents, most of whom weren't too thrilled about their children attending school with Blacks. In conjunction with the White racial guilt that began to be pumped into the curriculum wherever it possibly could, the new proximity between Whites and non-Whites -- whom some White students perceived as "interesting" or "exciting" -- resulted in the first large-scale romantic interest between White and non-White students. And that trend continues today, much to the detriment of our race.

Today, our schools are factories of anti-values. Up and down the curriculum, the wonders of "multiracialism" and "diversity" are hammered into students. In large measure, our social studies classes are based on the idea that White students must be taught to feel guilty for being White. American history classes focus on the injustices done to Black slaves and American Indians. English classes study novels by Black authors and by strident feminists with axes to grind. In many schools, all of the month of February is sacrificed to something Black: Martin Luther King, White oppression of Blacks in America, Black History, and so on.

There is even a push in math and the sciences to "diversify" the curriculum, although there hasn't been much success with that. Although non-Whites can be taught math and science, the foundation of all of modern math and science is, of course, completely Western. Sometimes, "multiculturalization" in the science classroom is limited to textbook pictures of Blacks in chemistry labs and, believe me, the textbook companies are right on board with the fashion advertisers in this regard. To see a photo in a textbook or advertisement containing only two or three people, all of whom are Whites, is almost unheard of.
But there is more to the anti-White program in the schools than overt indoctrination. The atmosphere of nearly every public school in America is pervaded by an implicit understanding that racial diversity is the highest ideal. At racial diversity, all arguments grind to a halt. Racial diversity is the trump card that stops all others. My guess is that on the high school debate team, if you can work racial diversity into your argument and point out how your opponent's argument disparages racial diversity, you'll win the debate, hands down.

You've seen the same thing in politics, and it has become such a common ploy in political campaigns that it even has a name: the race card. The race card immediately puts the man against whom it is played on the defensive. The same thing happens in schools. If a student gets the race card played against him, either by a teacher or by another student, he's a marked individual. It would be like if one guy was dressed in Michigan Wolverines clothing, sitting among all the Ohio State fans at a college football game in Columbus, cheering his head off for the Wolverines. His safety might not be in danger (or it might, depending on how the game is going), but certainly all the Buckeye fans around will notice him and keep an eye on him to note his reaction after key plays. That's how I imagine the climate is for a racially-aware White student in an American public school. Somebody always has a suspicious eye on him.

But yet I'm not one of those who blame the entire racial situation today on the schools. With some serious help from the Jews, it was White American society that started to cave in first, and then the schools followed suit. Today, it's a reciprocal relationship: through the media, society demands White guilt and racial mixing, and the schools respond in kind by sending their students out into the world well-versed in all the specifics about those things. And the school climate is one that demands the acceptance of multiculturalism by all. Debate about possible downsides to racial diversity is taboo.

If there is one potential bit of good about America's public schools today, it is that White students who have the courage to look the truth in the face (to see the emperor without his clothes, you might say) have all the evidence they need with regard to race right before their eyes. They can see all around them what DOESN'T work. If we can get the idea that racial separation is the only alternative into the heads of enough of them, then we will have made big inroads into securing our White homeland.

And once we've got our own nation, the test scores will soar. It will be the least of the many benefits we have to look forward to. Probably, White moms will still cry when their children first go to our schools, but at least they can take comfort in the fact that our schools will be all-White. They'll be safe schools. They'll be schools that work at building the self-esteem and character of White children instead of working at tearing them down. And they’ll be schools that have standards of excellence that will encourage our children to reach the very top of
their true potential.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

Saturday, September 25, 2010

Israeli Spies Target Pa.



By Michael Collins Piper

It’s a scandal (or it should be) of national—even international—proportions. But in Pennsylvania, where the news first reverberated, few understand the bigger ramifications: The ongoing furor has— just barely—kicked open the door of a hitherto secret house of horrors in which a whole host of spooks are lurking.

Exposed was yet another instance of Israeli spying on American soil. Adding insult to injury is the fact— revealed in Pennsylvania—that American tax dollars are being channeled to Israeli intelligence operations to spy on American citizens engaged in lawful political activity.

To understand the controversy, it is critical to recognize that in the wake of 9-11, “homeland security” became a booming racket—not just in the sense of a growing government bureaucracy. In fact, an amazing number of privately owned companies blossomed, operating in the sphere of American military, intelligence and law enforcement, contracting out services to U.S. government agencies and institutions at all levels.

An overwhelming majority of such firms are either 1) Israeli owned; 2) owned by U.S. subsidiaries of Israeli companies; or 3) owned by Americans tied to Israel and the Jewish lobby in America.

It was discovered that one such Israeli-owned company was spying on law-abiding citizens, paid to do so by the Pennsylvania state government—that is, the taxpayers .

Here’s the story:

In 2009, the Pennsylvania state Office of Homeland Security—under Gov. Ed Rendell—awarded a no-bid contract to a private company, the Institute of Terrorism Research and Response (ITRR). Its job was to monitor activities of a wide-ranging assortment of public-issue oriented organizations.

ITRR passed the fruits of its intelligence activities on to the state homeland security office that, in turn, distributed the information to a variety of law enforcement agencies, public officials and what is being described as others in “the private sector.”

Calling itself “the preeminent Israeli-American security firm providing training, intelligence and education to clients across the globe,” ITRR has offices in Washington, D.C., Philadelphia and Jerusalem. Corporate directors are Aaron Richman, a former Israeli police captain, and Michael Perelman, a former police commander in York, Pa.

By its own admission, ITRR focuses on monitoring those it calls “extremists” with a bent toward “religious, anarchist, anti-government, and anti-globalization” points of view—in short, virtually anyone with a point of view that could (potentially) run contrary to the outlook of the Jewish lobby in America and to the interests of Israel. And be assured that opponents of the “new world order” and foes of the banking establishment are on “the list.”

The Israeli point of view, outlined in historic religious teachings, is that anyone with any opinion or ideas is a possible danger: They might someday be an enemy.

ITRR’s alerts, distributed at taxpayer expense, cast political dissidents in Pennsylvania as potential terrorists, enemies of public order and threats to freedom. Those in Pennsylvania targeted by ITRR included attendees at a tea party march in Harrisburg, supporters of an anti-illegal immigration rally in Hazleton, critics of nuclear power, animal rights defenders, gay activists and a group protesting natural gas drilling. In other words, both “conservative” and “liberal” are subject to scrutiny.

The controversy surrounding ITRR began when the state’s homeland security director, James Powers, sent out an email “alert”—based on ITRR’s spy data—stating support for the natural gas industry and calling its critics “those groups fomenting dissent.”

Apparently, by accident, Powers’s bulletin was sent to Virginia Cody, among those protesting natural gas drilling (and thus subject to ITRR spying). Cody was disturbed to learn she and her colleagues had been targeted. In the wake of her discovery, independent media and political groups forced the mass media in Pennsylvania to take notice.

This proved embarrassing for Rendell. A Jewish Democrat known to jump ship politically when it comes to the issue of Israel—covertly backing pro-Israel Republicans over Democrats perceived unfriendly to Israel—Rendell moved into damage-control mode. He ordered ITRR’s contract canceled and made a bombastic public apology, shocked—he said—such a thing could happen.

In fact, the ITRR affair is the tip of the iceberg, one of myriad Israeli operations on U.S. soil subsidized by American taxpayers in many states, not to mention the federal level.

While some officials are raising questions about the ITRR matter, what none is asking is: Why, in the first place, was a group tied to a controversial foreign nation,  central to some of the most difficult issues affecting U.S. foreign policy, even considered eligible for such a sensitive area as monitoring matters relating to America’s homeland security?

One activist spied upon by ITRR said his group was inclined to avoid discussing the Israeli connection. “It’s kind of controversial to comment on, you know, what with the Holocaust. I mean, I would rather not. The Jewish people have been through a lot.”

The presence in the Pennsylvania capital of the Patriot News—the big daily newspaper—helps protect Israeli interests in the matter: The Patriot News is owned by the national media empire of the Newhouse family—once the richest Jewish family in America— whose ties to Jewish lobby groups such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and to the Jewish crime syndicate (with which the ADL is intertwined) extend back more than half a century.

What those who have expressed outrage about the ITRR affair fail to note (perhaps out of concern of being targeted) is that ITRR’s activities mirror those of the ADL which—in a similar scandal that erupted in San Francisco in 1993—was found to be monitoring the activities of various groups.

While many thought the ADL spied only on the Ku Klux Klan, American Nazis, Arab-Americans and critics of Israel, it turned out the ADL’s chief operative, Roy Bullock, also compiled reports on environmentalists, gay rights groups and even civil rights organizations, including the NAACP.

It has since been confirmed—by a former ADL official and by Freedom of Information Act filings—that the ADL also spied on the late Martin Luther King Jr. and his friend and colleague, comic Dick Gregory. The ADL turned its spy data over to the FBI. So while it is frequently heard “the FBI spied on Martin Luther King,” the truth is much of the FBI’s data was actually accumulated by the ADL. 

A journalist specializing in media critique, Michael Collins Piper is the author of The High Priests of War, The New Jerusalem, Dirty Secrets, The Judas Goats, The Golem, Target Traficant and My First Days in the White House All are available from AFP.

Subscribe to American Free Press. Online subscriptions: One year of weekly editions—$15 plus you get a BONUS ELECTRONIC BOOK - HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR - By Michael Piper.

Print subscriptions: 52 issues crammed into 47 weeks of the year plus six free issues of Whole Body Health: $59  Order on this website or call toll free 1-888-699-NEWS .

Sign up for our free e-newsletter here - get a free gift just for signing up!

(Issue # 40, October 4, 2010)

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Illegal Immigration, Amnesty and Obamacare

Obamacare To Cost American Families $15,200 A Year

March 22, 2010
With the November elections coming up fast, it would be a good time to take another look at Obamacare and what a burden it will be –right in the middle of a serious economic Depression. Despite the illusions of many people in America, Obamacare is nothing less than FORCING most working Americans to buy health care insurance. We’re already shelling out a lot of money for mandatory car insurance even though people somehow got by without car insurance until about 1975. The insurance companies however buy crooked politicians and hence we have mandatory car insurance and soon mandatory health care insurance. How much will this wind up costing us? A lot. Below is an article from CNS giving some alarming details. –James Buchanan


The U.S. House of Representatives voted 219-212 on Sunday night to socialize health care in the United States, making the government the paymaster of, and giving it sweeping regulatory authority over, the U.S. health care industry which represents one-sixth of the U.S. economy.
The legislation also enacts a dramatic and unprecedented diminution in the individual liberty of citizens. It does so by mandating that all Americans buy a government-approved health care plan while redistributing wealth on a massive scale by promising annual federal insurance subsidies to all Americans who earn less than 400 percent of the poverty level, which is currently $88,200 for a family of four.
Five self-professedly “pro-life” Democratic congressmen joined Stupak at a Sunday press conference to say that they would vote for the health care plan after President Obama promised he would sign this Executive Order dealing with the accounting mechanisms that will be used by abortion-providing, federally subsidized health insurance plans. These congressmen were Rep. Marcy Kaptur (Ohio), Rep. Kathy Dahlkemper (Pa.), Rep. Steve Driehaus (Ohio), Rep. Alan Mollohan (W.V.), Rep. Nick Rahal (W.V.) (more…)

Amnesty By Decree, Again?
Posted under:General — @ 9:10 pm

Amnesty By Decree, Again?

by Jeff Davis
For about the third time this year, rumors are flying that Obama is going to grant millions of illegal aliens amnesty by decree completely bypassing Congress.
An article in USA Today reports: “The Obama administration is changing the federal immigration enforcement strategy in ways that reduce the threat of deportation for millions of illegal immigrants, even as states such as Arizona, Colorado, Virginia, Ohio and Texas are pushing to accelerate deportations. The changes focus enforcement on immigrants who have committed serious crimes, an effort to unclog immigration courts and detention centers. A record backlog of deportation cases has forced immigrants to wait an average (of) 459 days for their hearings, according to an Aug. 12 report by Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), which analyzes government data.”
Why not simply put them on a prison bus headed for Mexico as soon as 50 illegal aliens pile up in any big city? That way, you’d minimize incarceration time and keep deportation costs to a minimum. If they ever enforced the immigration law in Los Angeles, they could be filling up a new bus every two minutes. (more…)

Battle over Illegal Immigration Continues
Posted under:General — @ 3:43 am

Battle over Illegal Immigration Continues

by Jeff Davis
Once again we have proof that the federal government of the United States wants the illegals here, and will not tolerate any attempt on the part of US citizens to resist that policy.
A recent news article reports “A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that Hazleton, Pa., may not enforce its crackdown on illegal immigrants, dealing another blow to 4-year-old regulations that inspired similar measures around the country. The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia said that Hazleton’s Illegal Immigration Relief Act usurped the federal government’s exclusive power to regulate immigration.”
Any claim that the Feds have an “exclusive right” to enforce the law is complete and utter nonsense. Just as a local law officer has the right (not to mention the duty and obligation) to detain someone with a suitcase full of counterfeit $20 bills –even though the Secret Service is technically in charge of counterfeiting– the same law officer has an obligation to arrest illegal aliens. (more…)

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Judaism: A License to Lie

National Prayer Network

By Rev. Ted Pike
21 Sep 10 (republished)

Editor’s Note:

Last June tens of millions of evangelicals unquestioningly accepted Israel’s account of its attack on the Free Gaza flotilla. The “ Israel can do no wrong” mentality is so ingrained in the religious right that Christians reflexively believe that, in any dispute with the Arabs, doubting Israel is out of the question.

Yet Orthodox Judaism, the official position of the State of Israel, makes an astounding provision for observant Jews: They may, by reciting the Kol Nidre prayer on the eve of Yom Kippur, receive pre-forgiveness for all the lies, deceit, broken contracts, etc. they may indulge in for the next year.

Is Israel telling the truth when it claims its commandoes were innocently surprised by knife and baton-wielding resisters, forcing Israeli soldiers to shoot more than 50 activists, some with up to four gunshot wounds each?

International investigations are attempting to answer that. Meanwhile, Israel’s leaders, including Netanyahu, have clear consciences. As Orthodox Jews, a little over a year ago they undoubtedly prayed the Kol Nidre prayer, absolving them from having to tell the truth about the flotilla affair.

Read this reprint of my November 2008 article which reveals an ominous reality: The group Christian Americans should least trust is a nation led by Orthodox Jews.


By Rev. Ted Pike
(17 Nov 08)

Seventy-eight percent of American Jews voted for Obama and there are now a record 46 Jews in Congress (nearly six times their proportion to Jews in the American population). As never before, Americans can expect Jewish influence in government. During the Clinton and Bush administrations, Jews attained saturation-level presence in government and cabinet positions.1 Undoubtedly Obama will be surrounded by powerful Jews; he already appointed an Orthodox Jew as his chief of staff. Will these powerful Jews legislate and judge justly? Will they reflect what is regarded as a common Judeo-Christian tradition of high moral values?

It's highly unlikely. In fact, the more religiously observant a Jewish congressman, federal judge, or attorney general is, the more at variance he will probably be with Christian values. Let me explain.

Every year through the fall session of Congress, relatively little is accomplished because of lengthy interruptions from Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays. Today, though Jews constitute only 1.5 percent of the US population, Congress also frequently shuts down so Jewish members may debark, some flying home, for the Jewish holidays. First comes Rosh Hashanah, then Yom Kippur, and finally Sukkoth. (See, "Does Congress Always Take Off for Rosh Hashanah?", "Congress quiet on Jewish New Year") The more religious a Jewish legislator, the more important he attends synagogue on the eve of the Day of Atonement, Yom Kippur. This highest Jewish holiday is preceded with rites and collective recitation of the Kol Nidre prayer.

The Kol Nidre says, "All vows, obligations, oaths, and anathemas [curses]…which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from this Day of Atonement until the next…we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void, and made of no effect: they shall not bind us nor have any power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligations; nor the oaths be oaths." 2

What is the meaning of this strange and disturbing prayer recited by millions of Jews every fall? Surely, you may say, it cannot literally mean what it says: that Jews invalidate all their promises, contracts, agreements, and even curses throughout the coming year? If that were true, the word of a religious Jew would be meaningless. No rational person could trust anything he said, not to mention elect him to high office.

Overturning God's Law

To understand the Kol Nidre prayer, let’s first consider the opposite: God’s ancient command to His chosen people to fulfill all their oaths and promises. "When thou shalt vow a vow unto the Lord thy God, thou shalt not slack to pay it: for the Lord thy God will surely require it of thee...that which is gone out of thy lips thou shalt keep and perform…" (Deuteronomy 24:21, 23)
Yet the Jewish Encyclopedia tells us God’s requirement of promise-keeping ultimately became so burdensome to Jews that, as a result of "their longing for a clear conscience," compassionate rabbinic authorities overturned God's law around the 8th century AD. They collectively absolved entire congregations, instructing them to recite what has became known as the Kol Nidre prayer. 3 At first, the prayer allowed forgiveness for broken promises and curses of the previous year; later, in the twelfth century, it granted pre-forgiveness for sins of unfaithfulness for the following year. Both forms are observed today.

Kol Nidre, from its beginnings, was controversial and "aroused bitter controversy" among rabbinical authorities. 4 Dissident, non-Talmudic Karaites also proclaimed it a sham and said it made the word of a Jew worthless. Christian critics leveled the same charge (but are now called "anti-Semitic" for doing so). Such criticism provoked more than a millennium of suspicion, persecution and discrimination against Jews (i.e. much of the "senseless anti-Semitism" with which historical Christianity has been charged).

Yet the Jewish people were willing to suffer unspeakable persecutions rather than give up the intoxicating moral release of Kol Nidre. It "became the most beloved ritual of the Day of Atonement." 5 Today synagogues are packed worldwide on the eve of Yom Kippur as millions of Jews, deeply moved by the high drama, pageantry and haunting melodies of Kol Nidre, affirm that their "vows, obligations, and oaths" or curses are forgiven and forgotten by God.

All Jewish encyclopedias and authoritative works on Kol Nidre include a powerful disclaimer. They say Gentiles should not feel threatened by Kol Nidre! The prayer's Kol Nidre, we are told, applies only to breaking vows to oneself or to God. It may not be employed to justify breaches of confidence, curses of Gentiles, or lies under oath in civil courts.

Testimony from a Christian Jew

I posed the question to a Christian Jew, Milton (Brother Nathaniel) Kapner.

"What is the reason behind the mass appeal of Kol Nidre," I asked. "Do millions of Jews seek absolution from Kol Nidre because they are tormented with guilt for violating oaths to themselves and God?"

Until age 21, Kapner, now 57, was a convinced Jew involved in conservative, Orthodox, and ultra-Orthodox Judaism. At 21, even after finding Christ, he spent a year of intense study with ultra-Orthodox Lubavitcher rabbis and scholars.

"Kol Nidre," he said, "is a big show. The Jews get worked up by the high drama and cantor singing the haunting Kol Nidre melody. They persuade themselves that every lie they have told over the past year is forgiven. They’re off the hook!"

"Are they repenting of lies to God, or also to the Gentiles?" I asked.

"All lies and broken vows to everyone are covered," he replied, "except for legal contracts that are enforced by law." He said most Jews consider Gentiles inferior. Most ultra-Orthodox consider them sub-human. Kapner said just as promises made to animals are worthless, so the Talmud (even without Kol Nidre) teaches that promises to the goyim are meaningless.

The Talmud frequently says Gentiles may be deceived and defrauded. Jews are above "barbaric" Gentile laws and courts. 6 Also the Jewish Zohar (Kabbalah) repeatedly describes Gentiles as beasts and even demons. (This is substantiated in detail in my 354-page book, Israel: Our Duty…Our Dilemma, available at (See, "Have You Read the Talmud Lately?", "The Jewish Kabbalah: Root of Mideast Violence")

What about the testimony of Jewish authorities that Kol Nidre does not apply to contracts between Jews and Gentiles? "That’s all for Gentile consumption," Kapner said.

Can You Trust Your Jewish Congressman?

Of course, especially in the US, many Jews are so assimilated and secularized that, though usually liberal, they have shed any high regard for Kol Nidre or the Talmud. Yet according to Kapner's personal experience, a religious, Kol Nidre-reciting, Jewish businessman can cheat you without guilt for the next year. Henry Ford, a businessman who dealt with many Jews, comments: "It requires no argument to show that if this prayer be really the rule of faith and conduct for the Jews who utter it, ordinary social and business relations are impossible to maintain with them." (The Dearborn Independent, Nov. 5, 1921)

We should also keep in mind Kol Nidre's permission to Jewish survivors of the Holocaust to lie under oath (as in the Nuremberg trials). Can we continue to accept as fact their testimony of seeing countless Jews destroyed in gas chambers and ovens?

It also means an observant Jew in Congress can renege on any promises he makes his constituents in the past or coming year. Gone also is any duty of federal or Supreme Court justices to be loyal to their oath to the Constitution and the United States of America.

Do I have this wrong? Incredibly, I don’t. Despite the suspicion and revenge Kol Nidre has aroused, modern Judaism still considers its recitation one of the most sacred duties of Jewish life, liturgy, and tradition. It is so important that as Congress evolves into the "American Knesset," congressional leaders, under control of the all-powerful Zionist lobby, are eager to please Jewish members by sending them home to take advantage of this moral loophole in Judaism.

Perhaps, with Jewish activists flooding Congress as never before, promoting perverse Jewish "hate crime laws" and "workplace bias" legislation, as well as bills that persecute Christian/conservative activism, (See, Lobby Reform Bill Cripples Free Speech) we can understand why many Jewish members of Congress need the moral absolution provided by Kol Nidre. There will be a lot of lies to constituents and breaking oaths to uphold the constitution by First Amendment-destroying Jews this session of Congress. Such treachery could really strain anyone’s conscience. But Jewish members of Congress return after reciting Kol Nidre with consciences cleansed. After all, who cares about governing according to the will of the lowly goyim?

For them, ruling according to Kol Nidre is the will of God.


Michael Collins Piper's books such as The New Jerusalem extensively document the preponderance of Jews in the highest echelons of American government. They are available
Article on "Kol Nidre," The Jewish Encyclopedia, New York, London : Funk & Wagnalls, 1906.
Article on "Kol Nidre," The Encyclopedia Judaica, Keter Publishing House, Jerusalem, LTD. Israel, 1996.
The Talmud says Gentiles can be deprived of justice (Baba Kama, 113a), can be cheated (BK, 113b), are animals (Iore Deah 148, 12 Hagah), may be killed (Sanhedrin 59a, Choschen Hamischpat 425.5, Abodah Zarah 26b), can be led to death or not saved from death (Choschen Ham. 425.5, Iore Deah 158).

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Feminism: Tearing the Race in Two

Feminism : Tearing The Race In Two
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2010-09-18 22:20:40 in category: General [ Print]

ADV Broadcast Of September 18, 2010

Hello, and welcome back to this week’s broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

It is a common tactic in military strategy not to divide one’s forces. You have to do it sometimes, of course – especially in modern warfare, which is highly mobile in nature. Compared to how wars have been fought throughout history, modern military strategy has the great advantage of reliable communication technology that allows the effective coordination of units separated by great distances – something that the armies of the history books had no experience with. So today, you might split your forces in order to give yourself the best chance of achieving this or that military objective. But, in general, military strategists down through the ages have emphasized the need to keep your forces amassed as a single unit, so as to minimize the risk of the separated bits of your army being overwhelmed one at a time by the enemy.

You have probably heard the Aesop fable in which an old man on the verge of death summons his sons and orders his servants to bring in a bundle of sticks. The old man challenges his sons to break the bundle, and none of them can. “Now untie the bundle, and each of you take a stick and try to break it,” the old man told his sons. They did so, easily. “You see, now,” said the old man, “that if you stand together, you are strong, but as mere individuals, your enemies can overcome you.” Even as long ago as the days of Aesop – more than 2,500 years ago – people understood the idea of there being strength in unity.

On the other side of the coin, aggressors of all kinds have made good use of the “divide and conquer” technique. In ancient days, military forces that were separated due to poor leadership or inclement weather were attacked and often annihilated by an enemy wishing to capitalize during a moment of his opponent’s weakness.

If a particular group doesn’t WISH to be divided, then the group’s enemies sometimes go to great lengths to TRY to divide them. The enemies try to get “a man on the inside” to sow the seeds of doubt, suspicion, and distrust, and to turn members of the group against each other. If the splinter thus created runs deep enough, the enemy can disarm or nullify the organization. Corporations – particularly international corporations – have the power and resources to do this kind of thing, and of course so do governments. In fact, any group with a sizable chunk of power that views another group as a danger to it will almost certainly resort to some variation of the “divide and conquer” tactic, sooner or later.

Read more at:

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Doomsday Approaching For Democrats

Doomsday Approaching For Democrats

Doomsday Approaching For Democrats

by Jeff Davis

The bloom definitely seems to be off the rose for Obama. The European press is even more full of doom and gloom for the Dems than our own Jewish-controlled media. Once again, we must turn to the foreign media to find out what is happening in our own country.

The London Daily Telegraph reports: “Democrats in Congress are no longer asking themselves whether this is going to be a bad election year for them and their party. They are asking whether it is going to be a disaster. The GOP pushed deep into Democratic-held territory over the summer, to the point where the party is well within range of picking up the 39 seats it would need to take control of the House. Overall, as many as 80 House seats could be at risk, and fewer than a dozen of these are held by Republicans. Political handicappers now say it is conceivable that the Republicans could also win the 10 seats they need to take back the Senate. Not since 1930 has the House changed hands without the Senate following suit.”

What’s especially significant about this election is that people are not just blindly voting for the opposition party. The Tea Party has eliminated a number of hack Republican candidates in the primaries to make sure that many of these Republicans running in November are actually on the side of ordinary Americans.

The Telegraph goes on: “Is this a piece from National Review, The Weekly Standard, The Wall Street Journal or Fox News, all major conservative news outlets in the United States? No. It’s a direct quote from yesterday’s Washington Post, usually viewed by conservatives as a flagship of the liberal establishment inside the Beltway. The fact the Post is reporting that not only could Republicans sweep the House of Representatives this November, but may even take the Senate as well, is a reflection of just how far the mainstream, overwhelmingly left-of-centre US media has moved in the last month towards acknowledging the scale of the crisis facing the White House.”

I guess 18 months of bungling by Barack Obama and a complete failure to turn the economy around has woken up all the moderates, who had bought into the “hope and change” cult of the Magic Negro.

The article notes “For most of the year, America’s political and media elites, including the Obama team itself, have touted the notion of an economic recovery (which never materialised), significantly underestimated the rise of the Tea Party movement, and questioned the notion that conservatism was sweeping America. It is only now hitting home just how close Washington is to experiencing a political revolution in November that will fundamentally change the political landscape on Capitol Hill, with huge implications for the Obama presidency. What was once a perspective confined largely to Fox News, online conservative news sites, or talk radio is now gaining ground in the liberal US print media as well – historic change is coming to America, though not quite the version promised by Barack Obama. ”

We need to get the Republicans back in order to create gridlock and see if it’s possible to stop Obama from doing some of the horrible things that are still on his agenda, such as amnesty and gun control. When government grinds to a halt, White Americans can only benefit.

What I will be interested in seeing is whether or not the Republicans keep their promise and attempt to repeal Obamacare. They could at least stop Obamacare the way both Democrats and Republicans stopped the building of the border fence–by refusing to fund it. There’s a good chance that legal challenges to Obamacare will shut it down.

We aren’t getting “free” medical insurance from the government under Obamacare —instead we’re being forced to BUY medical care from greedy health insurance companies that are certain to price gouge the public.

The US economy is 70 percent dependent on consumer spending. If Obamacare goes into law, it will LOOT the middle and working class to enrich the health care industry. It will rob consumers at a time when the economy needs them to be spending more money.

Only an out of touch Marxist lunatic would consider forcing a mandate on Americans that could cripple consumer spending as a Great Depression looms. Sadly, that’s exactly what we have in the Oval Office right now.

SPLC President Richard Cohen Abandons Sinking Ship

OH GLORIOUS DAY! After all these years, where were you when  the stock of the Poverty Palace crashed and collapsed under the weight of i...